URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <
       form action=&amp
       ;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; method=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;p
       ost&
       quot; target=&am
       p;amp;amp;quot;_top&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;cmd&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; value=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot
       ;_s-xclick&a
       mp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hosted_button_id&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; val
       ue=&
       quot;DKL7ADEKRVUBL&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;image&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.payp
       alobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; nam
       e=&q
       uot;submit&a
       mp;amp;quot; alt=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;quot;PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
       &quo
       t;&g
       t; &
       lt;img alt=&
       amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypalobjects.com
       /en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; width=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; height=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/form&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Christian Theology
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2107--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: guest17 Date: November 10, 2018, 2:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Olde Tymer link=topic=197.msg2106#msg2106
       date=1541880049]
       .
       [font=arial]FAIL SAFE
       According to John 8:29, 2Cor 5:21, Heb 4:15, and 1Pet 2:22;
       Jesus committed no sins of his own.
       The Watchtower Society is of the opinion that Christ didn't sin
       because he "chose" not to sin. That's what they say; but it's
       not what the Bible says. The fact of the matter is; Christ's
       divine genetics make it impossible for him to sin.
       ● 1John 3:9 . . Everyone who has been born from God does
       not carry on sin, because His [reproductive] seed remains in
       such one, and he cannot practice sin, because he has been born
       from God.
       That translation makes it look as though one born of God sins
       now and then but not all the time; viz: doesn't make a habit of
       sin. But the text on the Greek side of the Kingdom Interlinear
       reads like this:
       "He is not able to be sinning because out of God he has been
       generated."
       There's more:
       ● Col 2:9 . . It is in him that all the fullness of the
       divine quality dwells bodily.
       What we're looking at isn't nondescript divine quality; rather,
       the divine quality; viz: we're looking at the quality of God's
       divinity; which I think pretty safe to assume is impeccable. I
       seriously doubt even the Devil himself could fail and/or sin
       were he brimming with not just a percentage; but with all the
       quality of God's divinity.
       Q: If it was impossible for Christ to sin; then what practical
       purpose did his temptation serve?
       A: Christ testified "I always do the things pleasing to Him"
       (John 8:29). The Devil's failure to break Christ proves the
       truth of his statement. In other words: Christ was proof-tested
       to demonstrate that he contains no flaws.
       No doubt the Devil expected that after forty days in the outback
       without food, Christ would be worn down to the point where he
       would no longer care whether he sinned or not. But it made no
       difference. Christ was still just as impervious to sin after
       forty days in the outback as he was during the first 30 years of
       his life in Nazareth because Christ's innocence doesn't depend
       upon his resolve; rather, upon his genetics so to speak; viz:
       upon God's [reproductive] seed.
       While we're on the subject: what is the one thing God cannot do?
       Well; the JWs' conditioned response is that God cannot lie (Heb
       6:18). But a better response than that is God cannot sin. In
       point of fact: it is just as impossible for God to sin as it is
       for His progeny to sin. I mean; think about it. If God's progeny
       is unable to sin due to the intrinsically sinless nature of
       God's reproductive seed; then it goes without saying that the
       source of that seed would be unable to sin too.
       ● Jas 1:13 . . For with evil things God cannot be tried.
       _[/font]
       [/quote]
       I'm sure you know that the Governing Body is viewed as "anointed
       ones"  who the rank and file JW must obey and instead of seeing
       Jesus as the mediator, the rank and file JW are taught to view
       the Governing Body as, and this is what they call it, the only
       channel of communication to God. So in effect the Governing Body
       put themselves above Jesus.
       #Post#: 2108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 10, 2018, 2:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=truthjourney link=topic=197.msg2107#msg2107
       date=1541881653] [font=arial]I'm sure you know that the
       Governing Body is viewed as "anointed ones"  who the rank and
       file JW must obey[/font][/quote]
       [font=arial]See reply No.22
       _[/font]
       [quote author=truthjourney link=topic=197.msg2107#msg2107
       date=1541881653] [font=arial]instead of seeing Jesus as the
       mediator, the rank and file JW are taught to view the Governing
       Body as, and this is what they call it, the only channel of
       communication to God. [/font][/quote]
       [font=arial]See reply No.13
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2151--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 12, 2018, 12:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]HO THEÓS
       Q: Why does the Watchtower Society translate the Word in John
       1:1 as a god in lower case instead of God in upper case?
       A: The Watchtower Society's translation is based upon an
       imaginary grammatical technicality.
       The common Greek word for "god" is [I]theós[/I]. When it's
       modified by the little Greek definite article ho the Society
       translates  [I]theós[/I] in upper case, viz: in the Society's
       theological thinking; ho theós pertains to the one true God,
       while [I]theós[/I] by itself is somewhat flexible, for example
       John 1:18 and John 20:17 where [I]theós[/I] is translated in
       upper case though it be not modified by ho.
       However, according to Dr. Archibald T. Robertson's Grammar Of
       The Greek New Testament, page 767: in regards to nouns in the
       predicate; the article is not essential to speech. In other
       words: when [I]theós[/I] is in the predicate, ho can be either
       used, or not used, without making any real difference.
       So then; a translator's decision whether to capitalize either of
       the two [I]theós[/I] in John1:1 or not to capitalize them, is
       entirely arbitrary rather than dictated by a strict rule of
       Greek grammar.
       The Society prefers "a god" because lower case is agreeable with
       their opinion of Christ's celestial status.
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2163--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 13, 2018, 9:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]THE FIG TREE
       ● Mark 11:12-13 . .The next day, when they had come out
       from Bethany, he became hungry. And from a distance he caught
       sight of a fig tree that had leaves, and he went to see whether
       he would perhaps find something on it. But, on coming to it, he
       found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season of figs.
       Q: If Jehovah really was in the world as the man Jesus, then why
       didn't He know by omniscience that the fig tree would have no
       fruit? Why was it necessary for Him to examine it up close in
       person?
       A: Jehovah's conduct in that matter would've been unusual but by
       no means uncharacteristic.
       In the 11th chapter of Genesis, the people built themselves a
       tower. Jehovah came down to see the tower. Now, if Jehovah is
       omnipresent and omniscient, then why bother coming down out of
       heaven to inspect the tower in person?
       In the 18th chapter of Genesis, Jehovah announced to Abraham
       that He was on a journey to visit Sodom in order to determine
       whether the reports He was hearing about the city were true or
       not. Again: if Jehovah is omnipresent and omniscient, why bother
       coming down out of heaven to visit Sodom in person?
       In the 22nd chapter of Genesis, Jehovah had Abraham offer his
       son as a sacrifice made with fire. At the conclusion of the
       event; a celestial being-- speaking for Jehovah and speaking as
       Jehovah --said: "Now I do know that you are God-fearing in that
       you have not withheld your son, your only one, from Me."
       It goes without saying that Jehovah knows every man's thoughts,
       and He also knows the future, viz: nothing we do, say, or think
       catches Jehovah by surprise; He sees everything. So then, if
       Jehovah already knew in advance that Abraham would offer Isaac,
       and already knew in advance that Abraham was God-fearing, then
       why did He say "now I know"? Shouldn't Jehovah have already
       known?
       The only sensible answer to those questions, including the
       question about the fig tree, is that there is a humanness to God
       that began quietly coming to light all the way back in the very
       beginning of the Bible; but the New Testament is where we see
       God's humanness on display even more.
       ● John 1:18 . . No man has seen God at any time; the
       only-begotten god, who is in the bosom position with the Father,
       is the one that has explained him.
       "explained him" is accurate enough but doesn't really say it
       right-- "revealed him" is much better.
       ● John 14:7 . . . If you men had known me, you would have
       known my Father also; from this moment on you know him and have
       seen him. Philip said to him: "Lord, show us the Father, and it
       is enough for us." Jesus said to him: "Have I been with you men
       so long a time, and yet, Philip, you have not come to know me?
       He that has seen me has seen the Father also.
       Q: Well then, why didn't Jesus use his divine powers to make
       that tree produce fruit for him to eat right then and there on
       the spot instead of cursing the poor thing?
       A: Isn't that similar to the Devil's reasoning in the 4th
       chapter of Matthew?
       The fact of the matter is: Jesus was micro-managed. He cursed
       that fig tree in compliance with his Father's wishes to do so.
       ● John 6:38 . . I have come down from heaven to do, not my
       will, but the will of him that sent me.
       ● John 8:28 . . I do nothing of my own initiative
       ● John 8:29 . . He that sent me is with me; He did not
       abandon me to myself, because I always do the things pleasing to
       Him.
       ● John 10:30 . . I and my Father are unified
       ●  John 14:10 . . Do you not believe that I am in union
       with the Father, and the Father is in union with me?
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2175--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 14, 2018, 11:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]THOMAS' GOD(S)
       ● John 20:28 . . Thomas said to him: "My Lord and my God!"
       "God" is from the Greek word theós
       Many moons ago; I asked some Watchtower Society missionaries to
       explain to me why their Bible translated theós in upper case in
       Thomas' statement seeing as how in Watchtower theology; only
       Jehovah should be referred to with capital letters. Well; they
       were too inexperienced to explain and my question left them
       stumped.
       The fact of the matter is: in John 20:28, theós is modified by
       the Greek definite article "ho". So by the Society's own rules;
       its translators had to use upper case because it is their
       practice that whenever theós is modified by the Greek definite
       article, then the upper case is required.
       For argument's sake; let's remove the upper cases and translate
       the passage like this:
       Thomas said to him: "my lord and my god!"
       We could tolerate a lower case lord because that was a common
       way to address just about any superior back in those days,
       whether divine or otherwise; for example 1Pet 3:6.
       However; we would have difficulty with a lower case god because
       the passage is possessive. In other words: the apostle Thomas
       didn't just declare that Jesus was a god. No, Thomas clearly
       declared that Jesus was his god.
       The covenant that Moses' people agreed upon with Jehovah in the
       books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy forbids
       them to possess more than one god.
       "And God proceeded to speak all these words, saying: I am
       Jehovah your God, who have brought you out of the land of Egypt,
       out of the house of slaves. You must not have any other gods
       against my face." (Ex 20:1-30
       "against my face" is a combination of two Hebrew words that
       essentially refer to God's competitors. In other words: it is
       not Jehovah's wishes to have a market share of His people's
       affections; no, He'll settle for nothing less than 100%. (cf.
       Mark 12:28-30)
       If the apostle Thomas was a Torah-trained Jew, then he was fully
       aware that possessing any other god but Jehovah would incur the
       covenant's curse upon himself.
       ● Deut 27:26 . . Cursed is the one who will not put the
       words of this law in force by doing them.
       The way I see it: the Society has two options. Either the
       apostle Thomas knew what he was doing when he addressed Jesus as
       his god, or he meant to say something else.
       Now, if the apostle Thomas knew what he was doing when he
       addressed Jesus as his god, then John Q and Jane Doe JWs need to
       ask around and find out why it is that Jesus Christ was the
       apostle Thomas' god but he isn't the Watchtower Society's god.
       Plus: I would really like to know how it is that the apostle
       Thomas and the Watchtower Society are poles apart in their
       opinions of Christ's divine status when Thomas actually
       associated with Christ and was one of his close personal
       friends.
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2217--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 15, 2018, 8:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]CHRIST'S GOD
       ● John 20:17 . . Be on your way to my brothers and say to
       them; "I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God
       and your God."
       Q: If Jesus is God, as classical Christianity claims, then how
       can he have a god? Does God worship Himself?
       A: I have yet to encounter the language of John 20:17 in
       reverse, viz: I have yet to see a passage in the Bible where the
       Father refers to His son as "my God".
       For simplicity's sake; it helps to think of the true God as a
       species; viz: if indeed a true God were to beget a child, He
       would beget a child of like species; i.e. a true God would beget
       a true divine being like Himself because that's the only kind of
       offspring that a true God could engender; just as when a true
       human begets a child, they beget a child of like species i.e.
       they beget a true human being like themselves because that's the
       only kind of offspring that a true human can engender.
       There is a hierarchy in the divine relationship just as there is
       a hierarchy in human relationships. Though all members of a
       human family are equally human, they are not all equal in rank
       and privilege; some are superior and some are subordinate. (cf.
       John 14:28, 1Cor 15:28)
       Now, we can volley back and forth with JWs, countering each
       other's verses with more verses: verse upon verse; but I can
       just about guarantee that us and they will both be chasing our
       tails and getting nowhere unless we approach the Son's
       relationship to his Father from a biological perspective; which
       is a perspective that just about anybody with even a cursory
       knowledge of the birds and the bees can understand with ease.
       The Watchtower Bible And Tract Society calls Jesus "the
       only-begotten son from a Father" and also "the only-begotten
       god". Well, don't let that mislead you. The Society dare not
       accept Christ's status as God's literal offspring because the
       ramifications would require that they revise their theology.
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2261--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 16, 2018, 8:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]LEARNING OBEDIENCE
       ● Heb 5:7-9 . . In the days of his flesh Christ offered up
       supplications and also petitions to the One who was able to save
       him out of death, with strong outcries and tears, and he was
       favorably heard for his godly fear. Although he was a Son, he
       learned obedience from the things he suffered; and after he had
       been made perfect he became responsible for everlasting
       salvation to all those obeying him
       The "perfection" Jesus Christ obtained by means of suffering is
       directly related to his high priesthood rather than his personal
       conduct.
       ● Heb 5:10 . . Because he has been specifically called by
       God a high priest according to the manner of Melchizedek.
       In order for a high priest to be effective, he has to be capable
       of empathy.
       ● Heb 5:1-3 . . For every high priest taken from among men
       is appointed in behalf of men over the things pertaining to God,
       that he may offer gifts and sacrifices for sins. He is able to
       deal moderately with the ignorant and erring ones since he also
       is surrounded with his own weakness, and on its account he is
       obliged to make offerings for sins as much for himself as for
       the people.
       Jesus Christ of course could do no wrong of his own; but he was
       put through the wringer so he'd have a taste of what us mere
       mortals face every day of our lives.
       ● Heb 4:15 . . For we have as high priest, not one who
       cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has been
       tested in all respects like ourselves, but without sin.
       Hence, the purpose of the suffering that the Son endured was for
       a far different purpose than the discipline which the Father's
       lesser sons are put through at Heb 12:5-11 since according to
       1John 3:9 and Col 2:9 it was, and it still is, impossible for
       God's son to ever be unholy, or unrighteous, or disobedient.
       In other words; the Son's suffering was for the purpose of
       experiencing first-hand what it's like to obey as a human being.
       As the Word in heaven, obedience is his way of life because
       according to John 1:1-14, the Word is a god; but the rest of us
       are mere mortals. Obedience isn't a piece of cake for those of
       us who are only human.
       It's one thing to sympathize and say you feel your fellow man's
       pain; but in order to truly empathize with his pain; you've got
       to go through it yourself. It's exactly that which makes Jesus
       an excellent choice for high priesthood in heaven because the
       things he suffered made him a "merciful" high priest; viz: an
       high priest that's truly one of us instead of an indifferent
       judgmental bigot from another world.
       During America's dust bowl era in the 1930's, the Federal Farm
       Security Administration sent out an educated young lady named
       Sonora Babb to counsel migrant farm workers out west. Nobody
       trusted her until they found out she grew up in the so-called No
       Man's Land of the southern great plains. Sonora wasn't just
       another indifferent stuffed-shirt bureaucrat. She was familiar
       with the dust bowlers' way of life first-hand, and it made all
       the difference in the quality of her rapport with migrant farm
       workers.
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2262--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 16, 2018, 8:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]I'm not in the habit of offering unsolicited
       spiritual counseling on internet forums; but today I probably
       should.
       Post No.36 addressed Christ's high priesthood. Non-anointed
       Jehovah's Witnesses-- a.k.a. the earthly class; viz: the hewers
       of wood and haulers of water, the great crowd ---do not have
       direct access to it, rather, they have indirect access to
       Christ's high priesthood via their affiliation with the
       Watchtower Society. (See post No.13)
       May I suggest to any and/or all JWs hereabout that they take
       advantage of whatever degree of access they have for now and
       speak up candidly and forthrightly with Christ, asking him if
       there isn't some way to take advantage of his high priesthood's
       services without having to be affiliated with the Watchtower
       Society; i.e. as a free moral agent instead of dependent upon a
       hierarchy.
       It's a reasonable request, and I'm pretty sure if asked in all
       honesty and sincerity that Christ will get back to its inquirer
       with a response.
       ● John 6:37-28 . . Everything the Father gives me will
       come to me, and the one that comes to me I will by no means
       drive away; because I have come down from heaven to do, not my
       will, but the will of him that sent me.
       ● Heb 4:16 . . Let us, therefore, approach with freeness
       of speech to the throne of undeserved kindness, that we may
       obtain mercy and find undeserved kindness for help at the right
       time.
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2289--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 17, 2018, 5:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]THE PARAKLETOS
       ● John 14:16-17 . . I will request the Father and he will
       give you another helper to be with you forever, the spirit of
       the truth, which the world cannot receive, because it neither
       beholds it nor knows it. You know it, because it remains with
       you and is in you.
       ● John 14:26 . .The helper, the holy spirit, which the
       Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things
       and bring back to your minds all the things I told you.
       John Q and Jane Doe non-anointed Watchtower Society missionaries
       are taught to believe that God's spirit is alongside assisting
       them to identify, and to understand, the correct interpretations
       of the Bible. However, the Society's missionaries are also
       taught that only a special guild of 144,000 anointed Jehovah's
       Witnesses actually have the spirit  "inside" them rather than
       only alongside and that is very serious. Here's why:
       ● Rom 8:9 . .You are in harmony, not with the flesh, but
       with the spirit, if God's spirit truly dwells in you.
       Seeing as how God's spirit does not truly dwell in John Q and
       Jane Doe missionary, then they are, by default, in harmony with
       the flesh. That only makes things worse. Here's why:
       ● Rom 8:5-8 . . For those who are in accord with the flesh
       set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those in accord
       with the spirit on the things of the spirit. For the minding of
       the flesh means death, but the minding of the spirit means life
       and peace; because the minding of the flesh means enmity with
       God, for it is not under subjection to the law of God, nor, in
       fact, can it be. So those who are in harmony with the flesh
       cannot please God.
       Their situation is just too ironic for words: John Q and Jane
       Doe missionaries displease God, and He displeases them; yet they
       go door-to-door sincerely believing themselves Jehovah's friends
       and allies.
       _[/font]
       #Post#: 2346--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Experiencing Jehovah's Witnesses
       By: Olde Tymer Date: November 19, 2018, 8:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       .
       [font=arial]THE LAST ADAM
       ● 1Cor 15:45a . . The first man Adam became a living soul.
       ● 1Cor 15:47 . .The first man is out of the earth and made
       of dust
       Those verses are references to Gen 2:7, which reads like this:
       "Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the
       ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the
       man came to be a living soul."
       The Watchtower Society alleges that Jehovah God wasn't directly
       involved in creating the first man, rather, His involvement was
       indirect. According to them, the actual work was done by the
       hand of a divine being called the Word.
       "In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and
       the Word was a god. This one was in the beginning with God. All
       things came into existence through him, and apart from him not
       even one thing came into existence." (John 1:1-3)
       Seeing as that's the case; then the breath of life spoken of in
       Gen 2:7 was blown into the first man's nostrils by the Word. In
       all respects then, we owe the beginning of the original human
       race to the Word just as much as we owe it to Jehovah God
       because both are given credit for its origin.
       ● 1Cor 15:45b . .The last Adam became a life-giving
       spirit.
       That verse speaks of the origin of yet another human race. This
       second human race wasn't made of dust from the ground, nor was
       it given consciousness by blowing into its nostrils the breath
       of life, nor did it come to be a living soul.
       Up to this point; I'm told of only two life-giving spirits in
       the Bible: the Word and Jehovah God. So unless there is now
       three life-giving spirits, I feel safe to conclude that the last
       Adam is one of the two; i.e. he's either the Word or he's
       Jehovah God. Well; it's easy to show by John 1:14 that the last
       Adam and the Word are one and the same person.
       "So the Word became flesh and resided among us"
       Q: When did this last Adam become a life-giving spirit? At his
       birth or at his resurrection?
       A: According to John 5:26 and 1John 1:1-2, the Word is an
       everlasting life which, according to Gen 21:33 and Rom 16:26, is
       an indestructible category of life that's impervious to death.
       And according to John 1:1, the Word is a god. Well; people die,
       but gods never die. (Ps 82:6-7)
       So the Word didn't go out of existence when he came into the
       world as an h.sapiens; which means of course that Jesus Christ
       was a life-giving spirit right from the moment of his conception
       rather than at his resurrection; i.e. he was capable of giving
       life prior to his crucifixion.
       Speaking to the Jews of his day; Jesus said:
       "My sheep listen to my voice, and I know them, and they follow
       me. And I give them everlasting life" (John 10:27-28)
       "You are searching the Scriptures, because you think that by
       means of them you will have everlasting life; and these are the
       very ones that bear witness about me. And yet you do not want to
       come to me that may have life." (John 10:39-40)
       Q: So you're saying a created man pioneered the original human
       race; and a man who's both creator and created pioneered the
       second human race?
       A: Yes.
       ● 1Cor 15:47 . .The second man is out of heaven.
       ● John 6:38 . . I have come down from heaven
       ● John 6:42 . . They began saying: Is this not Jesus the
       son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it that
       now he says: I have come down from heaven?
       The dual nature of Christ's existence is a fatal hang-up for the
       Watchtower Society due to its spurious belief that it's
       impossible for the Word to exist as a human being and a spirit
       being simultaneously. But the evidence is very difficult to
       refute.
       It ain't what you know that gets you into trouble.
       It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
       (Mark Twain)
       _[/font]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page