00:00:00 --- log: started forth/05.02.17 01:20:18 --- join: snowrichard (~chatzilla@adsl-69-155-177-154.dsl.lgvwtx.swbell.net) joined #forth 01:29:35 --- quit: snowrichard (Remote closed the connection) 02:58:08 --- quit: onetom (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 03:00:55 --- join: onetom (~tom@ns.dunasoft.com) joined #forth 03:11:21 --- join: snowrichard (~chatzilla@adsl-69-155-177-154.dsl.lgvwtx.swbell.net) joined #forth 03:12:33 hi 03:13:29 --- quit: snowrichard (Client Quit) 03:23:21 --- quit: onetom (Read error: 101 (Network is unreachable)) 03:53:53 --- join: skylan_ (~sjh@dialup-216-211-5-67.tbaytel.net) joined #forth 03:59:53 --- quit: skylan (Connection reset by peer) 07:32:20 --- join: fridge (~fridge@dsl-203-33-164-75.NSW.netspace.net.au) joined #forth 07:33:29 --- part: fridge left #forth 09:36:56 --- join: Serg[GPRS] (~z@193.201.231.126) joined #forth 09:37:45 hi ! 09:38:06 Hi :) 09:38:59 now i got answered 2 of my XML questions ;)) ready to make 2nd version of my XML engine 09:41:15 how are your projects ? 09:42:36 Coding on the C64 game, working at a 1-bit CPU ;) 09:43:26 1bit ? how so ? 09:44:25 and what kind of game ? 09:45:33 Playing around with generic array logic chips 09:45:39 Moon lander fight ;I 09:55:08 i got 2 probable dates for weekend - one girl from online dating, one - from old work 10:00:17 u have real C64 ? 10:00:41 Just a C128D 10:02:05 nice. here it is almost unknown, Z80 boomed 10:02:32 Yeah, I heard so 10:02:57 Too bad, considering the 6502 is a bit more efficient. :) 10:03:01 and Amiga, but this is diff category 10:03:17 I have a semi-broken A500 10:03:42 here most Z80 are/were kits, xtreme cheap 10:04:13 and even chips were produced pirately 10:04:56 :) 10:05:30 in time of Z80 impression i thunk of cross-forth, but soon dismissed the idea 10:05:49 what about C64 cross-forth ? 10:06:29 I have a feeling that would be rather inefficient. 10:06:40 And on a C64 you can't really afford wasting many cycles ;) 10:06:47 or, more correct, Forth-derived lo-level language, coz i did not plan interpreter at target box 10:08:54 no-no, native-code compiler, not threaded 10:10:43 I think that could get hard. 10:10:59 Considering you have 3 8-bit registers to work with. 10:12:31 what is instruction set ? indirections, auto-increment ? 10:15:04 http://www.6502.org/tutorials/6502opcodes.html 10:15:10 Small reference. 10:15:56 nah, xpensive bytes ! 10:17:53 Oh, right 10:18:02 You can do indirect addressing from the zero page 10:18:22 No auto-increment/decrement modes. 10:18:34 Two 8-bit index pointers 10:18:56 Instructions are between 2 and 7 clock cycles long, as opposed to the z80 4 - 15 (or something) 10:18:58 somewhere i got tutors on making native forths for oldies. need ? 10:19:03 ok 10:19:12 Not really, no. 10:30:59 * Serg[GPRS] squirreled my English dictionary, dhamn ! 10:31:27 misplace it and can't recall where ;(( 10:32:42 * robert uses dict 10:34:02 did i tell i bought a new SLR camera w/ Pentax bayonet ? 10:34:42 Perhaps, but I have no idea what that means :) 10:35:18 SLR is jump-mirror thingie, the most popular camera type nowdays 10:38:02 --- join: Herkamire (~jason@h000094d30ba2.ne.client2.attbi.com) joined #forth 10:38:03 --- mode: ChanServ set +o Herkamire 10:38:25 Hi 10:54:35 * Serg[GPRS] fa11s as133p 10:54:40 --- quit: Serg[GPRS] () 12:33:03 --- join: qFox (C00K13S@82-169-140-229-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl) joined #forth 12:33:50 Hi qFox 12:56:19 hey robert 12:56:25 been a while, where are you hiding out? 12:58:18 Under my bed, waiting for better times. 12:58:19 You? 12:59:17 study mainly 12:59:35 plus i dont have many ties on irc anymore lately 12:59:47 have little time for forth, or anything else for that matter 13:00:12 and starting mirc up is more a thing for the heck of it, then for actual communication 13:00:13 :) 13:00:14 Poor qFox 13:00:24 how's your study going? 13:00:50 Something is wrong. Can't put my finger on it, but it feels like I shouldn't be doing nothing. 13:01:18 wait, didnt you start some kinda school this year? 13:01:32 --- join: tathi (~josh@pcp01375108pcs.milfrd01.pa.comcast.net) joined #forth 13:01:33 well, "schoolyear" :) 13:01:41 Yeah, university. 13:01:53 but you dropped out? 13:02:04 No 13:02:08 but... 13:02:10 That's the thing 13:02:22 I did NOT drop out, and I'm not doing much either. 13:03:07 and how's it going so far? :) 13:04:02 Fine 13:04:28 really? thats good then 13:05:10 yet it doesnt exactly sound like you feel at ease there 13:05:34 I do, compared to other places. 13:05:48 k 13:06:06 :) 13:06:17 and how are you doing on forth terms? :) 13:06:41 Not doing much Forth, really. Mostly electronics and C64. 13:07:00 :) 13:07:04 --- join: I440r_ (~mark4@216-110-82-203.gen.twtelecom.net) joined #forth 13:07:06 H9 13:07:08 Hi 13:07:08 i've been learning prolog, sucky language really 13:07:13 Awww. 13:07:20 cant be worse than delphi 13:07:28 :D 13:07:31 and now learning haskell... not being so much better either, except haskell does have some funny features 13:07:46 Sssssh! 13:07:52 The Haskell spies are everywhere. 13:08:00 :p 13:08:02 And they're violent. 13:08:09 but hey btw 13:08:15 what type of language is forth anyways 13:08:17 i thought it was functional 13:09:41 I haven't seen a clear definition of "functional language", but I tend to associate it with things like Haskell 13:09:45 Not really. 13:09:57 where you're more describing the results you want than the process by which you get results. 13:10:20 I'd say Forth was a fairly straightforward imperative language. 13:11:13 still imperative? 13:11:15 wokeuj... 13:13:00 http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~gmh/faq.html#functional-languages 13:20:05 its just that the teacher was listing a few languages (most of my classmates are quite computer-illiterates and havent coded anything, except prolog the last semester) and listed lisp as functional 13:20:25 and since everybody kept saying lisp is like forth, and forth has ... well its own style, i just figured... wrong :p 13:23:33 lisp is kind of in-between, IMO. 13:26:29 but there really doesn't seem to be a definitive definition of "functional programming language", so... :) 13:35:27 tunes.org has this to say: Functional: The term for a paradigm of programming that originates in the early works about lambda calculus: computations consist in evaluating/expanding structured expressions, rather than executing instructions, as with imperative programming. 13:36:01 I wouldn't say that forth has "structured expressions". 13:36:07 I think of forth more as executing instructions 13:42:36 --- part: KB1FYR left #forth 13:46:06 --- join: KB1FYR (~Alex@196-220.suscom-maine.net) joined #forth 14:05:31 --- join: TheBlueWizard (TheBlueWiz@modem-046.nyc-tc03a.FCC.NET) joined #forth 14:05:38 Hi 14:06:05 hiya robert 14:23:14 --- join: Sonarman (~snofs@adsl-66-124-255-94.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) joined #forth 15:05:06 --- quit: I440r_ ("Leaving") 15:30:29 --- nick: skylan_ -> skylan 15:32:54 Hi all 15:33:01 Hi 15:33:05 And good night. :) 15:55:31 --- join: fridge (~fridge@dsl-203-33-164-75.NSW.netspace.net.au) joined #forth 16:38:13 --- join: arke (f2@bespin.org) joined #forth 16:38:28 --- quit: qFox (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)) 17:55:12 --- quit: arke ("leaving") 19:21:04 --- join: Sonarman_ (~snofs@adsl-67-113-235-171.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) joined #forth 19:29:32 --- quit: I440r ("Leaving") 19:34:02 --- quit: Sonarman (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 19:44:56 --- quit: saon ("Leaving") 19:58:59 --- part: TheBlueWizard left #forth 22:07:54 --- join: asymptote (~dmesg@68.48.8.92) joined #forth 22:53:58 --- quit: SeaForth ("Leaving") 22:59:07 --- join: SeaForth (~SeaForth@c-24-1-126-202.client.comcast.net) joined #forth 23:00:43 --- quit: Sonarman_ ("leaving") 23:14:15 --- quit: asymptote ("Free the mallocs!") 23:41:49 --- join: hit-n-mis (151215@d220-236-192-69.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au) joined #forth 23:42:19 --- part: hit-n-mis left #forth 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/05.02.17