URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <
       form action=&amp
       ;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; method=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;p
       ost&
       quot; target=&am
       p;amp;amp;quot;_top&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;cmd&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; value=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot
       ;_s-xclick&a
       mp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hosted_button_id&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; val
       ue=&
       quot;DKL7ADEKRVUBL&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;image&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.payp
       alobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; nam
       e=&q
       uot;submit&a
       mp;amp;quot; alt=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;quot;PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
       &quo
       t;&g
       t; &
       lt;img alt=&
       amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypalobjects.com
       /en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; width=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; height=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/form&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Christian Theology
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 14016--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: patrick jane Date: June 6, 2020, 11:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chaplain Mark Schmidt
       link=topic=953.msg14015#msg14015 date=1591495732]
       I had heard of him, but until you put the name up again, I had
       not read anything about him.  Interesting fellow, now I want to
       learn more.
       [/quote]Well, John Nelson Darby was not Wesleyan but he was a
       dispensational teacher, maybe the first.
       #Post#: 14017--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest116 Date: June 6, 2020, 11:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       According to the two sources, I just looked at, he is considered
       the Father of dispensationalism.   Wesley lived right before
       him, so that leads to the question, did Darby come to his
       Theology because Methodism gave him a way in.
       #Post#: 14657--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest116 Date: June 29, 2020, 11:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As I have read more about this Theology I have come to one solid
       foundation thought of John Wesley to build my understanding from
       
       Wesley believed that the living core of Christianity was
       revealed in Scripture; and the Bible was the sole foundational
       source of theological development.  This seems to be ground zero
       for all of his theological thoughts.  This should be an
       interesting journey.
       #Post#: 14669--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest8 Date: June 29, 2020, 6:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chaplain Mark Schmidt
       link=topic=953.msg14657#msg14657 date=1593448329]
       As I have read more about this Theology I have come to one solid
       foundation thought of John Wesley to build my understanding from
       
       Wesley believed that the living core of Christianity was
       revealed in Scripture; and the Bible was the sole foundational
       source of theological development.  This seems to be ground zero
       for all of his theological thoughts.  This should be an
       interesting journey.
       [/quote]
       The most crucial point for any theology is the way to
       salvation......Certainly not by works as is most denominations
       world wide.
       Blade
       #Post#: 14670--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest116 Date: June 29, 2020, 6:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As I understand Wesley, is salvation came from God's grace
       #Post#: 15018--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest116 Date: July 10, 2020, 11:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In studying Wesley I have concluded he is not what I would call
       a Theologian's theologian.  He founded no system even though he
       is considered a systematic theologian.  He really belonged to no
       one school of thought, but seemed to embrace many for what
       became his Methodist approach.  He was more like the
       well-educated folk preacher that had a system and method.  He
       did his theology in service to the church and mission.   If not
       for the Methodist church growth, he would have gone unnoticed in
       the world of theology.
       Just my thoughts at this point as I dig deeper.
       #Post#: 15031--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest8 Date: July 11, 2020, 6:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chaplain Mark Schmidt
       link=topic=953.msg15018#msg15018 date=1594443528]
       In studying Wesley I have concluded he is not what I would call
       a Theologian's theologian.  He founded no system even though he
       is considered a systematic theologian.  He really belonged to no
       one school of thought, but seemed to embrace many for what
       became his Methodist approach.  He was more like the
       well-educated fold preach that had a system and method.  He did
       his theology in service to the church and mission.   If not for
       the Methodist church growth, he would have gone unnoticed in the
       world of theology.
       Just my thoughts at this point as I dig deeper.
       [/quote]
       Yes, He was a  rather complex individual
       Blade
       #Post#: 15921--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest116 Date: August 7, 2020, 1:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I was reading through a book on Wesley's theology and found a
       passage.  I am paraphrasing it here.  I found it to be a pretty
       decent explanation in the short form of his Justification
       theory.   Please forgive the footnote numbers interlaced
       throughout.   Let me know what your thoughts are if any.
       John Wesley certainly confesses that believers are accepted by
       God ‘wholly and solely for the sake of what Christ hath done and
       suffered for them.’7 However, in the course of his development
       he became afraid of antinomianism to such an extent that in the
       end he did not any more use the term ‘imputation of the
       righteousness of Christ’.8 He rather emphasized that our faith
       is imputed to us as righteousness. Of course, there is nothing
       wrong with that, but it is characteristic! In Wesley’s thinking
       the inward aspect always prevails over the relationship with God
       in Christ.
       Moreover, for Wesley it is not justification that is decisive
       for salvation, but sanctification. It is the new life that is
       most necessary. Of course, justification is necessary for
       salvation, but it is not sufficient. The real, essential change
       in a Christian’s life has to be sanctification, or rather
       holiness. Wesley mostly treats justification in view of
       sanctification. Justification for Wesley only means a relative
       change, sanctification a real one.9 There is a clear difference
       with Calvin in this respect. For Calvin, justification and
       sanctification are both given by the grace of God, and they are
       closely connected. The one cannot exist without the other.
       Essential to both is the relationship with Christ by faith.
       This was not acceptable to Wesley. To him, Calvinism was an
       impediment on the way to holiness.10
       Certainly Wesley confessed that to him justification is a work
       of God.11 At the same time, the fact that some people believe,
       and others don’t, is caused not by divine election, as Calvin
       and Whitefield would say, but by ‘the free responsiveness of
       human nature’12 that was not taken away.13
       Wesley had developed a special construction in order to say that
       the free choice of man is still caused by free grace. Wesley was
       convinced that this ‘preventing’ or ‘prevenient’ grace is given
       to every human being.14 With this construction he could replace
       the doctrine of predestination of Calvinism. Nevertheless,
       Wesley’s doctrine of conditions must not be overlooked. In order
       to receive the grace of faith there must be repentance and
       ‘works meet for repentance’ that go before faith.15
       #Post#: 15925--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: patrick jane Date: August 7, 2020, 6:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Very interesting Chaplain, thank you.
       #Post#: 15949--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wesleyan Theology
       By: guest8 Date: August 8, 2020, 10:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wesley is of Armenian theology whose sole purpose was to find
       away around the WORD of GOD...We see this in the first
       paragraph.
       “However, in the course of his development he became afraid of
       antinomianism to such an extent that in the end he did not any
       more use the term ‘imputation of the righteousness of Christ’."
       The imputation of Righteousness was to a person who has the
       faith in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
       "He rather emphasized that our faith is imputed to us as
       righteousness."
       Here righteousness is imputed to the Faith not the person….Thus
       it could be said that this righteousness is very dependent on
       the faith of the person..An armenian would argue that Free-Will
       would be able to pull away from the faith thus foregoing
       righteousness.
       "Of course, there is nothing wrong with that, but it is
       characteristic! In Wesley’s thinking the inward aspect always
       prevails over the relationship with God in Christ.”
       [Color=blue]Of course this is ok with the author of this
       article. [/color]
       "Moreover, for Wesley it is not justification that is decisive
       for salvation, but sanctification."
       Justification is Salvation. Sanctification is the process of
       one’s walk from sinner to righteousness.
       "It is the new life that is most necessary. Of course,
       justification is necessary for salvation, but it is not
       sufficient. The real, essential change in a Christian’s life has
       to be sanctification, or rather holiness. "
       Here we see, a cross between Justification by faith and faith
       alone....to justification plus  the works of a change to a
       Christian’s life.
       Again, it seems one can lose their justification based upon
       their successful change from sinner to a Christian’s Life?
       "Wesley mostly treats justification in view of sanctification.
       Justification for Wesley only means a relative change,
       sanctification a real one. "
       I think this is self explanatory.  God’s justification is only
       minor compared to the works of man, his sanctification to
       Christian Life.
       "There is a clear difference with Calvin in this respect. For
       Calvin, justification and sanctification are both given by the
       grace of God, and they are closely connected. The one cannot
       exist without the other. Essential to both is the relationship
       with Christ by faith.
       This was not acceptable to Wesley. To him, Calvinism was an
       impediment on the way to holiness."
       It would seem that Romans 8:29-30 does not mean anything to
       Wesley even though it is GOD’s WORD as seen in the next
       paragraph.
       "Certainly Wesley confessed that to him justification is a work
       of God. At the same time, the fact that some people believe, and
       others don’t, is caused not by divine election, as Calvin and
       Whitefield would say, but by ‘the free responsiveness of human
       nature’ that was not taken away.
       Wesley had developed a special construction in order to say that
       the free choice of man is still caused by free grace. "
       Once you get away from the WORD of GOD, then anything goes. As
       Wesley does in his special construction to make it say what He
       needs it to say.
       Wesley was convinced that this ‘preventing’ or ‘prevenient’
       grace is given to every human being. With this construction he
       could replace the doctrine of predestination of Calvinism.
       Replace the WORDs of GOD is the answer!
       Nevertheless, Wesley’s doctrine of conditions must not be
       overlooked. In order to receive the grace of faith there must be
       repentance and ‘works meet for repentance’ that go before faith.
       Or
       In order to receive Justification though the grace of Jesus
       Christ one must have Faith in his Gospel and true repentance (a
       turn away from sin). If  one’s heart is true, the Holy Spirit
       will become an indwelling part of the Christian’s life and will
       guide, teach and protect them through the sanctification process
       to complete righteousness.
       
       Those who subscribe to Fatih plus works, will bring up Jas
       2:18..”Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works:
       shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my
       faith by my works.”
       Salvation through faith does not require works prior but rather
       works after. Here the “Bema  Seat(1)” judgments will bestow
       awards based on the works of the person after they have received
       salvation. and it does not affect one’s salvation.
       (1) 2 Co 5:10..[Color=red]”For we must all appear before the
       judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things
       done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be
       good or bad.”[/color]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page