00:00:00 --- log: started forth/02.06.17 00:33:44 --- join: rob_ert (~robert@h237n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 00:59:05 --- join: davidw_ (~davidw@adsl-32-74.38-151.net24.it) joined #forth 00:59:23 --- nick: davidw_ -> davidw 02:10:52 --- join: Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) joined #forth 02:11:45 Privet. 02:12:43 hi, busy for few mins.. 02:13:18 Okay. 02:16:20 now working on fixed-point math 02:16:35 do u know any damn thing on log-csale math ? 02:17:37 --- quit: Serg_penguin ("gonna reboot") 02:27:04 --- join: Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) joined #forth 02:28:27 log-scale? 02:28:57 --- join: your (ammu@baana-62-165-189-214.phnet.fi) joined #forth 02:29:10 yes 02:29:20 tervehdys 02:29:27 ??? 02:29:33 hello that is 02:29:36 Serg_penguin: What is that? :) 02:29:48 --- nick: your -> mur 02:29:49 whops :) 02:30:23 damn, if it would have been "you" then it woudl have caused more conpuzzlerness 02:30:51 so do one know abt log-scale math ? 02:31:17 What is "log-scale math"? 02:31:40 it's dirty sides of life, rob_ert 02:31:44 ... 02:32:03 What is it you're doing, serg? 02:32:05 the scavanger of mathematic, the dark alleys of real world 02:32:24 it's fear of fearness. you can't do that rob_ert 02:35:35 log-scale... numbers -> their logarifms, * -> + , + -> ? 02:35:51 Oh 02:35:56 Yes, why? 02:36:37 what why ? 02:37:02 faster and wider range of numbers 02:37:03 Why do you ask if I know that? 02:37:07 Oh. 02:37:56 i got just overall idea, but need some better texts.... 02:38:05 deeper texts.. 02:38:05 What are you coding? 02:38:07 * mur offfers Serg_penguin all numbers without formula 02:38:12 Fixed point log math? 02:38:47 no real task, just kidding w/ math... 02:48:36 will search next morning... 02:49:19 be4 work, i just turn off firewall for a while, and.... oppa! 02:53:24 --- quit: Serg_penguin () 02:58:42 --- join: Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) joined #forth 03:01:28 re hi 03:05:36 re re 03:05:57 snaga noi? 03:06:33 ???? 03:06:45 * Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) has joined #forth 03:06:50 shto eto? 03:07:06 ah dont asnwer in russian 03:07:06 :) 03:07:20 just remembered i'm not good in it 03:07:22 :) 03:07:22 damn it ! 03:07:39 it was snaga_NOINDEX_@inbox.ru 03:07:47 noindex is agains spam 03:08:12 :) 03:08:13 @nat... is our provider's firewall 03:08:35 it gone messed by hosts in between... 03:08:57 noindex url? 03:10:15 noindex my adress, all hell damn spamers !!! 03:12:03 oh i though it was some team 03:12:15 usually NOSPAM or such is used 03:12:55 hmm.. let's for NOINDEX team and be against spam :P 03:13:10 start fight from another aspect 03:13:17 most spam has sites 03:13:21 they shoudl be down instead 03:13:28 as email is not often tracable 03:17:40 Serg_penguin.. 03:19:52 join #noindex 03:19:56 it's kewl name 03:20:00 acctually 03:21:12 --- quit: Serg_penguin () 03:36:29 rob_ert 03:36:34 all join #noindex 03:36:38 let's fight against spam 03:45:48 --- quit: oxygene (Killed (NickServ (Ghost: oxygene_!~oxygene@linux-future.de))) 04:53:23 --- join: Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) joined #forth 04:53:29 re hi 04:55:54 Hi :) 05:02:33 --- quit: mur (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 05:03:01 --- join: mur (ammu@baana-62-165-189-214.phnet.fi) joined #forth 05:03:27 ammmuuu! 05:03:40 muu 05:04:07 moo 05:05:13 * Serg_penguin gone deaf after a few depth charges... 05:07:41 --- quit: Serg_penguin ("crash dive....") 06:12:08 --- join: Fare (fare@samaris.tunes.org) joined #forth 06:12:20 Hi Fare :) 06:12:25 gakuk :) 06:13:24 hello 06:13:35 is adventure where you walk hack stick and pick things? 06:13:46 genre of game 06:13:47 that is 06:13:47 :) 06:14:11 I guess so. 06:19:18 --- join: I440r (~mark4@1Cust66.tnt3.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 06:19:23 Hi :) 06:22:48 hi 06:48:41 hii 08:11:30 brb 08:11:30 --- quit: I440r ("Reality Strikes Again") 08:13:33 --- join: Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) joined #forth 08:13:44 re hi 08:23:24 --- quit: Serg_penguin () 08:33:04 --- join: tathi (~josh@ip68-9-68-213.ri.ri.cox.net) joined #forth 09:10:17 --- join: Speuler (~l@195.30.184.4) joined #forth 09:10:32 'oi 09:23:55 --- quit: tathi ("leaving") 09:31:13 --- join: kc5tja (~kc5tja@stampede.org) joined #forth 09:53:02 --- join: dsmith (~dsmith@cherry7.comerica.com) joined #forth 10:05:37 --- join: n_ (nm@pcp01518417pcs.reding01.pa.comcast.net) joined #forth 10:07:02 --- quit: Speuler ("generally shoves removeable zip, etc on hdb") 11:14:27 --- quit: davidw ("[x]chat") 11:26:49 --- join: davidw (~davidw@adsl-32-74.38-151.net24.it) joined #forth 12:21:41 --- quit: davidw (Read error: 113 (No route to host)) 12:40:18 --- join: davidw (~davidw@adsl-32-74.38-151.net24.it) joined #forth 12:43:46 --- join: Stepan (~stepan@p508477F0.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #forth 12:54:45 who was it that was talking about anti-aliasing the other day 12:55:08 i dont confess 12:57:08 gentelmen, put him on the rack untill he tells the truth 12:57:22 --- join: XeF4 (~XeF4@dsl-XV-118.kotikaista.weppi.fi) joined #forth 13:03:31 geeli 13:03:35 hej 13:03:43 --- nick: kc5tja -> kc-food 13:03:47 kävitkös lobotomiassa ? :) 13:04:58 onkohan geeli täällä? se kävi, joo 13:05:04 tapasin :) 13:05:21 hmm 13:05:32 minä olen sekaisin sinun ja geel kanssa 13:05:38 entäs siellä tietokone tapahtumassa? 13:05:44 ;) 13:06:00 vai ihan pää leikattiin vain? 13:06:01 ;) 13:06:16 no, se joo sinun ja kansaa olen onkohan! 13:06:42 jos oot sekaisin, muista että geel on se suomalainen, joka kirjoittaa tätä kieltä kunnolla :) 13:07:35 davidw: voit varmasti tehdä paremman =P 13:08:07 XeF4: oot olen geeli lobotomiassa jos muista kavi se kanssa! 13:09:02 translation: what a coincidence that you both have cats walking on your keyboards 13:10:16 pää kyllä leikattiin =) 13:11:10 Jävla finnar :) 13:11:41 zogo anca mi, ma vedemo cossa che ghe xe da dirve... de 'ndar in mona a to sorea? me senbra na bon'idea 13:12:07 rob_ert visst! 13:12:22 ... /topic #babel 13:12:40 i bet you dont have ops there ;) 13:13:17 I bet I do 13:14:03 then it's quite empry 13:37:10 --- join: I440r (~mark4@1Cust111.tnt2.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 13:43:29 --- quit: I440r (Connection reset by peer) 13:51:57 --- join: I440r (~mark4@1Cust111.tnt2.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 13:54:44 I440r! 13:55:41 yes, I440r, flooding so much ;) 13:58:55 --- nick: kc-food -> kc5tja 13:59:59 omg 14:00:00 wtf 14:00:06 Chuck Moore is not doing any forth work anymore??? 14:00:39 ya :) 14:00:48 what's that? 14:00:58 eh? 14:01:02 wheres it say that ? 14:01:02 why? 14:01:04 what are his reasons? 14:01:13 air said it in #osdev... 14:01:28 the yea was for "i440r flooading alot" heh 14:01:49 that means it's true.... 14:02:04 air has a nasty habit of taking things way out of context. 14:02:16 I440r: did u see that interview with chuck moore at the register? 14:02:16 I440r: he finally saw the light and will no longer be doing any forth work 14:02:16 air: is he switching to C? 14:02:16 or maybe C#? ;) 14:02:36 Saw the light my ass. 14:02:53 It's purely for economic reasons, if it's even true to begin with. 14:03:10 I hate the front page to the register 14:03:27 how to build a crappy web page 101 14:03:46 You guys realize you are talking about the register, right? 14:04:33 In fact, I just did a search on TheRegister.co.uk, and found *no* such interview. 14:09:19 pesky facts 14:09:48 Well, you know... 14:10:03 Chuck is already defamed enough. He doesn't need the likes of air to make his life even worse. 14:11:29 I've not seen Chuck defamed any more than any other quasi-public person. Am I just hanging out in the wrong circles? 14:11:34 I don't really understand the guy 14:12:03 XeF4: People make fun of him because he's different. 14:12:12 he has some odd ideas about computing 14:12:26 odd/different/brilliant/crackpot/...? 14:12:31 XeF4: He chooses his own path, and walks that path himself. I commend him for that kind of bravery. 14:13:21 davidw: There was an interesting statistic I read the other day: 75% of what we'd call geniuses would be diagnosed as schizophrenic. There is a very fine line between the two afflictions. 14:13:55 I wouldn't go that far, but some of his ideas are way outside of what is considered mainstream thinking 14:14:15 heh 14:14:19 what line? geniuses are the schizophrenics we deem productive 14:14:37 (or schizophrenics are the geniuses we deem unproductive) 14:14:37 kc5, i take it you don't like air? :) 14:14:44 well, in reality, schizofphenia is a diagnosable mental disorder 14:14:55 schizophrenia 14:15:11 yes, it's a disease 14:15:15 like any other, but it affects the mind 14:15:31 n_: He and I have had quite a number of disagreements in the past. Most of them were expressly instigated by him. He's a trouble-maker and a troll. 14:16:09 btw, do you know Nate Pinckney? aka nate37? 14:16:10 n_: When he's NOT in "troll-mode", he's quite agreeable and very intelligent. 14:16:25 n_: Not personally, but we have conversed quite a bit in the past, yes. 14:16:38 I haven't seen him in a long time, come to think of it. 14:16:38 Where did he go? 14:16:53 that's what i was wondering 14:25:17 kc5: do you suppose it would be possible to tile X18 cores on a die, so each core has access to the memories of the cores up/down/left/right of it? 14:25:47 and then so that one DAC has access to all of them? 14:26:28 I'm not quite sure I fully understand your requirements. 14:26:43 Your first question, yes, I think it can. 14:26:51 For the second question, that's what confuses me. 14:27:35 the idea is for a graphics processor in which each X18 core works on some small portion of the framebuffer 14:27:57 I cannot afford to have one fabricated in any case.. 14:29:16 Well, if you allocate three processors to the task of streaming bytes to the DAC, then the solution seems workable at the surface... 14:30:29 * kc5tja is starting to adopt more and more of Chuck's ideas though. For example, dedicated coprocessors surrounding a relatively general purpose and non-performance critical (but still reasonably fast) CPU is making an increasing amount of sense to me. 14:30:47 The Amiga was built this way, of course, but in using PCs for so long, I've lost touch with that type of architecture. 14:31:02 *nod*, but wouldn't that require that processors be used for relaying bytes to the dac? 14:31:14 Yes 14:31:25 Unless you had some form of DMA facility. 14:32:10 how on earth would the dma facility manage to route from the centre of the core to a DAC on the border? 14:32:26 wouldn't you consider graphics/sound/network chips as 'dedicated coprocessors' - albeit very specialized ones? 14:32:32 or are there layering possibilites I know nothing about? 14:32:33 It would have to be built that way. 14:33:18 davidw: Not really. Typical VGA devices don't do an awful lot of processing on the fly. Of course, modern video cards are more powerful than the computers that drive them. 14:33:37 I don't know about sound chips as I've never had direct intervention with them. 14:34:15 Basically, my definition of a coprocessor is if you can feed the execution unit a set of instructions, and it performs them. 14:34:18 most PC sound chips seem to be just DACs with some rudamentary DMA facilities 14:34:49 Exactly. That's not really a coprocessor -- it's not very intelligent. 14:35:19 But really, the line gets pretty fuzzy. 14:35:31 F21's video "processor" doesn't do much processing either. :) 14:35:49 But it's architecture is exactly that of a CPU, while a VGA or sound card is just a streaming bus interface. 14:46:14 hmz.. actually, using processors along a row/column for relay to the DAC shouldn't hurt too terribly 14:47:10 In supercomputing terms, that's called a systolic array. 14:47:12 :) 14:47:38 "I'm sorry, you have a systolic array, and we're going to have to operate immediately" 14:49:28 Heh 14:52:42 =) 14:59:56 must code a simulator for the above sometime this week.. 15:01:18 The way I see it, if you do the row/column solution, you can layer functionality in the system. For example, you can have one layer decompress video data, another layer handle sprites, etc. 15:03:53 I don't see how I would lose that functionality with a DMA solution. 15:04:17 Or, alternatively, you could always use the Atari 7800 techinque, where the video device consists of two ping-pong buffers just long enough to hold one scan line, and have that drive a DAC (FIFO), using the CPUs to fill the buffers on a scan-line by scan-line basis. 15:05:30 DMA tends to be a pretty linear operation -- start at the beginning of memory, and read until the end. 15:06:03 Sprites necessarily require the video device to jump around the video buffer, since sprite data, regardless of where the sprite appears on the screen, always occupies a single memory buffer. 15:07:44 naah.. the DMA-blittable display could be broken into spans with *next,span length 15:07:54 (and we get a copper-alike that way for free, too) 15:09:03 Well, that's how the 7800 worked more or less. A frame consisted of a list of pointers to scanline lists, and each scanline list consisted of one or more (length, address, next, format) quadruplets. 15:09:36 length, address specified the data to place into the scanline buffer. format indicated the format of the data (monochrome, 4-color, 16-color, etc). 15:10:09 It was a really slick way of implementing the video subsystem. 15:10:53 hm. that's how I've done it with some software video systems on i386 15:10:58 * kc5tja nods 15:11:16 It's really the only method that you can use to achieve an effective "infinite" number of sprites. 15:11:30 I think the 7800 permitted some 128 sprites on the same physical scanline. 15:11:53 OOoh, I almost forgot. 15:12:28 and it allows superfast fake 3d by reusing spans 15:12:46 They had an "offset" field too. That field addressed the scanline buffer at a pixel offset. This way, you could achieve transparency in a sprite by first loading the full-length background image into the buffer, then "overlay" the sprite data on top of that. 15:13:31 The only requirement put on the programmer is that he complete the video overlaying within one scanline. 15:13:58 Of course, doing something like that in a SVGA environment today is extremely tough to do without superwide buses. 15:15:01 brb 15:15:10 anyone has idea where to get sony usb driver (not installation app but actual files)? 15:15:23 I'm not sure I follow about the offset field 15:16:36 Well, a scanline starts at horizontal offset zero and continues for, say, 639 pixels. 15:16:45 But a mouse pointer starts at pixel 320 and continues for 16 pixels. 15:17:25 oh, so one may specify multiple offsets, or? 15:17:40 Each graphic element handled by the video chip's DMA engine has its own offset. 15:19:25 ooooh.. 15:19:47 Yeah. It was *uber-sweet*. 15:20:29 Blew the Amiga's video subsystem clear out of the water, and it predated the Amiga. It's a shame they abandoned the architecture. It could have been the Atari ST's saving grace had they stuck with it. And had a decent marketing department. 15:21:35 Of course, the Amiga's video architecture was not something to laugh at either. But it's a lot less scalable when you think about it. Atari's solution is scalable to SVGA-sized displays and higher; Amiga's isn't because the copper's timing is so highly tied to NTSC/PAL. 15:21:37 brb 15:25:07 back 15:27:03 in the Atari 7800, was all RAM "chip ram", or.. =? 15:29:09 aha, found a page about it 15:33:00 Yes. 15:33:08 At least as far as I know it is. 15:35:23 --- join: miket2 (Mike@modem-119-90-60-62.vip.uk.com) joined #forth 15:36:26 --- part: miket2 left #forth 15:55:31 --- quit: dsmith ("later..") 15:56:02 --- join: CrowKiller (Vapo_Rulez@cnq5-233.cablevision.qc.ca) joined #forth 15:56:13 hi 15:56:40 Re; going to go in about 30 minutes 15:58:25 kc5tja, didn't told you the fact i was porting a gba multiboot cable from PIC to AVR using the best forth techniques i know 15:58:41 hey, is anyone here a UNIX-Hater? 15:58:57 me i hate linux and unix a bit 15:59:01 n_: I don't hate Unix, but I don't love it either. Does that count? 15:59:03 because only of one thing 15:59:11 it enslave people 15:59:18 n_: yup 15:59:26 * Fare hates UNIX 15:59:44 well, I would if UNIX could deserve hate. 15:59:53 do you hate it without understanding it? 15:59:56 It can only deserve contempt 15:59:59 Unix is designed to be a reliable environment; you can't guarantee reliability of a computer system (especially unsupervised) unless you effectively enslave the users. 16:00:08 n_: I understand Unix too well. 16:00:17 Unix, reliable? HAHA! 16:00:23 Unix, designed? HAHAHA! 16:00:25 I hate incompetent design by pompous designers, does that count? 16:00:51 * kc5tja hates unjustified public display of childishness even more. 16:00:55 * rob_ert likes the UNIX clones he's tried. 16:01:16 Unix is damn reliable. I've never had one crash that was not the result of something I, as superuser, did. 16:01:35 * rob_ert thinks existing software is better than some OS designer's dreams :) 16:02:31 * CrowKiller thinks people are enslaved trying to make something flawed better and better and better by donating their free time 16:03:05 * CrowKiller thinks free time = greatest opportunity to create something new and refreshing 16:03:15 kc5tja: I crash unix when I want 16:03:24 Crow: you mean like you're doing right now? 16:03:33 and often it crashes when I don't want 16:03:41 Fare: What planet do you live on? 16:03:43 the configuration is brittle at best 16:03:55 as a student i have lot of free time and i enjoy them a lot 16:04:01 enjoy it 16:04:02 "better than Windows" doesn't mean remotely good 16:04:39 Fare: I recommend you stay away from computers first and foremost. If you can make Unix crash without provocation, then you have other problems. 16:04:55 and even then, there are things where Windows is VASTLY better than Unix 16:05:03 (don't get me started with i18n) 16:05:12 My Linux boxes at home never go down unless I take them down. The Solaris boxes we have at work never go down 16:05:28 kc5tja: I can make unix have weird problems w/o provocation 16:05:30 This isn't about Windows versus Linux/Unix. This is whether you like/hate Unix. 16:05:50 the problem with unix is inconsistent config files 16:05:53 I hate Unix, because it's SO dumb and unconfigurable 16:05:55 Fare: Then that's your damn problem, not Unix. I've never had any problems with Unix. 16:06:06 * kc5tja can't believe he's hearing this. 16:06:06 yeah 16:06:12 kc5tja: because you don't use it 16:06:20 Fare: I use it every day. 16:06:24 kc5tja: This is IRC. Get used to it. :) 16:06:24 I never had any problem with a Mac... until I used it 16:06:38 heh 16:06:40 rob_ert: :-) 16:06:45 i successfully trolled up a flamewar 16:06:46 hooray!! 16:06:47 * kc5tja had major issues with the Mac, long before I used it. 16:06:51 That proves nothing. 16:06:58 n_: 10 points 16:06:58 n_: hehehe ;p 16:07:27 I never had a crash with a block of concrete. 16:07:34 that's the kind of robustness of unix: 16:07:44 so impractical to do anything with it, that you don't 16:07:45 Fare, you're being irrational. 16:07:50 and thus it doesn't crash 16:07:55 because you don't use it 16:08:15 or you try to do things, and that doesn't work 16:08:17 Yeah, whatever. 16:08:20 but it doesn't count as "crash" 16:08:28 it counts as massive brain damage 16:08:50 i think Fare has been flustered in the past by UNIX 16:09:03 and has carried a proverbial chip on his shoulder ever since. 16:09:14 Well, I've been flustered a bit by Unix too in the past, but that doesn't make me irrationally hate the operating system. 16:09:35 same here 16:09:38 who says it's irrational? 16:09:46 you are irrational to say it's irrational 16:09:52 it's amazing that something half as decent as unix has ever been accepted so widely by the computing world 16:09:54 Ooo...brilliant logic. 16:09:57 i'm kind of glad for it myself 16:10:15 it's not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, especially in this day and age 16:10:31 it was the right idea at the time, i think, on the big microcomputers and mainframes it was designed for 16:10:46 Fare: aren't you being more irrational by calling him irrational for saying you are irrational? 16:10:50 Well, as Fare pointed out, it really wasn't "designed" as such. 16:11:21 It was originally a joke version of Multics (the original name was Unics). 16:11:39 Designed mainly for two things: playing games, and handling e-mail and text. That's it. 16:12:22 It grew from there. 16:13:28 did you read that paper by Ken Thompson? 16:13:33 or was it dennis ritchie.. 16:14:21 hm yes. the problem is that it isn't an OS at all, but a tumour. 16:14:49 It meets all the requirements of an operating system; hence it's an OS. 16:14:50 and as such, it certainly has done admirably 16:15:07 So? I can play Beatles music with the tumour, so it's not a bad one :) 16:15:21 "how to sound cool by being condescending" 16:15:27 heh 16:15:30 good one, david 16:15:32 I will write it one day for aspiring IRC people 16:15:40 davidw: :) 16:16:05 "well, C is just shit, even forth, compared with a real language, it's no good" 16:16:29 "what language? well, you wouldn't know about it anyway... it has too many advanced concepts" 16:16:55 "it was defeated by marketing and stuff, and because everyone is morons, not geniuses like me" 16:17:08 heh 16:17:20 :) 16:17:31 davidw: You're my favourite cynical italian. 16:18:33 * davidw isn't Italian 16:18:41 he's fake italian 16:18:42 Bah. 16:18:46 You should be! 16:18:51 Where are you from? 16:18:56 Eugene, Oregon, USA 16:19:04 fakes as italian when ever it's good and is american when there are no terrorists around 16:19:06 I just live in Italy for the moment 16:19:23 (he lost passport and all money) 16:19:24 ;) 16:19:25 davidw: I see... then you're my favourite cynical american :( 16:19:37 I'm headed back to the bay area, actually - my girlfriend landed a biotech job there 16:19:51 now I need to find a job...yuck 16:21:12 Coding forth at NASA? I want to see another space shuttle crash :) 16:21:20 david: do you happen to know a Chris Schraner? 16:21:58 (random guy from Eugene) 16:22:13 never heard of him, that I recall at least 16:28:46 who is he/what does he do? 16:31:06 nothing I'm aware of, just someone I met awhile ago who had lived in Eugene. 16:31:12 i.e. it was just random/idle curiosity 16:31:46 Eugene is nice, but it's too 1) wet and 2) laid-back for my tastes 16:34:37 I like laid-back places. :) 16:34:51 * kc5tja thinks he has a virus on his computer...running virus scanner now. 16:35:27 Bizarre things are afoot ... floppy access, intermittent focus changes, ... 16:35:55 Anyway, I need to get to aikido, so arrivaderci... 16:36:22 --- quit: kc5tja ("THX QSO ES 73 DE KC5TJA/6 CL ES QRT AR SK") 16:37:23 ciao 16:37:25 woops 16:44:34 --- join: I440r_ (~mark4@1Cust104.tnt3.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 16:59:13 --- quit: mur ("MURR! end of file reached. continuing filling logs some other time.") 17:06:07 --- quit: I440r (No route to host) 17:20:23 --- quit: I440r_ ("Reality Strikes Again") 17:25:45 --- quit: XeF4 ("pois") 17:41:55 --- quit: davidw (Read error: 113 (No route to host)) 17:46:35 jessus 17:46:43 whatever happened to Ole Dolphin? 17:47:13 wow, eugene OR 17:47:18 i have an uncle who used to live ther 17:47:19 e 18:20:46 --- join: CrowKilr (Vapo_Rulez@cnq5-233.cablevision.qc.ca) joined #forth 18:21:10 --- quit: CrowKilr (Client Quit) 18:21:43 --- quit: Fare ("3053") 19:35:42 --- join: sbk_ (~kbs@dsl-65-184-98-221.telocity.com) joined #forth 19:50:12 --- quit: sbk_ ("Leaving") 20:04:50 --- quit: CrowKiller ("User pushed the X - because it's Xtra, baby") 20:13:28 --- join: fountainhead (~thin@h24-64-175-61.cg.shawcable.net) joined #forth 20:17:47 --- nick: fountainhead -> futhin 20:44:52 welllllllllllllllll 20:45:54 ... 20:46:43 hm, i'm bored and nobody is talking forth.. boo hoo! 20:48:30 --- quit: futhin ("sleep") 21:08:01 --- quit: rob_ert (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 21:09:03 --- join: rob_ert (~robert@h237n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 22:06:55 --- join: Serg_penguin (~snaga_NOI@nat-ch1.nat.comex.ru) joined #forth 22:18:03 --- quit: Serg_penguin (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/02.06.17