00:00:00 --- log: started forth/11.01.09 00:43:57 --- join: ygrek (debian-tor@gateway/tor-sasl/ygrek) joined #forth 01:12:25 Ha. 01:12:44 At last another enlighted person on clf. 01:17:53 --- quit: ygrek (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 01:22:56 --- quit: gogonkt (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 01:24:39 --- join: gogonkt (~info@183.27.210.182) joined #forth 02:13:57 --- join: ygrek (debian-tor@gateway/tor-sasl/ygrek) joined #forth 02:29:29 --- quit: ygrek (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 03:04:53 --- join: MayDaniel (~MayDaniel@unaffiliated/maydaniel) joined #forth 03:10:38 --- quit: nighty__ (*.net *.split) 03:12:15 --- join: nighty__ (~nighty@x122091.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp) joined #forth 03:35:40 Damn, it reads from every input stream letter by letter. 03:35:42 * ASau sighs. 03:42:42 --- join: ygrek (debian-tor@gateway/tor-sasl/ygrek) joined #forth 03:52:53 --- join: Fox78 (~fox@123.118.145.132) joined #forth 06:06:18 --- quit: MayDaniel (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 06:24:21 --- quit: Fox78 (Remote host closed the connection) 06:29:10 --- join: qFox (~C00K13S@5356B263.cm-6-7c.dynamic.ziggo.nl) joined #forth 06:40:01 I think I need Forth profiler. 06:40:29 It seems to me, that I'm using "parse-name" more frequently than "parse-word" directly. 06:58:14 --- join: MayDaniel (~MayDaniel@unaffiliated/maydaniel) joined #forth 07:29:15 * ASau sighs. 08:35:24 --- quit: MayDaniel (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 09:16:30 --- join: nsswb (~nsswb@ip-80-113-5-247.ip.prioritytelecom.net) joined #forth 10:08:26 --- quit: nighty__ (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) 11:28:10 --- part: nsswb left #forth 12:01:43 --- join: qFxo (~C00K13S@5356B263.cm-6-7c.dynamic.ziggo.nl) joined #forth 12:05:25 --- quit: qFox (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 12:06:40 --- nick: qFxo -> qFox 12:09:21 --- quit: qFox (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 12:11:04 --- join: qFox (~C00K13S@5356B263.cm-6-7c.dynamic.ziggo.nl) joined #forth 12:19:03 I wonder if it is possible to implement large enough part 12:19:03 of Forth without numeric literals. 12:19:16 Given this: 12:19:18 : 10 base @ ; 12:19:23 it seems possible. 12:24:52 Hm. 12:24:58 This is dangerous trick. 12:25:05 : 10 [ base @ ] literal ; 12:25:16 this is a bit better. 12:54:45 --- join: Dan1234 (~chatzilla@adsl-226-127-126.mem.bellsouth.net) joined #forth 12:55:18 --- part: Dan1234 left #forth 13:13:26 --- quit: qFox (Quit: Time for cookies!) 14:03:45 --- join: tathi (~josh@dsl-216-227-95-5.fairpoint.net) joined #forth 14:08:06 --- join: MayDaniel (~MayDaniel@unaffiliated/maydaniel) joined #forth 14:12:41 --- quit: ygrek (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 14:26:01 why avoid numeric literals? 14:29:36 To avoid implementing numeric parser early. 14:48:11 BTW, I've found quite interesting IRC log from RuFIG-associated channel. 14:48:34 I'm not alone scepticist wrt new forth standard. 14:52:51 hm 14:53:03 what's your opinion on have any forth standard? 14:54:32 I don't need "any forth standard," 14:54:47 it is much better to have none, if it is misdesigned. 14:54:59 ...than having it misdesigned. 15:01:49 --- join: Snoopy_1711 (Snoopy_161@dslb-088-068-018-007.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #forth 15:02:31 --- quit: MayDaniel (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 15:06:17 --- quit: Snoopy_1611 (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) 15:09:55 crc: jfyi, cvs apforth should build on those sucking systems like windows and linux without manual intervention. 15:24:51 --- join: MayDaniel (~MayDaniel@unaffiliated/maydaniel) joined #forth 15:41:37 --- join: TreyB1 (~Adium@75.53.203.31) joined #forth 15:43:22 --- quit: TreyB (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 15:57:25 --- quit: MayDaniel (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 15:57:49 What is amusing is that someone (periodically?) checks apforth cvs even though I never announced it. 16:34:10 I have a copy checked out. 17:32:31 ASau: what's your opinion on PostScript? 20:58:22 --- join: Fox78 (~fox@123.118.145.132) joined #forth 21:50:00 --- nick: Snoopy_1711 -> Snoopy_1611 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/11.01.09