DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
<form
action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"
method="post"
target="_top">
<input
type="hidden"
name="cmd"
value="_s-xclick">
<input
type="hidden"
name="hosted_button_id"
value="DKL7ADEKRVUBL">
<input
type="image"
src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif"
border="0"
name="submit"
alt="PayPal
- The safer, easier way to pay
online!">
<img
alt=""
border="0"
src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif"
width="1"
height="1">
</form>
HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Flat Earth (click here)
*****************************************************
#Post#: 32628--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: July 1, 2021, 8:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Uniform Circular Motion is Constant Acceleration
5 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAI3RNlMiFE
[size=12pt]Consult any mainstream science publication or ask any
science teacher "why can't we feel the Earth spinning?" and they
will unanimously reply that it is because the globe spins at a
perfect constant speed, and we can only feel acceleration or
deceleration. As CoolCosmos writes: "Earth moves very fast. It
spins at a speed of about 1,000 miles per hour and orbits around
the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles per hour.
We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are
constant. You can only feel motion if your speed changes. For
example, if you are in a car which is moving at a constant speed
on a smooth surface, you will not feel much motion. However,
when the car accelerates or when the brakes are applied, you do
feel motion." The glaring problem with this claim rarely ever
addressed is that the globe and everything on it, if it existed,
would be undergoing constant acceleration, because uniform
circular motion IS constant acceleration.
As published on physicsclassroom.com, "Uniform circular motion
can be described as the motion of an object in a circle at a
constant speed. As an object moves in a circle, it is constantly
changing its direction. At all instances, the object is moving
tangent to the circle. Since the direction of the velocity
vector is the same as the direction of the object's motion, the
velocity vector is directed tangent to the circle as well. An
object moving in a circle is accelerating. An object undergoing
uniform circular motion is moving with a constant speed.
Nonetheless, it is accelerating due to its change in direction.
The direction of the acceleration is inwards. With the inward
net force directed perpendicular to the velocity vector, the
object is always changing its direction and undergoing an inward
acceleration." Therefore the globe's theoretical astronomy is
at odds with demonstrable physics. Uniform (and even moreso
with non-uniform) circular motion creates a centripetal force
which entails constant acceleration in constantly changing
directions.
The heliocentric models claims the Earth rotates in uniform
circular motion at a constant speed while revolving an
elliptical orbit around the Sun at another constant speed, while
the entire solar system makes a circular orbit around the Milky
Way galaxy at another constant speed, and the Milky Way galaxy
shoots off in a straight line from their Big Bang beginning at
yet another constant speed. In other words, we are actually
supposedly undergoing 4 different circular, elliptical and
straight line motions simultaneously, but being told that we
quote "do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are
constant."
They always give the example of a car or train going straight at
a constant velocity and claim we cannot feel that motion, but
what if the car is speeding along an elevated uniform circular
racetrack, while that entire elevated racetrack is making an
elliptical circuit around the racing grounds, while
simultaneously the entire racing grounds themselves are on a
gigantic moving circular foundation, while that foundation
itself shoots straight off into the universe? These are the
actual variables involved with the globe's supposed constant
speed that no one in history has ever demonstrated, measured,
felt or experienced whatsoever.
So the next time someone claims you cannot feel the Earth's
motion because it spins a constant speed, remind them that
uniform circular motion IS acceleration and acceleration IS
felt, and when they give you the example of a car driving down a
straight road, remind them that the car is actually driving on a
circular racetrack, while the racetrack is making an elliptical
circuit around the racing grounds, while the entire racing
grounds themselves are circling around a larger foundation, and
that foundation itself is traveling in a straight line.
These 4 simultaneous varying motions the globe is subjected to
in the heliocentric model create multiple acceleration vectors
and destroy any possibility that they wouldn't be felt or
measurable due to traveling at a constant speed.
#Post#: 33517--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: July 17, 2021, 5:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Space Virgins Get Lucky?
3 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G4udHtgJYo
Space fantasy fan-boys and fan-girls have just received their
latest damage-control propaganda update from actor Richard
Branson where he claims to have gone to space and filmed the
spinning-ball Earth for us (but really he just did some
parabolic maneuvers simulating free-fall while in a fancy
plane)!
Unfortunately for old Dick and his riders, rather than use a
normal lens to film the Earth, like all honest amateurs do when
sending up their high altitude balloons, these space virgins,
just like NASA, Space X, the Red Bull dive and all other
so-called "official" sources, always suspiciously choose to use
a fish-eye lens causing the horizon to constantly and radically
warp from convex, to flat, to concave.
As the camera tilts relative to the horizon the ends warp up or
down respectively, but when held still and level the horizon is
flat. As the normal back camera shows, the horizon actually
remains perfectly flat and rises to the eye-level of the camera
all the way up.
If the Earth was actually a globe, no matter how large, the
surface of the globe would curve downwards in all directions
away from the observer causing them to necessarily tilt their
heads down more and more the further they ascended to be able to
see the horizon. In reality, which is only consistent with
rising over a flat plane, the horizon rises along with the
observer and remains precisely at eye-level for the entire
ascent!
This trick is apparent both in Branson's trip this week as well
as Baumgartner's Red Bull dive from several years ago. The
fish-eye lens cameras show a constantly warping horizon which
was already curving the picture at ground level the very same
amount of so-called "Earth curve" that it showed at 128,000 feet
just before diving.
The trick is given away however when they switch to the regular
non-fish eye lens camera inside the craft which shows a
perfectly flat horizon still perfectly at eye-level while
hovering over 20 miles above a supposed globe. Do you see
something wrong with this picture? If you do, then welcome to
the truth of your hoaxed reality. If you don't, then enjoy
watching these terrible slack-jawed actors with their mouths
gaping wide open at how ridiculously gullible you sheeple are.
#Post#: 35055--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: September 21, 2021, 10:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Daylight Debunks the Globe
5 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlNhPXCH5cA
One simple and definitive proof that you are not living on a
spinning ball orbiting around the Sun is the fact that daytime
and nighttime never switch places as they must for the
heliocentric model to be true. According to the globe doctrine,
Earth makes one complete rotation on its axis every 24 hours,
while simultaneously orbiting around the Sun and completing one
full revolution every 365 days.
If this was truly happening however, as you can see from the
following image, the daytime and nighttime sides of the globe
would have to flip every 6 months. For a more detailed
illustration of this, imagine the Sun rising at 6am in New York
on the Summer solstice. After 3 months of 24 hour rotations,
the globe would be 90 degrees from its previous position and a
quarter turn away from the Sun, meaning that sunrise in New York
during the Autumnal equinox should now be happening at midnight.
After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be on
the complete opposite side of the Sun, 180 degrees from its
starting position, so that sunrise in New York during the Winter
solstice should be happening at 6pm, or in other words, daytime
and nighttime would have completely flipped from 6 months
earlier. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe
would be 270 degrees from its original position, and sunrise in
New York during the Spring equinox should be happening at noon.
In reality, as you can test and observe for yourself, this
simply does not happen and remains yet another nail in the
globe's coffin.
Globe apologist naysayers make either one of two ridiculous
claims in an attempt to excuse away this clear problem in their
model. Their first defense is to claim that days are not
actually 24 hours long, but instead only 23:56 long, and this 4
minute difference per day fixes the math allowing day and night
to flip. Now it is true that there are two kinds of days known
as solar days and sidereal days, and sidereal days are in fact
23:56 minutes long, but solar days, which everyone on Earth sets
their clocks by, are exactly 24 hours in duration.
Sidereal days, which nobody sets their clocks by, are actually
how long the fixed stars take to make one revolution over and
around our Earth plane. As you can observe and measure for
yourself, the constellations rotate just slightly faster than
the Sun, so that they take exactly 23:56 minutes to come back to
their starting point, while the Sun takes exactly 24 hours to
come back to its starting point.
Firstly, the fact that sidereal and solar days both exist and
are not exactly the same duration, is yet another proof that the
stars and Sun are moving and not the Earth. If the apparent
movement of the stars and Sun was actually the result of us
living on a spinning globe, as we're told, then there would and
could only be one duration of day, namely, the amount of time it
takes to complete one full rotation.
The fact that there are two different durations of rotation time
for the Sun and stars just further proves that they are moving
at their own unique speeds over and around a motionless, fixed
Earth. Secondly, if globe apologists want to claim solar days
are now suddenly only 23:56 minutes, then why hasn't anyone in
history ever noticed that our 24 hour clocks, which billions of
people have used for thousands of years, actually fall behind
reality 4 minutes every single day!? The reason is because it
doesn't happen, and trying to claim solar days are the same
duration as sidereal days just shows the disingenuous lengths
these zealots will go to cling onto their false cosmology.
Their next defense, even more ridiculous than the first, is to
claim that the Earth actually must complete 361 degrees of
rotation per day, and that that somehow makes up for it. They
completely redefine what a "day" means and claim, instead of a
day being one full 24 hour rotation of the globe as we have
always been taught, a "day" now suddenly means "the amount of
rotation until the Sun reaches the same point in the sky," which
they say is approximately 361 degrees.
With this excuse, however, new problems arise because the
globe's supposed orbit around the Sun is actually elliptical, so
depending where/when during its revolution around the Sun, the
Earth's rotation on its axis would have to be both speeding up
and slowing down at different times of the year just to maintain
their new definition of what a "day" means.
But of course in their own model, the Earth's alleged rotation
never speeds up or slows down and remains constant always. They
cannot have it both ways, but like the kid who wants to have his
cake and eat it too, these leaps of logic pose no problem for
the willfully ignorant.
#Post#: 35239--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: October 6, 2021, 11:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Why Flat Earth Matters
3 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNVVBVfO-KA
When the spinning ball-Earth is finally exposed worldwide for
the 500 year deception it was, Earth's entire population will
suddenly be faced with the reality that every government, every
space agency, university, secret society, religious
organization, mainstream and alternative media outlet have all
been duplicitous in propping up a monstrous manipulation to
fleece and control the masses.
The resulting mass mental exodus away from the control system is
exactly what humanity needs. Once the flat Earth truth gets out,
these lying politicians, spokesmen, reporters and teachers
suddenly change from being heralded voices of authority to being
ridiculed, shunned and denounced as they deserve.
Once the flat Earth truth gets out, these governments,
universities, media outlets and other entangled organizations
which have long been hard at work weaving this
multi-generational ball-Earth myth, suddenly and completely lose
all credibility. Once the truth of our flat Earth gets out, so
does the truth of these few elite families/societies who have
kept this most important and fundamental reality from us for
these hundreds of years!
Essentially, once the flat Earth truth gets out, so does every
other important truth by proxy, because this
"mother-of-all-conspiracies" holds under its umbrella literally
all of the other conspiracies, and exposes them.
#Post#: 35336--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: October 14, 2021, 9:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Every Flat Earth Question Answered - Flat Earth Model 2022
6 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhAjG-AaB8c
#Post#: 35347--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: October 15, 2021, 7:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello Family, I just received the saddest news that the one our
Father used to bring me and countless others to His truth has
passed away. Rob Skiba is without a doubt the most influential
person in the truth movement and the best at making the Bible
interesting and fun to study.
I can't put together any words that would do him justice due to
the shock and sadness, but I wanted to share a link I found that
will allow those of you who want to support his wife and family
a chance to do so.
I found the link to his paypal on his fb page and hope that it
is the best place to help his wife Sheila with anything she
needs. If you feel led to support her, please do so. Thanks!
HTML https://www.paypal.com/donate/?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=VWUBTW2R6W4GY
[img]
HTML https://yt3.ggpht.com/OKILvhXHw7UkOBR28qpB96lvT8Jmew114koR2zLBFEwpCq_Q1NkL1Vsyv1Aepl43V63QqQyx8UDoOqo=s640-c-fcrop64=1,2acb0000ec9dffff-nd[/img]
ROB SKIBA'S WISDOM AND WARNING FROM 2013 ABOUT TODAY'S REALITY
This is by no means a full length tribute to Rob as it would
take me months to create anything that does his ministry
justice. However, I did want to share some of the things that
have brought me comfort since learning of his passing.
12 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCyJ0I9w59c
#Post#: 35377--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: October 18, 2021, 7:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
William Shatner's rocket launch: real or fake?
Dear Captain Kirk: if the earth appeared flat to you at 350,000
feet, then there is no globe. Just come out and tell everyone
the earth is flat, it's the right thing to do.
3 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9TkQIA3UxQ
#Post#: 35616--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: November 11, 2021, 12:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Pseudo-Scientific Moon Mathe-Magic
3 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcsazyX1fwg
In the heliocentric model of the cosmos, the Moon revolves
around the Earth 13 times per year traveling at 2,288 mph, while
the Earth revolves around the Sun once per year traveling at
67,000mph. The following model and animation illustrate how
this is supposed to occur. As you can see, since the Moon is
revolving around the Earth, which itself is revolving around the
Sun, in order to maintain its regular orbit, the Moon would have
to be constantly and drastically changing its speed in ways
completely unaccounted for by the model.
In the outer part of its orbit, the Moon would have to speed up
67,000mph in addition to its regular speed of 2,288mph just to
keep up with the Earth. So the Moon would then be traveling at
69,288mph when it reached the front of the Earth. At this
point, since the Moon is allegedly 240,000 miles away from
Earth, the Earth would catch up in just 4 hours, so the Moon
must continue traveling 67,000mph along Earth's trajectory while
simultaneously continuing its now perpendicular 2,288mph second
trajectory. Then as it turns to reach the inner part of its
orbit, the Moon must slow back down to its original speed
allowing the Earth to pass by. Lastly, as it passes behind the
Earth, the Moon must once again quickly accelerate back up to
nearly 70,000mph before getting left in the dust.
In addition to all of this, the Sun itself is allegedly orbiting
the Milky Way galaxy at 448,000mph further compounding the
problems and calculations of the heliocentric model. If this
were true, then the Earth, Moon, and other planets would all
have yet another set of ridiculous and impossible corkscrewing
accelerations and decelerations necessary just to keep up with
the Sun. And for the cherry on top, all of these calculations
have been assuming perfectly circular orbits, but the actual
heliocentric model claims that the Moon's orbit around the
Earth, the Earth's orbit around the Sun, and the Sun's orbit
around the Milky Way, are all elliptical, not circular, meaning
there would be even more additional accelerations and
decelerations to calculate depending where each one is along its
elliptical path.
These constant and drastic accelerations and decelerations
necessitated by the heliocentric model are rarely if ever
mentioned by globe believers because they have always been
taught that the reason we do not feel or experience any of this
supposed motion is because we always travel at a constant
velocity. In their own model however, due to their elliptical
orbits and revolving around other revolving bodies, the Moon,
Sun, Earth and other planets, could not maintain constant
velocities and would instead be regularly accelerating and
decelerating. Yet meanwhile you can stack a house of cards,
make a rock cairn, or play a game of Jenga all without any of
this motion, acceleration and deceleration ever being felt or
experienced.
#Post#: 36294--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: December 24, 2021, 11:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Eratosthenes Experiment Debunks Flat Earth?
3 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH4PW0Y0wY8
One of the most common alleged proofs quoted for the spherical
Earth theory is the Eratosthenes sticks and shadows experiment.
Many people may remember NASA spokesman Carl Sagan presenting
this experiment by using a map of Egypt with two obelisks
attached and showing their resulting shadows.
The story goes that around 250 B.C. a Greek mathematician and
philosopher named Eratosthenes noted that at noon during the
Summer Solstice in Syene, the Sun cast no shadow and the rays
could reach straight to the bottom of his well, yet meanwhile in
Alexandria a vertically standing metal rod cast a significant
shadow.
Eratosthenes, Carl Sagan, and other globe proponents reason that
this result is impossible on a flat Earth. To quote Carl Sagan,
"If at a certain moment each stick casts no shadow at all, that
is perfectly easy to understand provided the Earth is flat.
If the shadow at Syene is a certain length, and the shadow at
Alexandria is the same length, that also makes sense on a flat
Earth. But how could it be, Eratosthenes asked, that at the
same instant there was no shadow at Syene and a very substantial
shadow at Alexandria?
The only answer (he claimed) was that the surface of the Earth
is curved." After reaching this conclusion, Eratosthenes then
famously factored the length of the two shadows with his assumed
distance to the Sun and recorded a measurement of the globe
Earth's circumference close to what heliocentrist astronomers
still use today.
The fact of the matter is, however, that Eratosthenes, Sagan,
and others are simply incorrect in their assumption that this
would only be possible on a curved Earth.
In reality, the exact same results occur on a flat Earth with a
local Sun. Eratosthenes’ calculations were made assuming the
Sun to be millions of miles away so that its rays would fall
perfectly parallel even in points as divergent as Syene and
Alexandria.
Anyone familiar with the phenomenon known as crepuscular rays,
however, knows full well that the Sun's rays simply do NOT fall
perfectly parallel, especially at such distant points, rendering
the entire argument moot. Furthermore, using sextants and plane
trigonometry, by measuring the Sun’s angle at two points on
Earth simultaneously and factoring their distance from each
other, the Pythagorean theorum reveals that the Sun is NOT
millions of miles away, but instead less than a few thousand.
High altitude balloon footage has also filmed lighting hot-spots
on clouds further proving the Sun to be local and acting as a
spotlight.
Therefore if globe believers wish to be honest, they must admit
it is their faulty assumption that only a distant Sun with
parallel rays could produce such results which has led to their
faulty conclusion of a curved Earth, because Flat Earthers have
always maintained that the Sun was local, and the very existence
of crepuscular rays render the entire experiment invalid.
#Post#: 36409--------------------------------------------------
Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth?
DIR By: patrick jane
Date: December 30, 2021, 9:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
20 Reasons Against Newtonianism (Videobook)
13 minutes
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJsoUUYQAuw
In the interest of preserving for posterity the wealth of flat
Earth knowledge and research done during the late 19th and early
20th century, I am continuing a series of audiobook and PDF
downloads to make them more easily and widely available. Today's
selection is Ebenezer Breach's 1898 booklet "20 Reasons Against
Newtonianism."[/url]
*****************************************************
Page 10 of 13
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page