DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
<
form action=&amp
;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; method=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;p
ost&
quot; target=&am
p;amp;amp;quot;_top&
amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;cmd&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; value=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot
;_s-xclick&a
mp;amp;quot;&amp
;amp;amp;gt; &am
p;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hosted_button_id&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; val
ue=&
quot;DKL7ADEKRVUBL&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;image&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.payp
alobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; border=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; nam
e=&q
uot;submit&a
mp;amp;quot; alt=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;quot;PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
&quo
t;&g
t; &
lt;img alt=&
amp;amp;quot;&am
p;amp;amp;quot; border=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypalobjects.com
/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; width=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; height=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/form&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Firestarter On Fire
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2337--------------------------------------------------
The AIDS hoax
By: Firestarter Date: November 19, 2018, 11:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Strange but true, there is absolutely no evidence that the
magical HIV virus causes AIDS. But according to the state media,
this is an established “fact” nonetheless and if you don’t
believe this nonsense you must be labelled a nutcase “conspiracy
theorist”.
There is however evidence that the first “medicine” to treat
AIDS, AZT, causes immune deficiency and death.
There are also many other causes of immune deficiency...
[B]AIDS-discoverer Montagnier – HIV not THE cause of AIDS[/B]
Dr. Robert Gallo and Professor Luc Montagnier are the scientists
credited with discovering AIDS. Luc Montagnier won the 2008
Nobel Prize for discovering HIV. Gallo couldn’t get the Nobel
Prize because he had been caught in a few cases of scientific
fraud too many...
In 2009, Montagnier made some statements in the "House of
Numbers" documentary in an interview with Brent Leung - shocking
because they come from one of the 2 men most credited with
inventing that HIV causes AIDS.
Montagnier explains that it isn’t only HIV that causes AIDS as
people with a good immune system can deal with HIV, and names
some “co-factors” that (also cause AIDS), like:
Oxidative stress;
Contaminated water;
Bad nutrition.
If I understand correctly Montagnier claims that HIV is one of
many factors that can cause AIDS; so he only tells part of the
truth.
Montagnier doesn’t believe that any vaccine can prevent AIDS.
Here is an extract from the interview (6:52).
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqnWEGyjUoE
See some quotes from the interview: [quote]Leung: You talked
about oxidative stress earlier. Is treating oxidative stress one
of the best ways to deal with the African AIDS epidemic?
Montagnier: I think this is one way to approach, to decrease the
rate of transmission, because I believe HIV we can be exposed to
HIV many times without bring chronically infected, our immune
system will get rid of the virus within a few weeks, if you have
a good immune system; and this is the problem also of the
African people.
Their nutrition is not very equilibrated, they are in oxidative
stress, even if they are not infected with HIV; so their immune
system doesn't work well already. So it's prone, it can, you
know, allow HIV to get in and persist. So there are many ways
which are not the vaccine, the magic name, the vaccine, many
ways to decrease the transmission just by simple measures of
nutrition, giving antioxidants - proper antioxidants - hygiene
measures, fighting the other infections.
So they are not spectacular, but they could, you know, decrease
very well the epidemic, to the level they are in occidental
countries, western countries.
[B]Leung: So if you have a good immune system, then your body
can naturally get rid of HIV?
Montagnier: Yes.[/B]
Leung: Oh, interesting. Do you think we should have more of a
push for antioxidants, and things of that nature, in Africa than
antiretrovirals (AIDS drugs)?
Montagnier: [B]We should push for more, you know, a combination
of measures; antioxidants, nutrition advice, nutritions,
fighting other infections - malaria, tuberculosis, parasitosis,
worms - education of course, genital hygiene for women and men
also, very simple measures which [are] not very expensive, but
which could do a lot.[/B]
And this is my, actually my worry about the many spectacular
action for the global funds to buy drugs and so on, and Bill
Gates and so on, for the vaccine.
But you know those kind of measures are not very well funded,
they're not funded at all, or they are, you know, it really
depends on the local government to take choice of this, but
local governments they take advice of the scientific advisors
from the intelligent institutions, and they don't get this kind
of advice very often.
Leung: Well there's no money in nutrition, right? There's no
profit.
Montagnier: There's no profit, yes. Water is important. Water is
key.[/quote]
Here’s the full interview that shows that these statements
weren’t taken out of context (1:02:04):
HTML http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyPq-waF-h4
[B]HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, other death causes, AZT kills[/B]
There are not only thousands of cases of HIV-positives that
never develop AIDS, but even of AIDS without HIV:
HTML http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/kmreason.htm
According to 2 European studies from 2011 the most common causes
of deaths in HIV-positive victims are not AIDS but cancer and
liver failure:
HTML https://www.poz.com/article/hiv-deaths-mortality-20011-5126
In the following study 167 deaths occurred among 9,583
HIV-positive subjects; only 54 of these deaths were related to
AIDS (32%). Neuhaus et al, Risk of All-cause Mortality
Associated with Non-fatal AIDS and .. Infected with HIV (2011):
HTML http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2897168/pdf/nihms203665.pdf
From the Concorde trial evidence it’s clear that HIV-positive
victims die (sooner) because of AZT; Seligmann et al “Concorde:
MRC/ANRS...” (1994):
HTML http://davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/papers/123-Concorde.pdf
Much more children born to women poisoned with AZT in pregnancy
get severely sick and die than of untreated (HIV-positive)
future mothers. Rapid disease progression ... (1999):
HTML http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=1999&issue=05280&article=00008&type=abstract
In 1993 came a giant step for mankind in the treatment to AIDS
with the results from the Margaret Fischl study comparing AZT
and ddC (without placebo); the results were that 42% on AZT, 43%
on ddC and 39% on AZT/ddC had progressed to serious illness or
death. They claimed these dramatic results as evidence that AZT
combined with ddC was superior (than AZT as monotherapy). From
1995 on the cocktail ARV was given to AIDS victims, so
unsurprisingly the death rate dropped (ddC is less toxic than
AZT).
It must be clear (even if you believe AIDS is caused by HIV)
that the stories about AIDS (that I heard in the 1980s and
1990s) were meant to create hysteria. Neville Hodgkinson put
together a lot information - AIDS: Scientific or Viral
Catastrophe? (2003):
HTML http://www.immunity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/JScE-article.pdf
E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al. conclude that HIV is not the
cause of AIDS, but people die because of AZT and the HIV-tests
are not reliable Is a Positive Western Blot Proof of HIV
infection (1993):
HTML http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/epwbtest.htm
[B]Peter Duesberg[/B]
The main scientist that for many years has understood that AIDS
is caused by toxic chemicals like AZT is Peter Duesberg, see for
example the following article (he has published several books
about the AIDS hoax).
The “AZT” medicine for AIDS was already discovered in the 1960s
by Jerome Horwitz but rejected as a chemotherapy for cancer
because it´s just too toxic:
HTML http://www.duesberg.com/subject/africa2.html
Following is a good article by Peter Duesberg, Koehnlein and
Rasnick from 2003.
Below are some excerpts from the paper, which show that:
1) AIDS isn’t caused by a contagious virus;
2) In Africa there is a correlation between malnutrition and
AIDS;
3) There is a correlation between “recreational” drugs use and
AIDS.
I’m not convinced (like Duesberg) that “recreational” drugs
cause AIDS though...
[quote]However, the plethora of AIDS diseases was not, and still
is not randomly distributed even among the different risk groups
(table 2). For example, Kaposi’s sarcoma was exclusively
diagnosed in male homosexual risk groups using nitrite inhalants
and other psychoactive drugs as aphrodisiacs (Newell et al 1984;
Haverkos et al 1985; Selik et al 1987; Duesberg 1988; Haverkos
and Dougherty 1988; Beral et al 1990). Bacterial pneumonia was
primarily diagnosed in children from mothers using psychoactive
drugs during pregnancy (Novick and Rubinstein 1987; Duesberg
1988, 1992; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997).
Tuberculosis and pneumonia were, and still are more prevalent in
intravenous drug users and “crack” (cocaine) smokers than in
other risk groups (Lerner 1989; Duesberg 1992; Duesberg and
Rasnick 1998).
(…)
In sharp contrast to its US/European namesakes, the African AIDS
epidemic is randomly distributed between the sexes and not
restricted to behavioural risk groups (Blattner et al 1988;
Duesberg 1988; World Health Organization 2001a). Hence
sub-Saharan African AIDS is compatible with a random, either
microbial or chemical cause.
(…)
But, only 1 in 1000 unprotected sexual contacts transmits HIV
(32–34) , and only 1 of 275 US citizens is HIV-infected (29,
30), (figure 1b). Therefore, an average un-infected US citizen
needs 275,000 random “sexual contacts” to get infected and
spread HIV – an unlikely basis for an epidemic!
(…)
But, in the peer-reviewed literature there is not one doctor or
nurse who has ever contracted AIDS (not just HIV) from the over
816,000 AIDS patients recorded in the US in 22 years (30). Not
one of over ten thousand HIV researchers has contracted AIDS.
Wives of hemophiliacs do not get AIDS (35). And there is no
AIDS-epidemic in prostitutes (36–38). Thus AIDS is not
contagious (39, 40).
(…)
According to the article “the state’s top AIDS and HIV
prevention officials came up with the smoking gun of all
statistics: Gay men in California who use speed are twice as
likely to be HIV-positive . . .” (Heredia 2003a).
(…)
The case for malnutrition and lack of drinkable water as the
common denominator and probable cause of African AIDS in the
HIV-era has been made by scientific (Mims and White 1984;
Seligmann et al 1984; Konotey-Ahulu 1987a, b, 1989; Fiala 1998;
Oliver 2000; Stewart et al 2000; Ross 2003) and non-scientific
observers (Hodgkinson 1996; Shenton 1998; Malan 2001). The
non-scientific observers even include the United Nations
(Namango and World Food Program of the United Nations 2001) and
president Mbeki of South Africa (Cherry 2000; Gellman 2000).
(…)
For example, the Lancet published in 1993 a Canadian
epidemiological study, “HIV and the etiology of AIDS”, which
found that 88% of AIDS cases in a cohort of male homosexuals at
risk for AIDS had used nitrite inhalants and that 75–80% of the
same cohort had also used “cocaine, heroin, amphetamines,
lysergic acid dimethyl amide, or methylenedioxy amphetamine”
(Schechter et al 1993). One of the subjects even passed away on
an “overdose” of recreational drugs during the study. In
addition an undisclosed percentage (but in 1993 certainly a high
percentage, see above) was also prescribed the DNA
chain-terminator AZT as anti-HIV drug (Duesberg 1993a, c). Thus
not a single drug-free AIDS patient was identified. But, the
study concluded, “drugs and sexual activity is rejected by these
data” as causes of AIDS. Nevertheless, the authors acknowledged
that their study “does not rule out a role for cofactors . . .”.
(…)
A sudden 10-fold increase in the mortality of HIV-positive
British hemophiliacs, right after the introduction of AZT in
1987, made scientific headlines in 1995, because the increased
mortality was attributed to HIV by the authors of the study,
i.e. Darby et al (1995), as well as by the editor of Nature,
“More conviction on HIV and AIDS” (Maddox 1995). Even the editor
of the Lancet wrote an editorial asking, “Will Duesberg now
concede defeat” (Horton 1995)? Darby et al based their
conclusion on the sudden 10-fold increase of the hemophiliacs’
mortality in 1987, shown in figure 5, on the facts that the
increased mortality was restricted to HIVpositive hemophiliacs
and that the increase was independent of the degree of
hemophilia (which is inversely proportional to the life
expectancy of the patient).
(…)
Moreover, the mortality of hemophiliacs was steadily decreasing
since the 1970s until 1987 – despite the presence of HIV
(Duesberg 1995c)! Thus the only new risk of mortality, in and
after 1987, was not HIV, but AZT. Darby et al even acknowledged
“treatment, by prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia or with
zidovudine (AZT), has been widespread for HIV-infected
haemophiliacs since about 1989 (more accurately since 1987)”.
The editor of Nature also pointed out that, “Darby et al failed
to provide full details of the drug regimen followed” (Maddox
1995). The AZT-mortality hypothesis would of course also explain
why the new hemophilia mortality was independent of the severity
of the hemophilia, as Darby et al observed.[/quote]
Peter Duesberg, Koehnlein and Rasnick – The chemical bases of
the various AIDS epidemics: recreational drugs, anti-viral
chemotherapy and malnutrition (2003):
HTML http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/pddrchemical.pdf
[B]No evidence that HIV causes AIDS[/B]
According to the “independent” Wikipedia: [quote]On May 4, 1984,
Gallo and his collaborators published a series of four papers in
the scientific journal Science [14] demonstrating that a
retrovirus they had isolated, called HTLV-III in the belief that
the virus was related to the leukemia viruses of Gallo's earlier
work, was the cause of AIDS.[15][/quote]
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gallo
This is what AIDS-whistleblower Papadopulos-Eleopulos had to say
about this "evidence": [quote]Although Gallo claims that in the
four Science papers (Gallo et al., 1986) he and his colleagues
"provided clearcut evidence that the aetiology of AIDS and ARC
was the new lymphotropic retrovirus, HTLV-III", no such data
were presented. (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1993b)
(…)
To be fair, in his 1984 Science papers Gallo did not make such a
direct claim. He said HIV was the probable cause of AIDS. But
even this conclusion is questionable. Even if Gallo's evidence
was incontrovertible proof he had isolated a retrovirus he only
managed to isolate it from 26 out of 72 AIDS patients. That's
only 36 percent. And only 88% of 49 AIDS patients had
antibodies.
There was no evidence. But two years later, when Gallo was
defending the accusation he had used the French virus to
discover his version of HIV, he was much more definite about his
1984 papers. He said they provided "clearcut" evidence that HIV
is the cause of AIDS. And his opinion was no different in
1993.[/quote]
Following are the 4 articles from 4 May 1984 of Gallo et al in
Science. Like Papadopulos-Eleopulos concluded, these don’t even
claim that HIV causes AIDS.
The first 3 articles make no claim whatsoever that HIV is the
cause of AIDS.
The 4th paper (page 18) “Antibodies Reactive with Human
T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) in the Serum of Patients
with AIDS[/I]” M. G. Sarngadharan, Mikulas Popovic, Lilian
Bruch, Jörg Schüpbach, Robert C. Gallo; is the most interesting
one of these and this is THE only (according to
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Duesberg and Nobel laureate Kary Mullis)
paper used by the state media as “evidence” that HIV is the
cause of AIDS.
The only claim made is that there appears to be a relation
between AIDS, homosexuality and HIV (that was named as
HTLV-III). These are the most interesting quotes I found in the
4th article: [quote]Serum samples from 88 percent of patients
with AIDS and from 79 percent of homosexual men with signs and
symptoms that frequently precede AIDS, but from less than 1
percent of heterosexual subjects, have antibodies reactive
against antigens of HTLV-III.
(...)
These new isolates are designated HTLV-III and are described in
the accompanyning reports (30-32). Here we describe the use of
HTLV-III in an immunological screening of serum samples from
patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS and from individuals at
increased risk for AIDS.
(...)
Serum samples were obtained from patients with clinically
documented AIDS, Kaposi’s sarcoma, sexual contacts of AIDS
patients, intravenous drug abusers, homosexual men, and
heterosexual subjects. These sera were tested for their
reactivity to HTLV-III by means of the enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (34).
(...)
Because these 17 men had been seeking medical as¬sistance, they
are not a representative sample of the homosexual population,
and the high incidence of HTLV-III–specific antibodies in their
sera may not reflect the true incidence in the homosexual
population.
(...)
Among the positive serum samples from AIDS patients there
appears to be a wide variation in antibody titer to HTLV-III.
Generally, the titers in sera from patients with advanced AIDS
are significantly lower than those in sera from newly diagnosed
patients and patients with pre-AIDS. This is consistent with the
idea that HTLV-III infection causes an initial lymphoid
proliferation but eventually causes death of the target
lymphocytes (OKT4+) leading to the abnormal T4+/T8+ ratios and
loss of helper T-cell functions including antibody production by
B cells.
(...)
In conclusion, we have shown a high incidence of specific
antibodies to HTLV-III in patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Among
the antibody-positive cases reported here a few are of
particular importance with respect to the transmission of the
disease.[/quote]
Here are the 4 papers from 4 May 1984 of Gallo et al in Science:
HTML http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.373.354&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=4
[B]Fiala - AIDS in Africa[/B]
I’ll end this first post with an interesting story about how the
AIDS numbers were exaggerated in the 1990s by Christian Fiala.
He focusses on the AIDS figures in Uganda and Tanzania to
conclude that a heterosexually transmitted AIDS epidemic in
Africa can only be regarded as cynical.
AIDS DEFINITION
In October 1985 in Bangui, Niger the World Health Organisation
(WHO) published a definition of AIDS that was exclusively
applicable to developing countries. In this definition AIDS is
determined - not by testing for HIV, but based on symptoms,
like: diarrhoea for more than one month, 10% weight loss, and
cough for one month. These symptoms weren’t rare in a country
like Uganda with 20 years of systematic destruction behind it.
Tuberculosis in Uganda could officially lead to an AIDS
diagnosis.
Half of the beds in the internal ward of the Makerere University
Clinic in Kampala were occupied by "AIDS patients". From 1986 on
Uganda's AIDS figures increased sharply and Uganda was declared
the "epicentre of AIDS".
In Tanzania another (narrower) definition was used to diagnose
“AIDS”. Then, for reasons unknown, "AIDS cases" in Tanzania were
reported that didn’t fulfil the definition; see the following
excerpt from a report by the Tanzanian health ministry from
August 1990: [quote]Of the 1,987 new cases registered, only 667
(33.6%) fulfilled the above mentioned criteria. Although 1,320
cases would not strictly qualify to be called AIDS cases, we
have taken them as cases assuming that those who reported them
just made an omission at the stage of compiling the
forms.[/quote]
In other words 2 third of the newly registered AIDS cases didn’t
fulfil the definition for AIDS!
MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS
After the WHO definition had been in use for several years, the
US Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Pan-American Health
Organisation (PAHO) concluded that the WHO definition of AIDS
"[i]may not be adequate for clinical work" because of "the
potential inapplicability of that definition". This means that
AIDS could also be diagnosed based on other criteria.
Since then, developing countries can choose between the 3
definitions to diagnose AIDS. They can also diagnose AIDS based
on the tighter definitions used in the developed world. In
international statistics, however, all the AIDS cases are
summarised together, although their numbers are based on
different definitions thus not comparable.
It must be clear that when a disease is diagnosed based on
symptoms that can be caused by (other) diseases - the number of
AIDS cases doesn’t mean a thing.
STATISTRICS
The number of new AIDS cases in Uganda and Tanzania increased
every year until 1991. Since then the numbers have been
dropping.
All AIDS cases worldwide are registered by the WHO in Geneva. As
there is an unknown number that isn’t registered, the WHO
multiplies the registered cases to estimate the "actual" figure.
This multiplication factor increases year by year.
In 1996, the WHO multiplied the registered AIDS cases in Africa
by 12; in 1997 by 17. In the last one and a half years alone
(written in 1998), 116,000 new cases of AIDS in Africa have been
registered with the WHO. The WHO estimated the new cases in
Africa by a whole 5.5 million, thus multiplying the reported
cases by 47.
It is also bizarre that the AIDS figures are presented
cumulatively. In this way not the number of new cases are seen
by the gullible public, but only the total amount. In this way
even a small amount of new AIDS cases (which could lead to a
dangerous conclusion that the AIDS epidemic is over) leads to an
increase in the number of AIDS cases.
Christian Fiala – [I]AIDS in Africa: dirty tricks[/i] (1998):
HTML http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/chrftricks.htm
#Post#: 2351--------------------------------------------------
Duesberg - Inventing The AIDS Virus
By: Firestarter Date: November 20, 2018, 3:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This post is not a full summary of the 724 pages book “Inventing
The AIDS Virus” (1996) by Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison. The
real book is “only” 467 pages, the rest of the book are
appendices (that don’t add much), Notes and the Index.
When I read it, I had already been investigating AIDS for some
time and thought that the information on the EIS and virus
hunters was realtively more interesting (than what I already kne
about AIDS).
I’ll add a couple of links that have the benefit of brevity over
the book (if you intend to read the book this doesn’t add much).
WHAT IS (THE CAUSE OF) AIDS?
To understand the true nature of AIDS it is helpful to
distinguish between the 4 separate groups that have developed
AIDS in high numbers: 1) Promiscuous homosexuals; 2) Drug
addicts; 3) Haemophiliacs; 4) Africans.
Duesberg states that the cause of AIDS is drug use. He explains
that all of the homosexuals were heavy users of (recreational)
drugs; he specifically names “nitrite". While Duesberg makes
strong arguments that drugs are the culprit, the real cause is
more sinister. It is known that as part of the CIAs MKULTRA
program experimental drugs were tested on unsuspecting people. I
don’t think it’s too farfetched to conclude that the
AIDS-victims were intentionally poisoned by putting some
chemical weapon into their drugs. Then after they became ill the
“AIDS-medicines” finish them off.
Duesberg specifically names that there were some 30 known Immune
deficiency diseases, before AIDS was invented, that are since
being labelled AIDS. He also specifically names that
haemophiliacs suffered from immune deficiencies long before
AIDS. The AIDS-syndrome includes the following diseases: brain
dementia, diarrhoea, cancers (like Kaposi's sarcoma and cervical
cancer), several lymphomas, pneumonia, cytomegalovirus
infection, herpes, candidiasis and tuberculosis. Even low T-cell
counts without clinical symptoms can be called "AIDS".
Duesberg unfortunately ignores the genocide against Africans
under the guise of AIDS. He simply states that other death
causes are labelled as AIDS.
Roughly 360,000 HIV positive Haitians have produced only a few
hundred AIDS victims.
KOCH’S POSTULATES
Duesberg frequently refers to the fact that Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) as the cause of AIDS doesn’t meet
the 4 scientific criteria of Koch’s postulates: 1) The
microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms
suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy
organisms; 2) The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased
organism and grown in pure culture; 3) The cultured
microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a
healthy organism; 4) The microorganism must be reisolated from
the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as
being identical to the original specific causative agent.
On Wikipedia you can read that the state propaganda has simply
thrown these scientific standards aside with “Koch’s postulates
for the 21st century”:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates
The failure to kill T-cells, even under optimal conditions, is
the Achilles' heel of the theory that HIV causes AIDS. The
abundance of uninfected T-cells in AIDS patients is possibly the
most important evidence against the many false claims for high
viral "loads" or "burdens" in AIDS victims.
HIV/AIDS NOT CONTAGIOUS
The mere fact that since the beginning of “AIDS” the epidemic
has never really spread beyond the risk groups is evidence that
the HIV virus doesn’t cause AIDS. If HIV would have been the
cause of AIDS - and is sexually transmittable - in 10 years
practically the whole world population would have been infected
with HIV (so if you can read this, the official story was a
lie).
After the immune system has made antibodies against HIV, it
becomes dormant and can only infect the partner in unprotected
sex in 1 out of 1000 cases. On the other hand: a pregnant mother
has at least a 50% chance of passing HIV to the unborn baby.
There are some 5,000 wives of HIV-positive haemophiliacs in the
USA. About 131 of these women have developed AIDS from 1985 to
1992 (2.6%).
Another interesting brain teaser is that the Phase II
"double-blind, placebo controlled trial" for AZT was stopped
before the planned 6 months duration, because the AZT group was
doing so well. How could they know, if the study was blinded?
VIRUS HUNTERS - SMON
For me the most interesting part of this book is the description
of the conflicting interests in medical “science”. I will ignore
most of this here because it isn’t specific for AIDS.
What is very interesting in this context, because it resembles
the AIDS hoax perfectly is the Subacute Myelo Optico-Neuropathy
(SMON) epidemic that claimed thousands of Japanese victims in
the 1950s and 1960s, because they were poisoned with the
supposed medicine clioquinol.
In 1970 the neurology professor Tadao Tsubaki made the educated
guess that SMON patients were dying because of clioquinol
(instead of some virus). By July of 1970 he concluded: 96% of
the SMON victims had taken clioquinol before the disease
appeared and those with the most severe symptoms had taken the
highest doses.
1971 saw only 36 cases, 3 in 1972, and 1 in 1973:
HTML http://www.primitivism.com/smon.htm
AZT KILLS – VAN LEEUWEN
In a Dutch study they found that AIDS-victims couldn’t stay on
the drugs because AZT is too toxic. It was a study of 97
AIDS-victims that were followed for a maximum of 147 weeks
(median follow-up period 67 weeks); 70 of these victims died
(72%).
Because of AZT the haemoglobin levels and leukocyte counts
declined significantly. 56 patients (57%) needed one or more
blood transfusions just to survive (the first blood transfusion
took place at a median of 26 weeks).
97 of the 91 victims were started on full dose AZT. In the first
year of poisoning 68% and in the second year 87% of the patients
had at least 1 decrease of the dose (the median for the first
dose reduction was 24 weeks). In 65 patients (67%) 103 times the
poisoning had to be interrupted. In 33 victims (34%) anemia was
the reason for the dose reduction.
At the same time of the first dose reduction, this had to be
followed by interrupting the poisoning in 40 cases (71% of the
victims with a dose reduction). Only 40% of the victims could
stay on AZT for 24 week (without interruptions).
To this date the Physician's Desk Reference quotes the low
toxicity of AZT reported by Broder et al in 1986, although the
real toxicity of the drug is one thousand times higher according
to more than 6 independent studies.
Van Leeuwen et al. – [I]Failure to maintain high-dose treatment
regimens during long-term use of zidovudine …[/I] (1990):
HTML https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1194580/pdf/genitmed00048-0010.pdf
EXAMPLE – LINDSEY NAGEL
Duesberg describes only a few individual AIDS-victims. I repeat
some of the atrocities about the adopted HIV-positive baby
Lindsey that got poisoned with AIDS-medicine.
[quote]Before treatment: "She is [a] very bright, smiling and
happy girl," noted the doctor. Lindsey was prescribed Septra, to
be taken three times each week. Septra can cause "nausea,
vomiting, anorexia," and "bone marrow depression," and also
includes "rash, fever, [and] leukopenia" among its side effects.
A week later the doctor prescribed AZT (a chemotherapeutic drug
designed to kill growing cells). Lindsey began swallowing a
total of 120 milligrams of the drug every single day, in
addition to her Septra. AZT kills dividing cells anywhere in the
body-causing ulcerations and haemorrhaging; damage to hair
follicles and skin; killing mitochondria, the energy cells of
the brain; wasting away of muscles; and the destruction of the
immune system and other blood cells.
The following month, the doctor strangely began praising
Lindsey's "improvement." Upon reflection, the Nagels grew
puzzled. What "improvement" could the doctor have meant, since
Lindsey had suffered no medical problems at all before the
treatment began? By the time Lindsey reached her first birthday
on October 15, 1991, her adoptive parents began to lose
patience. Becoming suspicious of their doctor for not admitting
or discussing these “side effects”, Steve and Cheryl took
Lindsey to Dr. Margaret Hostetter at the University of Minnesota
clinic.
Hostetter immediately ended the Septra prescription, while
increasing Lindsey's AZT dosage. At the Nagels' next visit she
credited the baby girl's improvement to the AZT. In fact, she
discussed plans to increase the AZT yet again. The doctor
praised Lindsey's nonexistent progress at each visit. A few
weeks later, the doctor had stretched the Nagels' patience by
pressuring them to put Lindsey on ddI (a chemotherapy like AZT).
The tension finally erupted a few days after Lindsey's second
birthday on October 15, 1992. Steve and Cheryl woke up one night
to the tormented screams of their daughter. The muscle pains
were unbearable. Leg massages, Tylenol-they used anything that
would allow Lindsey to sleep again.
After the Nagels stopped poisoning Lindsey with AZT, she became
a "new" child almost overnight. She started sleeping much
better, including longer hours ... Her muscle cramps went away.
She started eating at least 2-3 times as much every day as she
had ever eaten before.
Dr. Hostetter verbally attacked the Nagels, as if they were 5
years old, "She also said that there are foster homes to provide
care for children who were in Lindsey's predicament! (Living
with parents who wouldn't give their daughter AZT)".
On October 15, 1995, Lindsey celebrated her fifth birthday-with
HIV and without AZT -in excellent health. According to public
health officials, she should already have died of AIDS because
babies with HIV are supposed to survive only about two
years.[/quote]]
Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison - Inventing The AIDS Virus
(1996) - 22.5 MB:
HTML http://www.whale.to/c/Inventing-the-AIDS-Virus%20(1).pdf
#Post#: 2383--------------------------------------------------
Re: The AIDS hoax
By: Firestarter Date: November 21, 2018, 12:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Can anybody remember all of the horrible stories in the 1980s
and 1990s by the state propaganda about the expected epidemic
caused by AIDS? Of course over time the information about AIDS
changed (when lies are exposed the media just invents new
stories).
There is no AIDS “epidemic”...
[B]No AIDS epidemic[/B]
According to the state media, in Africa women represent 60% of
people living with HIV.
In the Netherlands the official numbers of confirmed HIV
positive victims is: 11,616 gay men; 3659 straight men; 3591
women. That’s only 19% women…
This is a total of 18,866 HIV-victims on a Dutch population of
17 million; a little more than 0.1%.
According to the state propaganda another 2800 HIV positive
patients are estimated in the Netherlands that have not yet been
discovered.
Here are the numbers worldwide. At the end of 2015, there is an
estimated 36.7 million people worldwide living with HIV/AIDS.
Only 60% of HIV victims have already been sentenced to AIDS (the
remaining 40%, or over 14 million, have simply been added for
political reasons).
The majority of HIV victims are in low- and middle-income
countries. Especially in sub-Saharan Africa, with an estimated
25.6 million HIV victims in 2015- that’s 70% of the total.
According to these statistrics there can be only 2 causes for
AIDS: malnutrition or chemical weapons.
An estimated 35 million people have died from AIDS (since the
beginning of the 1980s), including 1.1 million in 2015…
Since June 2016, 18.2 million HIV victims are poisoned with
antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the world, up from 15.8 million
in June 2015, 7.5 million in 2010, and less than one million in
2000:
HTML https://www.aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/hiv-aids-101/global-statistics/
In one study 50 out of 75 children in Uganda in 1972/1973 were
HIV-positive (67%); so you’d expect the same percentage of
HIV-positive adults (and since 1972/1973 steadily rising). I
remember stories that in some African countries more than 50%
are HIV-positive. If this were true, you’d expect a lower world
population of humans than of rhino’s (an estimated 29,000).
Saxinger et al, Evidence for exposure to HTLV-III in Uganda
before 1973 (1985):
HTML http://www.harvard.epiinformatics.com/ADPublications/HTLV1Antibodies.pdf
In 1985 the UK’s Royal College of Nursing predicted that one
million people in Britain ‘‘will have AIDS in six years unless
the killer disease is checked’’, in 2000 the official number of
AIDS deaths totalled 263.
In Africa doctors are allowed to diagnose AIDS by symptoms like
fever, cough, diarrhoea, or weight loss — the so-called Bangui
clinical case definition. So in Africa diseases like malaria,
tuberculosis or dysentery can be conveniently diagnosed as AIDS.
In nature monkeys do not develop AIDS after being infected with
HIV; Silvestri et al, Understanding the benign nature of SIV
infection in natural hosts (2007):
HTML http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2045617/pdf/JCI0733034.pdf
In the following study 167 deaths occurred among 9,583
HIV-positive subjects; only 54 of these deaths were related to
AIDS (32%). Neuhaus et al, Risk of All-cause Mortality
Associated with Non-fatal AIDS and Serious Non-AIDS Events among
Adults Infected with HIV (2011):
HTML http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2897168/pdf/nihms203665.pdf
[B]Refusing AIDS-therapy[/B]
Over the years some HIV-positive victims didn’t take drugs, see
the following quotes.
Dr. David Berner (1995)
[quote]Reflecting back on the numbers of diseases I treated in
the fifties and sixties which now would be grounds for
malpractice, I became skeptical about AZT, knowing it to be a
cytotoxic agent.
(...)
I had the temerity to give [Duesberg] a call. I’ll never forget
his initial remark. I told him my plight, and he said, ‘If you
take AZT, you’ll be dead.’ I read his work and got introduced to
other people who were skeptical about AZT.”
“I decided early on to add some vitamin therapies to my already
healthy lifestyle, particularly the anti-oxidants beta carotene,
ascorbic acid, and vitamin E. Despite my continuing excellent
health for a 69 year old — I do a lot of hiking and
mountaineering in the wilderness — I have still been pressured
by well-meaning clinicians to start AZT ‘before it’s too late!’
I think it’s very difficult for these people to admit that
they’re either partially or completely wrong.[/quote]
Robert Bryant (1998)
[quote]Before Ryan White *) there was me. Same doctors, same
hospital… [They told me to] take AZT... I said no to the doctors
and I am alive. I have been black-balled by the press which made
a hero out of White.
(…)
Some people have said that the virus does exist but it’s a
harmless one. You’ll test positive for it, but it won’t cause
any harm. I’m inclined to believe that. Because I’m not sick. It
hasn’t hurt me, and it hasn’t hurt my [HIV+] brothers, and it
hasn’t hurt my [HIV+] uncles. And it hasn’t hurt their kids, and
it hasn’t hurt their wives.[/quote]
*) Ryan White was a hemophiliac who died in April of 1990 of
unstoppable internal bleeding after taking AZT.
Dr. Scott Gottlieb:
[quote]I was prescribed four days of ‘triple therapy’ with the
latest protease inhibitors and other antiviral medicines… But
those four days left me with a realistic view of what infected
patients often face. Between nausea and aching pains in my
bones, I felt febrile and weak. I was unable to exercise. After
one day, I was no longer well enough to work, to go out with my
friends or to eat a full meal without vomiting. While it is true
that over time some people are able to tolerate the drugs better
than others, for many patients these symptoms never go away.
Many doctors and the pharmaceutical industry have failed to
convey the human toll that ‘triple therapy’ takes…[/quote]
According to 2 European studies from 2011 the most common causes
of deaths in HIV-positive victims are not AIDS but cancer and
liver failure (since AZT isn’t a monotherapy anymore but only
part of the ART cocktail the death rate has decreased
substantially):
HTML https://www.poz.com/article/hiv-deaths-mortality-20011-5126
Several studies show that much more children born to mothers
poisoned with AZT in pregnancy get severely sick and die than of
untreated (HIV-positive) mothers. Rapid disease progression in
HIV-1 perinatally infected children born to mothers receiving
zidovudinemonotherapy during pregnancy (1999):
HTML http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=1999&issue=05280&article=00008&type=abstract
[B]Whistleblowers[/B]
I couldn’t find much information on on how AIDS-whistleblowers’
lives have been destroyed…
Here’s (the beginning of?) a list of AIDS-whistleblowers that
faced some problems. I will not describe what their different
stances are on the cause of AIDS.
The most interesting story is about Professor Peter H. Duesberg.
In 1991, a government-appointed panel of scientists, decided not
to renew Duesberg’s research grants. Before raising questions
about the role of HIV in AIDS causation, Duesberg’s grant
applications were never denied. Duesberg remains cut off from
all NIH funding, and commutes to Germany to conduct his
scientific work.
Dr. Kuritzkes demanded that denialists like Peter Duesberg be
denied access to students and reported to authorities. WSJ
reporter Marilyn Chase warned reporters not to unintentionally
"exalt the position of denialists by making them seem like just
some sort of independent intellectual contrarian whose views
really should be heeded”.
On May 13, 2008, Semmelweis Society International (SSI)
presented the Semmelweis "Clean Hands" Award to Professor Peter
Duesberg and Investigative Journalist Celia Farber. Farber had
interviewed Duesberg first in 1988:
HTML http://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=Document:Farber_interviews_Duesberg
The NIH barred Farber from further contact with their scientists
and labelled her a "threat to public health". In May 2008,
Richard Jefferys - of the “independent” AIDS Activist group TAG
- led the campaign to antagonise the SSI over the
Farber/Duesberg awards. Clark Barker was hired by the SSI to
investigate if Duesberg and Farber deserved the award.
Immediately some former SSI-members told Barker that Duesberg
and Farber are liars and responsible for millions of deaths by
AIDS in Africa and insisted that he would stop the
investigation. When Barker wouldn’t listen; on June 19th they
initiated a "spam attack" against him:
HTML http://robertscottbell.blogspot.nl/2008/07/hiv-aids-gallos-egg.html
William R. Holub - After publishing an article in 1988 about
AIDS, was blacklisted from work in both industrial biotechnology
and academia. He lost his home, was forced into bankruptcy, and
now supports his wife and children with a job handling toxic
chemicals, supplemented by delivering newspapers.
Philip Artz Kees - Charges were brought against him in 1985
before the California Medical Board after he testified about the
promiscuous administration of psychotropic drugs like haldol,
prolixine and thorazine at Patton State Hospital. His medical
license was suspended (revoked in 1992) throughout his 7 years
of hearings, which led to bankruptcy.
Edward J. Wawszkiewicz – After publishing questions about the
established AIDS thinking, was suddenly labelled "mentally ill"
by the University in 1986, forced to stop teaching and with no
salary and is now (1994) struggling to stay alive on food
stamps.
Nathaniel S. Lehrman – Was critical of the official AIDS story
since 1985. He was set up by his colleague, was persecuted for
Medicaid fraud that this colleague had committed, lost his
medical license. He was convicted in 1991 to 1-3 years in
prison, $250,000 in "restitution" and a fine of $100,000 by a
Health Department administrative judge:
HTML http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/newsletters/1994-01.pdf
Dr. Etienne de Harven was censored in France for trying to
expose the AIDS fraud:
HTML https://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/07/27/four-questions-for-etienne-de-harven-about-hiv-and-aids/
Johan Van Dongen from the Netherlands discovered that Aids and
Ebola were manmade. He lost his job at the University of
Maastricht and his house:
HTML https://joelsavage1.wordpress.com/2015/11/08/be-strong-professor-johan-van-dongen-a-scientists-ordeal-after-revealing-aids-and-ebola-are-medical-crimes/
[B]Whistleblower Willner – proves HIV doesn’t cause AIDS[/B]
Dr. Robert E. Willner was another AIDS-whistleblower. He
published a book in 1994 “The Deadly Deception. The Proof That
Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS”.
Here’s an interview with Willner about HIV/AIDS; he claims that
HIV is not the cause of AIDS, AZT causes death and that “In New
York and San Francisco only 7% of AIDS victims were HIV
positive”:
HTML http://whale.to/c/conspiracy_nation.html
In 1993 Willner injected himself with HIV+ blood on the
telescreen in Spain. He repeated this stunt several times.
On December 7, 1994 Willner injected himself with the blood of a
HIV-positive victim to prove his point that HIV is harmless (see
the picture). This video itself is pretty good - a group of some
30 people asking questions to Willner about AIDS:
HTML http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress4/dr-robert-willner-injects-hiv-into-himself-on-tv/
[IMG]
HTML https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/download/file.php?id=414[/img]
Willner also favoured alternative treatment for cancer; so they
suspended his medical license in 1990. It shouldn’t surprise us
that he died on April 15, 1995 of a “heart attack”:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Willner
The following video shows Dr. Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury, who
explains that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS.
Like Robert Willner some 25 years ago, Chowdhury is prepared to
inject himself with the blood of somebody sentenced to
HIV-positive status...
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKhL36Qo0Ds
#Post#: 2416--------------------------------------------------
Papadopulos-Eleopulos
By: Firestarter Date: November 22, 2018, 9:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Here’s a summary of an article and interview by important
AIDS-whistleblower Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos with important
evidence that HIV isn’t the cause of AIDS.
In the following paper Papadopulos-Eleopulos concludes that HIV
doesn’t cause AIDS. To make reading a little easier first (this
paper is not an easy read) a translation for 2 of the
“scientific” words: “HTLV- III” is another name for HIV. “T4
cells” are the T-cells that according to the official story are
destroyed by HIV (T8-cells aren’t effected by HIV).
[quote]In 1985, Gallo and his colleagues (Gallo et al., 1985)
showed that in mitogenically stimulated lymphocyte cultures from
AIDS patients or in cultures from healthy donors "infected" with
HIV, there is a decrease in the total number of viable cells.
However:
(i) the decrease in viable cells begins before a significant
increase in reverse transcriptase activity (RT), that is, HIV
expression;
(ii) the rate of cell loss remains the same even when the
expression of HIV (RT), is maximum
(…)
According to Claude Ameisen and André Capron from the Pasteur
Institute, not one of the mechanisms "proposed to account for
these TH-cell defects, including: (1) immune suppression, or its
opposite, hyperactivation and exhaustion of the TH cells, (2)
inhibitory signals mediated by HIV viral or regulatory gene
products, (3) autoimmune responses, (4) selective infection and
destruction of memory TH cells, (5) syncytia formation between
infected and uninfected cells, and (6) inappropriate immune
killing of uninfected cells", is satisfactory
(…)
At present it is also known that:
(a) for the expression of HIV phenomena (RT, virus-like
particles, antigen/antibody reactions), activation (mitogenic
stimulation) is a necessary requirement (Klatzmann & Montagnier,
1986; Ameisen & Capron, 1991; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al.,
1992b);
(b) activation (stimulation) is induced by oxidation
(Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1982; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al.,
1992b);
Since both AIDS cultures and AIDS patients are exposed to
mitogens (activating agents), all of which are oxidising agents
(Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1988), both apoptosis and the phenomena
upon which the presence of HIV is based (viral-like particles,
RT, antigen/antibody reactions (WB), "HIV-PCR- hybridisation"),
may all be the direct result of oxidative stress and therefore
their specificity questionable (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1988;
Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992a; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et
al., 1992b).
As far back as January 1985 Montagnier wrote, "....replication
and cytopathic effect of LAV can only be observed in activated
T4 cells
(…)
In considering the data from haemophiliacs, a group of British
researchers, including the well known retrovirologist Robin
Weiss, concluded in 1985: "We have thus been able to compare
lymphocyte subset data before and after infection with HTLV-
III. It is commonly assumed that the reduction in T-helper- cell
numbers is a result of the HTLV-III virus being tropic for
T-helper-cells. Our finding in this study that T-helper- cell
numbers and the helper/suppressor ratio did not change after
infection supports our previous conclusion that the abnormal
T-lymphocyte subsets are a result of the intravenous infusion of
factor VIII concentrates per se, not HTLV-III infection" (Ludlam
et al., 1985)
(…)
one must conclude that:
(a) the decrease in the T4 cell numbers and increase in T8 cell
numbers in "HIV infected" cultures and individuals is due to
agents other than HIV; HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient
for the induction of the above phenomenon;
(b) in vivo the above changes may not be due to a selective
destruction of T4 cells and increased proliferation of T8 cells,
but loss of T4 surface markers and acquisition of T8 surface
markers[/quote]
Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al. – “[I]A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE
HIV-T4-CELL-AIDS HYPOTHESIS[/I]” (1995):
HTML http://www.sidasante.com/themes/cd4/ept4cells.htm
The following interview of Papadopulos-Eleopulos (EPE) by
Johnson (CJ) from 1997 is even more extreme. It comes to 4
conclusions that are bizarre if you’re a believer in the state
propaganda on AIDS.
It’s better readable than the previous paper...
1 - HIV isn’t a virus at all.
[quote]Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of a
few particles which they claimed are a retrovirus and are HIV.
But photographs don’t prove particles are a virus and the
existence of HIV was not proven using the method presented at
the 1973 meeting.
Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding but for
some unknown reason they did not publish any EMs of the material
at 1.16 gm/ml which they and everyone afterwards call "pure
HIV".
There are a few particles which the researchers claim are
retroviral particles. In fact, they claim these are the HIV
particles but give no evidence why. The band should contain
billions and when you take an electron micrograph they should
fill the entire picture. They bear only the vaguest resemblance
to retroviral particles.
Let me repeat, there is no question of isolation. Gallo did not
isolate a virus. There were no electron microscope pictures of a
banded specimen that one would expect to show nothing but
retroviral particles.[/quote]
2 – HIV cannot be a retrovirus because it’s too large and
doesn’t have knobs.
[quote]Retroviruses are incredibly tiny, almost spherical
particles that have an outer envelope covered with knobs and an
inner core consisting of some proteins and RNA.
All the AIDS experts agree that the knobs are absolutely
essential for the HIV particle to lock on to a cell. As the
first step in infecting that cell. So, no locking on, no
infection. The experts all claim that the knobs contain a
protein called gp120 which is the hook in the knobs that grabs
hold of the surface of the cell it’s about to infect.(14) If HIV
particles do not have knobs how is HIV able to replicate? And if
it can't replicate, HIV is not an infectious particle.
Gallo and all other retrovirologists, as well as Hans Gelderblom
who has done most of the electron microscopy studies of HIV,
agree that retrovirus particles are almost spherical in shape,
have a diameter of 100-120 nanometres and are covered with
knobs.(12,13) The particles the two groups claim are HIV are not
spherical, no diameter is less than 120nM, in fact many of them
have major diameters exceeding twice that permitted for a
retrovirus. And none of them appear to have knobs.[/quote]
3 – The CDC uses a subjective definition for AIDS.
[quote]In fact, according to the CDC AIDS definition, you don’t
even need to be HIV infected to be diagnosed as AIDS. That’s
what I mean about being subjective. It’s like a physician seeing
a patient with fever, diarrhoea, vomiting, weakness and shock
and then declaring the cause is cholera. Sure it might be
cholera but what about the dozens of other germs that cause a
similar pattern?[/quote]
4 – Haemophiliacs can’t be infected with HIV by donor blood.
[quote]CJ: I must confess I find it very hard to accept that
haemophiliacs have not been infected through contaminated
clotting concentrates. And I bet haemophiliacs do too.
EPE: Tell me this. If someone HIV positive is cut and bleeds how
long does the blood remain infectious? Outside the body?
CJ: According to what I’ve read, for only a few hours at the
most.
EPE: How is factor VIII made? All right I’ll tell you. It comes
as a dry, flaky, yellowish powder and by the time it’s used it’s
at least a couple of months old. Do you see the problem?
CJ: I do. If it’s dry and that old any HIV in it should be long
dead.[/quote]
Interview Papadopulos-Eleopulos (EPE) by Johnson (CJ) in 1997:
HTML http://www.theperthgroup.com/INTERVIEWS/cjepe.html
I add - which isn’t mentioned in the interview with
Papadopulos-Eleopulos - that there is not one shred of evidence
that HIV-antibodies exist (HIV isn’t even a virus!).
#Post#: 2479--------------------------------------------------
Epidemic Intelligence Service; Medavoy
By: Firestarter Date: November 24, 2018, 4:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) has been dubbed the
“medical CIA” by Peter Duesberg. It appears to me that the main
objective of the EIS is to manipulate the news on health “care”.
Here you can find some of the health scares that have been
promoted by the EIS, including Legionnaires’ disease, Ebola and
Zika microcephaly:
HTML http://web.archive.org/web/20171209122350/https://www.cdc.gov/eis/news.html
For more information on Zika:
HTML http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=426
The following PDF shows some of the highlights of the EIS.
1951 - CDC establishes the EIS training program in response to
the threat of biological warfare during the Korean War.
1955 - EIS officers trace 260 polio cases to unsafe vaccines
made by a California pharmaceutical company (the Cutter
incident).
For more information on polio (vaccines):
HTML http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1151
1964 - CDC assigns an EIS officer to work on family planning,
expanding the EIS’s work to global depopulation.
1976 - EIS officers help set up a field laboratory in Sierra
Leone to investigate the cause of a deadly fever found in Lassa,
Nigeria, in 1969. EIS officers in Zaire and Sudan investigate a
mysterious fever. Of 318 people infected, 280 (90%) die; later
dubbed Ebola after a nearby river.
1976 - CDC investigators with the help of more than 20 EIS
officers blame the legionella bacteria for Legionnaires’ disease
for the 1976 outbreak in Philadelphia. Retroactively also
“outbreaks” in 1965 and 1968 are labelled Legionnaires’ disease.
1981 - An EIS officer and a Los Angeles physician publish an
MMWR article describing the occurrence of Pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia among a total of 5 young gay males. This “epidemic” is
later called AIDS, and blamed on the magical HIV virus.
1987 - EIS officers assist health departments in conducting HIV
seroprevalence surveys. This helps health officials to monitor
HIV infections and evaluate, prioritise and sentence Targeted
Individuals to AIDS.
2003 - More than 100 EIS officers were involved in
“investigating” the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
outbreak in China. I thought that communist China and the USA
were sworn enemies…
2012 - CDC begins the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. EIS
officers begin polio surveillance as part of CDC’s efforts,
since then the incidence of paralysis in the developing world
has increased considerably.
A Snapshot of public health achievements (2015),:
HTML https://www.cdc.gov/eis/downloads/eis-timeline-booklet.pdf
EIS was the brainchild of Alexander Langmuir. In 1949, the CDC
was interested in expanding beyond its mandate for malaria
control. Federal officials granted millions of dollars, and the
first EIS class started in July 1951.
Nearly 2,000 EIS trainees occupy key positions in national and
international health care. Former US Surgeon General William H.
Stewart is a member, as are 2 other assistant Surgeon Generals.
Jonathan Mann and Michael Merson, past and present heads of the
World Health Organization's global AIDS Program, both trained
with the EIS.
The New York Times’ chief medical correspondent, Lawrence
Altman, is a member, like Bruce Dan, former ABC News medical
editor and former senior editor of the Journal of the American
Medical Association. Marvin Turck, the editor at the University
of Washington'' Journal of Infectious Diseases, joined EIS in
1960.
In 1976 there were some troubles in getting the “swine flu”
vaccine accepted by Congress, over some concerns of adverse
effects.
Then in July 1976, in one of those strange coincidences, a group
of pneumonia cases suddenly appeared in Philadelphia, days after
American Legion members had returned home. On August 2, after
receiving word of this outbreak, personnel in the CDC's
swine-flu war room established contact with Jim Beecham, an EIS
officer on assignment in the Philadelphia health department.
When the CDC personnel arrived, pre-positioned EIS members such
as Beecham and top health adviser Robert Sharrar began following
orders from the incoming CDC team.
With a nationwide hysteria rapidly developing, Congress quickly
approved the “swine flu” vaccine. Some 50 million Americans were
vaccinated over several months, producing at least 1,000 cases
of severe nerve damage and paralysis, dozens of deaths, and
nearly $100 million in liability claims.
Within days of the legislative approval, the EIS team finally
acknowledged that the pneumonia was not related to swine flu.
Later this was called Legionnaires’ disease.
In 1981, the White House was considering cutting the CDC budget
by 23%, but then in one of those strange coincidences, AIDS
arrived.
EIS officer Wayne Shandera, on active assignment in the Los
Angeles health department, received a call from Michael
Gottlieb, from the UCLA, about 4 patients with pneumocystis
carinii pneumonia and serious immune deficiencies. Shandera had
already heard about a 5th case. All 5 were young homosexuals;
this was the official start of what later was called the
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) “epidemic”.
Shandera forwarded the data to his unofficial bosses at the CDC.
New reports were trickling in of dying male homosexuals, most
also suffered from a rare skin cancer known as Kaposi's sarcoma
and Opportunistic Infections (KSOI). The task force that
"investigated", was loaded with EIS members like Harold Jaffe
and Mary Guinan.
Within just 11 days after the first report of AIDS appeared in
June 1981, EIS member Donald Francis placed a telephone call to
Myron Essex. Francis already “knew” that the new syndrome must
be caused by a retrovirus - with a long latency period between
infection and disease. Francis had already mapped out the entire
future of the disease…
Any other cause than an infectious virus was completely ignored.
EIS agents hunted down every heroin addict and blood transfusion
recipient with illnesses, which were labelled immune
deficiencies. EIS personnel scoured hospitals and monitored
local health departments for patients, and within months found a
handful of heroin users with opportunistic infections.
EIS member Bruce Evatt and Dale Lawrence tracked down a
haemophiliac in Colorado, dying of internal bleeding, who also
had pneumonia. EIS agent Harry Haverkos travelled to Florida and
Haiti to find impoverished Haitians with tuberculosis. Instantly
the heroin addicts, the haemophiliac, and the Haitians were all
relabelled as AIDS, and the CDC trumpeted the news that AIDS had
"spread" outside the homosexual community.
After Montagnier's paper on the “HIV virus” was published in
1983, Robert Gallo was pushed by the EIS to discover the same
virus. He didn’t, but by April of 1984 Gallo was ready to
announce having found a similar retrovirus, which he dubbed
HTLV-III. By 24 April, EIS member Lawrence Altman in the New
York Times named it the "AIDS virus".
In 1992, some scientists reported HIV-free AIDS cases. The
unexplained AIDS cases were simply relabelled Idiopathic CD4+
Lymphocytopenia (ICL):
HTML http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/beeis.htm
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/QFPT3)
I’ve found an interview between Jon Rappoport and “Ellis
Medavoy”. The problem is that “Ellis Medavoy” is a pseudonym, so
we have to “believe” Rappoport that it’s real. The reason that I
post a link to the description of the interview with “Medavoy”
is that the narrative fits what happened in the 1980s with AIDS.
I don’t believe that Rappoport could have made this up even if
he tried...
Since 1987, Rappoport repeatedly talked to “Ellis”, who told him
he was one of the spin doctors influencing the press with
(false) information on AIDS that has since become the official
story. “Ellis” said he quit because he saw that he was a pawn in
a vast depopulation effort.
“Ellis” said: [quote]When I got this assignment. I knew I was in
some very important territory. The world was going to be told a
lie, and they were supposed to believe that lie. Civilians,
doctors, researchers, politicians - they all had to swallow the
propaganda.[/quote]
In 1983, a year before HIV (aka HTLV-III) was announced to the
world as the official cause of AIDS, “Ellis” already knew that
Robert Gallo would be the messenger for "[I]some kind of
retrovirus that would be said to be the driving force behind a
global plague[/I]".
Gallo was selected for this task because they knew he would stop
at nothing to become rich and famous.
In the spring of 1987, “Ellis” was informed that Peter Duesberg
was a threat to the official story on AIDS. Duesberg argued that
if the blood test to determine of somebody was HIV-positive
found antibodies it would be unlikely that HIV would harm the
patients. Based on this story it would be impossible to develop
a vaccine against AIDS that would produce the same antibodies.
Duesberg's principal ally at the time was Harvey Bialy, the
research editor of Bio/Technology, a sister publication of
Nature.
Phillip Johnson not only agreed with Duesberg, but was better at
presenting the arguments against HIV in speaking forums.
Arguably even more dangerous were the stories of people
diagnosed as HIV-positive or even "full-blown AIDS" who were
surviving quite well. They were rejecting the whole HIV story,
stayed away from AZT, were exercising more, changed their diets
and stopped taking drugs. These people were living testimonials
that they could heal without big pharma and "doctors".
"Ellis" said: [quote]A lot of what we did at this point was stop
things from getting into print. That's often more important than
planting lies. As far as Duesberg was concerned, I can tell you
there were many newspapers and magazines who were ready to give
his views some space. You know, maverick scientist rejects HIV
as cause of AIDS.
So we began a coordinated effort to keep that from happening. We
let the scientists at NIH, who had the most to lose if Duesberg
could establish a credible beachhead, handle the PR on rejecting
Duesberg's science. They engaged in some character assassination
as well, which was fine. We, on the other side, got 'reliable
sources' to go to those newspapers and magazines and tell them
that to print anything good about Duesberg was DANGEROUS and
IRRESPONSIBLE. That was our tack.[/quote]
AIDS is a label given to a whole variety of disease conditions
not caused by HIV in any way, direct or indirect. Immune
suppression can be caused by all of the following: contaminated
heroin; medical drugs (like corticosteroids); starvation;
contaminated water; pesticides; intestinal parasites over
treated with antibiotics; syphilis; massive drug taking (MDA)
combined with many sex partners; vaccines given to people with
weak immune systems.
Here’s probably the most interesting quote from “Ellis”:
[quote]These operatives knew, and had been briefed on this, that
[B]T-cells could actually vary all over the place, up and down,
depending on factors like the time of day a person was given the
test.[/B] It was another area of shoddy science, and they took
advantage of it. I'll give you an example.
You've got some guy who has been told he's HIV positive, and so,
even though he's not sick at all, he gets tested every few
months for numbers of T-cells. Sooner or later, those numbers
will go down on a test. If the doctor isn't really attentive,
he'll tell the patient he is now officially diagnosed with
full-blown AIDS, because those numbers are too low. If the
patient hasn't been taking AZT yet, he will go for it
now.[/quote]
HTML http://www.whale.to/b/rappoport11.html
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/FHyYK)
#Post#: 2512--------------------------------------------------
AIDS – caused by vaccines?
By: Firestarter Date: November 25, 2018, 8:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There are some theories that AIDS was caused by vaccines. As
there are lots of possible causes for immune deficiency I’m not
convinced, but I can’t rule this hypothesis out.
Leonard Horrowitz has written a book about the invention of AIDS
in which he argues that Dr. Robert Gallo was making a virus like
HIV/AIDS from Fort Detrick for many years. After Dr. Luc
Montagnier in France discovered HIV and hoped it could be
labelled the cause of AIDS, he sent the virus to Gallo. Gallo
used the virus of Montagnier to claim being one of the first to
discover it.
Horrowitz follows most arguments of Dr. Robert B. Strecker, that
the “AIDS virus” is a retrovirus that´s been manmade by
combining bovine leukaemia virus of cattle and visna virus of
sheep. When Horrowitz found reports from Gallo from 1971, 1972
about modifying simian monkey virus by infusing them with cat
leukaemia RNA, he thinks this is like making cancers as seen in
people with AIDS.
[I]I don’t believe that this is possible though that’t not even
counting that he contradicts himself by claiming that Gallo made
the HIV virus and then had to used the virus Montagnier found to
claim he had discovered it...[/I]
In 1970 Dr. MacArthur was supplied with $10 million from the
Department of Defense (DoD) to “produce a synthetic biological
agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no
natural immunity could have been acquired”.
On July 30th, 1977, the United States’ congress annotated Title
50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 for the DoD, that states that
chemical and biological agents can be tested on humans.
In 1978 advertisements in New York, Los Angeles and San
Francisco were issued specifically asking for promiscuous
homosexuals. George W. Merck’s pharmaceutical company was
involved in this experiment in which the participants were
injected with HIV (according to Horrowitz). In 1981 the first
stories in the media appeared about AIDS in homosexuals from the
New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco areas.
In 1986 and 1987 AZT was approved rapidly, first in Great
Britain, and then the USA. The commissions approving AZT had a
lot of decision makers with financial ties to Burroughs Wellcome
(the manufacturer of AZT, later merged with another company and
renamed GlaxoSmithKline). John Lauritsen used the Freedom of
Information Act to get information on the phases I en II trials
in the USA and concludes from the evaluation of Ellen Cooper
that many died in these trials on AZT.
Burroughs was fully owned by the Wellcome trust, at that time
controlled by Lord Oliver Franks, among others director of the
Rockefeller Foundation.
Leonard Horrowitz - EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS & EBOLA (1996):
HTML http://ethosworld.com/library/Leonard-G.-Horowitz-Emerging-Viruses-AIDS-%26-Ebola-Nature,-Accident-or-Intentional-%281996%29.pdf
On July 30th, 1977, the United States Code annotated Title 50,
Chapter 32, Section 1520 of the DoD was signed. This approves
the testing of chemical weapons on human victims: “Use of human
subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by
Department of Defense; accounting to Congressional committees
with respect to experiments and studies; notification of local
civilian officials”.
For more arguments that AIDS was made in the USA see the
following links:
HTML http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/AIDS3.html?q=AIDS3.html
HTML http://www.whale.to/b/walker_azt.doc
On March 17, 1978 a nice memorandum was signed by Secretary of
State Zbigniew Brezinski “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM-46”. This led to recommendations on the US policy
towards Black Africa.
Memorandum-46 was (is) a plan to discredit “black” people in
general.
Because the state propaganda invented that the cause of HIV was
sexual promiscuity and sharing needles for injecting drugs,
convincing us that black Africans were often HIV-positive was in
reality (also) a strategy to discredit them: [quote]2. Special
clandestine operations should be launched by the CIA to generate
mistrust and hostility in American and world opinion against
joint activity of the two forces, and to cause division among
Black African radical national groups and their leaders
(...)
4. The FBI should mount surveillance operations against Black
African representatives and collect sensitive information on
those, especially at the U.N., who oppose U.S. policy toward
South Africa. The information should include facts on their
links with the leaders of the Black movement in the United
States, thus making possible at least partial neutralization of
the adverse effects of their activity (...)
(b) to elaborate and bring into effect a special program
designed to perpetuate division in the Black movement and
neutralize the most active groups of leftist radical
organizations representing different social strata of the Black
community: to encourage division in Black circles;
(c) to preserve the present climate which inhibits the emergence
from within the Black leadership of a person capable of exerting
nationwide appeal
(...)
(e) to support actions designed to sharpen social stratification
in the Black community which would lead to the widening and
perpetuation of the gap between successful educated Blacks and
the poor, giving rise to growing antagonism between different
Black groups and a weakening of the movement as a whole
(...)
(g) to take every possible means through the AFL-CIO leaders to
counteract the increasing influence of Black labor organizations
which function in all major unions and in particular, the
National Coalition of Black Trade Union and its leadership
including the creation of real preference for adverse and
hostile reaction among White trade unionists to demands for
improvement of social and economic welfare of the Blacks
(...)
This would promote the achievement of a twofold purpose:
first, it would be easier to control the activity of loyal black
representatives within existing institution;
second, the idea of an independent black political party now
under discussion within black leadership circles would soon lose
all support.[/quote]
HTML http://www.finalcall.com/memorandum-46.htm
I have found a 11 May 1987 article in the London Times, that
shows that argues that smallpox vaccination by the WHO could
have been the cause of AIDS.
[quote]The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the mass
vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox. The World Health
Organization, which masterminded the 13-year campaign, is
studying new scientific evidence suggesting that immunization
with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected,
dormant human immuno defence virus infection (HIV).
Some experts fear that in obliterating one disease, another
disease was transformed from a minor endemic illness of the
Third World into the current pandemic. While doctors now accept
that Vaccinia can activate other viruses, they are divided about
whether it was the main catalyst to the Aids epidemic.
But an adviser to WHO who disclosed the problem, told The Times:
'I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest
findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia.
Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to
the explosion of Aids.' 'In obliterating one disease, another
was transformed.'
Further evidence comes from the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre
in Washington. While smallpox vaccine is no longer kept for
public health purposes, new recruits to the American armed
services are immunized as a precaution against possible
biological warfare. Routine vaccination of a 19-year-old recruit
was the trigger for stimulation of dormant HIV virus into Aids.
This discovery of how people with subclinical HIV infection are
at risk of rapid development of Aids as a vaccine-induced
disease was made by a medical team working with Dr Robert
Redfield at Walter Reed. The recruit who developed Aids after
vaccination had been healthy throughout high school. He was
given multiple immunizations, followed by his first smallpox
vaccination.
Two and a half weeks later he developed fever, headaches, neck
stiffness and night sweats. Three weeks later he was admitted to
Walter Reed suffering from meningitis and rapidly developed
further symptoms of Aids and died after responding for a short
time to treatment. There was no evidence that the recruit had
been involved in any homosexual activity.
In describing their discovery in a paper published in the New
England Journal of Medicine a fortnight ago, the Walter Reed
team gave a warning against a plan to use modified versions of
the smallpox vaccine to combat other diseases in developing
countries.
(…)
The smallpox vaccine theory would account for the position of
each of the seven Central African states which top the league
table of most-affected countries; why Brazil became the most
afflicted Latin American country; and how Haiti became the route
for the spread of Aids to the US. It also provides an
explanation of how the infection was spread more evenly between
males and females in Africa than in the West and why there is
less sign of infection among five to 11-year-olds in Central
Africa.
Although no detailed figures are available, [B]WHO information
indicated that the Aids league table of Central Africa matches
the concentration of vaccinations. The greatest spread of HIV
infection coincides with the most intense immunization
programmes, with the number of people immunised being as
follows: Zaire 36,878,000; Zambia 19,060,000; Tanzania
14,972,000; Uganda 11,616,000; Malawai 8,118,000; Ruanda
3,382,000 and Burundi 3,274,000.
Brazil, the only South American country covered in the
eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that
region.[/B] About 14,000 Haitians, on United Nations secondment
to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to
return home at a time when Haiti had become a popular playground
for San Francisco homosexuals.[/quote]
HTML https://www.wanttoknow.inf
o/870511vaccineaids
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/UWPdR)
I’ve searched for the referenced Robert Redfield “scientific”
report that was referred to in the last article, but couldn’t
find a freely viewable version – Redfield et al –
[I]Disseminated Vaccinia in a Military Recruit with Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Disease[/I] (1987):
HTML http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198703123161106
#Post#: 2523--------------------------------------------------
Judy Mikovits – retroviruses in vaccines
By: Firestarter Date: November 26, 2018, 9:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This could be THE single most shocking “medical” story that I’ve
heard all year...
Molecular biologist Judy Anne Mikovits was part of a scientific
team that discovered xenotropic murine leukemia virus (XMRV) in
many of the study subjects with cancer, motor-neuron disorders
and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).
In 2009, the team published this study, which understandably got
very controversial. The team concluded that the XMRV retrovirus
came from mice. This was probably caused by contaminated
vaccines.
In October 2011, Mikovits was fired and subsequently arrested on
18 November, because she wouldn’t admit that her 2009 paper was
a fraud for manipulation of data and theft (of her own
notebooks).
The criminal charges against her were dismissed.
The paper was retracted 23 December 2011, with the excuse that
the mouse retroviruses they found weren’t in the human blood,
but were contaminants (which is unlikely):
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Mikovits
The following interview with Judy Mikovits is a good summary of
what she has to say (12:15).
HTML https://youtu.be/rhZETbXCqCM
Following is a transcript of an interview of Judy Mikovits by
Wendy Myers.
They found retroviruses, similar to HIV, in patients with
chronic fatigue Syndrome, which must have come in their
bloodstream by vaccines.
A lot of diseases are caused by these mouse retroviruses,
including AIDS and cancer. [quote]In 2009, we published a paper
showing retroviruses, viruses similar to HIV, were being
isolated. We isolated them from patients with the disease also
from their family members, also from people with cancer and
autism.
And so these retroviruses now, HIV/AIDS-like viruses, are
causing even worse than HIV/AIDS. They're causing these diseases
which destroy your immune system and your brain, and the worst
part about it is you don't die. You simply suffer for decades
with no brain, in horrible pain, can't sleep, can't think, can't
work. And the government had basically been calling these people
crazy, because you look fine. You look pretty like you and me
sitting here. And everybody says, "Oh, she can't be sick.”
(...)
Yeah, yeah, yeah. So we wrote the book Plague. Kent Heckenlively
is a former attorney, and he had an injured daughter, a severely
vaccineinjured daughter, in one of our family studies isolating
these HIV/AIDSlike viruses. Well, my colleagues from HIV and the
National Cancer Institute were all working with us at the
Whittemore Peterson Institute, and they were finding a much
bigger incidence of these viruses. And they're mouse viruses, so
they're related to mice. They're mice endogenous retroviruses
that have jumped into people, and that's how they cause disease.
The HIV-like virus came from monkeys into people.
And one of my colleagues from HIV wrote a paper in January of
2011 and said, "The most likely way that mouse viruses got into
human is vaccines and biological therapies." All of our
biological therapies essentially since the early '90s or mid
'80s are biological therapies that now we understood from my
work and from his commentary paper were most likely entering
humans from not only vaccines but our biological cancer
therapies, because they're all made in mice.
(...)
So chronic fatigue syndrome is really a big closet disease. It's
a shameful stigma name because in America, you can't be tired.
And they do the same thing, blame the victim, and just say
you're crazy, and oh, suck it up and get up and go work. And
when these devastating viruses hit your brain, you're literally
destroyed. So what our book does is walk through my arrest, my
jailing. So it opens with my arrest. And so I get held in jail
for five days without seeing a lawyer, with all of my
constitutional-
On a fake charge without a warrant, without anything. I was
called a fugitive from justice, but you can be a fugitive if
there's no crime.
(…)
The truth is essentially every vaccine is contaminated and/or
they're making them out of backbones of retroviruses. And the
sad truth is that the retroviruses stay in your genome for
generations, and the murine leukemia, the gammaretroviruses from
mice, can infect stem cells. So generations, grandma can have
MECFS, and child can get it from grandma, inherit the sequence,
and then the vaccines amplify it because there are many, many
more viruses in there. Because the retroviruses, you don't have
to have the particle, you just have the sequence. So anywhere
there is animal cell line or cellular material, the sequence is
only 8000 base pairs. It's called a provirus. And the provirus
needs your cells in order to make a particle and be infectious
and transmissible, and that's a really important part. But we're
injuring literally thousands, tens of thousands, millions of
base pairs of DNA in every single vaccine containing cow
retroviruses, mouse retroviruses, pig retroviruses. And in fact,
if you look at the CDC excipient list for the RotaTeq, the
RotaTeq vaccine. They list two pig retroviruses in there, and
they say, "Oh, but they don't do anything to humans." By
definition, if you inject an animal retrovirus in a human, and
it is expressed, it will hurt you.
(...)
Well, it's interesting, because we all have retroviruses that
are immune system has crippled. They're called endogenous
retroviruses, so they're not infectious and transmissible. And
so meaning they're just silenced, and your immune system has
kept them silent. And you have to keep them silent. So really it
becomes a big conundrum. You don't want to test and say, "Do I
have a retrovirus?" We know that you have lots of retroviruses,
and there are pieces and parts and components of those
retroviruses in every vaccine. And what we've learned now is you
don't have to have an infectious retrovirus, just the
components, just the pieces and parts, just the envelope gene,
and the glyphosate in vaccines, or the mercury, or the aluminum
that actually cripple the parts of the immune system that keep
them silent. So it's literally a time bomb because we all have
retroviruses, but mine are silent. Mine aren't turned on,
because I'm 60 years old, and most 60-year-olds only got two
vaccines. So it's not just a vaccine, it's the shear numbers of
these things. And it's not just the components and the
retroviral elements in the vaccines, it's the mercury. Because
every time you get one, it's like throwing gasoline on a fire.
So the kids get sicker and sicker and sicker. [/quote]
Mikovits also discovered that her superiors were committing
fraud. [quote]Yes. And I also uncovered that my supervisors were
misappropriating federal funds, and they were also selling al
diagnostic test that hadn't been properly validated for the
family of viruses. And so I discovered this huge criminal ring
surrounding the University of Nevada, Harry Reid, Harvey
Whittemore. And basically, they were using this discovery.
Harvey Whittemore had been embezzling money from his business
partners, and they caught him. And they were threatening to kill
him
And he had lied to the FBI about a election fraud with regard to
Harry Reid, so Harry Reid wasn't actually legally elected. And
they were paying people basically to donate to his campaign. So
lots of other things going on there. And I had discovered this.
In late August and early September, I discovered the scientific
fraud and the misappropriation of federal funds by actually the
first author on our paper, who was basically taking the money
out of the research lab and putting it in the company, which is
a big, big no-no, and not doing his job. And he was being paid
for it. And so they were taking our data and using it.[/quote]
AIDS couldn’t have been caused by HIV. [quote]So the hope, and
that's why we put the story in the book about Magic Johnson,
because my PhD thesis, the dogma at the time I was doing my
research, was that all our therapies in HIV were made towards
the T-cell. And it was let yourself get sicker and sicker and
don't use these dangerous drugs, because they're too dangerous,
and they'll kill you.
Well, what my research showed we knew only one in 10,000 T-cells
was infected. And I said something else is the orchestrator. So
the orchestrator of the disease turned out to be the macrophage,
the brain microglia, and what's the biggest damage from
aluminum? The brain microglia, the macrophages all over your
body. You have different microglia, different macrophage subsets
that do different specialized things. Like fatty liver is our
microglia in our liver, the Kupffer cells getting sick. And
that's all the toxins, all the poisons, things like
that.[/quote]
[I]I believe that there is only one way to keep ourselves
mentally and physically healthy:
Good nutrition;
Keep away from toxics;
Regular exercise.[/I]
I don’t believe in wonder medicines, but in preventing disease
instead, but Suramin is probably better than the AIDS drugs that
are used these days.
Mikovits claims that Suramin is a cure for autism, but Bayern
took it away from the kids. [quote]Well, as natural products. So
you can use teas. You can use herbs. You can use 100-year old
Bayer drug called suramin, S-U-R-A-M-I-N, and that drug is
100-year-old drug, and we know how to use it safely. And so an
investigator, and I won't use his name, in San Diego, did a
small clinical trial in autism with suramin used properly.
We used to do a lot of research in the early '80s. It was one of
our first HIV drugs. We pulled everything off the shelf that
made sense that might work. And so suramin actually was curative
for autism. And Bayer, the drug company, took it away from the
kids. You cannot get it. It can heal these kids like Kent
Heckenlively's daughter who hasn't spoke a word and is
desperately I'll. She looks like an AIDS patient, because that's
what she is. And he can't get the drug. And so this just
happened in the last year. So our book is revealing when you
cure a disease, you know what caused it.
And so suramin was actually the reason why we didn't use it in
HIV is what did it work best on? Oh, the gammaretroviruses from
mice. The retroviruses that we found from mice. And so HIV is a
different family of viruses, so the suramin drug worked best on
the family of viruses we isolated and discovered associated with
all of these diseases.[/quote]
HTML https://zl8r4yljp7281pio28kcrwnb-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Judy-Mikovits-Podcast-Transcript.pdf
Here’s a longer interview with Judy Mikovits (1:15:35).
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6HPe-s1V2o
Following is the retracted 2009 study.
Of the 101 test subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
that were analysed, 68 (67%) contained XMRV.
XMRV was only found in the blood of 8 out of 218 (3.7%) healthy
people.
They verified that it was highly improbable that they had
detected a laboratory contaminant.
The XMRV sequences were more than 99% similar to those
previously reported for strains of XMRV in prostate cancer
tumours.
The XMRV sequences were very similar to mouse strains.
After infecting T and B cells with XMRV, it was found that the
cells of the CFS patients reacted differently to the XMRV than
the (blood of) healthy individuals.
These results make it more probable that the immune response of
the CFS patients to XMRV is different than for healthy people.
J.A. Mikovits et al. – [I]Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus,
XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome[/I] (2009):
HTML https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49702559_Detection_of_an_infectious_retrovirus_XMRV_in_blood_cells_of_patients_with_chronic_fatigue_syndrome
Following is a later 2010 article in which Mikovits defends the
earlier 2009 study.
They detected XMRV in more than 75% of 101 patients with CFS by
5 different methods.
It is simply not possible that the blood samples used were
contaminated with mouse retroviruses as the WPI and NCI labs
where the analysis with PCR was done had never worked with mouse
tissues.
J.A. Mikovits et al. – [I]Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus,
XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome[/I] (2010):
HTML https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073172/
In 2014, Mikovits co-authored, "[I]Plague: One Scientist’s
Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome[/I]" with Kent Heckenlively.
Following is an article written by Heckenlively to promote the
book,
In 2012, a group headed by Ian Lipkin came to the conclusion
that there is no association between XMRV and patients with
chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
In a strange twist, they excluded patients with the following
conditions: 1) HIV virus; 2) Hepatitis B or C virus; 3)
Treponema pallidium (tapeworm); 4) B. burgdorfieri (Lyme disease
spirochete); 5) Illness associated with fatigue; 6) Abnormal
serum characteristics; 7; Abnormal thyroid functions.
There were no good objective reasons to exclude these “kind” of
people. Micro-biologist Gerwyn Morris explained that this is
like "[I]looking for HIV, but excluding homosexual males, IV
drug users, and those who'd received a blood transfusion[/I]".
So they intentionally manipulated the study...
In 2013, Lipkin said in a public conference call with CDC that
they found retroviruses in 85% of the sample pools but didn’t
know whether this 85% is “clinically significant or not”.
This manipulated study was used to do no follow-up research on
the findings of Mikovits and her team of scientists:
HTML http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/plague-book-america-must-read
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/WDsxv)
For more information on vaccines:
HTML https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1346
#Post#: 2535--------------------------------------------------
AIDS vaccines; PrEP
By: Firestarter Date: November 27, 2018, 10:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[B]AIDS vaccines[/B]
Ever since the HIV causes AIDS hoax has been pushed by the
media, big pharma has been working hard to get a vaccine
accepted. Surprisingly still without success...
For more than 20 years the eugenics movement has been pushing
for vaccination for AIDS – The global HIV vaccine pipeline.
The following is from the “Pipeline Report global antiretroviral
treatment (ART) guidelines” from July 2016. This also includes
information on Tuberculosis.
In 2015 it was recommended to poison all HIV positive people
with ART.
According to Polly Clayden, 40% of children on ART don’t get
enough, and developing “new antiretroviral drugs and appropriate
formulations for children continues to be far too slow”.
They want to harmonise (abolish?) regulations to speed up
approval for new ART poisons and HIV vaccines.
They want to expand free condoms and lubricant, counselling, and
access to AIDS testing and treatment.
“Education” should promote and facilitate participation in
clinical trials.
Manipulation of research to make “evidence that interventions
could benefit immunologic non-responders (INRs) even if they
fail the cure research context”.
I read in this report: [quote]Currently ongoing and planned
cure-related clinical trials are not expected to lead directly
to a cure, but rather to define pathways which when further
developed and possibly combined may lead to sterilizing or
functional cure[/quote]
I read here that sterilisation of the population is an objective
of AIDS-treatment:
HTML http://www.pipelinereport.org/2016/executive-summary
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/YeF4C)
The following report by the International Aids Vaccine
Initiative (IAVI), is also relevant, because it proves that the
focus in HIV-vaccination is on women.
If my theory is correct that the objective of HIV-vaccination is
depopulation by sterilisation, the focus would obviously be on
young women and girls...
The IAVI has performed a 2 year, $210 million pilot program
launched by: US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
(PEPFAR), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Nike
Foundation.
This program focuses on “hot spots” in 10 countries where HIV
incidence is highest among girls and young women.
They specifically focus on the girls and young women in east and
south Africa, because these are supposedly infected at rates 2
to 5 times higher than boys and men their age, with the
non-existent HIV virus.
82% of all adolescents (ages 10-19) with HIV reside in Africa.
Globally, half of adults infected with HIV are women. In Africa
women represent 60% of HIV positive victims.
Adolescent girls, should be vaccinated as pre-adolescents before
the onset of sexual activity ([I]before they can produce more
unwanted children...[/I]).
The UNAIDS-Lancet Commission calls for efforts to expand access
to HIV/AIDS treatment particularly among women and girls,
including development of an AIDS vaccine.
The number of new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths is
declining globally:
HTML http://www.iavi.org/what-we-do/advocacy/the-power-of-community-engagement/why-women-and-girls-need-an-aids-vaccine
[B]PrEP[/B]
After the highly toxic AZT was quickly approved for an
AIDS-medicine, it was also quickly advised for HIV-positive
victims, without any symptoms of AIDS.
We have really come full circle as in 2018 the ARV Pre-Exposure
Prophylaxis (PrEP) is pushed for HIV-negative promiscuous gays
(and some other “high-risk” individuals)…
PrEP was first a treatment for HIV-positive victims, but now
this PrEP (a [I]blue pill[/I] sold as Truvada) has become the
miracle drug that will prevent HIV-infections. PrEP is now
instead ONLY given to HIV-negative people and NOT to
HIV-positive victims. This requires an HIV-test (get your test
now!)…
In [I]The Matrix[/I] movie (1999) the [I]blue pill[/I]
represents “blissfull ignorance”!
I haven’t found a single story that tries to explain how PrEP
could prevent an infection with the (magical) HIV “virus”. I
neither have found any good story that exposes PrEP for the
fraud it is (besides stories on adverse effects).
It is claimed that when promiscuous gays take PrEP daily it is
almost 100% effective in preventing an HIV-positive test. I
haven’t found a single trial on PrEP that proves it prevents, or
delays, AIDS (but instead only if it prevents HIV-positive
tests)…
The following 2016 report is the “best“ scientific-looking on
PrEP that I found. No placebo was used, so the trial is
worthless…
They took 544 HIV-negative gay men who had anal intercourse
without a condom in the previous 90 days. About half of them got
the daily PrEP tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine
and the others nothing (for “control”).
The participants were enrolled between 29 November 2012 and 30
April 2014. Based on early “evidence” of effectiveness, the
trial steering committee quickly recommended on 13 October 2014,
that all participants would get PrEP, effectively stopping the
evaluation of PrEP. Just like the AZT trials…
The “evidence” was that only 3 subjects in the group on PrEP got
an HIV-positive test versus 20 in the “control” group.
HIV-positive was decided based on the (unreliable) HIV
antigen–antibody test. Although they were also tested with the
HIV RNA test, these results were ignored for some (unexplained)
reason...
There were 28 adverse events caused by PrEP, the most common:
nausea, headache, and arthralgia.
Sheena McCormack – [I]Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the
acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results
from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised
trial[/I] (2016):
HTML https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700047/
#Post#: 2556--------------------------------------------------
Trioxidal & Interferon
By: Firestarter Date: November 28, 2018, 11:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I’ve found 2 stories on supposed “cures” for AIDS – Trioxidal
and Interferon. I have a hard time believing in “miracle drugs”
though...
I haven’t found evidence that either of them has any (positive
or negative) effect on AIDS. Interferon could be the key in
understanding the disease AIDS. The pharmaceutical establishment
has claimed that HIV is the cause of AIDS, but the role of
interferon is unknown to most of us...
[B]Trioxidal, Robert Vesco[/B]
Robert Vesco bought IOS in 1970 for less than $5 million, and
looted it of $220 million in funds.
After he escaped the US to evade the charges brought against
him, he first settled in Costa Rica, where he invested some $11
million to become “friends” with President José Figueres.
Vesco also befriended nephew of President Richard M. Nixon,
Donald A. Nixon Jr., and gave $200,000 to the Nixon campaign
illegally through US Commerce Secretary and chief fund-raiser
Maurice Stans.
In 1978, Vesco was forced to leave for the Bahamas. In the years
that followed he hop scotched to several countries, including
Antigua and Nicaragua, before settling in Cuba in 1982.
Vesco eventually became an enemy of the Castro government, when
he was accused of defrauding a state-run biotechnology
laboratory in a project that involved Donald Nixon, and
sentenced to 13 years. This was about the production of the
miracle medicine Trioxidal (TX) that would cure cancer, AIDS,
arthritis and even the common cold.
TX is illegal in the US. They worked on TX at the Labiofam
plant; its president is Gloria Castro (a relative of Fidel's)
and Fragga Castro (Fidel's nephew):
HTML https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/a-very-big-fish-indeed-1591664.html
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/v8JjH)
I haven’t found any more information on Trioxidal (there is a
lot of interesting on Robert Vesco, but not in the context of
this thread)...
[B]Interferon[/B]
In 1992, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced
that it would test the AIDS-drug interferon, because of the
common believe within the black community that it’s a cure for
AIDS. The study included several hundred patients treated with
low doses of interferon.
Physicians, who prescribe interferon in low doses, reported that
it makes HIV-positive people “feel better”.
Other drugs like Immuviron and the similar Kemron were also used
in the US black community for years.
An important advocate for interferon is Abdul Alim Mohammad,
medical director of a non-profit organisation affiliated with
the [I]Nation of Islam[/I].
Interferon, was formerly marketed under the name Immunex and in
1992 renamed as Immuviron – sold for about $1,500 for a
six-month supply.
Mohammad said in an interview: [quote]We talked to physicians,
patients and the like. We were really convinced after 10 days
that it was very effective.[/quote]
In 1992, interferon was approved by the FDA for several
diseases, including a rare form of leukaemia and Kaposi's
sarcoma, a type of cancer that afflicts many AIDS patients.
In these treatments interferon is taken by injection in large,
expensive doses, costing up to $270 per day for treatment:
HTML https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/wellness/1992/11/03/nih-reverses-decision-on-controversial-aids-drug/46818d01-2fe8-46e2-9e83-38edfb5e9c45/?utm_term=.07be594a60f4
Unfortunately I didn’t find a single placebo controlled trial on
the treatment of AIDS-victims.
There’s even a Hollywood movie about AIDS-victim Ron Woodroof
that found out that AZT is highly toxic and looked for
alternative treatment (including interferon) that he sold to
other AIDS-victims – [I]Dallas Buyers Club[/I] (2013).
Woodroof got into legal problems with the US FDA. Woodroof died
in 1992, which was 7 years later than the doctors first
predicted.
Woodroof himself chose Peptide T for AIDS-treatment.
The state media understandably criticised the film for endorsing
“pseudoscience” (as opposed to the proven deadly toxicity of
AZT?).
They invented new characters for the movie to advertise the
LGBT-agenda:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_Buyers_Club
The reason that I think understanding interferon is important is
the relation with HIV and AZT-poisoning, while interferon is an
accepted therapy for HIV-positive victims with Kaposi’s sarcoma
and Hepatitis B and C.
The FDA first approved interferon alpha for the treatment of
hepatitis C in 1991.
Interferon is produced in response to viral infections as a
first line of defence and also has widespread effects on the
immune system.
Interferon was found in abundance in HIV-positive victims. It
seems illogical that injecting them with large amounts of
interferon, when they already had more than enough, would
benefit them.
AZT removes interferon from the body in the first week on AZT,
and reappears promptly when AZT is discontinued.
Some of the adverse effects of interferon are actually quite
similar to the reported effects of AIDS: 1) CD4 loss; 2)
leucopoenia; 3) low white and red blood counts; 4) high
beta2microglobulin counts; 5) an increase in serum
triglycerides:
HTML http://aidsperspective.net/blog/?p=118
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/m5s3q)
Interferon can have serious adverse effects.
Interferon can increase zidovudine's effectiveness, so that a
much lower dose of zidovudine (AZT) is needed:
HTML https://www.medicinenet.com/interferon/article.htm
The following study (without placebo) claims that some 1/3 of
the AIDS-victims with Kaposi's sarcoma benefitted (had a
positive “response”) from interferon treatment: [quote]Overall,
36 (35%) of 103 evaluable patients had either a complete (1 1
patients) or partial (25 patients) response to interferon
alfa-2b. The respective response rates of the low-,
intermediate-, and high-dose groups were 33%, 28%, and 45%.
However, these groups were not evenly balanced for known
prognostic factors.[/quote]
Volberding et al – [I]Treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma with
interferon alpha-2b (Intron A)[/I] (1987):
HTML https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/1097-0142%2819870201%2959%3A3%2B%3C620%3A%3AAID-CNCR2820591309%3E3.0.CO%3B2-5
#Post#: 2576--------------------------------------------------
HIV tests unreliable
By: Firestarter Date: November 29, 2018, 9:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I’ve found an interesting literature review that has a lot of
information on AIDS from AIDS-whistleblowers.
It includes information that shows that HIV tests aren’t
reliable…
In 1996, Johnson reported more than 60 factors that can cause a
false-positive HIV-positive test result.
No fewer than 5 different criteria have been used by different
groups in the US to decide if somebody is HIV-positive. The
criteria for a HIV-positive test are p41 and p24,
protein–antigens that are found in the blood of “[I]healthy
individuals[/I]”. This means that criteria used to “flag” the
presence of HIV aren’t “[I]specific to HIV or AIDS patients
[and] p24 and p41 are not even specific to illness[/I]”. In
other words, healthy victims can test HIV-positive but without
ever being “infected” by HIV...
There are significant differences worldwide in how the test
results are interpreted. If someone tests positive for p160 and
p120 he/she would be sentenced as HIV-positive in Africa, but
not in Britain. On the other hand a test reaction to p41, p32,
and p24 would be considered HIV-positive in Britain, but
negative in Africa.
Celia Farber comment cynically: [quote]… a person could revert
to being HIV-negative simply by buying a plane ticket from
Uganda to Australia.[/quote]
In 2010, the scientist Etienne de Harven added to the debate
that none of the images of particles supposedly representing HIV
ever show HIV-particles coming from an AIDS-patient.
Kay Mullis, who won the 1993 Nobel Prize for chemistry for
inventing PCR for detecting DNA, explained that PCR couldn’t be
used to test for HIV: [quote]these tests cannot detect free,
infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that
are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The
tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses
themselves.[/quote]
According to Mullis, AIDS is caused by “system overloads”, maybe
the result of a “chain reaction”. His hypothesis assumes that
AIDS is caused by: “[quote]an overwhelming number of distinct
organisms, which causes the immune dysfunction. These may
individually be harmless.[/quote]
Patricia Goodson – [I]Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis:
30 Years of Dissent[/I] (2014):
HTML https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172096/
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/sOXts)
A lot of information in this thread is hard to read because of
its “scientific” language. The following article on the HIV/AIDS
sham from December 2016 is more of a journalistic piece so much
easier to read…
Just like for vaccines, new AIDS therapies are exempted from
proper placebo controlled trials.
Antiretroviral trials are usually performed without a placebo
for controls.
Matt Irwin explained the unreliability of HIV-tests:
[quote][B]When [the viral load tests] are done on the serum of
people considered HIV-negative, 3% to 10% of them commonly have
positive viral loads, and the highest reported rate of false
positive results is a remarkable 60%[/B] (HIV surrogate marker
coll. group 2000). Although most cases reported have false viral
loads of 10,000 or less, there have been reports of false
positive viral loads as high as 100,000 copies per milliliter.
In the United States, where the prevalence of HIV is about 1 in
250 people (0.4%), [B]a false positive rate of only 2% would
still mean that random screening of the population would result
in 5 false positives for every true positive, and a false
positive rate of 10% would result in 25 false positives for
every true positive.[/B] The most likely explanation for this
high false positive rate is that HIV-RNA assays commonly react
with non-HIV RNA, such as that produced by normal human cells
and other microbes.[/quote]
In 2015, nearly 16 million HIV-positive people were treated,
compared to 9.7 million in late 2012 (worldwide)! This isn’t
caused by a huge increase in the number of HIV-positive people,
but by the efforts of health authorities to poison the victims
from the first time they have been sentenced to HIV-positive
status.
A 2005 study showed that HIV-positive victims poisoned with
HAART therapy suffered from: [quote]deaths related to end stage
liver disease were more common than deaths from opportunistic
infections… Hospitalizations for lactic acidosis, reconstitution
syndromes and late stage complications related to HAART were
becoming more apparent. Some authors also noted an increase in
mortality and hospital admission rate as the HAART era
progressed.[/quote]
It’s highly likely that at least some of these “symptoms” were
the direct result of the HAART therapy.
Bertrand, who was sentenced to be HIV-positive 7 years earlier,
refused AIDS-treatment. They tried to make him paranoid by
telling him that his “viral load” was around 250,000 copies
which caused him to “freak out”. Despite the unfavourable
forecasts of the doctors his “viral load” spontaneously fell to
11,500; it has never stabilised, oscillating around a “load” of
some 40,000 copies.
Bertrand also noted variations in his T-cell (CD4) count:
[quote]Over the tests, I was able to notice significant
variation in my count, without an apparent link to my health. It
had already gone down to 220 CD4, and then it rose up naturally.
On average, it would yo-yo around 350, without ever exceeding
500.[/quote]
Parents thought they could outsmart big pharma and stopped
poisoning their HIV-positive son with the ARV. Suddenly their
son got better and his CD4 and viral loads became much better
according to the medical quacks.
One day the medical “doctors” found out that the boy had no
“medication” in his blood. The parents were reported to the
Child Protection Court and their parental rights were
restricted. From then on they were controlled by a doctor, who
kept poisoning the child.
There are no reliable statistics on the number of HIV-positive
victims, who refuse triple therapy. This makes it impossible to
know how many HIV-positive victims stay healthy without the
“benefit” of antiretroviral therapy:
HTML http://pryskaducoeurjoly.com/actu/2447/hiv-positive-without-treatmentand-healthy?lang=en
(archived here:
HTML http://archive.is/gZLA0)
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page