00:00:00 --- log: started retro/10.06.11 06:10:17 --- join: docl (~luke@216-161-87-126.ptld.qwest.net) joined #retro 07:33:09 --- quit: docl (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 12:14:34 --- join: virl (~virl__@chello062178085149.1.12.vie.surfer.at) joined #retro 15:13:38 --- quit: virl (Remote host closed the connection) 16:31:53 --- join: sixforty (~sixforty@pdpc/supporter/active/sixforty) joined #retro 16:54:29 --- join: sdbc (5fd1da06@gateway/web/freenode/ip.95.209.218.6) joined #retro 16:55:01 --- quit: sdbc (Client Quit) 17:07:29 --- join: crc (~charlesch@184.77.185.20) joined #retro 18:22:13 --- join: docl (~luke@216-161-87-126.ptld.qwest.net) joined #retro 18:58:47 where can I keep track of the way graphical retro is heading? 19:10:32 http://rx-core.org/dev/retroforth.fossil is the repo with the latest changes 19:10:49 I've not done much with the graphical stuff lately though; lack of time :( 19:12:37 commited to SDL, or open to alternatives? 19:13:26 I'm not committed to SDL, it just happens to be the library I had the most experience with 19:15:32 how about graphical as a vocabulary, if it's demonstrated with working code? 19:17:22 the words there are currently pretty generic in terms of scope (just using the ports to draw basic shapes); they aren't specific to a given backend (they currently work with the javascript canvas as well as the sdl implementation) 19:21:15 I fear more and more I'm gonna have to do an asm ngaro to get what I want. Know if anyone's tried it for 10+? 19:22:44 I've not done an assembly implementation of ngaro. Personally I have no desire to do an all-assembly version again. 19:22:50 what do you want? 19:24:06 I'm thinking assembler could be a path to easier platform crossing. Yes, I see the contradiction. 19:24:37 And I understand why you don't want to do retro as asm again. 19:26:04 I did assembly coding for about 8 years. I'd be happy to do portions in assembly if I needed a higher-performance vm, but the x86 ISA annoys me too much for it to be enjoyable these days 19:27:15 The "reference implementation" should remain in C. I see that. Just like to put retro where there's no C compiler. 19:29:15 ok, that makes sense. I'd probably do Ngaro in assembly if I ever decided to try running retro on raw hardware again. 21:35:33 --- quit: crc (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) 21:36:14 --- join: crc (~charlesch@184.77.185.20) joined #retro 22:23:49 good evening 23:04:59 --- quit: sixforty (Quit: Leaving.) 23:59:59 --- log: ended retro/10.06.11