DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
airsoft-uk forum
HTML https://airsoftuk.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Conspriacies
*****************************************************
#Post#: 717--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: crazynutsx
Date: April 20, 2012, 5:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
1. Radiation would have killed them
2. In videos you can clearly see strings holding the astronauts
up
3. The film footage itself wouldnt have been possible due to
radiation and pictures
4. The technology at the time was incapable of going to the moon
5. The famous picture of the foot print on the moon must have
been faked because for the picture to have happend you need a
mix of moon dust and water for the footprint to set... there was
no water on the moon
6. The luner lander made no crater where it landed from its jet
THeres litreally hunderds of things wrong with it
#Post#: 718--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: Xadin
Date: April 20, 2012, 6:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Poppycock - all conjecture and unfounded speculation. WHERE IS
THE BEEF?
1. Radiation would have killed them - Your proof on this is?
Actually a high %of astronaughts that went up developed
cateracts due to the exposure - thus proving they did indeed
travel through the Van Allen belts - not to mention the
protective sheilding used on the spacecraft which would reduce
the lethality of exposure.
2. In videos you can clearly see strings holding the astronauts
up - clearly? You are REALLY going to use clearly in that
sentance
3. The film footage itself wouldnt have been possible due to
radiation and pictures - any science to back this up?
4. The technology at the time was incapable of going to the moon
- ummm the space shuttles look pretty capable
5. The famous picture of the foot print on the moon must have
been faked because for the picture to have happend you need a
mix of moon dust and water for the footprint to set... there was
no water on the moon - this was tested and proven on mythbusters
in a vaccume that water is NOT needed
6. The luner lander made no crater where it landed from its jet
- why would it? It had reduced speed on decent in a diff gravity
enviroment to earth so the thrust would be much much less... why
would that make a crater?
#Post#: 719--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: crazynutsx
Date: April 20, 2012, 6:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
somones done his home work
i think this is one of those subjects that we could argue about
for weeks
:D
#Post#: 721--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: Diablo
Date: April 21, 2012, 2:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Apollo landing sites have never been photographed in detail
since the early 1970s.
Not even Hubble can do it. The Moon is 384,400 km away. At that
distance, the smallest things Hubble can distinguish are about
60 meters wide. The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo
equipment is only 9 meters across and thus smaller than a single
pixel in a Hubble image.
Upon review it appears that since 1970 newer technology has come
about, but other missions, and projects none have come close to
having the ability to photo the lander or rover on the moon!?
All the abandoned equipment is earth side for filming thus no
excuses.
Must admit even this seems rather fishy to me, we have the
technology now to film / photo these relics but still no one has
done it?
#Post#: 730--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: crazynutsx
Date: April 21, 2012, 4:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
another very valid point :D
#Post#: 737--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: Xadin
Date: April 21, 2012, 5:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
One word - retroreflectors
#Post#: 738--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: crazynutsx
Date: April 21, 2012, 5:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
space probes ! ;D
The landing module weighs 17 tons and yet sits on top of the
sand making no impression. Next to it astronauts’ footprints can
be seen in the sand.
All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration.
No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts
on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development
#Post#: 743--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: Xadin
Date: April 21, 2012, 5:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Space probes? whaaaat - Exactly where the landings were? how
pray tell did they get there? What was that - we put them on the
moon -OMFG ORLY?!
17 tonnes ON EARTH - place on moon and spread over a WIDE AREA
weight of human on relatively SMALL area & exerted pressure –
you did science at school right?
HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw
#Post#: 745--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: Xadin
Date: April 21, 2012, 5:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention this:
HTML http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14813043
Suppose those are fake too... ::)
#Post#: 747--------------------------------------------------
Re: Moon Landings
DIR By: Adenis
Date: April 21, 2012, 6:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
No one has done it because it's obvious tht the government has
its concerns andnisntrying to hide something from the general
public. They always do shit like this. It's the pentagon where
there store all their secret documents. Imagine wikileaks gets
thee hand in sourceful info. The govt would have to resign all
their lies and the world will know a lot of secret shit :D
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 3
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page