00:00:00 --- log: started retro/10.09.09 06:38:05 added prepend and append to strings' vocab 06:46:59 --- join: docl (~luke@97-120-241-117.ptld.qwest.net) joined #retro 06:49:01 hi docl; I added your prepend and append to the strings' vocabulary 06:51:36 cool 07:59:42 --- quit: docl (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) 10:41:50 --- join: SimonRC_ (~sc@fof.durge.org) joined #retro 10:48:20 --- quit: SimonRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) 17:30:22 --- join: roarde (~sixforty@pdpc/supporter/active/sixforty) joined #retro 17:30:31 hi roarde 17:30:37 grrrr 17:32:28 problem? 17:35:52 in what sense does 10.7 break 10.6? Does it break, for example, 10.4? 17:36:16 10.7 has a new vocabulary implementation, which is not compatible with the vocabularies used in 10.6 17:36:39 oh. That I was expecting. 17:37:01 hello, then :) 17:37:01 that's the only significant change in terms of compatibility 17:37:48 (beyond 10.7, there'll be big changes though....) 17:37:52 how's it going? 17:38:48 so-called "rl" is fine, at a real crossroads with computers, etc. 17:40:33 a bit of reading about arrayforth suggests that some of the aha ideas have been incorporated. know whether that's so? 17:44:15 --- join: docl (~luke@97-120-241-117.ptld.qwest.net) joined #retro 17:44:59 I'm not familiar with aha 17:45:46 k, thanks. If you're curious, it's on the timeline at ultratechnology. Don't think it was ever quite complete. 18:19:33 --- quit: roarde (Quit: Leaving.) 19:23:59 --- join: roarde (~sixforty@pdpc/supporter/active/sixforty) joined #retro 19:24:05 crc: what exactly is not compatible 19:24:19 crc: basically you dropped some 10.6 vocabular45y 19:24:22 foucist: the implementation is completely different 19:24:34 how many 10.6 words did you drop 19:24:36 approx 19:25:02 how is the implementation completely differnt? 19:25:04 it's a forth isn't it? 19:25:24 10.6 had nestable, collapsable subchains for vocabularies. it was a clever technique docl came up with. 10.7 has completely separate linked lists, with a user selectable search order 19:26:01 what search order? 19:26:37 in 10.7, you can load the vocabularies in a particular order. vocabularies get searched before the global dictionary in the new approach 19:29:36 it makes sense that newer vocab would get searched before global dictionary anyways 19:29:41 isn't that how it was before 19:30:22 in the old system everything existed in the global dictionary; it was just possible to collapse some portions of it 21:10:16 --- quit: crc (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) 21:12:11 --- join: crc (~charlesch@184.77.185.20) joined #retro 21:36:50 --- quit: crc (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) 21:37:24 --- join: crc (~charlesch@184.77.185.20) joined #retro 22:11:07 --- quit: roarde (Quit: Leaving.) 23:16:14 --- quit: docl (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) 23:59:59 --- log: ended retro/10.09.09