00:00:00 --- log: started forth/04.04.13 00:17:55 --- part: Jim7J1AJH left #forth 00:28:59 --- quit: I440r (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 00:39:14 --- quit: kc5tja ("THX QSO ES 73 DE KC5TJA/6 CL ES QRT AR SK") 01:30:05 --- join: qFox (C00K13S@cp12172-a.roose1.nb.home.nl) joined #forth 01:31:23 --- quit: qFox (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 01:31:51 --- join: qFox (C00K13S@cp12172-a.roose1.nb.home.nl) joined #forth 02:08:03 --- join: Fractal (~doug@h24-66-228-205.ok.shawcable.net) joined #forth 03:43:22 --- join: yeoh (~yeoh@219.95.2.141) joined #forth 03:56:47 --- quit: yeoh ("User pushed the X - because it's Xtra, baby") 04:20:26 --- nick: onetom_ -> onetom 07:57:08 --- join: _proteus (~proteusgu@69.79.24.31) joined #forth 07:59:11 --- join: hovil (~hovil@CommSecureAustPtyLtd.sb1.optus.net.au) joined #forth 08:09:54 anyone watched the cosmos series? 08:09:58 --- quit: fridge (Remote closed the connection) 08:10:04 --- nick: hovil -> fridge 08:12:14 --- quit: proteusguy (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 08:17:18 I used to. 08:20:21 I'm watching it at the moment, Carl Sagan's over pronounciation of words is a bit off putting, but I like his books so I'll forgive him =P 08:23:06 Since people are awake in here... anyone considered using delimiting suffixes in Forth? 08:28:28 They would change how words are parsed. For instance, it might look something like this: 08:28:28 CHAR " SUFFIX 08:28:28 : TEST ."WHEE! No space at the start!" CR ; 08:31:47 --- join: kc5tja (~kc5tja@66-91-231-74.san.rr.com) joined #forth 08:31:54 --- mode: ChanServ set +o kc5tja 08:48:23 --- nick: _proteus -> proteusguy 08:51:10 fridge: He's past forgiveness - he's dead! :P 10:15:43 --- nick: kc5tja -> kc-school 10:46:17 I just downloaded 4th-3.3c-unix and want to learn to use it, is there a website dedicated to learning the 4th system? 10:49:21 ah, http://www.xs4all.nl/~thebeez/4tH/4th.htm 10:49:23 thanks! 10:52:20 np 11:21:01 whoohooo, 4tH is pretty cool. 11:28:08 --- join: networm (~networm@L0632P05.dipool.highway.telekom.at) joined #forth 11:30:29 how did that definitions bot work? 11:35:28 !fhelp 11:35:30 o 11:35:35 no i removed it :p 11:35:36 !fhelp cmove 11:35:39 oh 11:35:46 due to ppl just not liking it 11:35:48 what would be a good forth implementation of cmove? 11:36:09 it always seem to be code.. and my attempts to do it in forth use a lot of PICK.. which i read is bad.. 11:36:36 what should cmove do...? 11:37:13 : CMOVE BEGIN 1 PICK 3 PICK C@ SWAP C! ROT 1+ ROT 1+ ROT 1- 0= UNTIL 3DROP ; ( a a n -- ) 11:37:27 move n chars from a1 to a2 11:38:14 actually, after that i was trying COMPARE to do in the same way.. and that would have needed a lot of picks 12:39:38 --- join: slava (~slava@CPE00096ba44261-CM000e5cdfda14.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) joined #forth 12:39:42 and forth we go :) 12:50:44 --- nick: kc-school -> kc5tja 12:51:45 networm: I would implement CMOVE like this: 12:52:07 : CMOVE BEGIN DUP WHILE MOVCHR 1- REPEAT 3DROP ; 12:52:26 : MOVCHR >R 2DUP SWAP C@ SWAP C! 1+ SWAP 1+ SWAP R> ; 12:53:45 oh, thanks! 12:53:45 is there a name for 1+ SWAP 1+ SWAP? 12:54:00 moving n to the return stack, therefore only SWAP instead of ROT 12:54:00 No. 12:54:10 But I usually call something like that "bump" when I use it often enough. 12:54:15 kc5tja: btw, do you also have a COMPARE? 12:55:05 networm: I would have to take some time to think about how I would implement it. 12:55:27 ah, ok. i'll try myself now, also using a CMPCHR and the return stack :) 13:05:36 networm, you're the one making a forth on a VM right? 13:05:44 yes 13:05:44 or is that madgarden? 13:05:54 what is your set of primitive instructions in the VM Like? 13:06:18 just a stack, no registers 13:08:06 15 math, 4 stack, 4 memory access, 3 branching 13:08:20 just counted the commands :) 13:08:45 cool 13:10:16 i think i'll switch to machine forth at some point, as someone in there suggested 13:10:30 but my current VM already got approved by the professor, so don't want to change now 13:10:44 s/there/here/ 13:14:58 --- quit: proteusguy (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 13:32:15 --- join: madwork_ (~madgarden@derby.metrics.com) joined #forth 13:32:16 --- quit: madwork (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 13:33:33 --- nick: madwork_ -> madwork 14:09:52 --- quit: fridge ("Leaving") 14:40:17 --- join: proteusguy (~proteusgu@69.79.24.31) joined #forth 14:54:54 --- join: blockhead (default@dialin-999-tnt.nyc.bestweb.net) joined #forth 15:04:17 --- nick: madgarden_ -> madgarden 15:08:15 --- join: tathi (~josh@pcp02123722pcs.milfrd01.pa.comcast.net) joined #forth 15:09:37 --- join: wossname (wossname@HSE-MTL-ppp78178.qc.sympatico.ca) joined #forth 15:13:40 is anyone here using dvorak btw? 15:13:55 just was amused the Xth time about http://www.colorforth.com/keys.html 15:14:21 and thought this: you can type everything with dvorak as well as with querty. and the fastest querty typists are as fast or faster than the fastest dvorak typiests. still, some think dvorak is much better 15:14:21 and at the same time, it's not widely accepted 15:14:21 all just like forth :) 15:14:28 I use dvorak. 15:15:09 i really see a connection between forth and dvorak now 15:15:12 :) 15:15:30 I'm one of those who think that dvorak is better. 15:15:50 heh 15:16:05 Well, I was having trouble pushing my typing speed past 55 wpm or so. 15:16:25 and now it is? 15:16:53 networm: Dvorak is better because it's more ergonomical. 15:16:56 Well, _now_ I can probably hit 80 without too much trouble. 15:16:59 i tried to get used to dvorak over some years.. but always fell back to querty when i had to type a lot 15:17:03 but then I got an extra 10wpm or so. 15:17:14 networm: The myth that it is somehow faster is derived from its ergonomics: less finger movement is/was thought to make for faster typing. 15:17:19 Of course, in reality, this isn't true. 15:17:24 But the big thing that I like about it is that it's much less finger movement. 15:17:28 But it IS easier on many people's wrists, and that's what counts for me. 15:17:31 (as kc5tja says) :) 15:17:54 yes, read the somewhere. but somewhere else i read, more movement is healthy.. 15:18:26 And of course, dvorak is optimized for typing English text. Not quite so efficient for programming. 15:18:36 networm: Well, like anything else, too much of a good thing is bad. That includes movement. 15:18:49 i bet CM's mini-dvorak includes all the forth symbols 15:19:30 networm: All those required for ColorForth, yes. Not all that are required for ANSI Forth. 15:20:44 Has anybody here used SCons? 15:20:57 (I'm getting sick of Make). 15:21:50 I am unfamiliar with SCons. 15:22:35 Python-based build system. 15:23:00 Improvement on an earlier Perl-based one, apparently. 15:25:52 hmm 15:27:32 What aspect of using make are you having trouble with? 15:28:08 Why not access the data stack directly, if possible? Couldn't that speed things up in some cases? 15:37:12 madgarden: In some cases, yes, but it breaks the concatenativity of the language. 15:47:01 kc5tja: I've got a bunch of code that I wanted to put into a subdirectory, but it proved to be annoying/impossible to do cross-directory dependencies with make, so I didn't. 15:47:55 Nothing serious, just doesn't work as cleanly as I'd like. 15:48:36 --- quit: qFox ("if at first you dont succeed, quit again") 15:48:42 Really I should stop dorking around with Linux tools and work on getting my forth environment to the point where I can use it instead. :) 15:51:43 --- quit: tathi (""volleyball"") 15:53:36 --- quit: OrngeTide (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 15:54:13 --- quit: SDO ("Vision[0.9.6-0203]: i've been blurred!") 16:16:50 --- quit: networm ("Client exiting") 16:16:51 --- quit: blockhead ("Client Exiting") 16:36:49 --- quit: wossname () 16:38:03 OK, now I'm hearing some voices, but I can't hear what is being said. 16:38:29 And it faded back into the noise. 17:29:46 --- join: OrngeTide (orange@rm-f.net) joined #forth 18:09:16 --- join: LOOPHOG (jdamisch@207.191.240.33) joined #forth 18:10:24 hi 18:10:44 re LOOPHOG 18:11:22 do you have broadband? 18:11:32 I do. 18:11:41 what kind? 18:12:22 Cable modem. 18:12:41 speed 18:13:58 --- join: SDO (SDO@chcgil2-ar7-4-34-132-204.chcgil2.dsl-verizon.net) joined #forth 18:14:21 Not sure of its maximums, but on average I get about 1Mbps or so. 18:14:43 how much do you pay a month? 18:15:25 Well, the bill is approximately $40/month or so; I don't know exactly, because it's split across all the roommates. 18:15:30 Certainly no more than $50/month though. 18:15:47 cable here is like $60 18:17:31 i can get dsl for $33, thats 256k 18:18:34 Well, prices will undoubted differ depending on where you live, your service provider companies, etc. 18:18:42 yea 18:18:59 Damn, I can only find one UHF to BNC connector. >:( 18:19:09 I need two to complete this re-wire of my radio. 18:19:27 will you go look again or will you goto the store? 18:19:49 Probably just go to the store. 18:20:00 I've searched everywhere I store electronics parts, and many places that I don't. 18:20:09 rats 18:20:26 I replaced the coaxial cable leading to my antenna with balanced twin-lead cable, and *MAN* that makes a HUGE difference. 18:20:51 The noise levels are WAY lower (and I thought they were already as low as can be because I'm using a loop antenna), and signals are WAY louder. 18:21:10 right on 18:21:29 Yeah, I'll say. 18:21:54 No wonder nobody responds when I call CQ on the ham bands -- nobody can hear me!! :/ 18:22:08 All my radio energy is going into heating my window sill or trees instead of the receiver's radio. :) 18:22:33 BTW, since I know you're interested in the ForthBox Kestrel, I did make some minor updates on the Kestrel website. 18:22:41 I'm also going to release the design of the Kestrel open source. 18:22:47 and will maintain it Bazaar-style. 18:24:37 i would like just a plain old black eye pea eatin' Forth computer, with two stacks and direct access to video memory stuff 18:24:50 :^) 18:26:59 Huh? 18:27:05 I don't understand your comment. 18:27:40 trying to make a joke 18:27:49 its like old fashioned, but good. 18:28:07 like my mamas pickle relish 18:30:34 Hehe -- gotcha. 18:30:38 Yaeh, I like old-school designs. 18:30:43 Unlike the more modern systems, they actually work. 18:31:08 it would be facinating to put one together 18:31:36 Well, that's what I'm shooting for. 18:31:54 Problem right now is time and resources. 18:33:46 good luck! 18:34:01 Thanks. 18:34:11 * kc5tja really should be programming on my customer's code right about now. 18:34:17 Damn, I wish I could code it in Forth. :/ 18:34:43 if you have a customer, you should be programming probably, because it often takes longer than you thought it would 18:34:54 because of unforseen details and bugs 18:47:50 i need to scram 18:47:57 --- quit: LOOPHOG () 18:49:23 --- join: thin (thin@bespin.org) joined #forth 18:49:24 --- mode: ChanServ set +o thin 18:49:47 There's A race of men that don't fit in, 18:49:47 A race that can't stay still; 18:49:47 So they break the hearts of kith and kin, 18:49:47 And they roam the world at will. 18:49:47 They range the field and they rove the flood, 18:49:50 And they climb the mountain's crest; 18:49:52 Theirs is the curse of the gypsy blood, 18:49:55 And they don't know how to rest. 18:49:57 If they just went straight they might go far, 18:50:00 They are strong and brave and true; 18:50:02 But they're always tired of the things that are, 18:50:05 And they want the strange and new. 18:50:08 They say: "Could I find my proper groove, 18:50:10 What a deep mark I would make!" 18:50:13 So they chop and change, and each fresh move 18:50:15 Is only a fresh mistake. 18:50:18 And each forgets, as he strips and runs 18:50:20 With a brilliant, fitful pace, 18:50:23 It's the steady, quiet, plodding ones 18:50:25 Who win in the lifelong race. 18:50:28 And each forgets that his youth has fled, 18:50:30 Forgets that his prime is past, 18:50:31 WHOA.... 18:50:33 Till he stands one day, with a hope that's dead, 18:50:36 Information overload. 18:50:36 In the glare of the truth at last. 18:50:38 He has failed, he has failed; he has missed his chance; 18:50:41 He has just done things by half. 18:50:43 Life's been a jolly good joke on him, 18:50:46 And now is the time to laugh. 18:50:48 Ha, ha! He is one of the Legion Lost; 18:50:51 He was never meant to win; 18:50:53 He's a rolling stone, and it's bred in the bone; 18:50:56 He's a man who won't fit in. 18:51:27 i like the poem, had to share 18:52:05 heh 18:52:37 * kc5tja replaced the coaxial cable on his antenna with twin-lead cable. 18:52:42 BIG difference in signal quality. 18:52:50 * kc5tja is very, very, very impressed. 18:53:03 We're talking way more than 3dB of loss removal in just doing that. 18:53:21 (And I know how to get rid of another 3dB of losses too; but I don't have a connector to replace 100ft of cable with 10ft) 18:53:24 the poem is a bit sad cuz its true about not winning the life long race, & "just done things by half" but on the other hand, its our nature.. 18:53:35 its bred in the bone 18:53:36 * kc5tja nods 18:53:45 * kc5tja will release the design of the Kestrel as open source. 18:53:54 It could be landmark -- the world's first truely open source *computer*. 18:54:04 would that help your biz? 18:54:20 Not in the short term, but definitely in the long term. 18:54:32 Short term, I could find myself with a slew of competitors offering basically the same thing. 18:55:08 a recent cringely's post made a good point that open source isn't the technology that's going to obsolete microsoft 18:55:08 Long term, I'll have a community which submits patches to me, and I can just fold them into my commercial offering. 18:55:15 it will be something else, something related to hardware perhaps 18:55:22 or GA/GP (genetic algos) 18:56:00 Well, here's the deal. 18:56:17 I'm kind of debating sticking with the 65816. 18:56:34 If this is going to be an open source computer, then everything about the machine needs to be open. 18:56:37 Literally everything. 18:56:42 This ideally includes the CPU. 18:57:07 can the cpu be a FPGA? 18:57:14 Among other things, yes. 18:57:28 would it be feasible/cheap enough? 18:57:40 A MISC core inside a moderate density FPGA would cost only $15. 18:57:53 The question is, are you willing to solder a 100+ pin chip to the board as a surface mount component? 18:58:03 The 65816 has the advantage of being very easy for a beginner to work with. 18:58:16 The MISC has the advantage that I can integrate it with many external support chips. 18:58:19 So it's a toss-up. 18:58:33 I'm going to continue to develop for the 65816 for the time being. But it will not be a permanent CPU choice. 18:58:40 The MISC will inevitably be introduced. 18:58:44 why a misc core and not a stack machine? 18:58:55 Name me ONE MISC core that is not a stack architecture CPU. 18:58:57 :) 18:59:02 heh 18:59:11 * kc5tja can't believe you've never heard of MISC?? 18:59:18 As in P21, F21, etc? 18:59:20 minimial blahblah 18:59:28 i don't really keep track of hardware terminology 18:59:36 i try to forget things as quick as possible heh 19:00:14 yeah i recall p21 etc being MISC 19:00:31 just isn't at a conscious level 19:00:32 Anyway, I'm thinking of supporting the Kestrel Bazaar-style. 19:00:38 yeah 19:00:54 from PCB layouts, to schematics, to core operating system software. 19:00:57 well what kind of core will you put in, machineforth? 19:01:14 isn't there a non-socket FPGA out there.. 19:01:24 one that comes without need to solder 100 pins.. 19:01:26 All FPGAs are non-socketed. 19:01:40 why is 65816 easy to install ? 19:01:43 84 pins is the smallest package you'll find. 19:01:59 thin: Only 40 pins, and they're spaced 25.4mm apart. 19:02:23 what are the programmable alternatives to FPGA ? (with less pins..) 19:02:28 None. 19:02:41 PGA? AADsomething ? 19:03:00 The only thing available are SPLD (things like PAL chips), but they have only 20 or so pins, and can barely hold a single byte of internal storage. 19:03:34 so the buyer needs to solder the 65816 himself? what if he makes a mistake, would it be easy to kill the chip? 19:03:52 All through-hole parts will have sockets. 19:04:21 84-pin PLCC chips will also have through-hole sockets available for them. 19:04:35 (Though they are rather on the expensive side, costing up to $1.50 each). 19:06:21 no through hole sockets for the FPGA? 19:06:28 PINS!!! 19:06:31 LOTS OF PINS!!! 19:06:33 heh 19:06:36 bah 19:06:54 I'm not aware of 208-pin J-lead chips. 19:07:03 Or if they did exist, the sockets for them. 19:07:16 socket is the plastic thing with the holes and you stick the IC plastic case piece of thingie with the pins sticking out into the socket 19:07:20 right? 19:07:41 like the intel cpu has a socket for it.. 19:07:50 so why not the FPGA has a socket? 19:08:02 no one has made one? 19:09:58 i'm mostly ignorant of the hardware at this moment in time because i haven't needed to learn it 19:10:21 i don't go out of my way usually unless its in line with my interests to learn something 19:10:40 busy learning other things anyways 19:13:48 i've largely accepted i'm a non-non-programmer not a programmer and not a non-programmer 19:14:06 Because (a) they're expensive, and (b) they're flaky when run at higher speeds. 19:14:25 anyways my dream about programming was being able to program tools on the fly in minutes to serve my purposes 19:14:48 rather than being a lifestyle etc 19:15:27 forth holds a lot of promise as a great scripting language for fast coding 19:15:44 i think a forth os with a well thought out higherlevel scripting language could be quite killer 19:16:09 a language that acts as the macro language for EVERY app in the os 19:16:25 what would be 'higher level'? 19:16:26 for on the fly feature addition without even shutting down the app 19:16:34 why not forth itself? 19:16:47 it is forth 19:17:10 it's just a vocabulary that is highly abstracted & easy for non-programmers to understand and use 19:17:11 maybe factor? :) forth + gc + dynamic typing 19:17:42 the gc and dynamic typing concepts are to solve specific problems 19:17:54 or you mean non-rpn syntax? 19:17:57 forth doesn't really have those specific problems, especially if you code it properly 19:17:59 something like applescript? 19:18:05 no, rpn is fine 19:18:24 MUF (multi-user forth) inspired this idea 19:18:26 i think beginners could have trouble with managing memory in forth 19:18:33 ugh they wouldn't 19:18:39 maybe a language that doesn't have !/@ to random addresses? 19:18:49 i know in c++ new/delete in a bitch :) 19:19:28 the memory management would be hidden in the high level words that are in the "scripting lang" vocabulary 19:19:33 right 19:19:58 --- join: Speuler (~Speuler@forthfreak.net) joined #forth 19:20:01 really MUF (multi-user forth) which is a forth-like language for a MUD showed me forth's potential 19:20:16 cool 19:20:18 as a high level scripting language that one can code rapidly in 19:20:25 i didn't really get into forth until i saw joy 19:20:49 joy was made by a computer scientist 19:20:59 and we all know computer scientists are stupid idiots 19:21:22 * kc5tja needs to learn how to use Emacs. 19:21:24 its not very practical but i like the idea of adding lisp-like features. 19:21:24 with no interest in actual implementation quality 19:21:36 kc5tja: ctrl-K and ctrl-Y or V 19:21:38 I downloaded Emacs, but there are literally so many things in it that it's way too easy to get lost. 19:21:51 for cut in paste 19:21:55 s/in/and 19:21:58 i forget the paste one 19:22:00 ctrl-k cuts 19:22:05 very useful ;) 19:22:18 thin, joy is slow 19:22:40 slava: forth already has the lisp features & the c features & all the features of all the langs.. except for all the features that it doesn't need because it doesn't have the problems that the features are designed to solve 19:23:18 well that is a very ambitious statement 19:23:23 people shouldn't be designing languages around what features they want it to have 19:23:28 that's kinda what joy is 19:23:29 this is true 19:23:33 "oh i want it to have this and that feature" 19:23:37 it should be around a philosophy 19:23:45 joy was the guy's playground for ideas 19:23:47 thats all 19:26:49 this book Re-Imagine! by tom peters makes a good case that it is the tinkerers that fail in business, and its those that boldly pursue new ideas that succeed 19:26:59 can be applied to everything else ;) 19:27:07 bah to tinkerers 19:27:10 * thin hates tinkerers 19:27:11 heh 19:27:27 i'm a tinkerer ;) 19:28:02 * kc5tja is doomed then. :) 19:28:05 i know, i already hate you :( 19:28:06 nah 19:28:07 The Kestrel is one big TINK! 19:28:14 kc5tja is the least tinkerer in this channel 19:28:15 i hate the rest 19:28:21 except onetom & mmreach & i440r 19:28:29 those also tinker the least 19:28:31 oh, I see how it is. :) 19:28:42 heh 19:29:04 i'm prolly not being fair 19:29:41 Well, the thing that makes the Kestrel unique from any other computer I'm aware of is that it is entirely open source. 19:29:51 So it'll be an experimental business decision, that's for sure. 19:30:06 i don't really consider you so much a tinkerer.. like when you code a Forth etc you have a purpose 19:30:13 like your OS 19:30:24 i don't like the people that just code a forth for the heck of it 19:30:43 i don't want the Forth community to be about that anyways 19:30:46 i'm coding one for scripting in a game, does that count :) 19:30:46 forth has so much more potential 19:31:20 slava: that's somewhat acceptable 19:32:05 anyway i think you can't tell people what to do, if its their spare time work etc... 19:32:14 yeah i know.. 19:32:24 and i'm probably not inspiring anyone to code in forth with my attitude 19:32:25 heh 19:36:19 its inspiring that you think forth is the ultimate langugage :) 19:37:28 thanks :) 19:37:55 i'd say forth is the ultimate macro assembler :) 19:40:29 yeah 19:40:51 i think forth is the "ultimate lang" precisely because it's not really a language.. it's kinda an anti-language 19:41:13 its the result of pursuing a non-language & just pursuing simplicity & tools to build your own system etc.. 19:43:28 yes 19:43:29 like lisp 19:44:54 i'm not aware of any other languages other than forth and lisp which are this flexible 19:49:30 --- quit: thin ("gtg") 19:49:55 MUF code is pretty decent to read. 19:50:12 That's kinda how I picture a more mainstream-ized Forth. 19:50:20 WOOHOO!! First radio contact in almost a decade, and it is with AUSTRALIA!!! WOOT!! 19:55:46 Oops, actually, because of that 3dB to 5dB loss in that 100ft cable run between the radio and tuner, I was only putting out, at most, 50W at the antenna, and that's assuming a perfect radiating system. 19:55:54 So I'm guessing, really, 25W output or so. 19:56:00 Considering, that's not bad at all!! 19:56:22 Definitely need to get that UHF/BNC connector so I can take that 34m length of cable out of the circuit. 19:56:43 Are you communicating with your customer in Australia via radio? 19:56:51 My customer? 19:56:54 My customer is in USA. 19:56:59 He's only 30 miles away from me. 19:56:59 Oh, I see. 19:57:10 No, I am communicating with a fellow ham in the #hamradio channel. 19:57:18 Damn, it was *sweet*. 19:57:28 That means it won't take him nearly as long to find you and kill you when you don't finish his code. :P 19:58:03 Yeah. I really should be coding right now. :D 19:58:09 ;) 19:58:30 Definite note to self though: path to Australia appears to be open around 7:30PM to 8:00PM local time, at least. 20:43:31 --- part: Speuler left #forth 21:26:02 --- join: yeoh (~yeoh@219.95.0.217) joined #forth 21:27:06 --- part: yeoh left #forth 21:30:35 --- join: yeoh (~yeoh@219.95.0.217) joined #forth 21:39:02 --- part: yeoh left #forth 21:39:40 --- join: yeoh (~yeoh@219.95.0.217) joined #forth 22:04:02 --- join: Fractal_ (~doug@h24-66-228-205.ok.shawcable.net) joined #forth 22:04:03 --- quit: Fractal (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 22:06:23 --- join: qFox (C00K13S@cp12172-a.roose1.nb.home.nl) joined #forth 22:08:52 --- quit: qFox (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 22:08:54 --- join: qF0x (C00K13S@cp12172-a.roose1.nb.home.nl) joined #forth 22:11:31 --- part: yeoh left #forth 22:13:48 --- nick: qF0x -> qFox 22:15:26 --- quit: OrngeTide ("I'm off IRC for the week. AIM me or email me.") 22:31:59 --- join: fridge (~fridge@dsl-203-33-167-210.NSW.netspace.net.au) joined #forth 22:33:13 --- nick: Fractal_ -> Fractal 22:58:20 --- join: imaginator (~gps@georgeps.dsl.xmission.com) joined #forth 23:19:45 --- quit: Herkamire ("I'm off to bed") 23:20:10 --- quit: kc5tja ("THX QSO ES 73 DE KC5TJA/6 CL ES QRT AR SK") 23:23:29 --- quit: slava ("Leaving") 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/04.04.13