URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <form
       action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"
       method="post"
       target="_top">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="cmd"
       value="_s-xclick">
       <input
       type="hidden"
       name="hosted_button_id"
       value="DKL7ADEKRVUBL">
       <input
       type="image"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif"
       border="0"
       name="submit"
       alt="PayPal
       - The safer, easier way to pay
       online!">
       <img
       alt=""
       border="0"
       src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif"
       width="1"
       height="1">
       </form>
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: BIBLE STUDY - From The Late Lori Bolinger
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3643--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: February 2, 2019, 10:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Firestarter link ---
       >
       > [quote author=patrick jane link=topic=166.msg3620#msg3620
       date=1549048243]
       > I don't believe bullshit and I don't post any YT video I find,
       asshole. If you've watched any you would know. Are some
       questionable on the assertions they make? Likely but yours are
       too. I heard about st. jimmy from LRF. Lose the attitude here if
       you can, we can learn and grow and help each other instead of
       being jackasses.
       --- End Quote ---
       Do you believe everything that´s posted on Letsrollforums?
       Have you found just a single thread on the forum that actually
       gives a good overview of what really happened on 9/11?!?
       You have invented some BS about me, here it is again.
       --- Quote from: patrick jane link ---
       >
       > You believe historians about the Sumerians and these guys and
       those guys as if it were proven fact. Here you are questioning
       Sandy Hook but you believe scince and the fucked up history you
       were taught in school.
       --- End Quote ---
       
       Where you high when you invented this out of thin air?
       You can´t expose the scandals when you smoke drugs every day...
       [/quote]I don't smoke drugs so stfu. Stop beating your wife. Hah
       !!!
       #Post#: 3646--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: Firestarter
       Date: February 2, 2019, 11:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: patrick jane link ---
       >
       > I don't smoke drugs so stfu. Stop beating your wife. Hah !!!
       --- End Quote ---
       Sorry if I misunderstood your request for some marijuana
       seeds...
       Why did you make BS up to post about me?
       What are you gonna do next?
       Quoting ad hominem attacks against me from the Letsrollforums
       (I´ve seen some posted more than a year after I was banned)?!?
       If you have problems on the "conspiracy theories" on Sandy Hook,
       why don´t you leave me out of it? You could post about it right
       here. Or better yet start a thread on Letsrollforums!
       I have never posted anything on Sandy Hook. I don´t even know
       how many people reportedly died.[quote]I was talking shit like
       you. I never saw anything you posted but Truthissweet kept
       comparing me to you in a negative way. Marijuana is not a drug
       in my opinion and yes I smoke a little for medicinal reasons.
       I'm done with Sandy Hook but the officials stories are BS as
       usual.
       #Post#: 3648--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest43
       Date: February 2, 2019, 1:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ac28 link ---
       >
       > If God is not a liar, nor the author of confusion, it is
       impossible that there could any more than one correct answer to
       any question one might pose about the scriptures.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       So where would you put the Trinity Doctrine, is God a liar, or
       there is more than one correct answer in the Bible?
       #Post#: 3655--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest43
       Date: February 2, 2019, 2:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: patrick jane link ---
       >
       > Which Bible Translation Should We Read?
       >
       >
       > There are so many different translations out in the world.
       Which one is the most accurate? It is OK to read several or
       should we be reading only one?
       >
       > 15 minutes
       >
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7qSUSvPRPw&index=11&t=0s&list=WL
       >
       >
       >
       > [shadow=red,left]PayPal Donations :[/shadow]
  HTML https://paypal.me/ThankYou3169
       > [shadow=red,left]Patreon :[/shadow]
  HTML https://www.patreon.com/patrick_jane3169
       > Flat Earth Forums :
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php?action=forum
       > Theology Forums :
  HTML https://theologyforums.com/index.php
       > Youtube :
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
       > [glow=red,2,300]Pinterest :[/glow]
  HTML https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
       > Google :
  HTML https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
       > [glow=red,2,300]Linkedin :[/glow]
  HTML https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
       > Twitter :
  HTML https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
       > Facebook :
  HTML https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you for the video Mr. Patrick Jane!
       So this video "Which Translation should we read" says: "The one
       that supports the Trinity doctrine". like-
       Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens(plural) and
       the earth" NKJV - I guess God messed up on the globe, it turned
       out flooded and in chaos and darkness.
       In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was
       born, I am!”
       but the New Trinity version:
       John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”
       I did learn something I wasn't aware of before, that; Diocletian
       was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305 went out and destroyed all
       OT and NT documents, churches of Jesus Christ (who according to
       the Bible went by "followers of the Way"), Pastors everything,
       he practically ended Christs Apostolic Church on earth.
       Then guess who came the year after Diocletian cleared out the
       followers of the Way, the Truth and the Life, who revealed our
       One Infinite and Eternal God? None other than:
       the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (AD 306–337), taking the
       derogatory "Christian" word and created the RCC-Christian
       Religion, with his sword as Christs cross, and the Trinity
       many-gods doctrine as the new Roman gods, and his Christian
       Religion began to transition as the dominant religion of the
       Roman Empire.
       The year before a Roman Emperor wipes out all books, scrolls,
       letters, churches, Pastors and Elders of the followers of
       Christ, and the next year another Emperor revives it, having
       miraculously found all the scrolls, letters, books, with a New
       more acceptable Doctrine to the point it becomes the "dominant
       Religion of the Roman Empire"?
       #Post#: 3656--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: patrick jane
       Date: February 2, 2019, 3:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > Thank you for the video Mr. Patrick Jane!
       >
       > So this video "Which Translation should we read" says: "The
       one that supports the Trinity doctrine". like-
       >
       > Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens(plural)
       and the earth" NKJV - I guess God messed up on the globe, it
       turned out flooded and in chaos and darkness.
       >
       > In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       >
       > John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       > 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham
       was born, I am!”
       >
       > but the New Trinity version:
       > John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       > 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”
       >
       > I did learn something I wasn't aware of before, that;
       Diocletian was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305 went out and
       destroyed all OT and NT documents, churches of Jesus Christ (who
       according to the Bible went by "followers of the Way"), Pastors
       everything, he practically ended Christs Apostolic Church on
       earth.
       >
       > Then guess who came the year after Diocletian cleared out the
       followers of the Way, the Truth and the Life, who revealed our
       One Infinite and Eternal God? None other than:
       >
       > the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (AD 306–337), taking
       the derogatory "Christian" word and created the RCC-Christian
       Religion, with his sword as Christs cross, and the Trinity
       many-gods doctrine as the new Roman gods, and his Christian
       Religion began to transition as the dominant religion of the
       Roman Empire.
       >
       > The year before a Roman Emperor wipes out all books, scrolls,
       letters, churches, Pastors and Elders of the followers of
       Christ, and the next year another Emperor revives it, having
       miraculously found all the scrolls, letters, books, with a New
       more acceptable Doctrine to the point it becomes the "dominant
       Religion of the Roman Empire"?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of erased history
       and revised history. We are taught and told we somebody else
       WANTS us to believe and hear. Make the lie so big and repeat it
       so much that people will start to believe it and teach it to
       their children. I'm questioning a lot of things right now. Thank
       you for joining here and posting here, I really appreciate it.
       We get lots of views here and we can help spread truth.
       #Post#: 3657--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest8
       Date: February 2, 2019, 7:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: patrick jane link ---
       >
       >
       > [quote]
       > Thank you for the video Mr. Patrick Jane!
       >
       > So this video "Which Translation should we read" says: "The
       one that supports the Trinity doctrine". like-
       >
       > Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens(plural)
       and the earth" NKJV - I guess God messed up on the globe, it
       turned out flooded and in chaos and darkness.
       >
       > In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       >
       > John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       > 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham
       was born, I am!”
       >
       > but the New Trinity version:
       > John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       > 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”
       >
       > I did learn something I wasn't aware of before, that;
       Diocletian was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305 went out and
       destroyed all OT and NT documents, churches of Jesus Christ (who
       according to the Bible went by "followers of the Way"), Pastors
       everything, he practically ended Christs Apostolic Church on
       earth.
       >
       > Then guess who came the year after Diocletian cleared out the
       followers of the Way, the Truth and the Life, who revealed our
       One Infinite and Eternal God? None other than:
       >
       > the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (AD 306–337), taking
       the derogatory "Christian" word and created the RCC-Christian
       Religion, with his sword as Christs cross, and the Trinity
       many-gods doctrine as the new Roman gods, and his Christian
       Religion began to transition as the dominant religion of the
       Roman Empire.
       >
       > The year before a Roman Emperor wipes out all books, scrolls,
       letters, churches, Pastors and Elders of the followers of
       Christ, and the next year another Emperor revives it, having
       miraculously found all the scrolls, letters, books, with a New
       more acceptable Doctrine to the point it becomes the "dominant
       Religion of the Roman Empire"?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of erased history
       and revised history. We are taught and told we somebody else
       WANTS us to believe and hear. Make the lie so big and repeat it
       so much that people will start to believe it and teach it to
       their children. I'm questioning a lot of things right now. Thank
       you for joining here and posting here, I really appreciate it.
       We get lots of views here and we can help spread truth.
       [/quote]
       PJ ,,, You Said: Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of
       erased history and revised history."
       P.J. Constantine Married the Church and State. There was no pope
       at that time it was to come. In prior years, Christians were
       persecuted at holocaust rates.
       Arius Said:"In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was
       born, I am!”
       but the New Trinity version:
       John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”"
       In the only version that does not use the Alexandrian corrupted
       text is the KJV.
       In John 8:58.."Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto
       you, Before Abraham was, I am."
       Now please tell me truthfully, why would anyone want to change
       the KJV  into something more readable.   Seems to me like it is
       readable enough.
       The reason is to Create Doubt.   As the Serpent, Satan said to
       "EVE" that faithful day in the Garden. "Yeah Hath GOD Said"
       Creating Doubt in Her mind as does all the other versions other
       than the KJV... They actually remove the deity of Jesus.
       Compare (1 Tim 3:16) and see for yourself. Keep in mind that
       this verse clearly teaches us JESUS is GOD.
       Here is another. Rom 14:10b, 12  Yes, the other versions take
       the Deity out of Christ in this passage as well.
       I believe in the KJV and do believe I could convince anyone
       willing to listen and study. But alas, the KJV has been around
       for almost 400 years and the others have been around 75-100 at
       the most. Go ahead and compare the versions......
       History is only rewritten by the false teachers. History is out
       there, It is the same and has been accepted by many scholars.
       Hope this helps, my friend.
       Have a good evening,,, have company calling.
       Blade
       #Post#: 3667--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest43
       Date: February 3, 2019, 5:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Bladerunner link ---
       >
       > [quote author=patrick jane link=topic=166.msg3656#msg3656
       date=1549143230]
       >
       > [quote]
       > Thank you for the video Mr. Patrick Jane!
       >
       > So this video "Which Translation should we read" says: "The
       one that supports the Trinity doctrine". like-
       >
       > Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens(plural)
       and the earth" NKJV - I guess God messed up on the globe, it
       turned out flooded and in chaos and darkness.
       >
       > In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       >
       > John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       > 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham
       was born, I am!”
       >
       > but the New Trinity version:
       > John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       > 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”
       >
       > I did learn something I wasn't aware of before, that;
       Diocletian was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305 went out and
       destroyed all OT and NT documents, churches of Jesus Christ (who
       according to the Bible went by "followers of the Way"), Pastors
       everything, he practically ended Christs Apostolic Church on
       earth.
       >
       > Then guess who came the year after Diocletian cleared out the
       followers of the Way, the Truth and the Life, who revealed our
       One Infinite and Eternal God? None other than:
       >
       > the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (AD 306–337), taking
       the derogatory "Christian" word and created the RCC-Christian
       Religion, with his sword as Christs cross, and the Trinity
       many-gods doctrine as the new Roman gods, and his Christian
       Religion began to transition as the dominant religion of the
       Roman Empire.
       >
       > The year before a Roman Emperor wipes out all books, scrolls,
       letters, churches, Pastors and Elders of the followers of
       Christ, and the next year another Emperor revives it, having
       miraculously found all the scrolls, letters, books, with a New
       more acceptable Doctrine to the point it becomes the "dominant
       Religion of the Roman Empire"?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of erased history
       and revised history. We are taught and told we somebody else
       WANTS us to believe and hear. Make the lie so big and repeat it
       so much that people will start to believe it and teach it to
       their children. I'm questioning a lot of things right now. Thank
       you for joining here and posting here, I really appreciate it.
       We get lots of views here and we can help spread truth.
       [/quote]
       PJ ,,, You Said: Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of
       erased history and revised history."
       P.J. Constantine Married the Church and State. There was no pope
       at that time it was to come. In prior years, Christians were
       persecuted at holocaust rates.[/quote]
       According to the holiest of fathers the Pope aka God on globe
       earth and the holy Catholic Church, Peter was the first
       Christian Pope, .. unknowns to him, or the Apostolic Church of
       Christ?
       Constantine didn't marry the RCC and state, the RCC ruled over
       the state.
       Also, it was not the Christians who were persecuted (that's a
       nice twist on history there) but it was the "Christian Church"
       that went out with the sword and persecuted, and just about
       wiped out Christ Church who never went by the name Christian,
       but suffered because of it.
       1 Peter 4:16 Yet if any man suffer as (called/mocked) a
       Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on
       this behalf.
       --- Quote ---
       > Arius Said:"In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       >
       > John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       > 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham
       was born, I am!”
       >
       > but the New Trinity version:
       > John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       > 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”"
       >
       > In the only version that does not use the Alexandrian
       corrupted text is the KJV.
       >
       > In John 8:58.."Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say
       unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."
       >
       > Now please tell me truthfully, why would anyone want to change
       the KJV  into something more readable.   Seems to me like it is
       readable enough.
       --- End Quote ---
       The original text were together without spaces or commas to make
       sure no word would be missing. What happened is that the
       Christian Scholars separated the words and created sentences,
       and we know how we can alter the meaning with just a comma, or
       like the KJV has it capitalized the "I AM" to match how God
       identified Himself to Moses.
       Like if I say: "I AM hungry!" it doesn't mean I am God even if I
       capitalize the 'I AM'.
       --- Quote ---
       > The reason is to Create Doubt.   As the Serpent, Satan said to
       "EVE" that faithful day in the Garden. "Yeah Hath GOD Said"
       Creating Doubt in Her mind as does all the other versions other
       than the KJV... They actually remove the deity of Jesus.
       > Compare (1 Tim 3:16) and see for yourself. Keep in mind that
       this verse clearly teaches us JESUS is GOD.
       --- End Quote ---
       If Jesus was God, then the RCC by Constantine actually killed
       God. That is why the changes, because Rome not only wanted to
       claim the life of Gods son Jesus, but God too, which they did by
       altering the Bible. This was prepared some time before  Emperor
       Constantine, when Diocletian was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305
       he made sure no one else had copies of the scrolls, letters of
       either the Prophets, or the Apostles so he went on destroying
       everything and everyone that knew Gods Word.
       But look how the copies all of a sudden turned up in Rome's
       hands once the road was cleared for a New Doctrine, and became
       the official Religion using the mock word Christian Of course it
       was not Infinite God and His son Word who was presented to Rome
       and the rest of the world, but a plural deity. It just may be
       the one Jesus cast out who called himself "Legion".
       Look up "deity" it refers to any pagan god or goddess, our
       Infinite God is Not one of the deities like the Roman Christian
       sun-god.
       1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of
       godliness:
       God was manifested in the flesh,
       Justified in the Spirit,
       Seen by angels,
       Preached among the Gentiles,
       Believed on in the world,
       Received up in glory.
       That's right, until the son Word came, Infinite "I Am" spoke to
       us in many different ways, Angel of fire, thunder, still small
       voice, even a human body that Jacob wrestled with, but now He
       sent His son Word, through whom He created All Things both in
       Heaven and on earth, the perfect image of our invisible God.
       Jesus said: "When you see me, you see the Father", and they
       worshipped him, Not as 'God', but as the "son of God" who spoke
       what he heard from his Creator and Father, his God and our God.
       Just as Joseph became second only to Pharaoh, Jesus is now
       second only to God. Oh, and we are also to shine Gods light in
       us, .. don't you know we are the temple of God, that the Spirit
       of God dwells in us!?
       Look at the last sentence: "Received up into glory", I mean how
       on earth could that be referring to God? How?
       First the RCC-Christians killed God, so now He was
       accepted/received up into glory!? That is blasphemy, even the
       idea that God could die, not alone suggesting that He had to
       somehow earn His was back into glory!?
       --- Quote ---
       > Here is another. Rom 14:10b, 12  Yes, the other versions take
       the Deity out of Christ in this passage as well.
       >
       > I believe in the KJV and do believe I could convince anyone
       willing to listen and study. But alas, the KJV has been around
       for almost 400 years and the others have been around 75-100 at
       the most. Go ahead and compare the versions......
       >
       > History is only rewritten by the false teachers. History is
       out there, It is the same and has been accepted by many
       scholars.
       >
       > Hope this helps, my friend.
       >
       > Have a good evening,,, have company calling.
       >
       > Blade
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Romans 14:10 NIV
       For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat. 11 It is
       written:
       “‘As surely as I live,’ says the Lord,
       ‘every knee will bow before me;
       every tongue will acknowledge God.’”
       Romans 14:10 KJV
       10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at
       nought thy brother?
       for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
       11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee
       shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
       Yes, this and many other verses have been altered to try to kill
       God. And 2 billion Christians sing and praise, and give thanks
       to the RCC Christian Church for God dying for them, and pray
       before an idol that has Jesus back on the cross bleeding and
       still suffering.
       Or, Christians worship the baby-version of Jesus, which every
       Roman knows is Thammuz.
       #Post#: 3670--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest8
       Date: February 3, 2019, 10:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Arius link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Bladerunner link=topic=166.msg3657#msg3657
       date=1549155973]
       > [quote author=patrick jane link=topic=166.msg3656#msg3656
       date=1549143230]
       >
       > [quote]
       > Thank you for the video Mr. Patrick Jane!
       >
       > So this video "Which Translation should we read" says: "The
       one that supports the Trinity doctrine". like-
       >
       > Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens(plural)
       and the earth" NKJV - I guess God messed up on the globe, it
       turned out flooded and in chaos and darkness.
       >
       > In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       >
       > John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       > 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham
       was born, I am!”
       >
       > but the New Trinity version:
       > John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       > 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”
       >
       > I did learn something I wasn't aware of before, that;
       Diocletian was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305 went out and
       destroyed all OT and NT documents, churches of Jesus Christ (who
       according to the Bible went by "followers of the Way"), Pastors
       everything, he practically ended Christs Apostolic Church on
       earth.
       >
       > Then guess who came the year after Diocletian cleared out the
       followers of the Way, the Truth and the Life, who revealed our
       One Infinite and Eternal God? None other than:
       >
       > the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (AD 306–337), taking
       the derogatory "Christian" word and created the RCC-Christian
       Religion, with his sword as Christs cross, and the Trinity
       many-gods doctrine as the new Roman gods, and his Christian
       Religion began to transition as the dominant religion of the
       Roman Empire.
       >
       > The year before a Roman Emperor wipes out all books, scrolls,
       letters, churches, Pastors and Elders of the followers of
       Christ, and the next year another Emperor revives it, having
       miraculously found all the scrolls, letters, books, with a New
       more acceptable Doctrine to the point it becomes the "dominant
       Religion of the Roman Empire"?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of erased history
       and revised history. We are taught and told we somebody else
       WANTS us to believe and hear. Make the lie so big and repeat it
       so much that people will start to believe it and teach it to
       their children. I'm questioning a lot of things right now. Thank
       you for joining here and posting here, I really appreciate it.
       We get lots of views here and we can help spread truth.
       [/quote]
       PJ ,,, You Said: Yes, that does seem odd. I am more wary now of
       erased history and revised history."
       P.J. Constantine Married the Church and State. There was no pope
       at that time it was to come. In prior years, Christians were
       persecuted at holocaust rates.[/quote]
       According to the holiest of fathers the Pope aka God on globe
       earth and the holy Catholic Church, Peter was the first
       Christian Pope, .. unknowns to him, or the Apostolic Church of
       Christ?
       Constantine didn't marry the RCC and state, the RCC ruled over
       the state.
       Also, it was not the Christians who were persecuted (that's a
       nice twist on history there) but it was the "Christian Church"
       that went out with the sword and persecuted, and just about
       wiped out Christ Church who never went by the name Christian,
       but suffered because of it.
       1 Peter 4:16 Yet if any man suffer as (called/mocked) a
       Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on
       this behalf.
       --- Quote ---
       > Arius Said:"In the older, minor, or Eastern books;
       >
       > John 8:58 New International Version (NIV)
       > 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham
       was born, I am!”
       >
       > but the New Trinity version:
       > John 8:58 New King James Version (NKJV)
       > 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before
       Abraham was, I AM.”"
       >
       > In the only version that does not use the Alexandrian
       corrupted text is the KJV.
       >
       > In John 8:58.."Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say
       unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."
       >
       > Now please tell me truthfully, why would anyone want to change
       the KJV  into something more readable.   Seems to me like it is
       readable enough.
       --- End Quote ---
       The original text were together without spaces or commas to make
       sure no word would be missing. What happened is that the
       Christian Scholars separated the words and created sentences,
       and we know how we can alter the meaning with just a comma, or
       like the KJV has it capitalized the "I AM" to match how God
       identified Himself to Moses.
       Like if I say: "I AM hungry!" it doesn't mean I am God even if I
       capitalize the 'I AM'.
       --- Quote ---
       > The reason is to Create Doubt.   As the Serpent, Satan said to
       "EVE" that faithful day in the Garden. "Yeah Hath GOD Said"
       Creating Doubt in Her mind as does all the other versions other
       than the KJV... They actually remove the deity of Jesus.
       > Compare (1 Tim 3:16) and see for yourself. Keep in mind that
       this verse clearly teaches us JESUS is GOD.
       --- End Quote ---
       If Jesus was God, then the RCC by Constantine actually killed
       God. That is why the changes, because Rome not only wanted to
       claim the life of Gods son Jesus, but God too, which they did by
       altering the Bible. This was prepared some time before  Emperor
       Constantine, when Diocletian was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305
       he made sure no one else had copies of the scrolls, letters of
       either the Prophets, or the Apostles so he went on destroying
       everything and everyone that knew Gods Word.
       But look how the copies all of a sudden turned up in Rome's
       hands once the road was cleared for a New Doctrine, and became
       the official Religion using the mock word Christian Of course it
       was not Infinite God and His son Word who was presented to Rome
       and the rest of the world, but a plural deity. It just may be
       the one Jesus cast out who called himself "Legion".
       Look up "deity" it refers to any pagan god or goddess, our
       Infinite God is Not one of the deities like the Roman Christian
       sun-god.
       1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of
       godliness:
       God was manifested in the flesh,
       Justified in the Spirit,
       Seen by angels,
       Preached among the Gentiles,
       Believed on in the world,
       Received up in glory.
       That's right, until the son Word came, Infinite "I Am" spoke to
       us in many different ways, Angel of fire, thunder, still small
       voice, even a human body that Jacob wrestled with, but now He
       sent His son Word, through whom He created All Things both in
       Heaven and on earth, the perfect image of our invisible God.
       Jesus said: "When you see me, you see the Father", and they
       worshipped him, Not as 'God', but as the "son of God" who spoke
       what he heard from his Creator and Father, his God and our God.
       Just as Joseph became second only to Pharaoh, Jesus is now
       second only to God. Oh, and we are also to shine Gods light in
       us, .. don't you know we are the temple of God, that the Spirit
       of God dwells in us!?
       Look at the last sentence: "Received up into glory", I mean how
       on earth could that be referring to God? How?
       First the RCC-Christians killed God, so now He was
       accepted/received up into glory!? That is blasphemy, even the
       idea that God could die, not alone suggesting that He had to
       somehow earn His was back into glory!?
       --- Quote ---
       > Here is another. Rom 14:10b, 12  Yes, the other versions take
       the Deity out of Christ in this passage as well.
       >
       > I believe in the KJV and do believe I could convince anyone
       willing to listen and study. But alas, the KJV has been around
       for almost 400 years and the others have been around 75-100 at
       the most. Go ahead and compare the versions......
       >
       > History is only rewritten by the false teachers. History is
       out there, It is the same and has been accepted by many
       scholars.
       >
       > Hope this helps, my friend.
       >
       > Have a good evening,,, have company calling.
       >
       > Blade
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Romans 14:10 NIV
       For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat. 11 It is
       written:
       “‘As surely as I live,’ says the Lord,
       ‘every knee will bow before me;
       every tongue will acknowledge God.’”
       Romans 14:10 KJV
       10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at
       nought thy brother?
       for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
       11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee
       shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
       Yes, this and many other verses have been altered to try to kill
       God. And 2 billion Christians sing and praise, and give thanks
       to the RCC Christian Church for God dying for them, and pray
       before an idol that has Jesus back on the cross bleeding and
       still suffering.
       Or, Christians worship the baby-version of Jesus, which every
       Roman knows is Thammuz.
       [/quote]
       [shadow=blue,left]Constantine did bring the state and Church
       together (marry) by legalizing the Christian Church. All
       Theodosius was make the Christian religion the official religion
       of ROME... There is one other thing Theodosius did and that was
       to place his power into the Church trying to force this
       Christian religion throughout the land. The Church retained much
       of that power and the rest is history with the RCC ruling Kings
       and Kingdoms including Roman Emperors for 11-1200 years.
       The Bible was outlawed for anyone to have and only the Church
       could interpret it.
       The Bible Septuagint LXX was written 300 years prior to Christ.
       The New Testament was held in some 5-6000 manuscripts and used
       in the underground HOME churches for it was dead to all to even
       own the Bible.
       The RCC accepted writings of the manuscripts but also the
       non-cononical books and of course was interpreted by the Pope.
       (P.s as you said, Peter was not the 1st POPE. Yet the RCC today
       still claims He was the first POPE. WHY? because they
       incorrectly  interpreted the words Jesus told Peter: Mat 16:18
       "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this
       rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not
       prevail against it."
       I will tell you now. If you believe what your words are saying
       that Jesus only existed as a man, then my Friend, You are WRONG,
       WRONG, WRONG and according to His (Jesus')WORD, unless you
       change you mind, Hell is awaiting.
       The only way to Heaven and GOD is through Jesus Christ through
       Faith alone.
       ( 1 Cor 15:1-4). I hope you can change to believe in this for it
       the only road there.
       Blade[/shadow]
       #Post#: 3701--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest43
       Date: February 5, 2019, 7:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you again brother Blade.
       --- Quote ---
       > [member=8]Bladerunner[/member] said: Constantine did bring the
       state and Church together (marry) by legalizing the Christian
       Church. All Theodosius was make the Christian religion the
       official religion of ROME... There is one other thing Theodosius
       did and that was to place his power into the Church trying to
       force this Christian religion throughout the land. The Church
       retained much of that power and the rest is history with the RCC
       ruling Kings and Kingdoms including Roman Emperors for 11-1200
       years.
       --- End Quote ---
       I wasn't talking about Theodosius who came after Constantine,
       but Diocletian who was Emperor 'before' Constantine, who
       supposedly destroyed all the manuscripts, letters, books of both
       the OT and the New, yet they all appeared with a New
       interpretation in the hands of Constantine and his
       Catholic-"Christian" Church.
       Diocletian was a Roman emperor from (c. AD 284 to 305)
       Supposedly wiped out Christ disciples, those who were "of the
       Way" and confiscated (or destroyed) any books, letters scrolls
       they may have had along with the Ministers/Teachers of Christ,
       except those outside of their jurisdiction like Egypt, Greece,
       etc.
       except Arius, and Arianism remained strong, and followed the
       "son of God Word" and not the new Christian Trinity-gods.
       - Arian teachings were first attributed to Arius (c. AD
       256–336), a Christian presbyter in Alexandria of Egypt whose
       followers remained, and would not accept either the "Christian"
       mock name, or its "Trinity doctrine". Now the job to exterminate
       Arianism fell in the hands of Constantine I the Roman emperor
       who ruled between 305 - and 337AD. along with his militant
       Christian army. So Arius and those following Arianism were
       branded "heretics" by the "Christian Church of Rome", and
       persecuted by, .. that's right, by Christians.
       --- Quote ---
       > The Bible was outlawed for anyone to have and only the Church
       could interpret it.
       >
       > The Bible Septuagint LXX was written 300 years prior to
       Christ. The New Testament was held in some 5-6000 manuscripts
       and used in the underground HOME churches for it was dead to all
       to even own the Bible.
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes of course, they didn't want Roman citizens to figure out
       that the New "Christian Religion" was not Scriptural, and forced
       their own interpretation of both God whom they killed,, and that
       Jew Jesus, who even 1,700 years later according to todays first
       Jesuit Pope said was "a failure on the cross", which are the
       actual blasphemy of blasphemies.
       --- Quote ---
       > The RCC accepted writings of the manuscripts but also the
       non-cononical books and of course was interpreted by the Pope.
       (P.s as you said, Peter was not the 1st POPE. Yet the RCC today
       still claims He was the first POPE. WHY? because they
       incorrectly  interpreted the words Jesus told Peter: Mat 16:18
       "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this
       rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not
       prevail against it."
       --- End Quote ---
       You are either playing the "willfully ignorant" card, or you
       don't realize the implication of your Christian comment? If you
       agree that "Peter was not the first Christian Pope", then the
       Roman Christian Religion has no "foundation" to stand on, ..
       none. You just broke that thin thread that the RCC used for the
       past 1,700 years to make over 2 billion Christians believe they
       are somehow connected to Christ and his early Apostolic Church.
       --- Quote ---
       > I will tell you now. If you believe what your words are saying
       that Jesus only existed as a man, then my Friend, You are WRONG,
       WRONG, WRONG and according to His (Jesus')WORD, unless you
       change you mind, Hell is awaiting.
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, I am saying just as the Bible clearly states:
       John 1:14 (NIV)
       The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have
       seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from
       the Father, full of grace and truth.
       .. and also another 'yes' that "hell on earth" has been my home
       from the day I was born, to now 62 years of my life. But, in all
       this pain and suffering, all this confusion, the light is
       getting brighter as I am assured by Scripture:
       2 Corinthians 4:6 For God, who said, “Let light shine out of
       darkness,” made his light shine in our hearts to give us the
       light of the knowledge of God’s glory displayed in the face of
       Christ.
       7 But we have this treasure in jars of clay to show that this
       all-surpassing power is from God and not from us.
       8 We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed;
       perplexed, but not in despair;
       9 persecuted, but not abandoned;
       struck down, but not destroyed.
       10 We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so
       that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body.
       11 For we who are alive are always being given over to death for
       Jesus’ sake,
       so that his life may also be revealed in our mortal body.
       12 So then, death is at work in us, but life is at work in you.
       --- Quote ---
       > The only way to Heaven and GOD is through Jesus Christ through
       Faith alone.
       > ( 1 Cor 15:1-4). I hope you can change to believe in this for
       it the only road there.
       >
       > Blade
       --- End Quote ---
       And which heaven is that Blade, that NASA.gov space where the
       Christian globe resides along with other gods like Mars, Venus,
       Jupiter, Saturn, circling in praise of the sun-god Helios?
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1d8bpsAGVc
       Pope, besides claiming that Jesus (who is the Prince of Peace)
       was a "failure on the cross", now declaring: "Jesus was not a
       Prince"
       He also said that Catholic priests should not call themselves
       "princes" because princes don't associate with the poorest of
       the people. This coming from a man who claims to be not only
       Holy, but the "Holiest of Fathers, the vicar of God" aka "God on
       Earth"!
       #Post#: 3708--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How many right interpretations are there to scripture?
   DIR By: guest8
       Date: February 5, 2019, 11:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Arius link ---
       >
       > Thank you again brother Blade.
       >
       > [quote] [member=8]Bladerunner[/member] said: Constantine did
       bring the state and Church together (marry) by legalizing the
       Christian Church. All Theodosius was make the Christian religion
       the official religion of ROME... There is one other thing
       Theodosius did and that was to place his power into the Church
       trying to force this Christian religion throughout the land. The
       Church retained much of that power and the rest is history with
       the RCC ruling Kings and Kingdoms including Roman Emperors for
       11-1200 years.
       --- End Quote ---
       I wasn't talking about Theodosius who came after Constantine,
       but Diocletian who was Emperor 'before' Constantine, who
       supposedly destroyed all the manuscripts, letters, books of both
       the OT and the New, yet they all appeared with a New
       interpretation in the hands of Constantine and his
       Catholic-"Christian" Church.
       Diocletian was a Roman emperor from (c. AD 284 to 305)
       Supposedly wiped out Christ disciples, those who were "of the
       Way" and confiscated (or destroyed) any books, letters scrolls
       they may have had along with the Ministers/Teachers of Christ,
       except those outside of their jurisdiction like Egypt, Greece,
       etc. [/QUOTE]
       [shadow=blue,left]Yes, during this time, Jews were persecuted
       and any Christians were also. However, at the time of the Textus
       Receptus, there were still 5,000 original (NOTE) manuscripts to
       trans-scribe.
       Note: The term  "Original" is used here as those manuscripts
       that were saved by individuals or families. The Christian Church
       back then was in the Home and rightly so. Most of the
       manuscripts back then were written by the student of the
       synagogue from memory. Even though it was memory, all 5,000
       agreed with each other with very little differences and 98% of
       these being in the spelling of proper names.
       [/shadow]
       --- Quote from: Arius link ---
       >
       > except Arius, and Arianism remained strong, and followed the
       "son of God Word" and not the new Christian Trinity-gods.
       > - Arian teachings were first attributed to Arius (c. AD
       256–336), a Christian presbyter in Alexandria of Egypt whose
       followers remained, and would not accept either the "Christian"
       mock name, or its "Trinity doctrine". Now the job to exterminate
       Arianism fell in the hands of Constantine I the Roman emperor
       who ruled between 305 - and 337AD. along with his militant
       Christian army. So Arius and those following Arianism were
       branded "heretics" by the "Christian Church of Rome", and
       persecuted by, .. that's right, by Christians.[/QUOTE]
       >
       > [shadow=blue,left]The Roman Church, certainly not the
       Christian (body of Christ) church.[/shadow]
       >
       > [quote author=Arius link=topic=166.msg3701#msg3701
       date=1549415315]
       > [Quote]The Bible was outlawed for anyone to have and only the
       Church could interpret it.
       >
       > The Bible Septuagint LXX was written 300 years prior to
       Christ. The New Testament was held in some 5-6000 manuscripts
       and used in the underground HOME churches for it was dead to all
       to even own the Bible.
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes of course, they didn't want Roman citizens to figure out
       that the New "Christian Religion" was not Scriptural, and forced
       their own interpretation of both God whom they killed,, and that
       Jew Jesus, who even 1,700 years later according to todays first
       Jesuit Pope said was "a failure on the cross", which are the
       actual blasphemy of blasphemies.[/QUOTE]
       [shadow=blue,left]No that was not the reason. it was more
       nefarious. It seems that the emperor by marrying (promoting) the
       Church and the state had taken on the title of "Anti-christ". By
       placing the state and the church together, this title went to
       the high bishop at the time. He did not like it either and thus
       outlawed the Bible and any of its interpretations. This remained
       in effect for the world by the RCC up until Martin Luther. Of
       course, this was the beginning of the crusades the RCC carried
       out against the Protestants, etc.[/shadow]
       --- Quote from: Arius link ---
       >
       > [quote]The RCC accepted writings of the manuscripts but also
       the non-cononical books and of course was interpreted by the
       Pope. (P.s as you said, Peter was not the 1st POPE. Yet the RCC
       today still claims He was the first POPE. WHY? because they
       incorrectly  interpreted the words Jesus told Peter: Mat 16:18
       "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this
       rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not
       prevail against it."
       --- End Quote ---
       You are either playing the "willfully ignorant" card, or you
       don't realize the implication of your Christian comment? If you
       agree that "Peter was not the first Christian Pope", then the
       Roman Christian Religion has no "foundation" to stand on, ..
       none. You just broke that thin thread that the RCC used for the
       past 1,700 years to make over 2 billion Christians believe they
       are somehow connected to Christ and his early Apostolic
       Church.[/QUOTE]
       [shadow=blue,left]Peter was not the first Pope of the RCC. and
       as far as I am concerned, the RCC is heretical at best.
       [/shadow]
       --- Quote from: Arius link ---
       >
       > [quote]I will tell you now. If you believe what your words are
       saying that Jesus only existed as a man, then my Friend, You are
       WRONG, WRONG, WRONG and according to His (Jesus')WORD, unless
       you change you mind, Hell is awaiting.
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, I am saying just as the Bible clearly states:
       John 1:14 (NIV)
       The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have
       seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from
       the Father, full of grace and truth.
       .. and also another 'yes' that "hell on earth" has been my home
       from the day I was born, to now 62 years of my life. But, in all
       this pain and suffering, all this confusion, the light is
       getting brighter as I am assured by Scripture:
       2 Corinthians 4:6 For God, who said, “Let light shine out of
       darkness,” made his light shine in our hearts to give us the
       light of the knowledge of God’s glory displayed in the face of
       Christ.
       7 But we have this treasure in jars of clay to show that this
       all-surpassing power is from God and not from us.
       8 We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed;
       perplexed, but not in despair;
       9 persecuted, but not abandoned;
       struck down, but not destroyed.
       10 We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so
       that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body.
       11 For we who are alive are always being given over to death for
       Jesus’ sake,
       so that his life may also be revealed in our mortal body.
       12 So then, death is at work in us, but life is at work in
       you.[/QUOTE]
       [shadow=blue,left]First of all, you have the wrong Bible. The
       NIV version is full of  atrocities against the WORD of GOD.
       Jesus was a Man on earth born of woman, heir to the Throne of
       King David by both his parents, Joseph and Mary.......But Jesus
       was the Son of GOD, a part of the trinity Psalms 2 and Gen 1:26,
       etc. Jesus was there at the beginning.
       Rev 22:13...".I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end,
       the first and the last."
       There is no doubt that Jesus is part of the trinity of God (the
       Father), Jesus Christ (the Son) and the Holy Spirit.   Please
       read psalm 2 where all three of them are having a conversation.
       [/shadow]
       --- Quote from: Arius link ---
       >
       >
       > [quote]The only way to Heaven and GOD is through Jesus Christ
       through Faith alone.
       > ( 1 Cor 15:1-4). I hope you can change to believe in this for
       it the only road there.[/QUOTE]
       >
       > And which heaven is that Blade, that NASA.gov space where the
       Christian globe resides along with other gods like Mars, Venus,
       Jupiter, Saturn, circling in praise of the sun-god Helios?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       [shadow=blue,left]  Quit being silly. The 3rd Heaven to be
       exact. You are living under and in the 1st heaven.
       Blade
       [/shadow]
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 9
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page