URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Aldeon LARP
  HTML https://aldeon.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: 2015 Errata Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 731--------------------------------------------------
       monks and paladins
       By: lerocketking Date: April 17, 2015, 11:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Paladins: i feel the term paladin should be changed to
       sellsword.
       Monk: monks should be called clerics. And the natural armor they
       buy should be renamed or a new natural armor skill called divine
       armor. A monk makes sense for natural armor but not for faith,
       they are self enlightened mostly. Clerics are good for faith but
       natural armor would need to be renamed or a new type of natural
       armor created that cost the same.
       #Post#: 732--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: iikepie13 Date: April 17, 2015, 11:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Or rename paladins battle mages and monks clerics.
       #Post#: 735--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: lerocketking Date: April 18, 2015, 12:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes
       #Post#: 738--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: whitepaws Date: April 18, 2015, 10:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It just seems like semantics to me.
       #Post#: 739--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: lerocketking Date: April 18, 2015, 10:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes it may be, but it wouldnt hurt to change it. Not every
       errata decisions is huge
       #Post#: 740--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: ZachC Date: April 19, 2015, 8:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think that this matter isn't important enough to worry about.
       Errata takes long enough without arguing about what something
       should be called.
       I think the term paladin works well enough to describe that they
       are warrior mages.  Monks are the center of the road class  and
       for game purposes are a combination of monks, clerics, and d&d
       style paladins.
       #Post#: 743--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: Zaud Date: April 19, 2015, 7:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Paladin to me suggests 'divine' based fight/mage so the Change
       to Battle Mage actually makes sense to me.
       The fact that 'Monks' are the only divine magic based class does
       lend itself to using the term cleric, but I can see the
       advantage of breaking away from DnD terms to avoid some of the
       negative stereotyping. This same idea strengthens the changing
       of the name Paladin to Battle Mage.
       I do agree with Zach though on importance of keeping erratta
       focused. In the future it may be best to focus Erratta each year
       to things that are 'broken' and one aspect of the game that
       Plot/Players feel needs stream lining/improving.
       #Post#: 750--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: lerocketking Date: April 19, 2015, 7:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Actually an errata is for any player to express any greiveance.
       This bothers me and id like it to at least be voted on or talked
       about
       #Post#: 752--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: Zaud Date: April 19, 2015, 7:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with you that this forum should hold any topic people
       want to discuss.
       It will make for a long day of voting (and effectively allow
       filibustering) if everything ends up being put to vote at the
       official meeting without editing by someone. Most games I have
       worked with created 'rules committees' comprising of new
       players, old players and a few Plot people to spare the general
       populous a very stressful day.
       #Post#: 753--------------------------------------------------
       Re: monks and paladins
       By: whitepaws Date: April 19, 2015, 7:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes but is this something that really needs to be fixed? We have
       a limited amount of time each errata for suggestions and I'm
       sure players don't want this to drag on like Westmark erratas
       where you go throw the whole book and it ends up taking 4-6
       hours and next thing you know its 2 am. If there is time sure
       bring it up but really it is not something that is a big issue.
       As I previously stated it is a matter of semantics and as Bob
       has stated I would agree I'd like to see more of the game rely
       less on D&D for it's chosen source material on everything.
       Having something that is divergent from other games isn't bad
       and players know what the classes are and if they don't it is
       defined for them in the Core book. I just don't see it as a
       relevant issue in need of change at errata or any time in the
       near future if at all.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page