URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Airbattle Games
  HTML https://airbattle.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Wing Leader Rules Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 4779--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: Elias Nordling Date: March 15, 2020, 1:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't see the word before in the wording above. I assumed you
       first spend the mp, then move, so a MP spent to move from a
       position not in the sun to one in the sun did not count.
       On the other hand, bh the same reasoning, I counted the MP spent
       to enter the target square, so the net effect should be more or
       less the same. More or less.
       #Post#: 4780--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: March 15, 2020, 2:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The fact that Elias was baffled by this is testament to the need
       to incorporate a fix. However, is the proposed fix enough? Could
       it be done better?
       #Post#: 4784--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: Al Cannamore Date: March 15, 2020, 11:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Elias Nordling link=topic=159.msg4779#msg4779
       date=1584298095]
       I don't see the word before in the wording above. I assumed you
       first spend the mp, then move, so a MP spent to move from a
       position not in the sun to one in the sun did not count.
       On the other hand, bh the same reasoning, I counted the MP spent
       to enter the target square, so the net effect should be more or
       less the same. More or less.
       [/quote]
       (2) It spent at least two Movement Points (MPs) in the Sun arc
       immediately before entering the target’s square. (MPs spent
       actually entering the target’s square do not count towards this
       total.) The MPs can be spent moving, staying in the same square,
       or changing facing, but must be spent in the same Movement
       Phase.
       Does that change your interpretation Elias? Sometimes I skip
       over a key word even though I’ve read the rule a dozen times.
       Don’t know if that’s happening here.
       #Post#: 4785--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: Vincent Lefavrais Date: March 16, 2020, 12:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Lee Brimmicombe-Wood
       link=topic=159.msg4762#msg4762 date=1584269009]
       Reviewing feedback on the v2.2 rules, I'm considering adding
       this underlined text to the 4.6.2 'In the Sun' rule:
       (2) It spent at least two Movement Points (MPs) in the Sun arc
       immediately before entering the target’s square. (MPs spent
       actually entering the target’s square do not count towards this
       total.) The MPs can be spent moving, staying in the same square,
       or changing facing, but must be spent in the same Movement
       Phase.
       [/quote]
       How about simply rewording the proposed change to:
       (MPs spent to enter the target square do not count toward this
       total.)
       This way we don’t care whether the MPs are spent before, after,
       or during the actual fact of moving the counter... Would this
       take care of your issue, Elias?
       #Post#: 4789--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: Elias Nordling Date: March 16, 2020, 1:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Sometimes I skip over a key word even though I’ve read
       the rule a dozen times. Don’t know if that’s happening here.
       [/quote]
       It was. But it seems to me this whole thing sidesteps the whole
       basic question. We have a game mechanic that is reliant on
       movement points being spent in certain squares, but no crystal
       clear definition of where a MP is spent when you move between
       two squares.
       As far as I can tell, this is the ONLY game mechanic reliant on
       the number of MP spent in specific squares. The closest is the
       barrage rules, that manage to sidestep this by using entering or
       circling instead. So maybe that is the better solution? Instead
       of the current rule, why not make it that you need to have
       entered at least two squares in the sun, with each MP spent
       circling in the arc counting as one addirtional square?
       I think this would solve the problem without having to define if
       the first move into the arc counts, the final move into the
       target square counts, defining when exactly a MP is spent (which
       would have to be in a different rule, increasing the flipping).
       #Post#: 4790--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: March 16, 2020, 2:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hmmm. That does sound like a good solution, Elias, and certainly
       clearner than the current proposal. Let me take a close look at
       the text later today.
       #Post#: 4793--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: March 16, 2020, 4:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How about this as a specimen text for 4.6.2:
       (1) It entered the target square from a square in the Sun arc.
       (2) In the Movement Phase that it enters the target square it
       also enters two squares that are in the Sun arc. Each MP spent
       circling in the Sun arc counts as an additional square entered.
       #Post#: 4794--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: Elias Nordling Date: March 16, 2020, 5:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It might be even clearer if (2 said) something like, just before
       entering, it either moved through a second square in the sun or
       circled in the square it entered from. But better worded :-)
       #Post#: 4795--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: pilotofficerprune Date: March 16, 2020, 6:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hmmm. So you're suggesting something like this?
       (1) It entered the target square from a square in the Sun arc.
       (2) In the Movement Phase that it enters the target square it
       also enters two squares that are in the Sun arc. Alternatively,
       it enters one square in the Sun arc and spends one or more MP
       circling in that square before entering the target square.
       #Post#: 4796--------------------------------------------------
       Re: In the Sun
       By: Elias Nordling Date: March 16, 2020, 7:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Something like that, except the first part of 2 makes me think
       the square you enter the target from doesn't count. I think it
       is the "also".
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page