* * * * * Rise of the Corporate State One of my readers, Marcus Livius Drusus, sent in his comments on the START OF CORPORATISM: [1] > The British East India Company (charted on Dec. 31, 1600, you hit that part > exactly right) was the first of the proto-corporations that were organized > to expedite the great trading and exploration voyages. > > (Parenthetical note, this was only made possible, or it might be better to > say useful or desirable, by the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588—prior > to that the Spanish and the Portugese had a deathgrip on the spice trade.) > > Prior to this new type of organization, with the creation of a fictitious > persona, the corporation, any investor would have been personally liable > for any losses of the venture, to the entire extent of his personal assets. > > > The release from personal liability afforded made it much more easy to > organize and finance these extremely risky operations. > > Now, with that out of the way, I will take a bit of an issue with your > placement of the date of transition from nationalism to corporatism, for > the following reasons: > > First, if one would like to argue this date marked the first appearance of > limited liability fictive entities, that would be incorrect. The early > Middle Ages saw the first of these, in the form of towns, universities and > religious orders. Later, the principle included guilds. This was > established in English common law by the 14th century. > > The other way to argue this would be to mention that this saw the first > application of the concept to private enterprise and for profit entities, > that is technically correct. However, charters for these enterprises were > for purposes only seen by the granting government as in it's > national(istic) interests. They were private tools of public policy. > > It was not until after the onery American colonists revolted after 1776 was > there support for enterprises unrelated to the direct public interest. > (Alexander Hamilton was an early champion of the idea) Still by 1800, well > over 95% of all the corporations chartered in the States were for purposes > of thngs like building and operating bridges, roads, canals, and other > public service tasks. > > Finally, in 1811, New York enacted legislation that enabled corporations to > be charted with nothing much more than a statement of the intended purposes > of the business. Many of the other states took until the 1850's to do so. > England did in 1825, and the other European countries followed soon after. > > So, based on this, I would argue that the first part of the 19^th century > is the earliest time that can be considered the birth of an independent > corporation. If I were forced to pick the point at which the transition to > a corporate state began, I would argue that it happened immediately after > the Civil War. The urgencies of the war required consolidation of the > railroads, setting the stage for the first real national super-corporations > with the wealth and power to influence politicians, and therefore public > policy, an exact reversal of the status of the British East India Company. > If we go along those thoughts then, perhaps the start of the corporate state can be traced back to May 10^th, 1886 with Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company [2] where corporations could be considered a “fictional person” under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution: > **Section 1.** All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and > subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and > of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law > which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United > States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or > property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its > jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. > [1] gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2002/03/22.1 [2] http://www.ratical.org/corporations/SCvSPR1886.html Email Sean Conner at sean@conman.org .