DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
<
form action=&amp
;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; method=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;p
ost&
quot; target=&am
p;amp;amp;quot;_top&
amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;cmd&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; value=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot
;_s-xclick&a
mp;amp;quot;&amp
;amp;amp;gt; &am
p;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hosted_button_id&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; val
ue=&
quot;DKL7ADEKRVUBL&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;image&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.payp
alobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; border=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; nam
e=&q
uot;submit&a
mp;amp;quot; alt=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;quot;PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
&quo
t;&g
t; &
lt;img alt=&
amp;amp;quot;&am
p;amp;amp;quot; border=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypalobjects.com
/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; width=&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; height=&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/form&
amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Conspiracy
*****************************************************
#Post#: 10119--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: guest8 Date: February 6, 2020, 8:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=patrick jane link=topic=158.msg10086#msg10086
date=1580967820]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8-uRL7oMOM
[/quote]
It will get worse.
#Post#: 12629--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: guest17 Date: May 4, 2020, 9:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
He used to be Trans, Here's what he wants everyone to know...
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNkihVALlM8
#Post#: 12632--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: guest8 Date: May 4, 2020, 10:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=truthjourney link=topic=158.msg12629#msg12629
date=1588646301]
He used to be Trans, Here's what he wants everyone to know...
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNkihVALlM8
[/quote]
WOW......It is so sad!
Blade
#Post#: 12634--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: patrick jane Date: May 5, 2020, 12:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK3-ixRTe_Y
#Post#: 12703--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: patrick jane Date: May 6, 2020, 1:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
TRANSPACOLYPSE NOW - FREEMASON SECRETS
.
The Secret Teachings of All Ages by Manly P. Hall
Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike
The Androgynous Alchemical Agenda
The Secrets of the Phoenix
11 minutes
HTML https://www.bitchute.com/video/eAp9YRQhxio/
#Post#: 12716--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: guest17 Date: May 6, 2020, 9:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Doctors Gave Her Daughter Hormone Treatments (And She Couldn’t
Stop Them)
“Elaine” (pseudonym) is the mother of a daughter suffering from
gender dysphoria. She shared the pain and heartbreak of watching
her daughter hormonally and surgically alter her body.
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9j4gAeWqoY
#Post#: 13052--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: patrick jane Date: May 17, 2020, 11:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tL-BWIIdrIs
#Post#: 14198--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: patrick jane Date: June 13, 2020, 8:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JB6qiJ5n5w
#Post#: 14242--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: patrick jane Date: June 14, 2020, 11:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[center][b]Transgender Health Protections Reversed By Trump
Administration
[/center]
HTML https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/06/12/868073068/transgender-health-protections-reversed-by-trump-administration
The Trump administration on Friday finalized a rule that would
remove nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ people when it
comes to health care and health insurance.
"HHS respects the dignity of every human being, and as we have
shown in our response to the pandemic, we vigorously protect and
enforce the civil rights of all to the fullest extent permitted
by our laws as passed by Congress," said Roger Severino, who
directs the Office for Civil Rights in the Department of Health
and Human Services, in a written statement announcing that the
HHS rule had become final. The rule is set to go into effect by
mid-August.
It is one of many rules and regulations put forward by the Trump
administration that defines "sex discrimination" as only
applying when someone faces discrimination for being female or
male, and does not protect people from discrimination on the
basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Supporters of the new rule said this is a necessary reversal of
Obama-era executive overreach and will reduce confusion about
the legal meaning of "sex discrimination." Critics argue the
rule could further harm an already vulnerable group —
transgender people — in the midst of a pandemic and historic
unrest spurred by the killing of George Floyd at the hands of
police in Minneapolis.
"I can't help but wonder if the timing [of this rule] is by
design so that this is something that people won't pay attention
to," said Tia Sherče Gaynor, a political science professor at
the University of Cincinnati.
What the final rule does
The rule focuses on nondiscrimination protections laid out in
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act. That federal law
established that it is illegal to discriminate on the basis of
"race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability in certain
health programs and activities." In 2016, an Obama-era rule
explained that protections regarding "sex" encompass those based
on gender identity, which it defined as "male, female, neither,
or a combination of male and female."
In June 2019, under Trump, the HHS Office for Civil Rights
proposed a rule (the one finalized this week) that reverses the
one from the Obama administration.
Severino said at the time, "We're going back to the plain
meaning of those terms, which is based on biological sex." He
also said the rule could save hospitals and insurers and others
$2.9 billion over five years since they will be relieved of the
requirement to print notices of nondiscrimination in several
languages and include them with any "significant" mailings.
Under the new rule, a transgender person could, for example, be
refused care for a checkup at a doctor's office, said Lindsey
Dawson, associate director of HIV policy at the Kaiser Family
Foundation. Other possible scenarios include a transgender man
being denied treatment for ovarian cancer, or a hysterectomy not
being covered by an insurer — or costing more when the procedure
is related to someone's gender transition.
The Trump rule makes changes to gender-based discrimination
protections beyond Section 1557 of the ACA; it affects
regulations pertaining to access to health insurance, for
example, including cost-sharing, health plan marketing and
benefits. The rule could also mean that those seeking an
abortion could be denied care if performing the procedure
violates the provider's moral or religious beliefs.
Even with the rule now finalized, an LGBTQ person who is
discriminated against or denied health care can still sue, and
courts may rule that their civil rights were violated in such a
case. But that's not an easy avenue, Dawson said.
"Because of limited access to litigation, I think that it's fair
to state that the ramifications [of this rule] could be pretty
significant," she said. Protections will also vary based on
where someone lives, she added, so the rule "creates a patchwork
of civil rights, compared to standardized protections."
For Severino, this move has been a long time coming. He joined
the Trump administration from the Heritage Foundation, a
conservative think tank, where he wrote a paper on gender
protections in Section 1557. He's also a devout Catholic and, as
director of the Office for Civil Rights, has made protections of
religious freedom a key focus, including the right of doctors to
refuse to provide care that contradicts their religious or moral
beliefs.
The rule the HHS proposed on gender and discrimination in health
care garnered 155,966 public comments. The final rule is nearly
identical to the original version proposed last year.
Conservative groups, including the Christian Medical
Association, the Susan B. Anthony List and the Heritage
Foundation, applauded the new HHS guidance.
"Health professionals know they must base medical decisions on
biology and science, not ideology," Dr. Jeff Barrows, the
Christian Medical Association's executive vice president for
bioethics and public policy, said after hearing the
announcement.
"We are hopeful that this rule will help steer consideration of
gender issues in health care back toward science and away from
politics and ideology, back to the protection of professional
medical judgment and the freedom to adhere to long-observed
ethical and moral standards."
Ryan Anderson, a senior research fellow at the Heritage
Foundation and former colleague of Severino's, submitted a
comment in support of the rule. Anderson said it simply reverses
what he sees as the Obama administration's executive overreach.
"Just for the lawmaking process, it's important that the Trump
administration clarify that that's not what Congress had in mind
when they used the word 'sex,' " he said.
Critics worry about access to health care, especially in a
pandemic
Mari Brighe, a freelance writer and transgender woman who lives
outside Detroit, called the rule "terrifying."
"I can relate a decade of stories about getting terrible health
care because I'm trans," Brighe said. "We walk into any given
health care situation not knowing whether doctors are going to
treat us well, whether we're going to get high quality care,
whether any given, random health care person is going to be
terrible to us."
Once, when seriously ill with the flu and having trouble
breathing, Brighe recalled, she was sent home from a hospital in
rural New York and ended up driving 90 minutes and crossing a
lake by ferry to get treatment at a hospital in Vermont.
She said worries now that the rule could make transgender people
— who are already reluctant to seek medical care — all the more
likely to avoid coronavirus treatment and testing.
"The way that [the rule] reads to me is that people could refuse
to collect your COVID specimen because they don't want to touch
a trans person," she said. "That's a recipe for spreading a
really terrible pandemic among a really, really vulnerable
population."
"I can't help but think about how this impacts black trans
people," said Gaynor, the political science professor, who noted
that African American transgender people are "arguably the most
marginalized group in our country."
African Americans who get COVID-19 are much more likely to die
from that disease than are white Americans, statistics show. A
recent report from the Williams Institute at UCLA estimates that
hundreds of thousands of transgender adults may be especially
vulnerable to COVID-19 because they have an underlying
condition, are over 65, lack health insurance or live in
poverty.
For black transgender people, Gaynor said, "it's layers of
oppression — it's transphobia on top of racism on top of
economic oppression." All of that could affect their ability to
get health care during the pandemic, she said, which in turn
could have public health implications for all.
Katie Keith, a health law professor at Georgetown University,
noted that the new rule could have another chilling effect.
"Even if no one actually does discriminate more because of the
rule, you've created a fear," Keith said.
She pointed to research documenting how the "public charge" rule
— which penalizes people who are seeking to become citizens if
they use public safety net programs such as nutrition and
housing assistance — affected people and programs outside the
scope of the rule itself.
"When they target these vulnerable populations, you see less
enrollment in health insurance," she said. "You see folks scared
to go to the doctor."
Although the Heritage Foundation's Anderson supports the rule,
he said the prospect that it could have a chilling effect is "a
very reasonable concern."
"I don't think any reasonable person wants to see transgender
people not enrolling in health care plans and not having access
to health care," Anderson said. What's needed, he said, is a
"finer grain" approach to this issue — such as a new law in
Congress that protects LGTBQ people from health care
discrimination generally but carves out protection for providers
to refuse to provide care related to sex reassignment.
What's next? a word from the high court and, perhaps, Congress
Now that it's marked "final," this rule — which was issued by an
agency of the executive branch — may now encounter hurdles via
the two other branches of the federal government.
This month, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to weigh
in on two major cases on the meaning of the word "sex" in
employment discrimination. The two cases involve issues closely
related to the legal questions at play in Severino's HHS rule,
and the high court's decision might have major implications for
the rule's legal footing.
"It's wild that they're finalizing this rule before we have the
Supreme Court decision," Keith said.
Meanwhile, in Congress, House Democrats have already asserted
that they strongly disagree with the HHS rule. In early May,
Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a statement that read, in part: "The
Administration must immediately abandon this outrageous,
un-American plan and give LGBTQ individuals the reassurance that
they will never be denied the health care they or their families
need."
Now that the final rule is out, Congress does have a way of
invalidating it, using the Congressional Review Act. That would
only happen in this case if — within 60 days that Congress is in
session — Trump were no longer president, and simple majorities
in both chambers of Congress voted to block the rule. Even if
Democrats win big in November, it's not clear if that's a
possibility given the tricky timeline — Congress is typically in
recess in August, and the COVID-19 pandemic may complicate
matters further
The date at which the final rule would be able to avoid this
congressional threat is a moving target, Keith said. "Folks are
watching the calendar now [wondering], 'When is that 60-day
legislative deadline?' "
What's much more certain, she said, is that there will be
lawsuits to try to overturn the rule or block it from going into
effect.
On Friday, less than an hour after HHS issued its press release,
LGBTQ activist group Lambda Legal said it would challenge the
new rule in court.
"Today's rule is a tragically failed public health policy and
just flat-out illegal," Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, Lambda Legal senior
attorney and health care strategist, said in a written
statement. "We will be challenging the rule because at a time
when the entire world is battling a dangerous pandemic, which in
the United States has infected more than 2,000,000 people and
killed more than 116,000, it is critical for everyone to have
ready access to the potentially lifesaving health care they
need."
Unless someone does file a lawsuit that results in a judge
putting the rule on hold, it is set to go into effect 60 days
from the date the rule is published in the Federal Register.
#Post#: 15509--------------------------------------------------
Re: Transpocalypse Upon Us
By: patrick jane Date: July 23, 2020, 11:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F90C4cByhA&list=WL&index=10&t=0s
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page