00:30:42 --- nick: Fractal__ -> Fractal 01:43:11 --- quit: Speuler (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 01:44:46 --- join: Speuler (~Speuler@mnch-d9ba414e.pool.mediaWays.net) joined #forth 02:19:59 --- join: Klaw (~anonymous@ip68-101-120-167.oc.oc.cox.net) joined #forth 03:05:13 --- join: tathi (~josh@pcp02123722pcs.milfrd01.pa.comcast.net) joined #forth 03:07:12 --- quit: tathi (Client Quit) 04:51:37 --- join: deluxe (~deluxe@pD9EE149A.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #forth 04:52:07 hi 04:54:44 --- quit: Speuler ("NO CARRIER") 05:00:17 --- join: Speuler (~Speuler@mnch-d9ba414e.pool.mediaWays.net) joined #forth 05:20:21 --- join: sifbot (~sifforth@h0030bd0466f2.ne.client2.attbi.com) joined #forth 05:20:21 Type sifbot: (or /msg sifbot to play in private) 05:36:05 --- quit: Speuler (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 06:43:03 --- join: PoppaVic (~pfv@s168.waters.gtlakes.com) joined #forth 06:45:12 --- quit: deluxe ("Client exiting") 06:59:24 --- part: PoppaVic left #forth 08:03:42 --- join: I44-r_ (~x@dialup-67.29.214.142.Dial1.Cincinnati1.Level3.net) joined #forth 08:03:55 --- nick: I44-r_ -> I440r 08:11:32 --- join: PoppaVic (~pfv@s168.waters.gtlakes.com) joined #forth 08:27:10 --- part: PoppaVic left #forth 08:42:55 --- join: mur (murr@baana-62-165-186-84.phnet.fi) joined #forth 09:21:05 --- join: deluxe (~deluxe@pD9EE149A.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #forth 09:49:47 --- quit: deluxe (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)) 09:50:06 --- join: deluxe (~deluxe@pD9EE149A.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #forth 09:59:06 --- quit: I440r () 11:01:54 --- join: a7r (~a7r@206.72.82.135) joined #forth 11:01:59 hey 11:14:55 --- join: crc (~crc@AC8EF832.ipt.aol.com) joined #forth 11:15:32 so I was thinking more about a handheld colorforth last night. 11:16:01 I was thinking you could put the Forth on an iPAQ, and program it over the serial interface, and leave the LCD for everything GUI oriented. 11:16:20 so you use the GUI on the LCD, and the second you want to hack out some Forth, you just plug it into a laptop, or whatever./ 11:20:19 Would it run natively or as an application under WinCE or Linux? 11:21:41 it'd run natively 11:22:01 using the handheld.org bootldr to execute it out of flash. 11:22:18 That would be an interesting project 11:23:17 I've been thinking of porting RetroForth to my Zaurus SL-5500 11:24:51 You really should have some way of programming it without using a serial hookup. 11:37:19 --- quit: Stepan (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:37:19 --- quit: XeF4 (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:37:19 --- quit: a7r (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:37:32 --- quit: Robert (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:37:32 --- quit: skylan (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:37:32 --- quit: cyberlok (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:37:32 --- quit: Fractal (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 11:38:55 --- join: a7r (~a7r@206.72.82.135) joined #forth 11:38:55 --- join: Robert (~snofs@h138n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 11:38:55 --- join: Fractal (qnifqbs@new.cure.for.SARS.found.to.be.strongLSD.com) joined #forth 11:38:55 --- join: skylan (sjh@vickesh01-4726.tbaytel.net) joined #forth 11:38:55 --- join: XeF4 (xef4@lowfidelity.org) joined #forth 11:38:55 --- join: Stepan (~stepan@likes.smoking.and.watching.spacenight.dk) joined #forth 11:38:55 --- join: cyberlok (cyberlok@warl0k.sponsor.freenode) joined #forth 11:44:55 I'm thinking you could store forth blocks, in flash. 11:49:39 It should be possible, at least if you don't dual-boot with WinCE or Linux 11:50:50 yup. 11:51:04 you could do it even with a dual boot setup w/ Linux, if you did it right. 11:51:16 hh.org bootldr has partition support implemented. 11:51:35 Then it would be easy on the iPaq 11:51:59 A little harder on a Zaurus since the boot loader doesn't seem to support partitions 12:18:04 re 12:18:18 what are you talking about? forth blocks in flash? 12:18:46 ColorForth on the iPaq (or Zaurus) 12:20:57 I'm thinking of porting RetroForth to the Zaurus in the near future, and a7r was thinking of a ColorForth on the iPaq 12:21:38 The two projects would have some similiarities (RetroForth was inspired heavily from ColorForth) 12:24:03 --- quit: a7r (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 13:00:47 --- join: Fractal_ (nohqdal@new.cure.for.SARS.found.to.be.strongLSD.com) joined #forth 13:03:21 --- quit: XeF4 (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:03:21 --- quit: cyberlok (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:03:21 --- quit: skylan (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:03:21 --- quit: Robert (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:03:21 --- quit: Fractal (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:03:23 --- nick: Fractal_ -> Fractal 13:04:52 --- quit: Fractal (Killed (carroll.freenode.net (zelazny.freenode.net <- asimov.freenode.net))) 13:04:55 --- join: Robert (~snofs@h138n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 13:04:55 --- join: Fractal (qnifqbs@new.cure.for.SARS.found.to.be.strongLSD.com) joined #forth 13:04:55 --- join: skylan (sjh@vickesh01-4726.tbaytel.net) joined #forth 13:04:55 --- join: XeF4 (xef4@lowfidelity.org) joined #forth 13:04:55 --- join: cyberlok (cyberlok@warl0k.sponsor.freenode) joined #forth 13:05:48 --- quit: XeF4 (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:05:48 --- quit: Fractal (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:05:49 --- quit: cyberlok (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:05:49 --- quit: skylan (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:05:49 --- quit: Robert (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 13:06:35 --- join: Robert (~snofs@h138n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 13:06:35 --- join: Fractal (qnifqbs@new.cure.for.SARS.found.to.be.strongLSD.com) joined #forth 13:06:35 --- join: skylan (sjh@vickesh01-4726.tbaytel.net) joined #forth 13:06:35 --- join: XeF4 (xef4@lowfidelity.org) joined #forth 13:06:35 --- join: cyberlok (cyberlok@warl0k.sponsor.freenode) joined #forth 13:15:01 --- quit: mur (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)) 13:16:27 --- join: mur (murr@baana-62-165-186-84.phnet.fi) joined #forth 13:20:21 --- quit: Fractal (Connection reset by peer) 13:21:32 --- quit: crc ("I was using TinyIRC! Visit http://www.tinyirc.net/ for more information.") 14:14:13 --- join: a7r (~a7r@206.72.82.135) joined #forth 15:10:06 --- quit: deluxe ("Client exiting") 15:14:29 --- quit: mur ("MURR!") 15:35:32 --- join: jdamisch (jdamisch@207.191.240.69) joined #forth 15:35:54 sifbot: 5 5 + . 15:35:55 jdamisch: 10 15:36:01 Hi :) 15:36:07 hi 15:36:43 sifbot: : test ( n) 10 0 do i + loop . ; test 15:36:45 jdamisch: stack underflow 15:36:53 sifbot: 5 test 15:36:54 jdamisch: Word not found: test 15:36:58 it don't remember 15:37:03 sifbot: : test ( n) 10 0 do i + loop . ; 5 test 15:37:04 jdamisch: 50 15:37:10 there we go 15:37:50 Robert, do you know anything about SwiftForth? 15:37:57 Nope. 15:38:06 i have been reading the manual for it 15:38:17 i haven't written much code in it yet 15:38:35 i might try to write in it tonight or tomorrow 15:39:24 atleast they tell you the mechanics of how the object system works, although I'll probably just roll my own 15:39:28 --- join: kc5tja (~kc5tja@ip68-8-206-137.sd.sd.cox.net) joined #forth 15:39:34 hi 15:39:40 re 15:40:18 kc5tja, do you know anything about SwiftForth? 15:41:33 Nope. I used the demo version for a very brief period, but I couldn't get very far with it. It lacked documentation. 15:41:43 It looks pretty cool though, once you get used to it's environment. 15:42:14 my demo came with the Forth Users Handbook and the User Manual 15:42:19 it all came in the download 15:42:33 I'm demoing 2.2.2.9 15:42:56 its probably worth the d/l just for the Forth Users Handbook 15:43:06 I bought the paper version b4 it came in the download 15:43:33 Yeah, I have the paperback too. I use it quite often. 15:43:46 its worthwhile 15:44:06 I probably won't use SWOOP too much 15:44:20 but alteast they tell you how the object system works 15:45:39 parts of SwiftForth seem more complicated than they need to be. I can use it anyway. 15:45:55 Or just the parts of it that I need, I don't need to use all words in a system 15:45:59 there are alot of words 15:46:20 One thing is I don't know why they support blocks in the way that they do 15:46:39 I'd just have a file named BLOCKS, and then map the blocks directly into the file 15:46:52 I never got that far. WHen I downloaded it, I was evaluating it for use in a project for Windows, and it turns out (de facto) that C was a better choice for my needs. 15:46:58 I never looked at SwiftForth again. 15:47:06 i see 15:47:27 I wish I could have used Forth though, but management didn't like the idea. 15:48:08 management have their own agenda 15:49:01 Yes, money. I know, because I used to be a manager myself (and will be again, for my own company). 15:51:42 then a manager should just look at what is most economical is a given situation, not what language it is 15:51:57 but i'm no manager 15:52:57 Well, it was short-term economical to use C, and the long-term benefits didn't necessarily compete with C's long-term (and already well known) benefits. 15:53:34 Interfacing to other C modules was a priority, as was ease of use by other C programmers. 15:53:54 And we didn't have a whole heck of a lot of time to do feasibility studies either. 15:54:18 do you ever program in Forth? 15:54:26 Yes 15:54:42 i do sometimes 15:54:53 Mostly quick, one-off utilities for Linux text processing or other command-line filter applications, but I'm also writing my own Forth environment for my aging laptop. 15:55:14 small disposable apps? 15:55:23 Yup. 15:55:43 For more durable apps, I usually go with Python, because it has a better run-time library. 15:55:45 how many other guys have Forth in their tool box and just use it for small disposable apps? 15:55:54 I really don't know. 15:56:02 I would assume most of the participants of comp.lang.forth. :) 15:56:22 i'm totally into Forth, I'm even trying to write a Chuck style DB 15:56:33 --- quit: skylan ("bbiab") 15:57:20 The Forth environment I'm writing for my laptop will be raw metal -- no underlying OS. 15:57:29 cool 15:57:36 I intend on doing a lot of ham radio stuff with the laptop. 15:57:42 i have CF on a floppy, but i'm preoccupied with Swift right now 15:57:48 neat 15:58:04 But the new networking protocol I'm working on will still have to have a C version for use as a "reference implementation". Bleh. 15:58:04 do, will you be able to send Forth source code over the radio or something like that? 15:59:04 If you so desire. I can do that already with the existing packet radio protocols (e.g., AX.25 is currently the king of the hill for ham radio). 15:59:26 why are you writting a new protocol? 15:59:58 AX.25 makes woefully inefficient use of the amateur spectrum. 16:00:11 it's inefficient 16:00:19 go figure 16:00:37 It transmits source and destination addresses with each packet sent, despite being a connection-oriented protocol, so it's wasting some 15 octets with header overhead. 16:01:10 The ideal packet size for amateur radio links seems to be around 40 octets, based on empirical findings. With a 19 octet header, that's almost a 33% overhead. 16:01:30 ?? 16:01:32 too much 16:01:38 Yeah, WAY too much. 16:01:58 good luck! 16:02:06 :^) 16:02:08 So I'm trying to implement a protocol based on ATM networking. 16:02:20 is it tight? 16:03:14 is it efficient? 16:03:42 It has a fixed 10% header overhead, regardless of hwo much data you send. 16:03:56 much better 16:04:13 how much header do you really need? 16:04:22 A single cell comprises a 5 octet header, and 48 octet payload. 16:04:39 what's in the header? 16:05:29 Some currently unused fields (about 5 bits worth), a 24-bit virtual circuit identifier, a payload type ID (3-bits, NOT the same thing as its namesake in Ethernet protocol), and a cell-loss priority bit. 16:05:36 Oh, and an 8-bit CRC of the header contents. 16:06:09 I used to have a site about this, but SourceForge had to go and fucking blow it to kingdom come. 16:06:15 And they refuse to restore from backups. :( 16:06:25 its better to just have your own site 16:06:44 get a domain name and hall it around to where ever you need to go 16:06:51 then keep your own backups 16:07:01 I piggybacked it on another project site I have, which was also blown away. Fortunately, I still have all the regular files that people can download. 16:07:27 Well, two problems with that. Domains cost money, they require a DNS host, and my bandwidth is upload-limited to 30kbps. 16:07:43 s/two/three/ 16:07:54 i pay like $10/month to host my site 16:08:12 As someone who is currently unemployed, that's too much. 16:08:29 i see 16:08:41 Besides, I have specialized requirements for my site: I need to host Zope installations. 16:08:53 what are those? 16:08:57 SF doesn't host Zope, but any site I put up on my own box will definitely be Zope sites. 16:09:16 Think open-source ColdFusion killer. 16:09:27 Only even more. 16:10:23 i feel like getting something to eat 16:10:29 Me too. 16:10:36 like maybe I will just keep the line open and go get a snack 16:10:39 Got back from a 12-mile bike ride an hour ago. :) 16:11:02 i like to ride my bike sometimes :^) 16:11:06 Unfortunately, I won't be doing that. After my dinner, it'll be off to aikido for me. 16:11:12 biking is awesome. 16:11:19 My average trip speed is now 18MPH. I'm stoked. 16:11:37 I can burst up to 40MPH on flat terrain with my bike in 24th gear. Woohoo! 16:11:41 (wears me way out though) 16:12:10 Just about 8 months ago, I was happy if I got around 3MPH round-trip average speed. :D 16:13:13 l8ter 16:13:20 okies 16:14:47 --- quit: kc5tja ("THX QSO ES 73 DE KC5TJA/6 CL ES QRT AR SK") 16:41:50 --- join: tathi (~josh@pcp02123722pcs.milfrd01.pa.comcast.net) joined #forth 16:46:59 i'll be back in a few 16:47:00 --- quit: jdamisch () 16:50:06 --- quit: tathi ("leaving") 16:54:57 --- join: jdamisch (jdamisch@207.191.240.206) joined #forth 16:55:44 sifbot: : test ( n) 10 0 do i + loop ; 5 test 16:55:45 jdamisch: 16:56:01 sifbot: : test ( n) 10 0 do i + loop ; 5 test . 16:56:02 jdamisch: 50 16:59:47 forth like if honk then 17:03:59 Robert, are you there? 17:12:55 sifbot: help 17:12:56 jdamisch: Word not found: help 17:13:00 sifbot: words 17:13:02 jdamisch: ." .( : if then do loop repeat until exit ... 17:13:42 Not anymore. 17:13:46 sifbot: words . 17:13:47 jdamisch: ." .( : if then do loop repeat until exit ... stac 17:13:49 I'm going to bed :) 17:13:54 good night 17:14:03 Night 17:14:27 sifbot: assembler 17:14:29 jdamisch: Word not found: assembler 17:14:41 sifbot: bye 17:14:42 Got the brainfuck compiler down to 136 bytes, with 16-bit jumps and 32kB data area :) With 1/2kB data and 8-bit jumps, 128 bytes. 17:14:42 jdamisch: Word not found: bye 17:15:13 thats small 17:15:21 http://robert.zizi.org/ in case you're bored enough to have a look (only 128b one there). 17:15:24 Yes. 17:15:32 what do you know about sifbot: 17:15:38 Not much. 17:15:55 Anyway, I have to go now :) Bye again 17:15:59 bye 17:39:38 sifbot: : honk 10 0 do ." honk" cr loop ; honk 17:39:39 jdamisch: honk honk honk honk honk honk honk honk honk honk 17:39:54 sifbot: : honk 10 0 do ." honk" lf loop ; honk 17:39:55 jdamisch: Word not found: lf 17:40:45 re. 17:43:42 hi 17:44:21 what do you think about sifbot? 17:44:45 in the grand scheme of things? 17:44:53 yeah 17:45:00 its just a nice little toy isn't it 17:45:11 mildly interesting... like one of those Forth java applets. :) 17:45:21 totally 17:45:48 what Forth do you use? 17:46:47 pforth right now 17:46:57 but I want to write my own colorforth sometime soon. 17:46:59 i'm reading the SwiftForth manual 17:47:10 a7r: me 2 17:47:14 i would also like to write my own experimental forth 17:47:29 onetom: cool 17:47:36 i'm not sure that it would be CF, but i might snag some ideas from it 17:47:51 I want to do some CF, but I'm getting into SF now 17:47:54 I want a native StrongARM Forth, to run on a handheld.. that'll probably be the first thing I code. 17:48:09 sounds good 17:48:22 I was thinking of making a VMU Forth, as a gag, but I don't want to mess with it 17:49:23 keep the compilers heads in the host PC 17:49:37 keep the word headers in the host PC i mean 17:50:15 a VMU is a tiny computer 17:50:46 crc brought up the idea of using the Zaurus as a ColorForth computer, with the built in keyboard. 17:50:52 which is probably a great idea, except for the screen orientation. 17:51:12 i've never seen a Zaurus 17:51:22 is it Ru? 17:52:28 Russian? 17:52:46 is it Russian, yes that was my quesiton 17:54:01 no, it's Japanese. 17:54:11 ok 17:54:22 maybe i should type it into google 17:55:51 the screen orientation would not hurt one bit 17:56:01 so what if the screen is tilted like a videogame 17:56:57 the font size should be adjustable, and the 256 byte block can just wrap the screen area 17:57:06 there can be info bars someplace 17:58:21 you need information about the hardware, and how can you boot into it and jetison the os 17:58:27 i suppose 17:59:05 how would you boot up strait into it, replace the roms? 17:59:10 override the roms? 18:00:22 i'm looking at the Zaurus right now 18:01:18 jdamisch: the screen orientation is portrait.. I would prefer widescreen like I sometimes use on my iPAQ. 18:02:37 so, is there currently any Forth OS for an avaiable portible mini computer 18:02:42 so, is there currently any Forth OS for an avaiable portable mini computer 18:04:58 I don't know 18:04:59 me neither 18:05:01 I know people have code for embedded devices. 18:05:19 just forth-es attached 2 the underlying os 18:06:12 you can be either in the OS or not with Forth 18:06:19 I could just get a Palm Pilot 18:06:37 actually, I think there is a Forth for the Palm. 18:06:44 there are a few 18:06:53 i'm not sure which one i would pick at the moment 18:07:27 no free 4th 4 the pilot, but 18:07:37 there are a few pay ones 18:07:48 i don't mind if its a good forth 18:07:52 there is 1 commercial, whats pretty good 18:08:16 yup... let me think about the name 18:08:41 not dragon forth - tho its not bad either at all - 18:08:57 its not Quartus is it? 18:09:01 yes 18:09:04 thats it 18:09:44 and i could just bang on the metal from there if i need to, like in the atari ST 18:10:01 infact, isn't the palm also baised on a motorola 68K of some sort? 18:10:13 yup 18:10:34 we all know that the 68K works well with multiple stacks 18:10:39 like a 2 stack machine 18:10:55 but u cant access the hw directly 18:11:09 in the palm? no? 18:11:15 u have 2 access it via os calls 18:11:41 can you slam down on the bitmap? 18:12:20 ? 18:12:25 the only way to know would be to try 18:12:51 no 18:13:00 ? 18:13:01 i didnt understand the question 18:13:09 whats up w the bitmap? 18:13:16 can you write directly to the bitmap 18:13:26 the memory addresses which control the onscreen image 18:13:28 in hardware 18:13:39 aaaha, the framebuffer 18:13:47 no, u cant afair 18:13:57 darn 18:14:03 exactly :) 18:14:11 but im not sure 18:14:20 so, i could get the palm, and hack my way into it 18:14:25 but u can easily try it in pose 18:14:36 it might not be portable across all palms, but i could do it on mine 18:15:01 sure, i know what u would like 2 18:15:39 but using the os putpixel is also sufficient in most cases 18:15:46 right now i'll just read up on SF 18:15:50 that's my project 18:15:52 but! 18:16:20 if i use the os putpixel then that will be slower than doing it directly myself 18:16:28 afair, i saw a bitmap scroller program 18:16:55 an opensource 1 18:17:06 neat 18:17:30 probably u can gain some ideas from it 18:18:01 i've already written my own game in Forth on the Atari ST 18:18:04 it also handled all the 4 colors of my palm IIIe 18:18:06 or what.. 18:18:22 on that platform you were expected to write directly to the framebuffer if you wanted performance for games 18:18:39 aha 18:18:49 i know how to built blit routines 18:18:58 or if you have a blitter i can directly set it up in hw 18:19:07 it all depends what you have available 18:19:11 the GBA has sprites 18:19:17 Game Boy Advance 18:19:27 thought so ;) 18:19:38 CF on the GBA with some sort of expansion mod for storage memory would be phat 18:20:01 maybe palm though 18:20:15 that's not my direction at the time being 18:20:31 what woudl this proposed forth system be used for? 18:21:39 ? 18:21:48 was it a poetical question? 18:21:51 its just hypothetical 18:22:12 so u r just askin yourself? 18:22:17 I was wondering if the Forth that was proposed for the Zaurus would have a definite purpose now 18:23:15 I'd use it for a calculator, and doing hacking. 18:23:25 that is worthy 18:24:15 maybe one could get a Forth for the OS, and then use it as a platform for hacking, like write the Forth-OS using the Forth you got for free or bought 18:24:39 4 example 18:25:10 i also would like 2 use 4th 4 hw level hackin 18:25:13 g 18:25:16 get a Palm Pilot, and the get Quartus, and then see if you can find the screenbuffer and then go 255 swap ! 18:25:17 jdamisch: there's a good bootloader for the iPAQ,. I'd probably just hack it directly in assembly. 18:26:00 i would b happy 2 see 4th-es integrated as a builtin development & debugging console in2 many applications 18:26:25 into kernels, video & sound driver, mediaplayers... ;) 18:26:42 onetom: what I want is to be able to plug the PDA into my laptop over serial, and get a forth development environment.. and then once that is there, develop the GUI and all that. 18:27:16 jdamisch: u can try quartus 4 free... & try it inside pose, so u can easily type in2 it 18:27:44 a7r: sweet dreams.. ;) 18:27:52 onetom: come on, it's doable. ;) 18:28:22 you can store code blocks in FlashRAM sectors.. 18:28:23 a7r: still... its not done yet.. not as an opensrc prj :( 18:28:44 anyway, i gotta go 18:28:49 onetom: I put out the first real Linux distro for handhelds, so this doesn't seem insanely hard. 18:28:54 brb 18:28:56 aah 18:29:06 that sounds good, a7r 18:29:21 * onetom keeps polling the channel 2 18:29:28 the bootloader for the iPAQ is quite good for development. 18:29:55 freebsd bootloader also uses 4th afaik 18:30:59 eg: http://www.freebsd.cz/pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/src/sys/boot/forth/support.4th 18:31:26 that's really interesting. 18:32:00 i know 18:32:15 but still.. i dont have time 2 play w it :((( 18:45:23 about the bootloader, the words are between 2 lines and 20 lines of code with the majority of them 10 and less 18:45:32 in just glancing at it 18:45:46 lines of code i mean 18:54:47 well, i'm going to split 18:54:51 bye 18:54:56 --- quit: jdamisch () 19:04:23 --- quit: cyberlok (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 19:04:23 --- quit: Robert (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 19:05:58 --- join: Robert (~snofs@h138n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 19:11:56 --- join: cyberlok (cyberlok@warl0k.sponsor.freenode) joined #forth 19:20:37 hmmm 19:40:21 mmmh 20:47:27 --- join: Sonarman (~matt@adsl-67-113-234-208.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) joined #forth 21:00:07 --- quit: Sonarman ("leaving") 21:16:03 --- quit: cyberlok (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 21:16:04 --- quit: XeF4 (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 21:16:04 --- join: Fractal (luro@new.cure.for.SARS.found.to.be.strongLSD.com) joined #forth 21:16:57 --- join: cyberlok (cyberlok@warl0k.sponsor.freenode) joined #forth 21:16:57 --- join: XeF4 (xef4@lowfidelity.org) joined #forth 21:18:04 --- quit: cyberlok (calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 21:18:44 --- join: cyberlok (cyberlok@warl0k.sponsor.freenode) joined #forth 21:22:41 --- quit: a7r (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 22:18:49 --- join: kc5tja (~kc5tja@ip68-8-206-137.sd.sd.cox.net) joined #forth 22:19:11 73! 22:19:37 73 means "goodbye," not "hello." :) 22:20:29 But I understand what you mean. Hello! :) 22:21:41 I won't be staying too long. I need to get to bed fairly soon. Just stopping by to see what's going on. 22:22:26 :)))sorry, network i-face hang 22:22:55 i hadn't listen SW way too long 22:23:27 my RX rotten - damn oxyde capacitors ! 22:23:34 Heh; I'd like to listen more often, but I don't have a good station setup. I don't receive nearly as much as I'd like. 22:23:56 Right now I listen to Radio Taipei International a lot. 22:24:07 Though, not recently -- I need sleep for final exams. 22:24:23 DC RX can be made in a few evenings, if yuor hands are straight 22:24:49 The radio isn't the problem. It's my physical location. 22:25:10 I live in a valley, in a community with severe antenna restrictions, and my apartment is constructed out of aluminum 2x4s. 22:25:14 E.g., I live in a faraday cage. 22:25:37 cage ??? 22:25:48 a-a-h, took it ! 22:25:54 But someday I would like to try my hand at making a DC RX; I understand the audio on such radios is overwhelmingly good. 22:26:16 DC = direct conversion, i mean 22:26:20 * kc5tja nods 22:27:06 I started on a DC RX project of my own a few years ago, but never finished. I got as far as making the 66dB audio pre-amplifier. Man, that worked *wonderful*, and I jury-rigged it with a crystal AM receiver to listen to a few local AM stations. WOW, the audio was top-notch. 22:27:27 I didn't skimp on the power consumption either. Three transistors, +/- 12V rails (and 0V ground of course). 22:27:39 Sounded very much like a tube amplifier. 22:27:44 I was shocked. 22:28:27 It was so good that I never bothered to finish the project. I just listened to the local AM stations through it. :) 22:29:52 whadda u think on regenerators, to listen AM broadcast 22:30:14 I'm not sure I understand what you mean by regenerators. You mean beat-frequency oscillators? 22:30:16 * serg_ghost has really flaky WinXP w/ network driver falling all the time 22:30:32 Or do you mean regenerative receivers? 22:30:51 TRF w/ finely adjustable positive feedback 22:31:16 OK, that'd be what we call a regenerative receiver. I don't know -- I never built one. I'd like to try one of those some day too. :) 22:31:20 Too many projects, so little time. 22:31:23 (and money) 22:31:43 However, I do have to admit, of all the times I tried to make an oscillator, they've NEVER worked. 22:31:43 BFO suxx as all superheterodyne 22:31:53 ???? 22:32:11 All my oscillators make wonderful amplifiers. And all my amplifiers work wonderfully well as ... amplifiers. :) 22:32:29 * kc5tja has not yet ever made an oscillator that actually worked, intentionally or unintentionally. 22:33:08 * kc5tja likes superhets, because they're the only way to get single side-band with the sharp bandwidths you need on, say, amateur radio frequencies. 22:33:31 DC SSB transceivers do exist, but they don't have as good sideband filtration. 22:33:44 (that, and they're very complex to make) 22:33:57 i mean home built superhet 22:34:16 too complex RX compared to DC or regen 22:34:22 Oh, yeah, all my superhet rigs are commercial. :) Currently using a TS-2000 for my base-station. 22:34:49 You know what really irks the bloody heck out of me? 22:34:59 and common radios, all suxx 22:35:01 ? 22:35:06 How many years have ham radio operators had to put up with commercial broadcast stations on the 40m and 20m bands? Decades! 22:35:21 So why do *all* the commercial rigs today offer only **ONE** adjustible notch filter?! 22:35:38 That's one thing I'd like to make for myself someday, is a box with at least 4 notch filters. 22:36:22 And then there is local interference, like from computers and such. 22:36:34 Especially these DSP rigs -- there's no excuse. :) 22:37:59 what is most complex device you had built ? 22:38:15 Currently, just the 66dB audio amplifier I described above. 22:38:38 I tried to build the VFO for the tuner, but I just couldn't get it to oscillate. 22:39:12 how did u came to conclusion it did not work ? 22:39:15 It got to the point where I was seriously considering using a 555 timer chip to generate a square wave, and just filter off the harmonics to get my desired higher frequencies. 22:39:23 maybe, it worked way off designed freq ? 22:39:34 Yeah, it was way off frequency -- 0Hz. 22:39:40 It just plain didn't oscillate. 22:40:02 how did u control ? oscillograf ? freq meter ? 22:40:03 I tried Colpitts and Hartley configurations, and a couple others whose name I forget. None of them worked for me. 22:40:40 I measured it with a 500MHz-bandwidth oscilloscope. 22:41:09 I controlled it with a variable capacitor. 22:42:12 * serg_ghost never heard of such kiddish trouble from anyone 22:42:31 ask one to debug it 4 you 22:42:55 pre check all parts :( 22:43:03 All the parts are right. 22:43:23 The Colpitts oscillator I took right out of the ARRL Handbook. 22:43:29 The circuit is known to be a correct circuit. 22:43:37 Still, it didn't oscillate for me. 22:44:00 But it's not important now. 22:44:11 "is known ?" can you decide it yourself ? maybe, print error ? 22:44:15 It's been a few years, and I no longer have the circuit anymore. 22:44:31 The circuit has undergone peer review since the early 70s. 22:44:46 I think it's pretty safe bet that it's a known-good circuit design. 22:44:55 --- quit: Klaw (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 22:49:39 --- quit: kc5tja (Killed (NickServ (Ghost: kc5tja_!~kc5tja@ip68-8-206-137.sd.sd.cox.net))) 22:49:51 --- join: kc5tja (~kc5tja@ip68-8-206-137.sd.sd.cox.net) joined #forth 22:50:15 OK, that was fun. I hate end-to-end acknowledged networks. :( 22:52:37 i don't blame design, but why not some print-house ass-eyes reverse arrow on a transistor or a dot on coupling coil ? 22:52:49 just by hand mistake 22:53:16 As I indicated, it's been peer-reviewed at least since the 70s. Someone would definitely have caught any errors by then. 22:53:30 The ARRL has pretty good print standards. 22:53:31 --- join: Fractal_ (tqdybale@new.cure.for.SARS.found.to.be.strongLSD.com) joined #forth 22:53:40 * serg_ghost seen short circuit in TV linescan on diagram in learning book 22:54:08 Well, that's not the ham radio community. Lots of people build circuits and use the ARRL Handbook as a cookbook of sorts for their circuits. 22:54:23 If there's a problem with a circuit, as with open source software, it will get corrected at least by next year's publication. 22:55:05 what power do you feed to u'r device ? 22:55:15 on what base do you make it ? 22:55:24 maybe, parasite R or C ? 22:55:26 I used to have a +12V and -12V supply for it. 22:55:46 how good ? rectifier or battery ? 22:56:39 Commercial, lab-grade power supply, relatively cheap pass-transistor type. But switch-mode power supplies today are good enough to work for oscillator work as well, with a 7809 or 7805 put on the line. 22:57:04 I did try it using a battery though, and the same results. 22:57:21 I'm not at all sure why it didn't work. At this point it could be anything. 22:57:26 However, it's a non-issue now. 22:57:40 The circuit is destroyed/gone, and I have no further interest in persuing the project any further now. 22:57:57 * kc5tja just doesn't have the time for it anymore. 22:58:12 Or the space for the equipment and parts. 22:59:44 I also tried making a transistor mixer (using a benchtop frequency generator as the signal source) and that definitely didn't work. :( Again, I have no idea why. But I know that mixers have pretty strict input signal power level requirements, so it's quite possible i was overdriving it. 23:01:50 --- quit: Fractal (Read error: 101 (Network is unreachable)) 23:01:51 --- nick: Fractal_ -> Fractal 23:05:43 Oh well. I need to get to bed. 23:05:52 --- quit: kc5tja ("THX QSO ES 73 DE KC5TJA/6 CL ES QRT AR SK") 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/03.05.19