URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <form
       action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"
       method="post"
       target="_top">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="cmd"
       value="_s-xclick">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="hosted_button_id"
       value="DKL7ADEKRVUBL">
       <input
       type="image"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif"
       border="0"
       name="submit"
       alt="PayPal
       - The safer, easier way to pay
       online!">
       <img
       alt=""
       border="0"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif"
       width="1"
       height="1">
       </form>
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: From The Desk of Bernard Pyron
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 7370--------------------------------------------------
       Is the U.S. Under Judgment By God in 2022 For the National Sin
       of Abortion?
   DIR By: bernardpyron
       Date: July 31, 2019, 3:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is the U.S. Under Judgment By God in 2021 For the National Sin
       of Abortion?  Bernard Pyron, February 2, 2021
  HTML http://consistent-life.org/blog/index.php/2018/04/03/eugenics-roe-v-wade/
       "The 1973 Supreme Court decisions that ended all legal
       protection of unborn children were based on eugenics. Despite
       that, comments about the decisions usually focus on privacy and
       women’s rights, not on eugenics. So we should look carefully at
       the ways in which eugenics shows up in the decisions.
       "The appearance of eugenics in the abortion decisions that is
       easiest to see is the reference in a footnote to Buck v. Bell,
       the 1927 case that opened the floodgates for sterilizing people
       who were considered to be unfit. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme
       Court said that the Constitution protects a “right to privacy”
       and that the decision to have an abortion is an exercise of this
       right. But, the Court stated, the right to privacy is not
       absolute; it can be limited in some cases, such as vaccination
       and sterilization. So the abortion decision was not about
       women’s rights; it cited a case permitting forced
       sterilization."
       "The abortion decisions were written by Justice Harry Blackmun.
       His approach to abortion follows the lead of Glanville Williams.
       Glanville Williams, who taught law at Cambridge University, was
       a member of the Eugenics Society. In 1954, the Eugenics Society
       voted to support the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA),
       which set out to remove legal restrictions against abortion.
       Williams became president of the ALRA from 1962, and was
       successful within a few years; the British law was changed in
       1967."
  HTML http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm
       "The influence on the eugenicists on abortion in America is
       perhaps
       best seen by comparing Roe v. Wade and a book by Professor
       Glanville
       Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. The book is
       cited
       repeatedly in the 1973 abortion decision, but the numerous
       citations
       do not reveal the full extent of the influence. Justice Blackmun
       lifted his whole argument from Williams, including the history
       of
       abortion, ancient attitudes, the influence of Christianity,
       common
       law, Augustine's and Aquinas' teaching, canon law and English
       statutory law. And Williams was a member of the Eugenics
       Society. Roe v. Wade was based on eugenics."
       #Post#: 7420--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
   DIR By: guest8
       Date: August 4, 2019, 7:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: bernardpyron link ---
       >
       > The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
       >
       > The late David Rockefeller and other Globalists and members of
       the financial and corporate elite have been promoting population
       reduction for years.  Their population reduction movement is
       part of the Eugenics Movement,
       >
       >
  HTML http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States
       >
       > "The American eugenics movement was rooted in the biological
       > determinist ideas of Sir Francis Galton, which originated in
       the
       > 1880s. Galton studied the upper classes of Britain, and
       arrived at the
       > conclusion that their social positions were due to a superior
       genetic
       > makeup. Early proponents of eugenics believed that, through
       > selective breeding, the human species should direct its own
       evolution."
       >
       > MEDICAL EUGENICS WAS FUNDED AND PROMOTED BY THE TOP FINANCIAL
       ELITE
       >
       > "The American eugenics movement received extensive funding
       from
       > various corporate foundations including the Carnegie
       Institution,
       > Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman railroad fortune.[6]
       In 1906
       > J.H. Kellogg provided funding to help found the Race
       Betterment
       > Foundation in Battle Creek, Michigan."
       >
       > In the book, Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism
       In
       > AMERICA, 1979, by E. Richard Brown, he says the current
       problems in
       > the U.S. health care system are due to the "marriage of modern
       > medicine to corporate capitalism."
       > "In the early years of the 20th century, Brown says that
       because
       > medical technology was expensive, doctors turned to the
       financial
       > elite for money. The Rockefeller family supplied a large part
       of the
       > money to fund medical technology, as well as medical research
       and
       > medical schools."
       >
       > "Rockefeller University began in 1901 as the Rockefeller
       Institute for
       > medical Research. It began giving doctor's degrees in 1957.
       And the
       > Rockefeller University Hospital does basic as well as applied
       medical
       > research."
       >
       > The Rockefellers were involved in the pharmaceutical drug
       industry and
       > helped to make American doctors into highly paid salesmen for
       > prescription drugs. Perhaps the Rockefellers and others in the
       ruling
       > elite helped give high status to American doctors, making them
       members of a somewhat elite class, to help fool the people into
       accepting the drugs
       > they promoted as cures for many diseases. After all, a highly
       > respected doctor with much image must know what he is doing in
       > prescribing drugs.
       >
       > "And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee;
       and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard
       no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of
       the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived."
       Revelation 18: 23
       >
       > Note that sorceries is a translation in Revelation 18: 23 of
       φαρμακεια, or
       pharmakeia. "For by thy pharmakeia were all peoples deceived."
       >
       >
  HTML http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/…/armageddon-or-newa…/messages…
       >
       > The financial elite, especially the Rockefellers, made the
       American
       > medical profession into a top-down system, where local doctors
       are
       > controlled from the top of society, the financial and
       corporate
       > elites. The Eugenics movement was a part of that financial and
       > corporate elite, a movement that in the top-down system
       influenced the
       > culture of American doctors and nurses.
       >
       > THE CALIFORNIA EUGENICS MOVEMENT SPREAD TO HITLER'S NAZI
       GERMANY
       >
       > According to
  HTML http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States
       >
       > "California eugenicists began producing
       > literature promoting eugenics and sterilization and sending it
       > overseas to German scientists and medical professionals. By
       1933,
       > California had subjected more people to forceful sterilization
       than
       > all other U.S. states combined. The forced sterilization
       program
       > engineered by the Nazis was partly inspired by California's."
       >
       > IN THE 20TH CENTURY EUGENICISTS PROMOTED POPULATION CONTROL
       AND ABORTION
       >
       >
  HTML http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm
       > "From 1952 on, a major part of the eugenics movement was the
       > population control movement."
       >
       > "One of the organizations that promoted eugenics under the new
       > population rubric was the Population Council. It was founded
       in 1952
       > by John D. Rockefeller 3rd, and spent $173,621,654 in its
       first 25
       > years. That is not a bad budget for one of the organizations
       in a dead
       > movement! Clearly, the people who think the eugenics movement
       died in
       > the rubble in Berlin do not understand crypto-eugenics,
       genetics or
       > population control."
       >
       > "The coercive Chinese policy has a great deal of acceptance
       and
       > support in the United States, including from feminist leaders
       like
       > Eleanor Smeal and Molly Yard. When the Reagan administration
       cut off
       > funds for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) because
       of its
       > support for the Chinese population program, two American
       organizations
       > sued to restore funds: Rockefeller's Population Council and
       the
       > Population Institute in Washington. A 1978 survey of members
       of the
       > Population Association of America found that 34 percent of
       members
       > agreed that "coercive birth control programs should be
       initiated in at
       > least some countries immediately."
       >
       > "In fact, the United States government is responsible for much
       of the
       > global population control. "
       >
       > CIRCUMCISION AND THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT
       >
       > In the very late 19th century Doctor Peter Charles Remondino
       took up
       > the cause of routine infant circumcision. Remondino was
       influenced by
       > the theory of Charles Darwin and as a result believed that
       male
       > infants should be circumcised to perfect a fault in human
       evolution of
       > the male reproductice organ..
       >
       >
  HTML https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Male-Infant-Circumcision-Brief-Overview-of-Issues.pdf
       >
       > "Circumcision is an ancient cultural imposition on males that
       was adapted as a surgical operation - on the English Speaking
       Countries only - during the puritanical period of the 19th
       century. pre-germ theory medicine."
       >
       > See:
  HTML http://www.nndb.com/people/018/000133616/
       >
       > "Dr John Harvey Kellogg became chief physician at the Western
       Health
       > Reform Institute of Battle Creek, a home for healthy diet and
       > lifestyle that had been founded by Seventh Day Adventist
       leader Ellen
       > G. White in 1866."
       >
       > Dr John Kellogg was an early American medical Eugenicist who
       was a
       > Seventh Day Adventist, and advocated eating his Kellogg's corn
       flakes
       > and circumcision of all male babies.
       >
       > Here is something else connected to the Eugenics movement -
       legalized abortion in the United States.
       >
       >
  HTML http://consistent-life.org/blog/index.php/2018/04/03/eugenics-roe-v-wade/
       >
       > "The 1973 Supreme Court decisions that ended all legal
       protection of unborn children were based on eugenics. Despite
       that, comments about the decisions usually focus on privacy and
       women’s rights, not on eugenics. So we should look carefully at
       the ways in which eugenics shows up in the decisions.
       >
       > "The appearance of eugenics in the abortion decisions that is
       easiest to see is the reference in a footnote to Buck v. Bell,
       the 1927 case that opened the floodgates for sterilizing people
       who were considered to be unfit. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme
       Court said that the Constitution protects a “right to privacy”
       and that the decision to have an abortion is an exercise of this
       right. But, the Court stated, the right to privacy is not
       absolute; it can be limited in some cases, such as vaccination
       and sterilization. So the abortion decision was not about
       women’s rights; it cited a case permitting forced
       sterilization."
       >
       > "The abortion decisions were written by Justice Harry
       Blackmun. His approach to abortion follows the lead of Glanville
       Williams. Glanville Williams, who taught law at Cambridge
       University, was a member of the Eugenics Society. In 1954, the
       Eugenics Society voted to support the Abortion Law Reform
       Association (ALRA), which set out to remove legal restrictions
       against abortion. Williams became president of the ALRA from
       1962, and was successful within a few years; the British law was
       changed in 1967."
       >
       >
  HTML http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm
       >
       > "The influence on the eugenicists on abortion in America is
       perhaps
       > best seen by comparing Roe v. Wade and a book by Professor
       Glanville
       > Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. The book
       is cited
       > repeatedly in the 1973 abortion decision, but the numerous
       citations
       > do not reveal the full extent of the influence. Justice
       Blackmun
       > lifted his whole argument from Williams, including the history
       of
       > abortion, ancient attitudes, the influence of Christianity,
       common
       > law, Augustine's and Aquinas' teaching, canon law and English
       > statutory law. And Williams was a member of the Eugenics
       Society. Roe v. Wade was based on eugenics.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       [shadow=blue,left]I believe this has been tried before,,(i.e.
       Hitler, etc.)
       Blade[/shadow]
       #Post#: 10184--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: February 10, 2020, 4:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro7SZ1uEBTs
       #Post#: 16767--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: August 28, 2020, 3:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good
       #Post#: 19784--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: October 29, 2020, 1:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: patrick jane link ---
       >
       > Good
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       ;D
       #Post#: 20880--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: November 21, 2020, 6:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SY78ow6Fhk
       #Post#: 20886--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine
   DIR By: guest8
       Date: November 21, 2020, 9:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: patrick jane link ---
       >
       >
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SY78ow6Fhk
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       wow for someone who is without faith in Jesus Christ and His
       Promises, this w2ould be a devastating film.
       Blade
       #Post#: 24497--------------------------------------------------
       Is The U.S. Under God's Jugdment Because of Years of Unrepented
       Abortion?
   DIR By: bernardpyron
       Date: February 2, 2021, 3:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is the U.S. Under God's Judgment Because of Years of Unrepented
       Abortion?
       Bernard Pyron
  HTML http://consistent-life.org/blog/index.php/2018/04/03/eugenics-roe-v-wade/
       "The 1973 Supreme Court decisions that ended all legal
       protection of unborn children were based on eugenics. Despite
       that, comments about the decisions usually focus on privacy and
       women’s rights, not on eugenics. So we should look carefully at
       the ways in which eugenics shows up in the decisions.
       "The appearance of eugenics in the abortion decisions that is
       easiest to see is the reference in a footnote to Buck v. Bell,
       the 1927 case that opened the floodgates for sterilizing people
       who were considered to be unfit. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme
       Court said that the Constitution protects a “right to privacy”
       and that the decision to have an abortion is an exercise of this
       right. But, the Court stated, the right to privacy is not
       absolute; it can be limited in some cases, such as vaccination
       and sterilization. So the abortion decision was not about
       women’s rights; it cited a case permitting forced
       sterilization."
       "The abortion decisions were written by Justice Harry Blackmun.
       His approach to abortion follows the lead of Glanville Williams.
       Glanville Williams, who taught law at Cambridge University, was
       a member of the Eugenics Society. In 1954, the Eugenics Society
       voted to support the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA),
       which set out to remove legal restrictions against abortion.
       Williams became president of the ALRA from 1962, and was
       successful within a few years; the British law was changed in
       1967."
  HTML http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm
       "The influence on the eugenicists on abortion in America is
       perhaps
       best seen by comparing Roe v. Wade and a book by Professor
       Glanville
       Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. The book is
       cited
       repeatedly in the 1973 abortion decision, but the numerous
       citations
       do not reveal the full extent of the influence. Justice Blackmun
       lifted his whole argument from Williams, including the history
       of
       abortion, ancient attitudes, the influence of Christianity,
       common
       law, Augustine's and Aquinas' teaching, canon law and English
       statutory law. And Williams was a member of the Eugenics
       Society. Roe v. Wade was based on eugenics,"
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1