URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <form
       action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"
       method="post"
       target="_top">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="cmd"
       value="_s-xclick">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="hosted_button_id"
       value="DKL7ADEKRVUBL">
       <input
       type="image"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif"
       border="0"
       name="submit"
       alt="PayPal
       - The safer, easier way to pay
       online!">
       <img
       alt=""
       border="0"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif"
       width="1"
       height="1">
       </form>
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Christian Threads
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3119--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 10, 2019, 7:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 2:12a . . What more can the king's successor do than
       what has already been done?
       Many of the kings of the Davidic dynasty did pretty much the
       same thing Solomon did. They initiated building programs and
       public works, built themselves nice homes, accumulated wealth,
       built harems, and lived in luxury. None of them ever equaled
       Solomon's grandeur, but they all did pretty much the same things
       he did. Solomon recognized that he wasn't an unusual king; just
       one more doing the things that kings typically do; and when he
       was dead and gone, the next king would do pretty much what he
       did. Because of that, as a monarch, he felt predictable and
       unremarkable. Even though practically everything the man did was
       on a grand scale, he was still a foregone conclusion.
       There can be entertainment and satisfaction in the doing of
       great projects; but what happens when the task is finished?
       Oftentimes there's a feeling of let-down; like when finishing a
       long, complicated, quest-type video game and/or when New York
       City's sand hogs completed Water Tunnel #3 after thirty-eight
       years of boring, drilling, and blasting. There's a sudden
       feeling of emptiness; a feeling of being adrift, and of
       discombobulation.
       Solomon found delight "in" all his efforts, but afterwards, when
       they were all done, and he leaned back to appreciate his
       accomplishments, he was disappointed because he felt so empty.
       So he would begin a new project because it is in the doing of
       the work where a satisfactory sense of achievement is truly
       found. Henry Ward Beecher once said: "Success is full of
       promise; until men get it, and then it becomes last year's nest
       from which the birds have flown."
       During my youth, growing up, I heard a lot about the so-called
       "work ethic" which Webster's defines as: a belief in work as a
       moral good. Well, there is nothing wrong in work per se, but
       what about workaholism? Is that really a moral good? Is that
       really beneficial to one's mental health?
       I have a friend who can't relax. He has to be doing something
       productive all the time; even during mealtime. Oftentimes he’ll
       prune his roses while eating a sandwich for lunch because he
       feels that sitting down to eat is wasteful. He never goes to the
       movies; nor even watches TV unless it is on while he does the
       dishes or vacuums the carpet. He has never read any books other
       than the ones everyone had to read in school. He gets TIME
       magazine in the mail, but rarely bothers to glance at any of its
       articles.
       He can't take drives in the country because he feels he could
       better use the time to mow the grass around his rental
       properties. He arrives at work a full hour early, and volunteers
       for all the overtime. Some years ago, he bought a computer; but
       it's still in the box because he was afraid he might spend too
       much time on it. That was prior to color monitors-- the very
       first version of Windows wasn't even on the market yet. Now he
       can't buy software for his computer because it is so obsolete.
       My friend is a true workaholic.
       Work, for work's sake, can't satisfy the human heart no matter
       how successful the endeavor may be. This helps to understand why
       so many achievers are basically unhappy people. A single
       achievement is not enough. Achievers cannot sit back on their
       laurels. They have to keep finding new things to achieve. When
       Alexander the Great fought his last battle, it is said that he
       sat down and wept because he had no more kingdoms to conquer.
       The poor man was despondent because he had nothing to live for.
       People like Alexander have a very narrowly defined reason to
       live. Take it away, and they're adrift.
       When workaholics retire, they often feel useless, and sometimes
       die from lack of meaningful activity. Well; Solomon came to the
       conclusion that work is okay when it's kept in perspective. But
       work alone can't provide lasting satisfaction. Looking over his
       works, Solomon felt very unfulfilled; and contentment continued
       to evade his grasp
       _
       #Post#: 3138--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 11, 2019, 6:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 2:12b-13 . . My thoughts also turned to appraising
       wisdom and madness and folly. I found that wisdom is superior to
       folly as light is superior to darkness;
       Light has always been superior to darkness. Light cannot be
       dispelled by introducing darkness into a lighted room because
       darkness is not something that can be produced. It's simply a
       default condition in the absence of light.
       Science and engineering has given us a flashlight, but has yet
       to invent a flashdark. You simply cannot shine a beam of
       darkness like you can shine a beam of light. Light is energy.
       Darkness is totally inert.
       Solomon found that wisdom is superior to folly, which Webster's
       defines as: (1) lack of good sense or normal prudence and
       foresight (2) criminally or tragically foolish actions or
       conduct i.e. evil and wickedness; especially lewd behavior.
       So in the end, after careful consideration, and personally
       testing both styles of life, he found that it is far better to
       behave prudently than to act stupid, which is the default in the
       absence of good sense. I guess that all goes without saying, but
       sometimes intellectuals are prone to overstating the obvious.
       ● Ecc 2:14a . . A wise man has his eyes in his head,
       whereas a fool walks in darkness.
       Silly people just naturally get themselves into trouble all the
       time because they don't stop and think. We could create a huge
       list of dumb things that silly people are famous for doing. For
       example: If you've noticed, many of the advertisements on
       television target silly people. Why? Because Madison Avenue
       knows that most viewers of certain kinds of programming don't
       shop intelligently. They often buy impulsively, guided by their
       emotions rather than by their better judgment. Silly people are
       typically sensual rather than sensible; for example:
       Studies show that the average voter typically selects a
       candidate based upon how they feel about the candidate; and then
       use their intellects to fabricate a defense for their choice. A
       case in point is America's past US President. Did people vote
       for Mr. Obama because of his executive ability? No, the man was
       no more qualified for US President than Hollywood actor Arnold
       Swarzenegger, the ex governor of Cawleefornyah.
       People voted for Mr. Obama on the basis of just two elements of
       his persona: his charismatic speaking and the color of his skin.
       (Ironically, voters elected a candidate who campaigned as a
       Black man; but had a Caucasian mother; i.e. in reality, Mr.
       Obama is neither black or white; he's mulatto. Mr. Obama's skin
       is actually coffee rather than black; and he's no more an
       African American than the pop singer Mariah Carey.)
       ● Ecc 2:14b . . But I also realized that the same fate
       awaits them both.
       uh-oh! Now we're getting to the heart of the matter: the brevity
       of life. Solomon is looking ahead to the reality of death; and
       death is the great equalizer after all isn't it?
       ● Ecc 2:15-16 . . So I reflected : The fate of the fool is
       also destined for me; to what advantage, then, have I been wise?
       And I came to the conclusion that too was futility, because the
       wise man, just like the fool, is not remembered forever-- for,
       as the succeeding days roll by, both are forgotten. Alas, the
       wise man passes on just like the fool!
       Who's ever heard of Hannes Alfvén? He won a Nobel prize in 1970
       for discoveries in magneto-hydrodynamics. Wow! Yeah, okay; wow.
       Or how about Georges Lemaître? He proposed that the universe is
       expanding in all directions before Edwin Hubble figured it out.
       But how often do Alfvén's or Lemaître's names come up in
       conversation around the average dinner table? Probably never; in
       most homes. They might be well known among those who share their
       interests in astronomy and magneto-hydrodynamics; but Alfvén and
       Lemaître might just as well have been two nameless, homeless
       bums sleeping under an overpass for all the fame they have among
       everyone else.
       Most educated people know who Mozart was. But where is the great
       maestro today? He's gone. He's just as dead as all the people of
       his day who had no more talent for music than an ostrich. What
       lasting good did it do him to be a genius if it couldn't give
       him immortality? Mozart composed something like 600 pieces of
       music, but the composer of it all was washed away long ago one
       month short of his 36th birthday.
       _
       #Post#: 3149--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 12, 2019, 8:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 2:17 . . And so I loathed life. For I was distressed
       by all that goes on under the sun, because everything is futile
       and pursuit of wind.
       The "loathing" Solomon felt wasn't hatred, but rather, just
       plain old cynicism born of disillusion. When you're young, life
       is exciting and promising: you're optimistic and ready to roll
       into the future full speed ahead. But as the years go by, life
       loses its luster and becomes a drag, and as we get ever older
       and more debilitated, life becomes something to just get through
       and get over with.
       Just about the time you really get set in life, and have a few
       things figured out, and start to enjoy it, the aging process
       moves in to spoil your fun. One of my biggest gripes about life
       is that youth is wasted on the young. It's us oldsters who need
       youth, not the young because youngsters fritter away their youth
       on air-headed nonsense.
       One morning on television, Kelly Rippa, of Live With Regis &
       Kelly, said her little boy was in a hurry to be older. He was
       only 5 then and wanted to skip the next two years and go
       straight to 7. See? That's what I'm saying. Kelly's boy was too
       young to appreciate how valuable youth is. He wanted to shed
       youth because in his immature mind, older is better.
       It's not until our youth is gone that we can fully appreciate
       it's worth; but by then it's too late. In all of our young, self
       absorbed stupidity, we carelessly squander away the treasure of
       youth on meaningless pursuits and sometimes foolishly tempt fate
       in extreme sports because when we're young, it's all too easy to
       perceive ourselves suspended in some sort of time-stasis where
       we'll be forever 21. To our immature minds; older people appear
       to be born that way and we fail to comprehend that every time we
       encounter someone older, we are looking at our own futures.
       "Time is the fire in which we burn."
       Dr. Soran, Star Trek: Generations
       ● Ecc 2:18-21 . . So, too, I loathed all the wealth that I
       was gaining under the sun. For I shall leave it to the man who
       will succeed me-- and who knows whether he will be wise or
       foolish?-- and he will control all the wealth that I gained by
       toil and wisdom under the sun. That too is futile. And so I came
       to view with despair all the gains I had made under the sun. For
       sometimes a person whose fortune was made with wisdom,
       knowledge, and skill must hand it on to be the portion of
       somebody who did not toil for it. That too is futile, and a
       grave evil.
       It's bad enough that the wealthy have to leave their fortunes
       behind, but even worse when foolish relatives end up with it and
       fail to appreciate the toil and conscientious effort put into
       accumulating that wealth and the vigilance required to keep it.
       The dumb ones start living it up, not taking into consideration
       that money spent is money gone forever. What will be left for
       the next generation if the first wastes the primary inheritance
       and fails to invest for the future?
       Some people try to write their wills and trusts in such a way
       that their estates can't be wasted; but don't always succeed. In
       spite of the instruction and good example they may give, fathers
       and mothers have no way of knowing what their posterity will do
       with the wealth and property they worked so hard to accumulate
       during their lives.
       ● Ecc 2:22-23 . . For what does a man get for all the
       toiling and worrying he does under the sun? All his days his
       thoughts are grief and heartache, and even at night his mind has
       no respite. That too is futile!
       One of the disadvantages of striving to gain wealth is the sleep
       that's sometimes lost over it. Solomon observed that a rich
       man's abundance won't permit him to sleep (Ecc 5:12) for
       example: Michael Jackson and Elvis Presley, the most popular
       youth-oriented male singers ever to record music, shared a
       common malady: both had trouble sleeping. In contrast, I'm an
       obscure retired welder whose wife complains falls asleep too
       easily. Well, the difference is, I have peace of mind; whereas
       those two guys didn't.
       "People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and
       into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin
       and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of
       evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith
       and pierced themselves with many griefs." (1Tim 6:9-10)
       Managing an empire is no picnic. There's long hours, employee
       disputes, tax problems, investment risks, OSHA, EPA, legal
       hassles, Federal interference, lawsuits, deadlines, time
       pressure, accounting errors, loan calls, and all that sort of
       thing; not to mention debt. Haw! debt is the the Grim Reaper for
       quite a number of mega businesses like the auto industry. Debt
       is what ultimately toppled the energy giant ENRON; wiping out
       1.2 billion dollars in retirement funds, and 2 billion dollars
       in pension funds.
       You know what else befalls empire-builders? Broken homes. Ray
       Kroc, the McDonald's mogul, was on his third marriage when he
       passed away. Jesus once said that you can't serve God and
       mammon. Well; you can't serve money and family either.
       Wealth-seekers generally serve the money and leave their
       families to more or less sink or swim.
       _
       #Post#: 3167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 13, 2019, 8:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 2:24-26a . .There is nothing worthwhile for a man
       but to eat and drink and afford himself enjoyment with his
       means. And even that, I noted, comes from God. For who eats and
       who enjoys but myself? To the man, namely, who pleases [God] He
       has given the wisdom and shrewdness to enjoy himself;
       A person's financial means can enhance their peace of mind and
       feelings of security. But to hoard wealth, to stock-pile it,
       being miserly and stingy, never doing something worthwhile with
       your means, never doing even yourself any good with it; is not
       wise. Some years ago, I heard about an elderly couple who died.
       When the house in which they had lived for many years was torn
       down, an amount of cash was found in the walls totaling about
       $40,000. The coroner's determination of cause of death?
       Malnutrition.
       Money is a medium of exchange. Unless it's spent, it can do
       little or nothing for you. You can't eat money, but it will buy
       your food. It can't keep you warm, but it will buy your clothing
       and heating oil. Money is not a conveyance-- it can't be ridden
       like a magic carpet to transport you from point A on over to
       point B; but it will buy you a car, a bicycle, or a bus ticket.
       It can't chew your food, but it will pay a dentist to fix your
       teeth. Its possession doesn't make you a rock star, but it will
       buy you a ticket to an AeroSmith concert. Money has no scenic
       glaciers, but it will buy you a birth onboard a Princess Line
       cruise ship to Alaska.
       "Command those who are rich in this present world not to be
       arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain,
       but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with
       everything for our enjoyment." (1Tim 6:17)
       That verse reveals that all the opportunities this world has to
       offer are provided by God for Man's enjoyment. Therefore, it is
       absolutely not a sin to enjoy life. Some people feel guilty
       about success. But that is an unhealthy attitude. Others take
       vows of poverty in order to enhance their piety. But it isn't
       necessary to be poor in order to please God. Abraham, and Isaac,
       and Jacob, were all very wealthy men whose circumstances-- which
       enabled them to live high on the hog --were made possible by
       God's providence. Wealth isn't intrinsically sinful. It's how
       people use their wealth that matters.
       ● Ecc 2:26b . . and to him who displeases, He has given
       the urge to gather and amass-- only for handing on to one who is
       pleasing to God. That too is futile and pursuit of wind.
       When him who displeases donates to charities, his contributions
       don't earn him any points with God whatsoever because one of
       Solomon's proverbs says, in so many words, that a bad person's
       gifts are detestable. (Pro 15:8)
       I seriously doubt that it is God who personally urges a bad
       person to donate to charity. I just think it's the bad person's
       own conscience working on them. Well; seeing as how God created
       the human conscience, then I guess you could say "He has given
       the urge". Maybe that's how Solomon saw it; I don't really know;
       but it seems logical.
       NOTE: The mention of a supreme being throughout Ecclesiastes
       reveals that the author, though quite philosophical, wasn't an
       atheist. He was what might be called a theist; roughly defined
       as someone believing in the existence of one god viewed as the
       creative source of the human race and the world, who transcends
       yet is immanent in the world.
       The author's god is never once named, instead, referred to as
       'elohiym (el-o-heem') which isn't a personal moniker like Yahweh
       or Brahma, rather, a nondescript label that pertains to all
       sorts of deities; both the true and the false, and the real and
       the imagined, plus the gods of myth, superstition, and
       tradition.
       The three sacred names for the Bible's God-- [I]Shadday[/I],
       [I]'Adonay[/I], and [I]Yhvh[/I] --are nowhere in Ecclesiastes.
       The reason for that is quite simple. Solomon-- if indeed he's
       the author --refers to a supreme being in Ecclesiastes in a
       general sense; sort of like the common expressions: "Thank God
       nobody got hurt" and/or "God forbid!" There's nothing
       particularly religious in those kinds of expressions.
       _
       #Post#: 3181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 14, 2019, 7:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 3:1 . . A season is set for everything, a time for
       every experience under heaven.
       This next section smacks of fatalism and predestination, but
       actually it only speaks of events that are quite normal and
       commonplace under the sun.
       ● Ecc 3:2a . . A time for being born and a time for dying,
       Those two events are open ended and their precise moments aren't
       chipped in  stone. Every person experiences a birth, and each
       will experience a death too. Birth and death are like
       appointments. As soon as a women senses that she has conceived,
       she knows it's only a matter of time before she gives birth to a
       child so she has to begin planning for its arrival. Same with
       death. We all know we're going to die some day; it's just a
       matter of time.
       But the problem with death is its stealth. We're young only till
       somewhere in our mid thirties and then to our horror begin to
       gradually wither. One of the biggest surprises of Billy Graham's
       life was age. He always believed he would die some day, but
       Billy wasn't prepared to get old first. His is not an unusual
       case. Most of us readily anticipate death; but seldom anticipate
       losing form and function.
       ● Ecc 3:2b . . a time for planting and a time for
       uprooting the planted;
       Farmers are constantly cultivating, planting, harvesting-- and
       then tilling what's left after the harvest to prepare for the
       next crop.
       ● Ecc 3:3a . . a time for slaying and a time for healing,
       A rabid dog has to be put down. But when your pet is hit by a
       car, you take it to the vet.
       ● Ecc 3:3b . . a time for tearing down and a time for
       building up;
       My dad worked many hours with his bare hands building us a home
       when I was a kid. He sold it when I was 11 years old.
       Twenty-three years later, all of dad's hard work was torn down
       and hauled off to make way for an RV storage lot; and the
       property denuded of trees and scraped bare by bulldozers. It's
       like we were never even there.
       ● Ecc 3:4a . . a time for weeping and a time for laughing,
       Sometimes people laugh and weep all at the same time; like at a
       wedding.
       ● Ecc 3:4b . . a time for wailing and a time for dancing;
       In a war, the victors celebrate and the vanquished mourn-- like
       in professional sports. The cameras always show the winners
       elated, jumping up and down, clapping themselves on the back,
       emoting for the press, and pouring ice water on the coach; but
       over on the other side, the losers are all glum and silent and
       dragging themselves back to the locker room.
       ● Ecc 3:5a . . a time for throwing stones and a time for
       gathering stones,
       It would be nice if the Palestinians would follow that and pick
       up after themselves when they're done pelting Israeli soldiers.
       ● Ecc 3:5b . . a time for embracing and a time for
       shunning embraces;
       Sometimes lovers and friends need to make up and settle their
       differences before they hug.
       ● Ecc 3:6a . . a time for seeking and a time for losing,
       In other words: A time to search and a time to give it up for
       lost.
       ● Ecc 3:6b . . a time for keeping and a time for
       discarding;
       Today's hot couture is tomorrow's Good Will donation.
       ● Ecc 3:7a . . a time for ripping and a time for sewing,
       When doctors need access to an injured patient's body, they
       often cut clothing off with scissors rather than fussing with
       buttons and zippers. The very same clothing can be repaired
       later by needle and thread.
       ● Ecc 3:7b . . a time for silence and a time for speaking;
       They say silence in golden, but sometimes it's yellow; know what
       I mean?
       ● Ecc 3:8a . . a time for loving and a time for hating;
       A time for love might be when your friends come over for
       dinner-- through the front door. However, if they sneak in the
       back way while you're out, and steal your  50" plasma TV so they
       can sell it for meth; that might be reason enough to dump your
       friends for new ones.
       ● Ecc 3:8b . . a time for war and a time for peace.
       Peace is much to be preferred to war. But sometimes war is
       necessary to procure and to preserve peace. We live in a big bad
       world where there are people more than happy to oppress you,
       abuse your human rights, control your movements, restrict your
       speech, clamp down on dissent, take away your wealth and
       possessions, destroy your home, separate you from your family,
       and put you to work in a gulag where you'll be underpaid,
       malnourished, constantly hungry, politically indoctrinated, and
       poorly clothed for the rest of your life.
       _
       #Post#: 3198--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 15, 2019, 9:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 3:9 . .What value, then, can the man of affairs get
       from what he earns?
       In other words: What does the worker gain from his toil? Well .
       . one thing he does not gain is control over the "times" listed
       in the previous eight verses because many circumstances in life
       are unpredictable and out of our hands no matter how much money
       a person might be prepared to spend.
       ● Ecc 3:10 . . I have observed the business that God gave
       man to be concerned with:
       The "business" of course just being the daily round of life
       beneath the sun.
       ● Ecc 3:11 . . He brings everything to pass precisely at
       its time; He also puts eternity in their mind, but without man
       ever guessing, from first to last, all the things that God
       brings to pass.
       Man is fraught with anxieties; and some of those anxieties are
       aggravated by uncertainty about the future. Within no sphere is
       that more evident among Americans than in their thoughts about
       retirement. Oftentimes people are so concerned about their
       futures that they fail to enjoy the present; so life slips past
       them until one day they realize they should have lived life when
       they had the chance instead of waiting till they retired.
       ● Ecc 3:12-13 . .Thus I realized that the only worthwhile
       thing there is for them is to enjoy themselves and do what is
       good in their lifetime; also, that whenever a man does eat and
       drink and get enjoyment out of all his wealth, it is a gift of
       God.
       There's nothing intrinsically wrong with preparing for the
       future, but surely not to the expense of missing out on life in
       the present. It's far better to enjoy life as you live it, and
       thank whatever god it is that you recognize for the pleasures
       you have at hand right now, not for the ones that may or may not
       come your way later. I've actually known men in my line of work
       who stayed on the job as long as age allowed just to get that
       very last penny of retirement benefit only to die within two
       years after leaving.
       ● Ecc 3:14a . . I realized, too, that whatever God has
       brought to pass will recur evermore: nothing can be added to it
       and nothing taken from it--
       That frustrates and irritates some people because they would
       like to make some changes in the universe and change the world
       to suit their feelings. But the gods aren't budging. They're the
       ones in control. Man is not the one controlling the scheme of
       things. Man is a prisoner of the gods' sovereign control and
       there is not one single thing he can do about it.
       ● Ecc 3:14b . . and God has brought to pass that men
       revere Him.
       Unfortunately Man hates God for being the one in control. They
       neither fear Him, nor respect Him, nor yield to His sovereign
       authority. On the contrary, they very much resent God, and want
       Him deposed.
       ● Ecc 3:15 . .Whatever exists today and whatever will
       exist in the future has already existed in the past. For God
       calls each event back in its turn.
       What's that saying? History repeats itself? Who would have
       thought that people 3,000 years ago shared today's evaluation of
       world events? Modern man isn't really so modern after all; is
       he?
       _
       #Post#: 3214--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 16, 2019, 7:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 3:16 . . And, indeed, I have observed under the sun:
       Alongside justice there is wickedness, alongside righteousness
       there is wickedness.
       Back in the early days of movie-making, good and evil were well
       defined. The bad guys were totally bad and the good guys were
       totally good. Today, the difference between the good guys and
       the bad guys is blurred. The people we consider to be on the
       side of right, are often very immoral. They're dishonest, they
       sleep around, they steal, they break into people's homes, they
       don't respect private property, they bicker and quarrel, and
       they are exceedingly insubordinate with their superiors. The
       difference between the good and the bad is no longer black and
       white; but relative. The bad guys are badder than the good ones,
       but the good guys themselves are bad too.
       The current on-going pedophilia scandal in the Catholic
       community is a glaring example of wickedness in the same place
       as righteousness. With alarming regularity we see more and more
       criminal cops in the news-- cops who should be upholding the
       law, not breaking it-- and should be protecting people, not
       intimidating them, breaking their arms, electrocuting them with
       stun guns, and shooting them full of bullet holes. To every bad
       cop I would like to say: Wearing that badge doesn't make you
       right; it just makes you a bully with a gun and a canister of
       pepper spray.
       Imagine the chagrin of a San Diego municipal judge back in the
       1980's when one day, to his utter shock and dismay, a hooker he
       frequented appeared in court as a witness to testify in a case
       he was hearing. Upon taking the stand, the hooker greeted the
       guardian of jurisprudence and expressed amazement that one of
       her Johns was on the bench.
       ● Ecc 3:17-18 . . I mused: God will doom both righteous
       and wicked, for there is a time for every experience and for
       every happening.” So I decided, as regards men, to dissociate
       them [from] the divine beings and to face the fact that they are
       beasts.
       When you get right down to it: when you strip away people's
       accouterments; what's left is really little more than human
       wildlife. In point of fact, to call a human being a beast is an
       insult to the animal kingdom because people are capable of doing
       things that are lower than an animal. I've yet to hear of an
       animal getting drunk and beating his wife; nor have I yet to
       hear of an animal betting the family's entire week's food budget
       on one pony at Belmont; nor have I yet to hear of an animal
       rolling a car into a lake with their kids inside in order to
       keep a boyfriend.
       ● Ecc 3:19-20 . . For in respect of the fate of man and
       the fate of beast, they have one and the same fate: as the one
       dies so dies the other, and both have the same life-breath; man
       has no superiority over beast, since both amount to nothing.
       Both go to the same place; both came from dust and both return
       to dust.
       Some people are inclined to think it is arrogant of Man to
       suppose he's the only form of intelligent life in the universe.
       But what is Man anyway but an unsanitary primate with a 3-pound
       lump of flabby organic tissue sufficing for a mind? We should
       want more of his ilk in the universe? I don't think so. Man is
       hardly more intelligent than an orangutan; and ten times more
       immoral. And besides; he's made of clay. And you know what
       happens when clay is all wet? It gets stuck on itself. But death
       is the great equalizer.
       Beasts die and people die too; so people really have no
       advantage over a cow in that respect. True: a cow won't die
       rich, but then the rich take nothing out with them when they
       die; same as the cow: so who's really better off in the ground?
       the bovine or the rich man? Neither: they're equals in that
       respect.
       ● Ecc 3:21 . .Who knows if a man's life-breath does rise
       upward and if a beast's breath does sink down into the earth?
       Solomon has a point. Who today has a red-phone line connected to
       the afterlife? Nobody. People pride themselves on their faith in
       holy books like the Bible and the Koran; but really don't know
       for certain whether or not all of the writings in either book
       are actually true; do they?
       Solomon never met anyone who came back from the dead with a tale
       to tell about the afterlife. How about you? Who have you known
       personally who died, was buried, and then later came back?
       As brilliant and as intellectual as Solomon was, he was just as
       much in the dark about life after death as everybody else. Can
       you prove beyond a shadow of all reasonable doubt that there
       exists another life for human beings after death? No, you can't;
       and you won't know for sure until the day comes when you
       actually make the trip yourself.
       ● Ecc 3:22 . . I saw that there is nothing better for man
       than to enjoy his possessions, since that is his portion. For
       who can enable him to see what will happen afterward?
       Is that really such bad advice seeing as no one really knows for
       sure what happens after we die? What if all those super pious
       ascetics practicing a life of strict self denial discover later
       after death that it was all for nothing? Wouldn't that be
       tragic? It is stupid to suffer self denial when no one really
       knows for rock-solid sure whether or not it counts for anything.
       NOTE: Seeing as how Ecclesiastes is one man's world view, rather
       than a specific religious dogma, then it's no surprise when we
       encounter things in here from the point of view of common sense
       quite often.
       _
       #Post#: 3234--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 17, 2019, 8:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 4:1-3 . . I further observed all the oppression that
       goes on under the sun: the tears of the oppressed, with none to
       comfort them; and the power of their oppressors-- with none to
       comfort them. Then I accounted those who died long since more
       fortunate than those who are still living; and happier than
       either are those who have not yet come into being and have never
       witnessed the miseries that go on under the sun.
       I'd be curious to know just exactly when, where, and how Mr.
       Born-with-a-silver-spoon-in-his mouth king Solomon was exposed
       to the "tears" of the oppressed. Maybe he was talking about all
       the hapless Jewish men he conscripted to work like slaves in his
       stone quarries and logging camps.
       Some people really are better off dead, and also better had they
       not been born. I mean, for some people, what's the point of
       living at all.
       It's difficult for the average American to appreciate the misery
       of people in other countries living in poverty, want, squalor,
       tyranny, despotism, and oppression. When I was a little boy
       living in San Diego back in the early 1950's I went on a trip
       with my parents to Tijuana. As we walked across a bridge over
       the Tijuana River, I looked down below at a pitiful community
       just like the community filmed in the movie Slum Dog
       Millionaire. The jam-packed homes (rudimentary shelters
       actually) were constructed of cardboard, sheets of plywood,
       corrugated tin, and sign boards. The children were all barefoot
       and there were no streets and sidewalks; just riverbed soil. I
       have no clue what they did for sanitation. It's my guess all
       their offal went into what there was of the Tijuana River as raw
       sewage.
       Those people down in that riverbed weren't living; they were
       existing, and that with no more dignity than a hog in a wallow.
       (In later years, the community was washed away by unusually high
       water and subsequently the site permanently closed to squatters
       by the government.)
       Hafez al Assad, deceased father of the current dictator of
       Syria, Bashar al Assad, was ruthless towards his political
       opponents. In the early 1980's, he dispatched his air force to
       bomb the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood's densely populated
       neighborhoods in the area of Hama. (I'm talking about Syrian
       citizens in a Syrian city; not foreigners in a foreign country).
       Afterwards, Hafez had his army bulldoze the smoking remains.
       Between 10,000 and 40,000 people were killed, and thousands more
       were jailed, tortured, and left to languish in prison. Protests
       from human rights organizations bounced off Hafez like a BB off
       of depleted uranium plating.
       Ryan Crocker, a US ambassador who served in Damascus during the
       transition from Hafez to Bashar, said of the son: "Any
       suggestion that Bashar is a push-over is an illusion. He's so
       personable that it's easy to underestimate him. But rest
       assured, he is his father's son." Mr. Ryan is so right. It isn't
       unusual this very day to be dining out in Damascus while at the
       same time having to listen to dreadful screams coming from a
       second-floor window of the Bab Touma police station. In the
       street, people cast each other knowing glances but nobody says a
       word because someone might be listening.
       There's little to no justice in China. Fully 99 percent of all
       trials result in a guilty verdict. If you're executed with a
       gun, the state sends your family a bill for the bullet.
       In North Korea, three generations of a family can be punished
       for one member's alleged crime. As of 2008, an estimated 200,000
       North Korean citizens were detained in labor camps: and don't
       get me started on Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe.
       ● Ecc 4:4 . . I have also noted that all labor and
       skillful enterprise come from men's envy of each other-- another
       futility and pursuit of wind!
       Most of us are pretty satisfied with what we have until we see
       someone with something better. Just because the Devil wears
       Prada, is it really essential that everyone else does? Gordon
       Gekko, of Wall Street/Money Never Sleeps, said : "While I was
       away, it seemed greed got greedier; with a little bit of envy
       mixed in. Hedge funders were walking home with 50, 100 million
       bucks a year". They say money is the root of all evil. Well, I
       would have to say that envy is money's kissing cousin. Bring
       those two together and the markets can become very volatile and
       just as vulnerable.
       ● Ecc 4:5 . .The fool folds his hands together and has to
       eat his own flesh.
       Just the opposite of those who strive to get ahead, is the lazy
       good-for-nothing, who can't be motivated to go out and find work
       or start a business. The others have it all, while he has
       nothing at all. At least the greedy and the envious have food on
       the table and a place to live. The fool is homeless and probably
       lives out of dumpsters, or worse, panhandles and mooches off
       friends. (One of my all-time favorite panhandler's makeshift
       cardboard signs said: Dreaming of a cheeseburger.)
       ● Ecc 4:6 . . Better one handful with tranquility than two
       handfuls with toil and chasing after the wind.
       In between the go-getters, and the homeless bums, are the
       moderate people. They don't have to have the best that life has
       to offer, nor the most money, and they don't want it. Their
       motto is: Better isn't necessary when adequate will do. These
       are happy with what they have and make do with what they can
       afford.
       Moderate people aren't lazy, but then again, neither are they
       achievers nor overly industrious. They don't need a lot, they're
       easy to please, and are usually very content; e.g. when they
       shop for diamond jewelry, the stones don't have to be flawless;
       just sparkly and pretty. They might splurge on a consumer-priced
       Bulova or a Seiko, but won't shell out the extra dough for a
       Breitling or an IWC even though they're the better timepieces.
       They prefer cars that are economical rather than cars that are
       cool, fast, and fitted out with the latest electronics. They eat
       at ordinary buffets and restaurants rather than fancy, black-tie
       supper clubs; and their back yards are likely to have just as
       many weeds as ornamental shrubs. While others chase status,
       moderates prefer to chase sales and clip coupons.
       But the sad part is; those greedy, leveraged-to-the-hilt
       hedge-funders are the very ones ravaging the moderates'
       retirement plans. And if the fund goes belly-up-- as many did in
       the last sub-prime blood bath --what do they care? It wasn't
       their money that was lost; it was yours while they escaped with
       a bail-out and/or a golden parachute. And the bail-outs? Who
       pays for those? Duh . . . the moderates; via federal taxes, of
       course.
       _
       #Post#: 3254--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 18, 2019, 7:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 4:7-8 . . And I have noted this further futility
       under the sun: the case of the man who is alone, with no
       companion, who has neither son nor brother; yet he amasses
       wealth without limit, and his eye is never sated with riches.
       For whom, now, is he amassing it while denying himself
       enjoyment? That too is a futility and an unhappy business.
       That surely describes people like Ebenezer Scrooge-- Charles
       Dickens' friendless loner in A Christmas Carol --the prince of
       misers. The man has great wealth, and sees the amassing of
       wealth as the only justifiable reason to be alive. He despises
       family life, shuns circles of close friends, and regards
       charitable causes as theft. The man won't even spend his money
       on decent food to nourish himself; let alone wood or coal to
       heat his dismal home. His fortune does neither him nor anyone
       else any real good at all except provide him with questionable
       old-age security.
       ● Ecc 4:9-10 . .Two are better off than one, in that they
       have greater benefit from their earnings. For should they fall,
       one can raise the other; but woe betide him who is alone and
       falls with no companion to raise him!
       Webster's defines "synergism" as: interaction of discrete
       agencies, agents, or conditions such that the total effect is
       greater than the sum of the individual effects.
       John Nash put that principle into his Nobel Prize-winning
       economic theory. He felt that it is possible to not only do
       yourself the better good, but at the same time to do it in such
       a way that your efforts mesh with the efforts of others so that
       all benefit.
       Marriage is a synergic arrangement. Partners are more secure,
       and usually accomplish much more together than an individual on
       their own; and they look out for each other too. When a wife
       gets a muscle spasm in her back, and can't walk, then the
       husband can put her on a blanket and drag her down the hallway
       to the bathroom. When the husband's car blows a heater hose on
       the way home from work, the wife can use her own car to come and
       get him at the repair shop and bring him home for dinner. Plus,
       if both work, their combined income makes it possible to carry a
       mortgage instead of throwing money away on rent.
       ● Ecc 4:11 . . Further, when two lie together they are
       warm; but how can he who is alone get warm?
       To be warm, as in Ecc 4:11, implies more than merely warding off
       a chill. It means to be comforted. There is very little solace
       to be found in solitude. Loner type of people often end up
       plagued with feelings of isolation, depression, and dark
       thoughts.
       ● Ecc 4:12 . . Also, if one attacks, two can stand up to
       him. A threefold cord is not readily broken!
       All he's saying there is that a single strand of hemp by itself
       is weak; but when woven together in multiple strands, becomes
       very strong; viz: the combined strands become force multipliers.
       In the darkening days in which we live in America, jogging,
       hiking, and bicycling alone can be very dangerous in a City,
       State, or National park; especially after sundown. It's far more
       sensible to mingle with others; even if they're strangers.
       People alone are easy marks for muggers and wilding attacks.
       Nobody's invincible. Even tough guys like Chuck Norris and Jason
       Stathan can be taken down. As Arnold Schwarzeneggar said in the
       Hollywood movie Predator, "If it bleeds, we can kill it".
       _
       #Post#: 3286--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Solomon's World View
   DIR By: Olde Tymer
       Date: January 19, 2019, 4:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       ● Ecc 4:13-16 . . Better a poor but wise youth than an old
       but foolish king who no longer has the sense to heed warnings.
       The youth may have come from prison to the kingship, or he may
       have been born in poverty within his kingdom. I saw that all who
       lived and walked under the sun followed the youth, the king's
       successor. There was no end to all the people who were before
       them. But those who came later were not pleased with the
       successor. This too is meaningless, a chasing after the wind.
       That passage observes the instability of political power, and
       the fickleness of popularity. The incumbent ruler may have at
       one time heeded his advisors' input and lead his country wisely.
       But when he got old, he stopped listening to them. As a result,
       a younger generation despised him for being egotistic, out of
       touch, and insensitive to his countrymen's feelings. His
       arrogance and egotism made him a prisoner of his own foolish
       mind and eventually, he was either deposed, or voted out of
       office.
       A younger man, unknown till now, an underdog, whose platform
       preached political reforms, a hope you can believe in,
       environmental improvement, and economic recovery; made
       impressive speeches and won the people's hearts. He took over,
       led his country out of economic depression and to great
       victories over their enemies. His country enjoyed worldwide
       prestige and great prosperity.
       But the younger leader's popularity didn't endure. He himself
       aged and stopped listening to the voice of the people and his
       advisors' input, and he too then became unpopular with a younger
       generation; who then began clamoring for his overthrow just like
       his own generation had done to his predecessor. It's an endless
       cycle. Politicians are loved when they are voted in, and hated
       when they are voted out.
       Oliver Cromwell, who took the British throne away from Charles
       l, and established the commonwealth, said to a friend: "Do not
       trust to the cheering, for those same persons would cheer just
       as much if you and I were going to be hanged."
       _
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 8
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page