URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       <
       form action=&amp
       ;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; method=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;p
       ost&
       quot; target=&am
       p;amp;amp;quot;_top&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;cmd&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; value=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot
       ;_s-xclick&a
       mp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hidden&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; name=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;hosted_button_id&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; val
       ue=&
       quot;DKL7ADEKRVUBL&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;input type=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;image&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.payp
       alobjects.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; nam
       e=&q
       uot;submit&a
       mp;amp;quot; alt=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;quot;PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
       &quo
       t;&g
       t; &
       lt;img alt=&
       amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;quot; border=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;0&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; src=&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;https://www.paypalobjects.com
       /en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; width=&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot; height=&amp
       ;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;1&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;&am
       p;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &a
       mp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/form&
       amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
  HTML https://3169.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Christian Theology
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36167--------------------------------------------------
       Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: December 15, 2021, 10:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       1 hour 44 minutes
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM82qxxskZE
       Is Genesis History? features over a dozen scientists and
       scholars explaining how the world intersects with the history
       recorded in Genesis. From rock layers to fossils, from lions to
       stars, from the Bible to artifacts, this fascinating film will
       change the way you see the world.
       The film’s goal is to provide a reasonable case for Creation in
       six normal days, a real Adam and Eve, an actual fall, a global
       flood, and a tower of Babel. Dr. Del Tackett, creator of
       𝘛𝘩𝘦
       𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩
       𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵,
       serves as your guide—hiking through canyons, climbing up
       mountains, and diving below the sea—in an exploration of two
       competing views…one compelling truth.
       #Post#: 36911--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: January 24, 2022, 1:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GX2E07oePQ
       #Post#: 37791--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: March 8, 2022, 1:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSLqHaI_ORU
       #Post#: 38315--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: March 28, 2022, 11:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [img]
  HTML https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/128462.jpg?h=528&w=940[/img]
  HTML https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2022/march-web-only/when-sin-begin-loren-haarsma-evolution.html
       Evangelicals Have Four Proposals for Harmonizing Genesis and
       Evolution
       Loren Haarsma maps out the prevailing schools of thought on the
       origins of humanity and sin.
       The past few years haven’t been kind to evangelicalism. Every
       other month a new scandal or controversy seems to appear. Sexual
       and spiritual abuse. Patriarchy and toxic masculinity. Critical
       race theory and racism. The list goes on. Following in the wake
       of these self-inflicted wounds, deconstruction and exvangelical
       have become buzzwords in Christian discourse. No one should be
       surprised.
       Given the circumstances, it seems almost quaint to revisit
       questions of evolution, original sin, and the historical Adam
       and Eve. How do these decades-old theological controversies bear
       upon our present predicament? The answer is simple. Despite
       appearances, the phenomenon of deconstruction isn’t new, and the
       story researcher David Kinnaman told in his 2011 book, You Lost
       Me: Why Young Christians Are Leaving Church … and Rethinking
       Faith, still rings true. Younger people have been leaving the
       faith in increasing numbers for decades, and one of the main
       reasons is the perceived anti-science mindset of the church.
       The anti-mask, anti-vaccine stance of far too many conservative
       pastors and pundits added fuel to the fire, but the evangelical
       problem with science ultimately comes down to resistance to
       “secular” evolutionary science, which is set in opposition to
       the biblical narrative. Of course, all evangelical Christians
       feel a duty to be faithful to Scripture, but is it possible
       leave room for evolution and remain faithful to the inspiration,
       authority, and inerrancy of God’s Word?
       The issues in play
       In his book When Did Sin Begin? Human Evolution and the Doctrine
       of Original Sin, Calvin University physics professor Loren
       Haarsma outlines various evangelical proposals for harmonizing
       human evolution and original sin. Drawing from a dozen recent
       books on the subject, Haarsma runs through the four main
       options:
       God selected Adam and Eve from an existing population to
       represent all of humanity. Since they represented everyone, the
       consequences of their failure immediately affected everyone.
       God selected Adam and Eve from an existing population to
       represent humanity, but after being expelled from the Garden,
       their sinfulness was spread to others by culture or genealogy.
       Adam and Eve aren’t literal individuals. Rather, Genesis 2–3 is
       a stylized retelling of many human events compressed into a
       single archetypal story. Although God occasionally revealed his
       will to individuals or groups, people persisted in disobedience.
       Adam and Eve are symbolic figures in an archetypal story. Over a
       long period of time, humans became morally accountable through
       general revelation (Rom. 1:18–20), yet they chose sin.
       Haarsma, the husband of BioLogos president Deborah Haarsma, has
       been involved in faith-and-science dialogues for decades, and
       his expertise shows throughout. The sort of “harmony” Haarsma
       seeks isn’t a one-to-one correspondence between the details of
       Scripture and science. Instead, he advocates “a harmony
       reminiscent of J. S. Bach’s counterpoint,” which employs two
       melodies played simultaneously. Each can be enjoyed
       independently, but “played together, they form a richer whole.”
       Before discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each view,
       Haarsma spends the first half of the book reviewing the
       theological and scientific issues that come into play:
       scriptural interpretation, divine action, natural evils, and
       human evolution. The opening chapter covers principles of
       biblical interpretation, invoking John Calvin’s well-known
       principle of divine accommodation—how God, knowing our
       limitations, speaks to us in something resembling “baby talk”—to
       explain the “ancient science” in the Bible. Haarsma concludes
       that science doesn’t dictate interpretation, but “scientific
       discoveries are one of several ways that the Holy Spirit has
       prompted the church to reinterpret specific passages.”
       On divine action, Haarsma focuses on addressing the common
       objection that many aspects of evolution rely on random
       processes, which nonspecialists characterize as “without
       purpose” or “meaningless.” When scientists use the term
       “random,” however, they simply mean “unpredictable” from a human
       standpoint, which doesn’t rule out God’s purposes or control of
       the processes.
       Similarly, his discussion of natural evil addresses the common
       misconception that animal suffering and death are consequences
       of human sin and the Fall. Although there is “abundant
       scientific evidence,” he writes, that “death was a natural part
       of both animal and plant existence from the beginning,” Haarsma
       turns also to Genesis, Job, and Romans 8 to make his case,
       helpfully ending with a word of pastoral advice that in Christ,
       “God gave us the mandate to ease the suffering of others.”
       The chapter on human evolution begins with a review of the
       genetic and fossil evidence for common ancestry, particularly
       the fact that species start from a population, not a single
       pair. Haarsma points out that the early sapiens population was
       geographically spread out and never very large, but he stumbles
       a bit on a population bottleneck between 100,000–200,000 years
       ago. Recent research has ruled that out, but it’s a minor flaw
       in an otherwise good discussion.
       From there, the chapter shines in its treatment of human
       sociality and gene-culture coevolution. The terms may be
       unfamiliar, but the concept isn’t hard to understand.
       Coevolution simply involves a “feedback loop” between genetic
       and cultural change. For example, the genetic changes that led
       to larger brains also required more calories to feed and more
       time to learn and mature. Human survival techniques and social
       structures had to adapt as a result. As Haarsma explains, “Each
       generation inherited both genes and cultural practices from
       their ancestors, and both were important for survival and
       reproduction.”
       This chapter is practically required reading for those
       unfamiliar with recent developments in evolutionary thought.
       Briefly, animals exhibit behaviors that we would label “naughty”
       or “nice,” writes Haarsma, but “humans do much more than this.
       Humans develop moral codes to regulate and improve behavior and
       transmit these codes through actions and words.” Animals have
       learned “rules” of behavior, and they have methods of
       communication, but they lack language, which is necessary for
       truly human morality.
       Appropriately, the chapter on human evolution marks a turning
       point in the book. Going forward, Haarsma poses pointed
       theological questions about the soul, the image of God, Adam and
       Eve in Scripture, the historical doctrine of original sin, the
       definition of sin, and so on. He considers the answers posited
       by the four main evangelical schools of thought, and he weighs
       the pros and cons of each in their attempts to reconcile
       Scripture and scientific evidence.
       This approach is both a strength and a weakness. I greatly
       appreciate the fact that Haarsma asks the right questions
       without coming down on one side or the other. Unlike most who
       write about these subjects, including myself, he doesn’t express
       a preference, instead challenging his readers to consider the
       options and choose for themselves. The downside isn’t a weakness
       in his evidence or reasoning; it’s purely stylistic. The format
       lends itself to a certain repetitiveness, but perhaps that was
       unavoidable. I found it an occasional distraction, but no more
       than a fly bumping against a windowpane.
       Keeping Jesus in view
       I’ll forego a detailed critique of the rest of the book,
       respecting Haarsma’s decision not to provide answers, but I do
       have a few nits to pick and highlights to hit.
       Early on, I was concerned by several references to sin as “a
       violation of God’s revealed will.” This shorthand definition is
       problematic. First, it requires special revelation from God,
       which would mostly rule out the fourth scenario—that over a long
       period of time humans became morally accountable and chose sin.
       Second, it implies that people who are unaware of God’s will
       (for instance, those who “never heard”) could not sin. That
       said, Haarsma’s chapter on sin did more than allay my fears—it
       was worth the price of admission on its own. In particular,
       Haarsma’s treatment of Romans 2 and general revelation was
       handled beautifully.
       Although I understand it as a marriage of convenience, I also
       didn’t care for genealogy and culture being lumped together as
       possible mechanisms for the transmission of sin. No one has
       offered a clear mechanism for the transfer of sinfulness along
       genealogical lines. Simply asserting the possibility isn’t an
       explanation. Lines on a family tree don’t make a person a
       sinner. On the other hand, the method of cultural transfer is
       obvious. The fruit eaten in the Garden was from the Tree of the
       Knowledge of Good and Evil. Knowledge is learned, not inherited
       in the genes or by genealogy. Passing down knowledge from one
       generation to the next is virtually the definition of “culture.”
       It’s hard to equate those two very different explanations.
       Fittingly, the book ends on another high note: “God’s Answer Is
       Still Christ.” A common complaint of those who build Noah’s Ark
       theme parks is that an evolutionary view of creation removes the
       need for Christ’s atonement. As Haarsma thoroughly demonstrates,
       that charge is not true. Across the spectrum of evangelical
       interpreters who accept the science of evolution, none denies
       the need for Christ’s atonement. To his credit, Haarsma keeps
       Jesus in view throughout the book. I appreciated that even more
       than his even-handed treatment of the various options for
       understanding Adam and Eve.
       A 2017 Gallup poll showed that, for the first time, there were
       as many people who believed in God-guided evolution as people
       who believed that humanity began with two people named Adam and
       Eve. Including the minority (19%) who deny God’s involvement in
       human evolution, most Americans (57%) accept the scientific
       evidence. If a concern for evangelism is still one of the
       hallmarks of evangelicalism, pastors and lay leaders especially
       need to stop drawing needless lines in the sand on evolution and
       the interpretation of early Genesis. It only pushes people away
       from Christ.
       If anyone has serious questions whether a person can believe
       both Jesus and evolution, I recommend Haarsma’s book. The
       problem isn’t a lack of faithful options. If anything, there are
       too many.
       Jay Johnson has written about evolution, original sin, and Adam
       and Eve for Canadian-American Theological Review, BioLogos, the
       Lutheran Coalition for Faith, Science & Technology, and God and
       Nature magazine. His website is becomingadam.com.
       #Post#: 38625--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: April 11, 2022, 4:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X9I3Pw_SuA
       #Post#: 40046--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: June 8, 2022, 4:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO4HvMWguzc
       #Post#: 41707--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: August 18, 2022, 10:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsKzB-Qchik
       #Post#: 41810--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: August 22, 2022, 10:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRTMsjO6V0Y
       #Post#: 42097--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film
       By: patrick jane Date: September 1, 2022, 12:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C774sfSvhs
       *****************************************************