URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Airbattle Games
  HTML https://airbattle.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: IGNORE: Wing Leader Playtest Archive
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 973--------------------------------------------------
       O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: January 19, 2019, 4:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       New scenario thread for playtest of Chirris Over Brunete. Please
       do not create a new thread for this scenario.
       #Post#: 1223--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: Elias Nordling Date: January 26, 2019, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Special rules says the bombing rules are used, but there are
       no ground units listed.
       #Post#: 1230--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: January 26, 2019, 1:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Roger that. It should be a non-bombing scenario.
       #Post#: 1429--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: guest26 Date: February 3, 2019, 1:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Scenario: 019 Chirris over Brunete
       Version: scenario: v0.0, rules: v2.1
       Playtesters: SOLO
       Report:  in the first turn every fighter squadron tallied some
       enemy. One CR.42 squadron attacked the first bomber squadron,
       the others tried to climb before engaging the Republican
       fighters.
       A number of dogfights resulted with Nationalist squadrons
       failing a number of critical early Cohesion rolls. This, a
       better starting position for the Republican fighters and the
       superiority of the I-16s on the CR.32s
       resulted in a big win for the Republicans.
       Victory:
       Republican bombers gained 6+1 VP by exiting the map (no loss but
       one squadron was broken by failing its first two and only two
       cohesion rolls)
       Republicans shot down 8 CR42s for 8 VP
       TOTAL republican VPs: 15
       Nationalists shot down 7 I-15s and 2 I-16 for a TOTAL of 9VP
       Total: -6 Nationalist VPs - Huge Republican victory.
       I will now retry the scenario trying to concentrate on the
       bombers. I think that in this first playing the Republicans have
       benefited greatly from having sighted the enemy at once.
       #Post#: 1444--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: February 4, 2019, 2:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Welcome aboard, Stefano! A great AAR.
       Firstly, you have revealed an error with the victory conditions.
       If the exchange of aircraft is roughly even in VP terms, then we
       should probably reverse the victory calculation and subtract
       Nationalist from Republican VP. In which case we need to change
       the victory levels to something like this:
       +7 or less Nationalist Victory
       +8 to +10 Draw
       +12 or more Republican victory
       In your playthrough this would have given you a score of +6, or
       a Nationalist victory, which is what it should have been.
       The impression I get is that the exchange rate of fighters may
       even out with similar losses on each side. Going to the scoring
       system outlined above might make this scenario very dependant on
       what what edge in air combat results the fighters can grind out,
       but another playing might give me more data to work from.
       #Post#: 1579--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: guest26 Date: February 9, 2019, 2:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dear Lee,
       I am playing the scenario a second time; I tried to concentrate
       the nationalist fighters against the bombers with the hope of
       denying the Republican side the VP
       for exiting them. I did not read your correction about the
       victory conditions before this replay and thus tried to find a
       way to victory for the Nationalist.
       The result was not dissimilar to the first playing, with an
       actual count of 6 CR 32 shot down against 7 republican bombers
       and 5 republican fighters.
       I will finish the scenario and I will post the AAR report in the
       proper format later.
       Then I will try to re-play it but considering your corrected
       victory conditions.
       What I can say is that the lack of Radios makes squadrons much
       fragile (I mean durable) in combat
       due to the added risk of disruption and of breaking in cohesion
       tests.
       The "rigid doctrine" and "edge" rules, never used by me before
       (I did not played a lot of scenarios of the game in the past),
       add really some chrome to this
       "early war" or even "Before the war" scenarios.
       For the immediate future, after a replay of this one, If you
       agree I will continue with the testing of the Spanish civil war
       scenarios.
       #Post#: 1580--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: guest26 Date: February 9, 2019, 3:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here is my second try at this cenario
       Scenario: 019 Chirris over Brunete
       Version: scenario: v0.0, rules: v2.1
       Playtesters: SOLO
       Report:
       The Nationalist fighters choose to concentrate on the bombers
       managing to avoid detection by the sweeping I-16 squadrons for
       turn 1.
       The tactic worked with CR-32s wreaking havoc on the bombers and
       breaking the leading squadron but when the escorts and the I-16
       entered the fight, the Italians had to quickly leave the battle
       but not after achieving a victory.
       Overall I noticed a much less durability of the squadrons in
       combat due to lack of radios and liked a lot the added chrome of
       the "edge" and
       "rigid doctrine" rules I never used before
       Victory:
       Republican bombers gained 6+1 VP by exiting the map ( 7 loss,
       one squadron was broken by failing its third cohesion rolls due
       to high losses (5))
       Republicans shot down 6 CR42s for 6 VP
       TOTAL republican VPs: 13
       Nationalists shot down 7 R-Zs,  1 I-15 and 3 I-16 for a TOTAL of
       11VP
       Total (with reversed VC as suggested by Lee): +2 Republican ->
       Nationalist victory!
       #Post#: 1608--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: February 10, 2019, 4:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for the great AAR, Stefano! Okay, so for now I’m going to
       swap around the victory conditions so that we subtract
       Nationalist from Republican VPs. I’ll then adjust the victory
       levels to give us a draw window of +8 to +10.
       To help the Nationalists I’m also going to drop the Republican
       Veteran markers by 1.
       #Post#: 1621--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: guest26 Date: February 10, 2019, 9:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is my third play of this scenario.
       Scenario: 019 Chirris over Brunete
       Version: scenario: v0.0, rules: v2.1
       Playtesters: SOLO
       Report:
       This time the Republican setup with the escort one space behind
       the bombers in order to avoid the +2 tally mod for big
       formation.
       The Nationalist fighters divided in two. The lower two squadrons
       went for the bombers while the top Italian squadron and the
       Spanish Flight,
       spotted by the I-16s on the first turn, tried to climb and flee
       in order to not engage the I-16 from unfavorable position.
       The result was that averyone apart from the fleeing Nationalist
       went in the direction of the bombers. The fighting around the
       bomber formation was intense but brief,
       as like happened in my other attempts at this scenario,
       squadrons without radios quickly failed cohesion test and broke.
       The Republicans scored a number of hits but rolled very poorly
       inflicting no losses on the CR32s. The Italians did better,
       especially shooting down 4 R-Zs and disrupting both
       bomber squadrons.
       Victory:
       Republican bombers gained 3+3 VP by exiting the map ( 4 loss,
       both were disrupted)
       Republicans shot down no CR32s
       TOTAL republican VPs: 6
       Nationalists shot down 4 R-Zs,  1 I-15 and 2 I-16 for a TOTAL of
       7VP
       Total (with reversed VC as suggested by Lee): -1 Republican ->
       Nationalist victory!
       #Post#: 1622--------------------------------------------------
       Re: O19 Chirris Over Brunete
       By: guest26 Date: February 10, 2019, 9:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Final consideration on the scenario.
       I found it difficult to suggest a proper adjustment of the VP
       schedule needed for victory.
       If subtracting Nationalist VPs from Republican ones, I reached
       the following results:
       first play: +6 Republican
       second play: +2 Republican
       third play: -1 Republican
       In my opinion the third replay was a bit flawed for the
       Republican by unlucky rolls both in inflicting few loesses and
       in having a number
       of squadrons broken after the first turn of combat and both
       bomber squdrons broken quite easily.
       I could suggest that a range between +3 and +6 for the
       Republican could be called a draw but please consider my limited
       experience
       in playing and especially my lack of competitive play. Even if
       inadvertently, I probably try to play in an historical manner
       (or at least
       in away that I consider historical) rather then to try to win
       from a gameplay point of view...
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page