URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <
       form action=&amp
       ;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; method=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;p
       ost&
       quot; target=&am
       p;amp;amp;quot;_top&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;cmd&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; value=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot
       ;_s-xclick&a
       mp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hosted_button_id&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; val
       ue=&
       quot;DKL7ADEKRVUBL&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;image&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.payp
       alobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; nam
       e=&q
       uot;submit&a
       mp;amp;quot; alt=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;quot;PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
       &quo
       t;&g
       t; &
       lt;img alt=&
       amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypalobjects.com
       /en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; width=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; height=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/form&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Apocrypha
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 21636--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: guest116 Date: December 7, 2020, 3:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I learned, or maybe was reminded, that the majority of the book
       considered part of the Apocrypha were written during the 400
       silent years.
       I find this label kinda misleading, but in reading the
       background on it and reading what Blade gave me a direction to,
       the silent years got its name because there were no recognized
       Jewish Prophets.   That the Jewish nation felt God had gone
       silent by not providing them a prophet.
       Both of these tidbits of information were either lost to me and
       my memory or I just did not know them.  Either way, very
       interesting to me.
       BTW, thanks Blade for your input on the silent years.  Made it
       an interesting adventure to learn more.
       #Post#: 21637--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: guest8 Date: December 7, 2020, 4:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chaplain Mark Schmidt
       link=topic=673.msg21636#msg21636 date=1607375795]
       I learned, or maybe was reminded, that the majority of the book
       considered part of the Apocrypha were written during the 400
       silent years.
       I find this label kinda misleading, but in reading the
       background on it and reading what Blade gave me a direction to,
       the silent years got its name because there were no recognized
       Jewish Prophets.   That the Jewish nation felt God had gone
       silent by not providing them a prophet.
       Both of these tidbits of information were either lost to me and
       my memory or I just did not know them.  Either way, very
       interesting to me.
       BTW, thanks Blade for your input on the silent years.  Made it
       an interesting adventure to learn more.
       [/quote]
       thanks for your kind sentiments.
       Blade
       #Post#: 22983--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: guest116 Date: December 28, 2020, 10:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My son for Christmas gave me a copy of the English translation
       of the Septuagint with Apocrypha,  Now for those that have never
       looked extensively into the Septuagint, it is the Greek Old
       Testament.  There is not the Gospels or books from what we know
       as the New Testament.   It is considered one of the three main
       control texts for translators of the Old Testament to other
       languages as it was the Greek translation of the original Hebrew
       text.   Interestingly the only book missing that you sometimes
       find in Apocrypha is the First Book of Enoch.  Even the
       translators at the time in BCE did not consider this a book to
       be included.
       So why am I bringing this up?  I spent time comparing the
       Apocrypha books I have from the Catholic Bibles used for
       research I do and the Protestant versions to my Septuagint.
       Huge differences can be seen in what was changed and deleted.
       Gives you pause on what we are missing from other books.   The
       upside is that the meanings and intentions do not change.
       I might be posting some of the more interesting difference as I
       explore more.
       #Post#: 27107--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: patrick jane Date: March 18, 2021, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [img]
  HTML https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/122723.jpg?w=940[/img]
  HTML https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2021/march-web-only/new-dead-sea-scrolls-discovery-bible-translation-israel.html
       Dead Sea Scrolls Discovery Reveals New Details About the Bible’s
       Earliest Translations
       Tiny fragments of the minor prophets in Greek show that scribes
       adapted texts in similar ways to our contemporary versions.
       Israeli researchers and archaeologists unveiled this week
       several groundbreaking discoveries, including dozens of biblical
       scroll fragments that represent the first newly uncovered Dead
       Sea Scrolls in more than half a century.
       The Dead Sea Scrolls contain some of the earliest known Jewish
       religious documents, including biblical texts, dated from the
       third century B.C. to the second century A.D. The manuscripts
       were first unearthed in the immediate aftermath of World War II
       in the caves near Qumran and the Judean Desert.
       Even an initial review of the new fragments—which will be
       analyzed and scrutinized for years to come—offers some exciting
       findings about how the earliest biblical texts were translated
       and adapted in ways like our own.
       The discovery comes at a time when demand for antiquities has
       skyrocketed, spurring looting and forgeries over the past
       several years as wealthy collectors hope to acquire any
       remaining scraps of the priceless scrolls.
       Starting around 2002, a number of widely publicized “Dead Sea
       Scroll” fragments emerged with questionable origin stories.
       After a series of illegal attempts to acquire artifacts and
       scrolls, Israeli Antiquities Authority conducted a series of
       archaeological surveys to reexamine the interiors of the caves
       along the cliffs of the Judean Desert.
       Beginning in 2017, its researchers uncovered two dozen scroll
       pieces, each measuring only a few centimeters across, from the
       so-called Cave of Horror near the western shore of the Dead Sea.
       It’s a site where insurgents were believed to have hidden during
       the uprising led by Simon bar Kokhba against the Roman empire in
       A.D. 133–136. It gets its name from the discovery of 40 bodies
       during initial excavations decades before.
       Unlike most of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were written in
       Hebrew and Aramaic, the fragments from the Cave of Horror
       contain Greek letters. Scholars determined they came from a
       Greek translation of the Book of the Twelve in Hebrew, what many
       Christians call the Minor Prophets.
       The job of reconstructing the original document is akin to
       trying to assemble a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle with only a
       handful of pieces. The largest fragment contains portions of
       Zechariah 8:16–17, and some smaller bits are identified as Nahum
       1:5–6. These pieces appear to be connected to other previously
       discovered fragments from the same cave along the ancient gorge
       of Nahal Hever and were part of a single large scroll including
       all of the minor prophets.
       The text comes from the oldest physical scroll of the Greek
       Bible we have, but it likely represents a development or
       revision of the standard Greek translation—often referred to as
       the Septuagint, LXX, or Old Greek.
       Two characteristics found for the first time in this ancient
       Greek translation correspond in remarkable ways to our modern
       English Bibles.
       First, the newly discovered pieces show a special treatment for
       the four letters of God’s name, the Tetragrammaton (see Exodus
       3:14–15). Instead of rendering the name in typical fashion with
       the Greek word Kyrios, the name of God is represented in Hebrew
       letters written right to left. It would be similar to us using
       the Hebrew letters יהוה (YHWH) or
       possibly the Latin DOMINUS in the middle of an English sentence.
       This representation is significant because using specialized
       characters for the divine name has carried through to our modern
       Bibles. Most English Bibles represent the name as “the LORD”
       with small capital letters, rather than representing its
       supposed pronunciation Yahweh, as many scholars suggest. This
       substitution follows the ancient tradition of reading Adonai, a
       Hebrew word meaning “Lord,” or even HaShem “The Name,” in place
       of representing God’s name according to its sound.
       Moreover, the lettering for God’s name is not typical of most of
       the other Dead Sea Scroll Hebrew manuscripts. It is an even
       older script, sometimes called paleo-Hebrew, which was mostly
       abandoned in everyday writing during the second temple period.
       Think of it as the difference between our modern Latin lettering
       and the calligraphic Fraktur or Gothic script, or possibly even
       like Greek letters. Putting these representations into a
       translated text provides both a foreignness to the writing and a
       type of reverence for the name’s uniqueness.
       The second correlation we find in the new fragments is evidence
       of changing words to try to improve a new translation. The Minor
       Prophets scroll represents a revision of an older Greek
       translation of the Hebrew Bible. The original version was used
       widely by Greek-speaking Jews in the first century throughout
       the Mediterranean world, but at some point, a new translation
       became warranted.
       For Zechariah 8:17, the Old Greek translated the first word in
       the Hebrew text (אִישׁ) as a
       distributive term meaning “each other, another,” which put at
       the end, similar to every major English version. For example,
       the NIV reads, “Do not plot evil against each other.”
       In the new fragment, the same term is translated by a different
       Greek word at the beginning. Using an interlinear
       approach—finding a corresponding word without accounting for the
       context of its use—the verse starts by representing the same
       Hebrew word as “man.” It forms an overliteral translation: “As
       for a man, do not plot evil against his neighbor in your heart.”
       It would seem that the efforts to render the Bible accurately
       into common languages date back to our earliest textual evidence
       of the Scriptures. Yet this difference anticipates the various
       modern opinions about how best to represent God’s word in our
       vernaculars.
       These texts will undoubtably launch an array of research in
       years to come, with other features possibly revealed through
       multispectral imaging and digital magnification. As a biblical
       scholar, I can imagine these ancient readers striving to
       translate the Hebrew Scriptures that we read today and then
       carrying these meaningful texts into the darkest moments of
       their history to help them better understand God and their
       world.
       Our connection to these people through this ancient text—now
       brought forward in tiny pieces, bit by bit—demonstrates the
       profound human desire to seek God especially in our moments of
       greatest trial and uncertainty.
       Chip Hardy is associate professor of Old Testament and Semitic
       Languages at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and the
       author of Exegetical Gems from Biblical Hebrew: A Refreshing
       Guide to Grammar and Interpretation.
       #Post#: 29341--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: patrick jane Date: May 14, 2021, 12:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Facts Behind the New Dead Sea Scrolls Discovery (Interview
       with Craig Evans)
       Is the latest discovery of new Dead Sea Scrolls reliable? How
       were they found? What do they reveal? In this interview, I talk
       with Craig Evans, one of the leading biblical scholars today,
       about this fascinating new discovery.
       1 hour
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTNUUd9TDbo
       #Post#: 29345--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: guest116 Date: May 14, 2021, 3:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Excellent watch.  Very informative and the details on how they
       determine the effects and authenticity of the new finds were so
       interesting to me.
       #Post#: 30999--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: patrick jane Date: June 4, 2021, 3:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [img]
  HTML https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/123965.jpg?w=700[/img]
  HTML https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2021/june/hobby-lobby-dirk-obbink-gospel-papyrus-theft-suit-7-million.html
       Hobby Lobby Sues Oxford Professor for $7 Million
       Ancient papyri with gospel texts were allegedly stolen.
       Hobby Lobby would like its money back, and this time it’s not
       saying please.
       The Oklahoma-based craft store company has filed a federal
       lawsuit demanding the return of more than $7 million from an
       Oxford University classics professor who oversaw the world’s
       largest collection of ancient Egyptian papyri.
       Dirk Obbink, an American who was once awarded the MacArthur
       Fellowship “genius grant” for his skill in rescuing and
       interpreting papyrus fragments, allegedly stole 120 fragments
       from the Egyptian Exploration Society’s collection of ancient
       artifacts held at the Sackler Classics Library at Oxford.
       Obbink then allegedly sold 32 of the 120 fragments to Hobby
       Lobby, as the evangelical, family-owned business attempted to
       build a world-class collection of biblical artifacts and launch
       Museum of the Bible.
       The professor, now 64, was arrested in Oxford in March 2020. The
       criminal investigation is ongoing.
       Hobby Lobby, in the meantime, would like its $7,095,100
       returned, along with lawyer fees and “any further and different
       relief as the Court deems just and proper,” according to the
       lawsuit filed June 2.
       Obbink frequently worked as a private dealer, in addition to his
       position at Oxford. He authenticated artifacts for private
       collectors and occasionally acted as go-between for buyers and
       sellers.
       According to the lawsuit, Obbink first sold papyri to Hobby
       Lobby in February 2010. The company paid the professor $80,000.
       Four months later, Hobby Lobby made a second purchase of
       fragments and other antiquities, paying Obbink $350,000. In
       November, it made a third purchase for $2.4 million.
       Hobby Lobby bought two more lots of antiquities from the Oxford
       professor in 2011 for a total of $1.8 million. There was a sixth
       sale the following year that came to about $600,000.
       The seventh and final sale was the largest: Obbink offered Hobby
       Lobby four pieces of papyri from the first century bearing a few
       verses each from Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
       Two of the fragments contained the words of John the Baptist,
       including the passage where he condemns the Pharisees and
       Sadducees, saying “You brood of vipers, who warned you to flee
       from the coming wrath? Produce fruit in keeping with repentance”
       (Matt. 3:7).
       Two contained the words of Jesus, including a passage where he
       answers the question, “Who are you?” with “When you have lifted
       up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am he, and that I
       do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught
       me” (John 8:28).
       The craft store company paid $1.8 million for the four fragments
       and two other items, bringing their total purchases from Obbink
       to more than $7 million. It wired the money to a bank in Ann
       Arbor, Michigan.
       Obbink, as part of the arrangement, hung on to the gospel
       fragments for further study. Four years later, in December 2017,
       the professor emailed his contact at Hobby Lobby to say there
       had been a mistake. The gospel fragments actually weren’t his to
       sell. They belonged to the collection he was charged with
       overseeing for Oxford University.
       Hobby Lobby demanded a refund, and heard nothing. Six months
       later, it asked more firmly for the return of $760,000, and
       Obbink wrote back that he didn’t have the money, according to
       the lawsuit.
       “I will be able to begin payments in the second half of July and
       anticipate completing these by late August or early September,
       perhaps sooner,” he wrote. “I hope this is okay, and I remain
       committed to making full payment ASAP.”
       By September 2019, he had only returned $10,000. He wrote Hobby
       Lobby again.
       “I crave your indulgence to exercise some patience,” Obbink
       said. “I am convinced that this whole issue will be settled
       latest by November and if complete payment is not made by then,
       I will accept whatever actions you decide to take against me.”
       The issue was not settled by November. The Museum of the Bible
       contacted the Egyptian Exploration Society, and after comparing
       notes, the British organization determined that 32 fragments
       Hobby Lobby purchased from Obbink rightly belonged in the
       Egyptian collection.
       When the Egyptian Exploration Society examined its holdings of
       more than 500,000 artifacts, it found another 88 fragments were
       also missing. Someone had also tampered with the catalogue cards
       and the photographic records of the documents.
       Obbink was removed from the library and put on leave. Students
       were informed by email that someone else would be teaching their
       classes. The next spring, he was arrested.
       The scandal has led to questions about the Oxford professor’s
       other work. In 2014, Obbink claimed to have discovered two new
       poems from the Greek poet Sappho. A 2020 article in the Bulletin
       of the American Society of Papyrologists casts doubt on the
       story of the discovery and the provenance of the fragments,
       raising the possibility that the poems are forgeries.
       “Scholars must scrutinize new discoveries carefully before
       conducting or publishing research, and present their findings
       transparently,” wrote C. Michael Sampson, classics professor at
       the University of Manitoba. “Scholars [need to be] wary of the
       antiquities market because academic appraisals add to objects’
       commercial value, which can incentivize looting and the illegal
       trade in antiquities.”
       Steve Green, president of Hobby Lobby and chairman of the Museum
       of the Bible, said that when the craft store company started
       spending millions on biblical artifacts, it placed too much
       trust in the antiquities market and “unscrupulous dealers.”
       Hobby Lobby ended up paying for stolen items, forged
       antiquities, and artifacts looted from the Middle East during
       war.
       The company has returned thousands of objects, paid for
       extensive investigations, and double-checked the legitimacy of
       the 60,000 items that remain in its collection. The thorough
       effort has been praised by top scholars including Christopher
       Rollston, an expert on the forgery of biblical antiquities, and
       Lawrence Schiffman, a pioneer in the study of the Dead Sea
       Scrolls.
       “The museum deserves to be praised,” Schiffman said. “From the
       day it opened, the museum told the truth. They have been
       completely kosher about this.”
       [img]
  HTML https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/117427.jpg?w=700[/img]
       Auction house covered up false purchase history for Gilgamesh
       tablet, US Attorney alleges.
  HTML https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2021/june/hobby-lobby-dirk-obbink-gospel-papyrus-theft-suit-7-million.html
       Bible Museum Must Send One More Artifact Back to Iraq
       Another ancient document is causing controversy for the Museum
       of the Bible after a federal government prosecutor filed a claim
       that a six-by-five-inch clay tablet was stolen from Iraq. The US
       Attorney’s Office of Eastern New York says that Hobby Lobby
       legally purchased the Gilgamesh Dream Tablet for $1.6 million to
       loan to the museum, but the papers documenting the artifact’s
       purchase history were false.
       “In this case, a major auction house failed to meet its
       obligations by minimizing its concerns that the provenance of an
       important Iraqi artifact was fabricated, and withheld from the
       buyer information that undermined the provenance’s reliability,"
       said US Attorney Richard Donoghue, who filed a foreiture claim
       on the Gilgamesh tablet on Monday.
       In an official statement to Christianity Today, the Museum of
       the Bible announced it has cooperated with the investigation and
       is cooperating with authorities to return the tablet to Iraq.
       The museum also said Hobby Lobby will sue the British auction
       house that sold it the tablet. The Museum of the Bible
       identified the auction house as Christie’s.
       The clay tablet is a part of the Gilgamesh epic, which tells the
       story of a great king who battles with gods and tries to
       discover the secret to eternal life. It is considered one of the
       world’s first great works of literature, dating to the Sumerian
       civilization of Mesopotamia of more than 4,000 years ago. The
       epic is also famous for including a flood narrative with
       similarities to the biblical story of Noah’s flood. This tablet
       has been dated to around 1600 BC and contains the account of a
       dream, which is interpreted by the hero’s mother. Department of
       Homeland Security agents seized it from the Bible museum in
       September. It is now being held in a US Customs and Border
       Protection facility in Queens, New York.
       The importation of cultural property from war-torn Iraq has been
       restricted, since nine museums were looted in 1991 during the
       turmoil of the Gulf War. According to the US Attorney, the
       cuneiform tablet was brought into the US illegally from London
       in 2003 by an unnamed antiquities dealer. It was then sold to
       another dealer in 2007 with false documents saying it was
       purchased legitimately in a box of bronze artifacts in 1981. In
       2014, Hobby Lobby purchased the tablet from an auction house and
       donated it to the Museum of the Bible.
       Museum officials started to investigate the provenance of the
       tablet in 2017, in what the US Attorney calls “due diligence
       research.” According to the US Attorney’s office, museum
       officials took questions about the item to the auction house,
       but auction house officials repeated the antiquities dealer’s
       account of where it was purchased, withholding the falsified
       provenance letter and the dealer’s name. The museum notified the
       Iraqi embassy that it had the Gilgamesh tablet and committed
       itself to independently researching the provenance of the item.
       In April, the Museum of the Bible announced it would return
       11,500 other clay seals and fragments of papyrus to the Iraqi
       and Egyptian governments because they did not have complete
       documentation and may have been looted.
       A year ago, the museum agreed to return 13 Egyptian papyrus
       fragments that were stolen from the University of Oxford. And in
       2017, the federal government fined Hobby Lobby and ordered it to
       return thousands of cuneiform tablets and other objects that
       were illegally taken from war-torn Iraq and brought into the US
       by a United Arab Emirates-based dealer who falsely labeled the
       shipments as ceramic tiles.
       “I trusted the wrong people to guide me, and unwittingly dealt
       with unscrupulous dealers in those early years,” said Steve
       Green, the president of Hobby Lobby and founder of the Museum of
       the Bible, in an official statement in March. “My goal was
       always to protect, preserve, study, and share cultural property
       with the world. … If I learn of other items in the collection
       for which another person or entity has a better claim, I will
       continue to do the right thing with those items.”
       [img]
  HTML https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/116966.jpg?w=700[/img]
  HTML https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2020/april/dirk-obbink-bible-museum-mark-manuscript-oxford-arrest.html
       Stealing Ancient Bible Texts from Oxford
       Dirk Obbink accused of selling papyrus fragments to Hobby Lobby
       and California collector.
       An Oxford professor has been arrested on allegations of stealing
       and selling as many as 120 ancient pieces of papyrus, including
       a fragment of the Gospel of Mark once believed to be the oldest
       New Testament text ever discovered.
       Dirk Obbink, professor of papyrology and Greek literature at
       Christ Church Oxford, was arrested on March 2. News of the
       arrest broke last week in the student newspaper TheOxford Blue.
       Obbink allegedly took the fragments from the Egypt Exploration
       Society’s collection of about 500,000 artifacts discovered in
       the ancient city of Oxyrynchus. The collection is housed at
       Oxford’s Sackler Library, and Obbink was one of three scholars
       charged with overseeing it until he was removed under a cloud of
       suspicion in 2016.
       Obbink has denied the allegations in an official statement and
       said the evidence against him was “fabricated in a malicious
       attempt to harm my reputation and career.”
       The evidence is convincing, however, to some who’ve worked
       closely with Obbink.
       “It’s difficult seeing this ending well for Dirk,” said Jerry
       Pattengale, a professor at Indiana Wesleyan University and one
       of the founding scholars of the Museum of the Bible. “It’s sad
       to think that such a gifted mind might have an abbreviated
       contribution to the field of Greek papyrology.”
       Obbink, originally from Nebraska, went to Oxford in the late
       1990s and became director of a project to digitize ancient
       papyri. The Oxyrynchus collection is a massive trove of
       documents, including many biblical passages, uncovered in the
       ruins of a Greek city in Egypt in the 1880s. Much like the Dead
       Sea Scrolls, the fragments have given modern scholars a broad
       window into the ancient world and affirmed the reliability of
       biblical manuscripts.
       Obbink became one of the trio of editors responsible with
       publishing the Oxyrynchus Papyri and overseeing the scholars who
       were given access to the collection. He was awarded a MacArthur
       Fellowship—known as the “genius grant”—in 2001 for his skill in
       rescuing and interpreting ancient manuscripts.
       Report of major discovery
       Obbink attracted the attention of some evangelical scholars in
       2011 when he informally shared news about a fragment of Mark’s
       Gospel found in the collection. Obbink told Pattengale and Scott
       Carroll, two scholars who were working with the Museum of the
       Bible at the time, that the fragment dated to the late first
       century. The manuscript included a bit of the text of Jesus’
       baptism, where John the Baptist tells the crowd, “I baptize you
       with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit” (Mark
       1: 8 )
       According to Obbink, the words might have been copied down
       within 30 years of the date of the original biblical manuscript.
       There are no known biblical manuscripts from earlier than the
       second century, so this was a major discovery. (The fragment is
       now believed to date to the second or third century.)
       Carroll passed the news to Daniel Wallace, executive director of
       the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, and
       Wallace mentioned the purported discovery in a public debate
       with Bart Ehrmann, a religious studies professor at the
       University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in February 2012.
       The news created a buzz but wasn’t followed by any additional
       information. There was no academic paper substantiating the
       claims. A number of scholars who said they had seen the fragment
       told other scholars at the time that they were not allowed to
       talk about it because of non-disclosure agreements. Questions
       about the Gospel discovery went unanswered.
       Alleged antiquities sales
       At about the same time, Obbink reportedly took 13 bits of
       papyrus and sold them to Hobby Lobby. The sale did not include
       the Mark fragment but did include parts of Genesis, Psalms, and
       Romans, according to the Egypt Exploration Society (EES).
       Steve Green, the president of Hobby Lobby, was buying thousands
       of artifacts for the Museum of the Bible, which he launched in
       2017. He ultimately ended up with a collection of about 60,000
       objects, including about 17,000 tablets, seals, and fragments
       that were likely looted from Iraq and Egypt; 16 pieces of the
       Dead Sea Scrolls that were later discovered to be forgeries; and
       13 bits of papyrus that were improperly taken from an Oxford
       library. (Green has recently apologized, and the Museum of the
       Bible in Washington, DC, is in the process of returning all the
       stolen artifacts and developing an exhibit on antiquities
       forgery.)
       Then in 2013, Obbink allegedly sold Hobby Lobby four more
       fragments from the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John,
       each from “Egypt Circa 0100 AD,” according to the purchase
       agreement that appears to be signed by Obbink. The amount paid
       for the fragments is unknown, though Pattengale called it a
       “considerable sum.”
       The purchase agreement stipulated that the physical documents
       wouldn’t be transferred to Hobby Lobby for four years but would
       stay with Obbink for research. During the period, news that the
       Museum of the Bible owned the exciting new discovery of a
       possible first-century fragment of the gospel of Mark prompted
       EES to clarify that the papyrus was not for sale and had never
       been for sale. Then the Museum of the Bible produced the
       purchase agreement, and an investigation began.
       Internal investigation
       EES launched a systematic check of the collection, to see what
       else might have been stolen. They found that not only were more
       than 100 fragments missing, someone had removed the catalogue
       cards and the photograph recording the items location in the
       collection.
       Seven were found in California, in the private collection of
       Andrew Stimmer, chairman of Hope Partners International, an
       evangelical ministry serving children in Costa Rica, Kenya, and
       India. To date, it is not clear how Stimmer got the texts, which
       included bits of Exodus, Ecclesiastes, and 1 Corinthians. He has
       agreed to return them to Oxford.
       Obbink was not reappointed to his editorial position in 2016. In
       June 2019, EES blocked Obbink from even accessing the
       collection, and in October, Obbink was suspended from Oxford.
       The next month, local police received a report that as many as
       120 artifacts were stolen from the Oxyrynchus Collection at the
       Sackler Library. The police investigation is ongoing.
       It is not known how much the stolen antiquities are worth. Carl
       Graves, director of EES, said he doesn’t think of the objects in
       those terms.
       “They are testament to Egypt’s early Christian heritage and are
       early evidence of biblical Scripture,” he told the Guardian. “We
       don’t value them monetarily but they are priceless and
       irreplaceable.”
       Money corrupts
       According to Pattengale, however, the money the Green family
       spent acquiring artifacts for the Museum of the Bible caused a
       number of people to seem to go crazy. “We were approached by
       dealers … in the oddest of ways,” he wrote in CT.
       “After speaking at Liberty University, I went to shake a
       fellow’s hand at the end of the greeting line. Instead, he
       pulled out a paper tube from beneath his trench coat and tried
       to show me a Megillah (Esther scroll) he wanted to sell. … One
       fellow kept calling about a buried boxcar of antiquities in
       Texas, another claiming ownership of something from Jesus’ birth
       stable, and yet another with plaster casts of the first-century
       tomb in Jerusalem.”
       Obbink may have also been motivated by the possibility of the
       money. But unlike most people, had access to half a million
       antiquities.
       Christopher Rollston, professor of Semitic languages and
       literatures at George Washington University, said money has done
       a lot of damage to the study of biblical antiquities.
       “The antiquities market is a blight on the field,” Rollston
       said. “It is corrosive and destructive, and scholars, museums,
       and the public must have nothing to do with it. Those who do, do
       so at their peril, as this tragic story demonstrates in spades.”
       #Post#: 36269--------------------------------------------------
       Re: APOCRYPHA
       By: patrick jane Date: December 22, 2021, 7:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Revisiting the Apocrypha
       During the Reformation, Martin Luther and Protestant Christians
       argued that everyone should be able to read the Bible in his or
       her own language. When they went back to the Hebrew texts of the
       Old Testament, they realized that the Latin Christian Bible
       included a number of books that Jews did not consider scripture.
       
       The Reformers stripped these books from the canon, calling them
       the “Apocrypha” or hidden books.  We'll take a look at these
       books that the Reformers hid away and consider why they made it
       into the early Christian canon and not the Jewish canon.
       1 hour 37 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j3kd_1qNzU&list=WL&index=8
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page