URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Aldeon LARP
  HTML https://aldeon.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: 2015 Errata Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 733--------------------------------------------------
       shields
       By: lerocketking Date: April 17, 2015, 11:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The mono cost of shield for any size doesnt make sense. If sword
       length determines cost then so should shield size. I recommend,
       buckler 20 square inch max, same as longsword cost
       Shield 35 square inch max ,same as current shield cost
       Large shield/tower 36 and up , same as greatsword cost
       #Post#: 745--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: Zaud Date: April 19, 2015, 7:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I originally agreed with Rocket, but then I thought a bit more
       and decided the skill is probably ok the way it is.
       Here is my rational:  Using a small shield is actually more
       difficult then using a Large Shield, but in most cases in the
       game 'bigger=more costly' so making the smaller shield more
       costly then the heavy shield would open up controversy, and in
       truth, arguments can be made either way.
       I then thought: Split the cost up fairly evenly, and make the
       cost of the First shield form a person was taking cost a bit
       more, and the second on a bit less due to law of diminishing
       returns. This opens up doors for 'was this first or second'
       shield taken and having to describe this rule in the book.
       I considered that the shield skill has built into it the ability
       of the person to use it in their off hand, (like having the two
       weapon fighting skill but always using the off weapon for
       parrying) and thinking of it this way, the cost of shield skill
       seems fully justified, or at the very least, not worth adding
       the extra paragraphs to the rule book breaking it down would
       take.
       We can fall back to statistics (though based on observation, not
       actual numbers) and the game seems to have a fair number of
       Shield Users so the cost does not seem to be keeping people from
       playing shield man).
       #Post#: 749--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: ZachC Date: April 19, 2015, 7:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are you referring to shield style or weapon skill?  Because you
       technically can buy small or short shield weapon skill.
       #Post#: 751--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: lerocketking Date: April 19, 2015, 7:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Shields in general. Its ridiculous that a tower shield cost the
       same as a normal shiels
       #Post#: 755--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: whitepaws Date: April 19, 2015, 7:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I could maybe understand the adjusted cost if as Zach pointed
       out in case of using it as a weapon you attack with but
       regardless of the size of the shield if you are just using it
       for defense I dunno if I'm fully behind the cost CP wise. Bigger
       shields require more components and cost more and they also make
       you a bigger target for spells and there are special attacks for
       getting around a tower shield. I think it is balanced but I
       wouldn't mind entertaining debate on it if it could be worked in
       a way that wouldn't kill using a shield for everyone.
       #Post#: 756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: lerocketking Date: April 19, 2015, 8:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes there are special attacks to et through shields... Of any
       size, but a bigger shield will stop more and make it way harder
       to get off all other special attacks.
       #Post#: 757--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: lerocketking Date: April 19, 2015, 8:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Or i would argue to limit shield size once again like it used to
       be
       #Post#: 759--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: whitepaws Date: April 19, 2015, 8:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I could see an idea for a size restriction or make a certain
       size a two handed shield. Tower shields historically were used
       in a support roll. One whole person held the shield while
       another person fought around the ends of the shield or it was
       placed in the ground as a fixed shield then the person drew
       their weapon to fight in that fixed area. Perhaps something like
       that should be considered where if you are welding a shield
       above a certain size category it was considered a two handed
       shield.
       #Post#: 760--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: ZachC Date: April 19, 2015, 8:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Let me ask this question.  Where have you seen shield size be a
       problem in this game?
       #Post#: 761--------------------------------------------------
       Re: shields
       By: lerocketking Date: April 19, 2015, 9:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not long ago scott lowerrys party had a dwarf and his shield has
       insanely big
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page