URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Airbattle Games
  HTML https://airbattle.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: IGNORE: Wing Leader Playtest Archive
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 79--------------------------------------------------
       E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: September 12, 2018, 10:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Date: 8 Aug
       Playtester: Gordon Christie/Andrew Brazier
       Andrew & I have run through this twice. Good fun & we think it
       is fine as it stands…
       Brief summary-nothing to see here, move along….
       First run saw 8 losses on each side with both refinery targets
       heavy damage & a final score of +24 VP for a draw which felt
       about right.
       Second run was one of the occasional wild outliers a 2D6 system
       seems to generate-everything went perfectly for the British with
       the dice roller & dismally for the Japanese. Final result was 19
       Japanese losses (2 Ki 45s) for 20VP against only 4 FAA losses
       (-4VP) with one refinery target fatally damaged & the other
       heavily damaged (+48VP) for a comprehensive British victory.
       Overall though it feels pretty good. The forces are pretty
       balanced. The mix of aircraft is unusual (first time I’ve ever
       actually sought dogfights as the Allies playing against the
       Japanese encouraged by the lower dogfight ratings of the Ki-44 &
       Ki-45). The Allies have to try & protect the bombers & preserve
       enough fighters to eliminate the barrage balloons. The bombers
       are few enough in numbers that the Japanese can reasonably hope
       to inflict enough damage & disruption to blunt the bombing
       attack. Flak & balloons are a threat & can derail the bombing
       but are not overwhelming.
       One rule thought. At present the balloons can only be tallied
       within 3 squares. This made it somewhat hard for the FAA
       fighters operating a bit higher to get down to attack the
       balloons at altitude 2 & seemed a bit odd as (I would assume)
       barrage balloons are not the most inconspicuous targets.I’d
       suggest changing the tally range to 6-8 squares or allowing
       fighters within 4 columns to attack balloons without a tally
       akin to the strafing rules permitting attacks on ground targets
       within 3 columns.
       As an aside following on from that (bearing in mind our request
       for an SSR in Operation Tungsten to allow escorts to strafe
       within 5 columns) might it be better to increase the provision
       to within 4 columns for strafing as a diving fighter can
       generally cover 4 squares as it comes down to attack a strafing
       target?
       That apart though we felt it was a good, fun scenario which
       (despite our second playing) is probably pretty balanced.
       #Post#: 295--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: Elias Nordling Date: October 5, 2018, 6:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think this scenario needs Japanese split limits.
       #Post#: 297--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: October 5, 2018, 6:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are there any particular aircraft that need split limits? The
       Ki-44s, for example? Or just put a 2 flight limit on everything?
       #Post#: 302--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: Elias Nordling Date: October 5, 2018, 7:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't know about balance yet, I just don't want to have to
       figure out how many Ki 44 and Ki45 flights there are in the
       countermix. 2 flights per type will probably work fine.
       #Post#: 310--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: October 6, 2018, 4:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For the next release the only change I've made is to add split
       limits for the Japanese.
       #Post#: 314--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: Elias Nordling Date: October 6, 2018, 1:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is the lack of split limit intended to mean it can't split?
       Because I think according to the rules, it is able to split to
       the limit of the countermix, which is 1 in this case so you
       can't split but you won't find out until you have sifted through
       the countermix.
       #Post#: 315--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: October 6, 2018, 4:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, the split limit essentially overrides the countermix.
       However, all the Japanese aircraft in this scenario have at
       least two flights each. (I checked.)
       #Post#: 316--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: Elias Nordling Date: October 7, 2018, 1:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry, I failed to write that I was talking about the Firefly,
       which has no split limit but only 1 flight.
       #Post#: 327--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: Elias Nordling Date: October 7, 2018, 1:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Meridian II 0.3
       Playtester: Elias Nordling (Solo)
       I put two of the British veterans in the bombers and one in the
       hapless fireflies (I don't get the deal with those, for all
       intents and purposes they suck within the framework of this
       system). Halfway through this looked like a mistake, but in the
       end it paid off. The reason it looked like a bad idea initially
       was that the Hellcat sweep, except for one flight, failed to
       tally, which meant that the Japanese had numerical superiority
       against the bombers. The Japanese got a fair number of attacks
       on the bombers, causing three disruptions.
       The air combat was over with all Japanese fighters broken well
       before the bombers reached the Flak zone, so the bombers circled
       while the Hellcats dispatched the balloons (the Fireflies were
       maimed and broken early on). I'm not sure they are worth the
       bother.
       The Avengers descended under the clouds and then did steep angle
       attacks. the Flack got to fire at all 4 but rolled 5 or less on
       all attempts.
       Bombings:
       +2: 9: 50%: 7
       +3: 7: 50% 7
       +1: 4: Miss
       +1: 9: 50% 7
       Score:
       British: Bombing 36, Balloons 2, 4 Ki43, 6 Ki44, 3 Ki45.
       52,5
       Japanese:
       1 corsair, 2 hellcats, 3 firefly, 5 Avengers: 11
       Total: 41,5. Runaway British victory.
       3 US air losses suffered by Flak, but US would have gained 12
       more points without disruptions, so at least the air fight
       wasn't a net loss for the Japanese.
       Comments: Given the value of the target, this one is going to be
       highly dependent on bombing rolls, and the British were lucky
       where it mattered, on the flak rolls. They could have blown one
       more bombing roll and still would have won, though.
       My biggest concern with the scenario is that it played nothing
       like the historical outcome. The Fireflies are dead meat unless
       the Japanese choose to ignore them, and the combat is a big
       brawl well before the target is reached. Chances for the
       historical attacks after the target has been bombed are
       nonexistent.
       #Post#: 343--------------------------------------------------
       Re: E20 Operation Meridian II
       By: Elias Nordling Date: October 9, 2018, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I just noticed this one:
       "first time I’ve ever actually sought dogfights as the Allies
       playing against the Japanese encouraged by the lower dogfight
       ratings of the Ki-44 & Ki-45"
       There's a difference in play style. I dogfight whenever I can as
       the defender, even against fighters with a defence rating. It
       doesn't matter if the interceptors have superior skillz in
       dogfighting, if they are dogfighting they aren't intercepting,
       and any favourable attrition rate they can get out of the
       dogfight is small consolation. Besides, the US usually have
       superior firepower and protection, more than making up for
       poorer turning ability.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page