URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bad Manners and Brimstone
  HTML https://badmanners.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Life in General
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 65238--------------------------------------------------
       A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: LurkingGurl Date: April 6, 2021, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Horrible altercation at Target . Yesterday, I had a horrible
       experience while standing in line at the Hometown St. Target.  I
       was in self checkout with my mother and my 2 year old was having
       a crying spell because I wouldn’t buy her a particular toy.  She
       cried for a good few minutes and the middle aged man in front of
       me decided to get into a verbal altercation with me about the
       fact that I should take “it” (referring to my toddler) outside.
       It’s awful to think men like that exist these days - shaming a
       mother with a distraught child enough to make a verbal attack on
       a woman.  To all the moms out there with small children, I hope
       you never run into this man at Target and deal with Target
       security being pulled in as you try to parent your kids.  End
       rant!"
       What do we think?
       I've got to think that if the guy actually said anything
       actually rude that she would have recounted it.
       I asked her why she didn't just have her mom take the kid out
       and she responded that she didn't post so that she could also
       have an altercation with me, so I guess her definition of an
       "altercation" isn't what most people's is.  She also doesn't say
       who called security...
       #Post#: 65241--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: TootsNYC Date: April 6, 2021, 12:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I feel like it's an Everybody Sucks Here situation.
       "a good few minutes" is pretty long, but I can also see that
       it's one of those things that sometimes you just can't help.
       But him calling a child "it"?  Not cool.
       us NYCers realize that you just don't engage when people are on
       the other side of the etiquette line--you especially don't scold
       or attack, because that just makes it worse. On everybody around
       you.
       But of course, when someone DOES attack, we also deflect and
       avoid.
       #Post#: 65246--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: LurkingGurl Date: April 6, 2021, 12:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=TootsNYC link=topic=2026.msg65241#msg65241
       date=1617729048]
       But him calling a child "it"?  Not cool.
       [/quote]
       I highly doubt that he called her child an "it."  He was
       probably referring to the situation as in "Take it outside."
       #Post#: 65247--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: Aleko Date: April 6, 2021, 12:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Maybe he couldn't figure out if the 2-year-old was a him or a
       her, and just didn't want to get into a 'How dare you! That's
       not my son, that's my daughter!' side-issue.  I agree it doesn't
       sound good, but I can see why he might have settled for 'it'.
       #Post#: 65248--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: LurkingGurl Date: April 6, 2021, 12:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Since she had her mom with her, I asked her why she or her mom
       didn't take the kid out to the car while the other remained
       behind to check out.
       This was her response:
       “Because I’m the one in charge, not my child.  Children do not
       have the ability to self regulate their emotions because it is
       inconvenient for you.  I did not post this to have another
       altercation online with you.”
       I think she created this problem herself.  I don't think he
       actually referred to the child as "it."  I think she's blowing
       it out of proportion because she knows she was wrong.
       I agree with Toots, that it's never a good idea to engage
       someone in a situation like this regardless of which side you're
       on.  We're "down south" and things like that just flow more
       freely, I guess.
       My POV is that if she had been by herself that she would have
       gotten maximum tolerance from those around her.  But, because it
       was two people together, and they both just let the kid carry
       on, that tolerance was in short supply.
       Wondering if the guy involved will see her post and chime in.
       I'd need popcorn for that!  ;)
       #Post#: 65250--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: Soop Date: April 6, 2021, 2:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't understand how taking the child to the car is the child
       being in charge. Seems to me the fastest way to make them
       (better neutral rather than 'it'  ;)) realize no amount of
       crying will get a toy is to remove them from the magic place
       toys come from.
       Or as it was worded in my family 'straight home, straight to
       bed'.
       #Post#: 65257--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: lakey Date: April 6, 2021, 3:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]“Because I’m the one in charge, not my child.  Children
       do not have the ability to self regulate their emotions because
       it is inconvenient for you.  I did not post this to have another
       altercation online with you.”[/quote]
       I'm tolerant of parents whose toddlers have tantrums in stores,
       but that parent's attitude is a problem. It seems  entitled and
       inconsiderate of other shoppers. The parent is not entitled to
       inconvenience  other shoppers. I think most parents at least try
       to control their kid's screaming. Sometimes they're more
       successful than at other times, but I expect them to at least
       try. When a parent doesn't remove the child from the store, I
       assume that it is because they have no other way to get the
       shopping done.  As far as the man's behavior, I think that it is
       better to not make suggestions to strangers unless it is really
       serious. A lot of people just get defensive, and nothing is
       accomplished. I learned that lesson when I shushed someone in a
       movie theater. They just argued back. Now I move.
       #Post#: 65266--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: Isisnin Date: April 7, 2021, 7:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Mary Sunshine Rain
       link=topic=2026.msg65248#msg65248 date=1617731808]
       Since she had her mom with her, I asked her why she or her mom
       didn't take the kid out to the car while the other remained
       behind to check out.
       This was her response:
       “Because I’m the one in charge, not my child.  Children do not
       have the ability to self regulate their emotions because it is
       inconvenient for you.  I did not post this to have another
       altercation online with you.”
       I think she created this problem herself.  I don't think he
       actually referred to the child as "it."  I think she's blowing
       it out of proportion because she knows she was wrong.
       I agree with Toots, that it's never a good idea to engage
       someone in a situation like this regardless of which side you're
       on.  We're "down south" and things like that just flow more
       freely, I guess.
       My POV is that if she had been by herself that she would have
       gotten maximum tolerance from those around her.  But, because it
       was two people together, and they both just let the kid carry
       on, that tolerance was in short supply.
       Wondering if the guy involved will see her post and chime in.
       I'd need popcorn for that!  ;)
       [/quote]
       Agree with all this and while I understand not engaging a
       stranger in a stressful situation, I do kinda wish that people
       would point out inappropriate or correctable situations. Perhaps
       such situations will occur less often if such behavior was
       called out. E.g. maybe now the mother will have the other adult
       with her take the child outside (or vice-versa).
       Curious, I work retail, and I feel like there are more of these
       inappropriate situations then in the past. Like a lot of young
       children in the store and crying, especially late at night.
       Also, ag, dogs being brought in.
       What y'all think?
       #Post#: 65268--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: lowspark Date: April 7, 2021, 8:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       She needed to remove the kid from the store. Full stop. The
       whole reason the child cried "for a good few minutes" is because
       she (the child) knew it was distressing everyone around, and
       therefore the mom, increasing the chances of getting what she
       wanted.
       I removed my kids from situations like that at great
       inconvenience to myself a few times. They stop crying the minute
       you get them out of the store because they know that their
       crying no longer has any effect. I left behind groceries (left
       them with a manager/cashier/whoever); left behind library books
       that we'd spent an hour choosing (both me and child); left a
       restaurant while my husband paid the bill and gathered the
       leftovers. You do it a few times and then all you have to do is
       threaten to leave and the child quiets down.
       No matter how you chose to raise your child, it should not be at
       the continued expense of strangers at a Target. Every kid cries.
       And if you can remedy the situation quickly, then you do so. If
       you can't, you remove the child from the store, library,
       restaurant, place of worship, etc. You don't just expect the
       rest of the world to suck it up and deal with your kid's
       tantrum.
       I agree that the man probably used the word "it" because he
       didn't want to assume the child's gender. When it gets to the
       point where security is being called, it's really time to
       reexamine your parenting methods as they pertain to your child's
       behavior in public places.
       #Post#: 65275--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A Rant from Nextdoor
       By: sandisadie Date: April 7, 2021, 10:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Many, many times, over the years I've been shopping in a big box
       store (bad acoustics) and the whole time a child is crying,
       whining or screaming and the adult with the child is just
       strolling around the store shopping.  Not much you can do about
       it as far as I can see.  I'm in the group that says that if your
       child is doing this you must exit the store no matter what.
       That's how I raised mine and it usually works that when you take
       the child outside they stop because they see that you mean
       business.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page