DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
8th Fleet
HTML https://8thfleet.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Community Voting
*****************************************************
#Post#: 139--------------------------------------------------
Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: SiroVai
Date: April 30, 2016, 3:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Should players communicate through the chain of command as was
the norm, or be free to contact anyone on the SIMM directly.
CoC would be IC and would no longer relate to PM communications.
If a cadet wanted to speak to the CO directly, they could,
instead of DH>XO>CO.
#Post#: 141--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Mikey010178
Date: April 30, 2016, 3:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Jon Tulley link ---
>
> Should players communicate through the chain of command as was
the norm, or be free to contact anyone on the SIMM directly.
>
> CoC would be IC and would no longer relate to PM
communications.
>
> If a cadet wanted to speak to the CO directly, they could,
instead of DH>XO>CO.
>
--- End Quote ---
I think a open door policy would be better, especially if it was
something urgent. We've seen it on the other site, where someone
has used the CoC and gone unanswered for days. I would hope we
could answer people a lot quicker.
#Post#: 144--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Jaden Montgomery
Date: April 30, 2016, 3:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Mike, I think that it would be ideal to follow the
chain of command; but, there does need to be room for exceptions
when they don't get answers. Maybe a no reprucution policy for
going to the next level?
#Post#: 145--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Kira Wyman
Date: April 30, 2016, 3:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I believe it should be followed but if it's urgent there should
be an exception.
#Post#: 146--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: SiroVai
Date: April 30, 2016, 3:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think I've worded the question weirdly. Just to clarify:
Yes is - we should keep CoC like SF
No is - players can contact anyone
#Post#: 161--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: John S. Harriman
Date: April 30, 2016, 5:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Mike link ---
>
> I think a open door policy would be better, especially if it
was something urgent. We've seen it on the other site, where
someone has used the CoC and gone unanswered for days. I would
hope we could answer people a lot quicker.
>
--- End Quote ---
I agree with Mike, I know it happened to me many times and if
you are friends with the CO you should be able PM them to just
talk if you can't any other way.
#Post#: 164--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Joshua Shepard
Date: April 30, 2016, 5:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think the CoC needs to be followed. Mostly to make it
authentic, however if posts are not even acknowledged then
people can go to the next step.
#Post#: 181--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Kate Errikkson
Date: April 30, 2016, 6:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think day to day business should follow the established IC
CoC, but there are exceptions if something is more urgent OCC or
needs attention ASAP. What that criteria would be needs to be
established and whom to contact. Also, if the player in the CoC
is not responding within a reasonable amount of time, then they
should be disciplined and/or relieved of that duty (like would
happen IRL). Just my 2 cents.
#Post#: 182--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Kira Wyman
Date: April 30, 2016, 6:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Kate Errikkson link ---
>
> I think day to day business should follow the established IC
CoC, but there are exceptions if something is more urgent OCC or
needs attention ASAP. What that criteria would be needs to be
established and whom to contact. Also, if the player in the CoC
is not responding within a reasonable amount of time, then they
should be disciplined and/or relieved of that duty (like would
happen IRL). Just my 2 cents.
>
--- End Quote ---
I agree with this but also would add a warning system. Maybe 3
warnings and then action is taken like relieve of duty? I would
also add that if the member of the CoC has a valid reason (such
as no internet because of sudden storms etc.) then they should
be forgiven.
#Post#: 190--------------------------------------------------
Re: Chain of Command communication vote
DIR By: Joshua Shepard
Date: April 30, 2016, 7:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page