URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <form
       action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"
       method="post"
       target="_top">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="cmd"
       value="_s-xclick">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="hosted_button_id"
       value="DKL7ADEKRVUBL">
       <input
       type="image"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif"
       border="0"
       name="submit"
       alt="PayPal
       - The safer, easier way to pay
       online!">
       <img
       alt=""
       border="0"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif"
       width="1"
       height="1">
       </form>
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Flat Earth (click here)
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36508--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: January 6, 2022, 9:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrqIoBaFxcE
       #Post#: 36539--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: January 7, 2022, 7:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX7awxLobfU
       #Post#: 36822--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: January 19, 2022, 11:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       50 Scientific Facts for the Downfall of Modern Astronomy
       (Videobook)
       29 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk8hwjceGLo
       In the interest of preserving for posterity the wealth of flat
       Earth knowledge and research done during the late 19th and early
       20th century, I am continuing a series of audiobook and PDF
       downloads to make them more easily and widely available. Today's
       selection is Ebenezer Breach's 1896 booklet "50 Scientific Facts
       for the Downfall of Modern Astronomy."
       Please Note:  Ebenezer Breach was a literalist Christian and
       makes a few points in this booklet which are clearly not
       scientific, and potentially not even facts.  He also made his
       own astronomical measurements and had his own figures for the
       diameter and distance of the Sun, Moon and stars which differed
       from other 19th century flat Earthers, who themselves didn't
       have a consensus, other than to always be working with tens,
       hundreds and thousands, rather than the heliocentrist's
       millions, billions and trillions.
       #Post#: 37759--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: March 6, 2022, 9:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cavendish Experiment Proves Gravity?
       3 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB-_A1AIEjo
       In 1797, Henry Cavendish, the British scientist, Freemason, and
       wealthy grandson of the Duke of Devonshire, created an
       experiment which he claimed successfully proved the existence of
       gravity, measured its constant, and provided accurate figures
       for the exact masses of the Earth, Sun, Moon, and Planets.  How
       did Cavendish achieve this quantum leap for heliocentric
       pseudo-science?  He fixed two large lead balls on opposite ends
       of a torsion balance and hung them from the roof of his shed.
       By watching and recording slight motions of the contraption via
       telescope through his shed window so his mass would not affect
       the reading, Cavendish claimed to have proven gravity.  Two
       small lead balls were hung near the large ones and any motion
       observed towards one another was touted as being the influence
       of gravity. Now, the Cavendish experiment has been widely
       criticized by the scientific community because never in over two
       centuries since its creation has anyone been able to replicate
       it!
       Firstly, the balls simply do not always attract one another as
       they must for the so-called gravitational constant to be
       constant at all.  Sometimes the torsion balance turns towards
       the balls and sometimes away as it is impossible not to give
       some slight tremulous motion when interacting with it. Henry
       even complained in his notes how often as he was performing the
       measurement the contraption was still in oscillation.
       Secondly, since his calculated force of gravity was 10^39 weaker
       than the force of electro-magnetism, from which all material
       objects are composed, there is no control for the experiment
       which can factor out and positively differentiate the alleged
       gravitational force, from the known stronger electro-magnetic
       force.
       In other words, the balls could simply be attracting each other
       through static electricity, a known force existing in all
       things, billions of times stronger than gravity, and impossible
       to control for the experiment.  Even though no one could
       replicate Cavendish’s findings, the experiment went down in
       history as a great success, and is still taught as veritable
       proof of universal gravitation in science textbooks today.
       #Post#: 38184--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: March 22, 2022, 10:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Coriolis Effect Debunks Flat Earth?
       5 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4Zge7YgON4
       In the mid-19th century, a Frenchman named Gaspard-Gustave
       Coriolis performed several experiments showing the effect of
       kinetic energy on rotating systems, which have ever since become
       mythologized as proof of the heliocentric theory of the cosmos.
       The “Coriolis Effect” is often said to cause sinks and toilet
       bowls in the Northern Hemisphere to drain spinning in one
       direction while in the Southern Hemisphere causing them to spin
       the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning
       ball-Earth.
       Once again, however, just like Foucault’s Pendulums spinning
       either which way, sinks and toilets in the Northern and Southern
       Hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction! Sinks
       and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin
       opposite directions, depending entirely upon the shape of the
       basin and the angle of the water’s entry, not the supposed
       rotation of the Earth.
       NOTE:  For people who have seen my other similar videos on these
       subjects, I am updating them with new information, new visuals,
       and higher quality audio/video, also giving them different
       titles to to work around the algorithm.  You can help by liking,
       commenting, sharing, and subscribing, thanks!
       #Post#: 38831--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: April 18, 2022, 5:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why Can't Everyone See Mount Everest on a Flat Earth?
       3 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqvH0Y1L41s
       Globe Earthers often ask, "if the Earth is flat, then why can't
       people from anywhere in the world zoom with a telescope and see
       Mount Everest?"  To begin with, this question pre-supposes the
       errant assumption that we can see indefinitely far with the use
       of a telescope.  This idea has been indoctrinated into people
       due to modern astronomers claiming that the stars and planets
       shown through their telescopes are millions and billions and
       trillions of miles away, making many people assume that a
       telescope pointed horizontally should also be able to see
       equally far, or at least as far as Mount Everest.  In reality,
       however, as you can test for yourself using a telescope or
       camera with just 100x - 200x zoom capability, the stars and
       planets are not nearly that far away and can be zoomed into
       incredible detail beyond what would be possible of something so
       absurdly distant.
       Furthermore, when looking horizontally across the Earth there
       are a number of visibility and atmospheric limitations present
       that don't factor when looking upwards towards the stars, namely
       perspective and convergence, angular resolution and the
       vanishing point, as well as pollution, haze, humidity, fog, mist
       and more.  Most people asking about seeing Mount Everest through
       a telescope have never actually experimented with one themselves
       or else would already know that visibility gets progressively
       more distorted the further you zoom until nothing can be
       discernibly resolved.  There are also of course hills,
       mountains, buildings, trees and innumerable other objects in the
       way obstructing any possible view to Mount Everest.
       If you stand on the beach, a plain or prairie, you will find the
       horizon extends about three to six miles around you depending on
       the weather and your eyesight. The range of the human eye, our
       field of vision is from 110 to 1 degree, and the smallest angle
       under which an object can still be seen is 1/60 of 1 degree, so
       that when an object is 3000 times its own diameter away from an
       observer, it will cease to be visible. So for example, the
       farthest distance at which one can see a 1 inch diameter penny,
       is 3000 inches, or 250 feet.  With the aid of the best
       telescopes on the clearest days, we can resolve objects a few
       hundred times smaller and/or further away, but anything on the
       scale of seeing Everest from anywhere on Earth is simply not
       possible.
       #Post#: 39092--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: April 27, 2022, 3:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why is Earth the Only Flat Planet?
       3 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5UvtaFE-0k
       Another common question posed by Globe Earthers is, "if the
       Earth is flat, then why are all the other planets round?"  To
       begin with, the Earth is a plane, not a planet, and by simply
       adding a "t" on the end modern astronomers have linguistically
       transformed our Earth plane into a globe spun around the Sun.
       The word "round" is also deceiving, because most Flat Earthers
       would agree that the Earth is round like a coin, just not round
       like a ball.  When making this argument online, Globe Earthers
       will often present a picture of the traditional heliocentric
       model with eight spherical planets and a Flat Earth among them
       floating in space.
       This entire concept is a strawman, however, as no Flat Earthers
       believe in a flat planet floating in space third from the Sun in
       a heliocentric solar system.   In NASA's many CGI depictions the
       planets do indeed appear spherical, but when looking at them for
       yourself through a telescope or super-zoom camera, it is
       certainly contestable whether or not the planets are spherical.
       Every time I have personally observed the planets they look like
       small, relatively flat, round lights and nothing like huge
       spherical terra firma worlds.
       Only in NASA and other "official" space agency footage do the
       planets appear like three-dimensional globular worlds; in
       amateur footage they look more like two-dimensional lights,
       similar to all the other stars.  In fact, before they were
       called "planets," the ancients referred to them as "wandering
       stars" because they only differed from the other "fixed stars"
       in their relative motions.
       They each have their own unique appearance, but none of them
       look like spherical worlds, even Saturn which appears more like
       a circular luminary with a halo of light around it.
       Ultimately, however, it is completely irrelevant what shape the
       other planets are when looking to prove the shape of the Earth.
       Modern astronomers constantly repeat this red herring that I
       have dubbed the "appeal to the sky" fallacy.
       Imagine inviting a contractor over to your house to measure the
       dimensions of your floor and instead they immediately get out
       their tape-measure and start measuring all the recessed lights
       in the ceiling!  This is exactly what Globe Earthers are doing
       by claiming to provide scientific proof for the shape of the
       Earth under our feet by looking at lights in the sky over our
       head.
       Like magicians distracting you with one hand while fooling you
       with the other, globe apologists when asked for empirical,
       measurable proof of the shape of the Earth beneath their feet,
       invariably inevitably instead turn their noses up to the sky and
       start talking about the shape of things up there.  But even if
       all the other planets really were spheres, what on Earth does
       that have to do with the shape of the Earth?
       #Post#: 39753--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: May 25, 2022, 11:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Greetings, this is just a post to state my conclusions of the
       earth. I believe the bible is literal in God's descriptions of
       the earth and cosmos. This means the earth does not move, no
       rotation and no revolutions around the sun. I don't believe the
       sun is a star, as well. I believe the sun and moon are the same
       size and when measured with a sextant, both are about 33 miles
       in diameter.
       The sun and moon are measured and calculated with the sextant to
       be about 4 to 5 thousand miles above the earth. Without even
       posting scriptural support for a stationary, extended plane
       earth with the oceans contained and the continents above sea
       level. I do not believe Antarctica is a continent. The famous
       experiment in 1887 proves the earth doesn't move.
       I think the earth extends beyond the Antarctic Circle for
       thousands or even tens of thousands of miles. the military and
       science have likely not been to "the edge" which is not an edge
       but the firmament, the solid barrier that encloses the earth and
       cosmos.
       They are still sending rockets up and out to attempt to measure
       the earth and gather data. I have explained in previous posts
       with great detail, how the "conspiracy" works and WHY the people
       in control hide the true nature of earth, they are hiding God
       and creation just for starters. I care about this because untold
       millions of people have denied God because of the big bang,
       evolution and certain areas of "science" that are deceptive at
       minimum.
       Cosmology is not science and neither is theoretical physics.
       Gravity is a force but not as influential as depicted and
       taught. Only a handful of people at most know the whole truth
       and are likely acting in positions with permanent, lifelong
       appointments.
       #Post#: 39772--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: May 26, 2022, 4:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Lake Pontchartrain Bridge Shows Earth's Curvature?
       There are several photographs and videos of the Louisiana Lake
       Pontchartrain causeway and transmission lines showing what globe
       enthusiasts claim to be visual proof of the curvature of the
       Earth.  In the footage, the bridge and transmission lines, when
       viewed from a certain angle and height, appear to curve downward
       as they tend toward the horizon, and this apparent curvature is
       claimed to be proof of the globe...
       4 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4i__Mh30PY
       #Post#: 39903--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Can You Debunk Flat Earth? 
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: June 1, 2022, 11:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why are There No Photographs of the Flat Earth?
       4 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pV2FBrUWWM
       One of the more bizarre and confusing questions frequently asked
       by globe believers is, "why are there no photographs showing a
       Flat Earth?"  What they mean by this is why are there no
       photographs taken from "outer-space" which show the entire flat
       Earth in one frame similar to how NASA images show the entire
       globe Earth?
       To begin with, we do not pretend to know how far our Earth plane
       extends outwards, whether it terminates with an edge, some kind
       of barrier, or reaches out into infinity, so when globe
       believers ask this question they are making an assumption that
       the flat Earth is just some object floating in space similar to
       the way NASA presents the globe.
       There are many cartoon depictions of such silly flat Earth's
       floating in space put out by the farcical gate-keepers at The
       Flat Earth Society and others, but these images do not represent
       the claims of genuine globe skeptics.  We simply posit that
       through objective and empirical means the Earth is demonstrably
       a stationary level plane devoid of any curvature which proves
       the prevailing globe Earth theory to be scientifically
       impossible...
       *****************************************************
       Page 11 of 13
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page