URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Bad Manners and Brimstone
  HTML https://badmanners.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Weddings
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 30305--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Jem Date: May 2, 2019, 8:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Rose Red link=topic=1111.msg30304#msg30304
       date=1556803567]
       But I didn't care. I'm more about individual circumstances than
       blanket "rules."
       [/quote]
       POD. OP, you are never going to please everybody, so talk to
       your fiancé and together decide what you want to do. You've
       gotten quite a bit of insight into how various people view your
       plans, much of it negative, some positive, but do you really
       care what random internet strangers think? Is this really about
       etiquette for you, or is it more about how you want to celebrate
       your marriage? If it's about etiquette, absolutely do NOT go
       through with your plans as articulated in your OP. If it's about
       having a marriage celebration of your dreams, then do that and
       just accept some people are going to disapprove. Some people
       will disapprove no matter what you (general) do, by the way.
       #Post#: 30310--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Hanna Date: May 2, 2019, 11:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Rose Red link=topic=1111.msg30304#msg30304
       date=1556803567]
       There are rare* times when I think it's understandable to get
       legally wed and then have a bigger ceremony later, but it
       doesn't make sense when there's no reason at all. If you're
       going through with a bigger ceremony with vows in front of
       guests, why not do that in the first place? ???
       [/quote]
       I understood it to be because the OPs fiancé was ill enough that
       they are now using the word "remission."  He wants to be married
       ASAP. But they need time to plan in order to have a wedding with
       the entire family and friends involved.
       I think it's a matter of inviting people that love you and want
       to witness the celebration of your marriage and are
       understanding about the fact that  you already did the legal
       part.  A know your audience thing.  People are going to have
       opinions regardless.  (uh, someone suggested a purplish dress to
       me!  I've never been married, but am not young.  I don't even
       know what to say. Are we living in 1930?  I guess there will be
       whispers at the wedding. :o)
       #Post#: 30312--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Lilac Date: May 2, 2019, 12:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I do think people should relax when mortal illness is involved
       but in this case if the couple wanted to be married ASAP
       presumably they wouldn't wait seven or eight more months, and
       then be planning a re-do a few months after that.
       A small wedding or actual elopement followed by a "six-month
       anniversary cookout" or something like that would be festive but
       as mentioned, the shelf life of 'wedding celebration' vibes is
       pretty short in this day and age.
       #Post#: 30313--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Aleko Date: May 2, 2019, 12:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote] Is this really about etiquette for you, or is it more
       about how you want to celebrate your marriage? If it's about
       etiquette, absolutely do NOT go through with your plans as
       articulated in your OP. If it's about having a marriage
       celebration of your dreams, then do that and just accept some
       people are going to disapprove. Some people will disapprove no
       matter what you (general) do, by the way.[/quote]
       But this is also a case of you (both). What OP's fiance wants,
       really wants, is also crucial. OP's statement -
       [quote]I know men don't really care about the wedding details,
       he keeps saying he just wants to be married, but I like planing
       parties and weddings are fun to plan.[/quote]
       - worries me a bit. Fiance says he wants one thing, but OP wants
       another, and is breezily saying "men don't really care about the
       wedding details", implying that it will be all one to him
       whether she organises a ceremony with 'excitement', 'emotion'
       and all the rest of it, or not. Is it really all the same to
       him, or will he just put up with it because he knows how much
       she wants it? Would he, deep down, really rather not have an
       elaborate ceremonial bash? If so, it would be inconsiderate to
       put a sick man through it.
       #Post#: 30314--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Rose Red Date: May 2, 2019, 12:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hanna link=topic=1111.msg30310#msg30310
       date=1556814247]
       I understood it to be because the OPs fiancé was ill enough that
       they are now using the word "remission."  He wants to be married
       ASAP. But they need time to plan in order to have a wedding with
       the entire family and friends involved.
       [/quote]
       [quote author=Lilac link=topic=1111.msg30312#msg30312
       date=1556818357]
       I do think people should relax when mortal illness is involved
       but in this case if the couple wanted to be married ASAP
       presumably they wouldn't wait seven or eight more months, and
       then be planning a re-do a few months after that.
       A small wedding or actual elopement followed by a "six-month
       anniversary cookout" or something like that would be festive but
       as mentioned, the shelf life of 'wedding celebration' vibes is
       pretty short in this day and age.
       [/quote]
       Lilac's post is what I'm thinking. They're not getting married
       ASAP in a panicked state of mind which I would completely
       understand. ASAP means going to the courthouse this weekend. New
       Years is over half a year away.
       I honestly don't care what they do as long as they're happy, and
       they should not care what strangers think either. I'm just
       puzzled why they are eloping when they may go through with a
       ceremony after a few months anyway.
       #Post#: 30319--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: lakey Date: May 2, 2019, 2:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Lilac's post is what I'm thinking. They're not getting
       married ASAP in a panicked state of mind which I would
       completely understand. ASAP means going to the courthouse this
       weekend. New Years is over half a year away.
       I honestly don't care what they do as long as they're happy, and
       they should not care what strangers think either. I'm just
       puzzled why they are eloping when they may go through with a
       ceremony after a few months anyway.
       « Last Edit: Today at 12:48:54 pm by Rose Red »
       [/quote]
       Yeah the timeline here is strange. The couple needs to discuss
       why fiance wants the small New Years wedding. Some people don't
       want to be the center of attention and would find the big, white
       wedding  to be stressful.
       #Post#: 30320--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Aleko Date: May 2, 2019, 2:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]I'm just puzzled why they are eloping[/quote]
       - and I'd still like to have it confirmed that in the USA
       'eloping' really just means 'not taking any friends and
       relations with you when you go to tie the knot'? No implication
       of having to run away somewhere to do it? No secrecy or
       surprise?
       #Post#: 30322--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Lilac Date: May 2, 2019, 2:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Traditionally "elope" meant to go away secretly -- just the
       couple -- and marry, announcing the marriage as a fait accompli
       to family and friends either via telegram, letter, phone call or
       upon return.
       SURPRISE. JUST MARRIED AT CHICAGO COURTHOUSE.  RETURN MONDAY
       5:30 EXPRESS TRAIN.  LOVE BARB & BILL.
       #Post#: 30335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: Gellchom Date: May 2, 2019, 3:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with the points Aleko and Lilac made.
       I'm not a big stickler on ceremony per marriage, although I
       think one "wedding," big or small, per marriage is enough --
       e.g., I'd go with a private courthouse ceremony for some
       pragmatic/legal reason before or even after The Wedding,
       especially if we are just talking about a few days -- you'd be
       surprised how often that happens without anyone knowing about
       it, or having to (officiant not licensed in that state so the
       couple goes to city hall a few days before the wedding; someone
       forgot to bring the license to the wedding so they have to do a
       state-recognized re-do on Monday; etc.).  And certainly a big
       party after an elopement or very, very tiny wedding (as opposed
       to a big cheap party after a small but nice or destination
       wedding -- that's just A and B lists, in my opinion, and is
       often seen as fishing for gifts without offering hospitality).
       And I too remember the string about the couple whose mothers
       were both dying -- perfect example, in my opinion.
       But the timeline in this case is an issue.  There is no
       emergency here.  It just kind of sounds like they want it two
       ways.  That's not uncommon or unsympathetic, but, as in the case
       with destination weddings, sometimes you just have to make a
       choice.  I agree that it sounds like the OP may be making
       assumptions about how little her fiance cares, to make it
       easier, and I also agree that while her vision does sound fun,
       his also sounds romantic.
       But I'm chiming in because my concern is NOT about how others
       might feel about it.  I do think there would be some
       eye-rolling, but so what?  Rather, I'm concerned that YOU, OP,
       will not enjoy this as much as you hope if you do a BWW a few
       months after a small ceremony.  I'm afraid that you will be
       second-guessing yourself the whole time during the planning and
       the event itself, and that would be a shame, because it would
       cut into your enjoyment at this wonderful time.
       If you were my sister or best friend, I would advise you to
       choose between these options:
       (1) Have one event, at the time and in the style that you and
       your fiance agree on
       or
       (2) Have a small, private (at most immediate family and
       grandkids only) ceremony, and then a fun party with no ceremony.
       If it's close to the date of the ceremony, I'd go ahead and
       call it a reception and have, if you want, a wedding cake,
       corsages, toasts, maybe even matching dresses for the little
       girls.  But no quasi-ritual; I think it's just going to feel
       funny to your guests and, more important, to YOU.  Ask yourself
       honestly what the purpose of the "ritual" would be.  (If you
       will have a civil ceremony first and then a religious ceremony,
       that's different, but then I'd still keep them fairly close in
       time.)
       If you have it much later, I'd wait and make it an anniversary
       party.  You can have toasts and flowers and such then, too.
       #Post#: 30353--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reception after elopement?
       By: TootsNYC Date: May 2, 2019, 11:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Aleko link=topic=1111.msg30320#msg30320
       date=1556824472]
       [quote]I'm just puzzled why they are eloping[/quote]
       - and I'd still like to have it confirmed that in the USA
       'eloping' really just means 'not taking any friends and
       relations with you when you go to tie the knot'? No implication
       of having to run away somewhere to do it? No secrecy or
       surprise?
       [/quote]
       In recent years, Americans have been misusing "elope" to mean
       "go off somewhere without a lot of hooplah." Some people even
       use that term for a wedding that was planned for a year, and for
       which several friends were invited! (I edited the term out of
       that story, but it was still framed, in the larger story, as an
       elopement.)
       It did used to mean "leaving secretly and getting married
       without family and most friends knowing." But people have begun
       misusing it.
       I don't know that lack of advance planning was necessarily a
       part of the classic Georgette Heyer / Gretna Green elopement;
       maybe not months and months, I guess, but a month or two might
       be involved in the planning. It was the secrecy that made it an
       elopement.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page