00:00:00 --- log: started forth/02.01.30 00:00:10 I have a red window, with some text at the bottom and nothing inbetween 00:00:25 yes 00:00:33 scroll down? 00:00:41 oic 00:00:44 heh 00:00:48 it even says scroll down on it :) 00:00:53 doesn't here 00:00:56 i've been playing around with machine code on my 486 for weeks 00:01:01 cool koft 00:01:11 what browser do you use 00:01:11 I suggest you remove the confusing space 00:01:26 communicator/linux 00:01:32 4.x? 00:01:35 4.75 00:01:37 yeah, I haven't checked it in 4.x 00:01:44 that has iffy css support 00:01:53 * ajkroll][ nods 00:02:03 forget css 00:02:06 I just threw these up 00:02:06 it's crap ;-) 00:02:10 css is great 00:02:13 for presentation 00:02:18 browsers can be crap though :) 00:02:56 it works in textual browsers and all the major browsers 00:03:03 so that is fine enough for me 00:03:06 ever seen my pages? 00:03:21 yeah 00:03:23 mine work with every single browser 00:03:24 the one you just gave me 00:03:34 I use to do every browser sites 00:03:36 check this commercial site I wrote 00:03:41 www.rhqc.com 00:03:50 but since I am using published standards by the w3c 00:04:01 I don't feel bad if a browser screwed up in rendering because of improper support 00:04:04 and yes, we are using our own certificates 00:04:36 eh, why ssl? 00:04:44 that won't work in every browser :) 00:04:51 was easier to make the entire site ssl 00:05:02 heh 00:05:12 that is going to lock out a lot of textual browsers 00:05:22 and any browser that doesn't support ssl 00:05:29 we usedto have an * certificate till verisign started eating everyone and charging outragious prices 00:05:40 yeah no crap 00:05:43 prices are enormous 00:05:45 and you can get ssl lynx 00:05:49 you can 00:05:52 yes 00:05:55 but it isn't very popular 00:05:58 nope 00:06:03 but it is available 00:06:04 most systems with text browsers have very old versions 00:06:06 heh 00:06:10 so is mozilla and ie :) 00:06:25 which render dist.org perfectly 00:06:30 identically 00:06:42 that is what is great about css 00:06:56 you can have it render perfectly yet still give people choice on what they want it rendered like 00:07:02 they can use their own custom css scripts 00:07:11 less is better 00:07:12 or you can also offer multiple css 00:07:21 and one day, you'll realize that less is better 00:07:26 I know less is better 00:07:31 my pages are 3.5k in size 00:07:40 and mine? 00:07:50 5.186 00:07:54 html 00:07:57 and then images 00:08:02 now consider the amount presented 00:08:05 :-) 00:08:10 much less on the front page 00:08:17 at least on rolling hills 00:08:20 * ajkroll][ nods 00:08:24 check dr.ea.ms 00:08:32 once it's in the inside page that is 00:08:56 4.5 + images 00:09:07 and lots to offer 00:09:07 and still less text heh 00:09:12 nope 00:09:16 lots of text there 00:09:20 less than dist.org 00:09:21 piles of links too 00:09:32 I am merely supporting CSS 00:09:38 it will look fine on any browser too 00:09:39 since it is an open standard 00:09:46 I completely believe in any browser rendering 00:09:52 that is why I use css instead of tables 00:10:04 since css is 100% backwards compatible 00:10:05 tables tend to work well tho 00:10:29 I know tables 100% 00:10:44 I did the table code for a massive site 00:10:46 heavy graphics 00:10:49 yup 00:11:01 and several other sites 00:11:07 been doing html for years =( 00:11:14 tables are extrememly handy to force size of the window 00:11:18 I always have to have everything perfect 00:11:23 well, CSS is much better 00:11:26 without doing stupid shit like java resize 00:11:34 java resize code totally pisses me off 00:11:36 one line of CSS code can do what fifty lines of table code would ordinarily do 00:11:41 damn, been a while since i saw some vic-20 stuff 00:11:55 koft: really now :-) 00:12:09 koft: I use one of my vic's to burn eproms 00:12:11 :-) 00:12:15 and your page just about put a hole in my subwoofer 00:12:17 much more eloquent 00:12:23 hahah koft 00:12:24 yeah 00:12:27 inline sound :) 00:12:29 no no 00:12:38 which page? 00:12:43 the hardware one 00:12:46 http://dr.ea.ms/hardware.html 00:12:49 it even plays on load 00:12:51 oh, with inspector gadget 00:13:00 yes yes :-) 00:13:11 www.whispercanyonsoaps.com 00:13:16 that is another site I am working on 00:13:31 i remember poking metal objects into the cart slot as a child, and watching the cool trippy patterns on the tv set 00:13:54 koft: great way to blow it up too 00:13:59 heh 00:14:12 I got shocked to hell and back once from the earphone plug on a 12" tv 00:14:20 i blew it i[ when i was 9 and fixed it back up when i was 13 00:14:33 blew the amp on it 00:14:34 * ajkroll][ nods 00:14:50 I have several hacked CMB equiptments 00:14:54 tvs with earplugs = dangerous 00:15:04 vic's, 64's, 128's 128D and a PET 2000 00:15:08 :-) 00:15:24 there's a broken plus/4 someplace here too 00:16:00 2 things I need to aquire yet tho 00:16:06 an amiga and an apple//gs 00:16:20 i remember piggybacking ram chips on my a1000 00:16:28 my old //e just isn't being nice l8ly 00:16:29 i miss that computer 00:17:15 i should get my ass in gear and reburn the mousetext rom for it too 00:17:21 rofl, 32mb sims on a vic20 00:17:25 err 32pin 00:17:36 30pin simms are for the c64/128's 00:17:48 that's a hacked 1750REU 00:17:53 which is a rare item 00:18:07 I use it mostly in cp/m mode 00:18:14 haha 00:18:18 makes a nice large ram disk for virtual memory 00:18:28 quick too 00:19:00 I still have to hack cp/m to accept my ajkdos hard disks, which will be really nice 00:19:19 and I still have to implement fast/burst on the card too 00:19:28 then it will scream 00:19:31 lol 00:20:00 you think I jest about ajkdos? 00:20:19 http://dr.ea.ms/devfin.jpg 00:20:25 that runs ajkdos 00:20:30 now that looked like fun to piece together 00:20:35 and anything else I toss at it 00:20:43 it took me only a week 00:20:48 I built it out of my head 00:20:59 does it work? 00:21:05 I recently finished the schematics 00:21:08 yes it works 00:21:17 god it is nice to get 270kB/s 00:21:23 i'm not to good at recalling pin assignments from memory 00:21:35 it's been working for the last 3 years serving .5tb of disk from my linux box to the c128/c64/vic20 00:22:46 rofl 00:22:46 http://dr.ea.ms/snowgirl/snowgirl2.jpg 00:22:54 that was my daughter's doing 00:23:00 is that a beer can? 00:23:01 :-) 00:23:03 yes 00:23:14 that was my doing 00:23:16 ;-) 00:23:23 your in canada? 00:23:26 so when do you come on irc ajk? 00:23:30 close enuff to it 00:23:30 I haven't seen you in a long time 00:23:46 ree: I normally don't pop on this network, actually 00:23:53 ohh? 00:23:54 which network 00:23:55 nope 00:23:57 i just moved from ottawa cause i got laid off 00:24:04 doh koft 00:24:06 sorry to hear that 00:24:09 usually LinuxNET and my own private network 00:24:18 your own private network? 00:24:22 yea 00:24:25 I was thinking of starting two servers 00:24:31 what ircd do you use 00:24:44 an ircd hybred + my hacks 00:24:55 no services? 00:25:09 my hacks allow true god mode for opers, like self ops, cross channel kills, etc 00:25:10 where is your server 00:25:26 my server is password protected 00:25:27 :-) 00:25:32 ohh 00:25:35 like I said, it's private 00:25:37 :-) 00:25:40 for just you? 00:25:52 just me, another node and about 8 people 00:25:56 or so 00:25:58 so how do I get access to it 00:26:09 you'd have to 00:26:24 1: have a need to communicate regularly to me or someone on it 00:26:30 2: keep it private 00:26:45 and we have enough nodes 00:26:50 2 is plenty 00:26:50 heh 00:26:54 if it is that much work 00:26:59 you ever play around with thoes forth chips? 00:27:07 I don't like secrets =) 00:27:09 koft: nope 00:27:28 ree: there's no secrets, it's just we like to keep assholes off of our network of friends 00:27:51 yeah 00:27:54 we're all very close and tight 00:28:02 we're a sub-community 00:28:11 liuke a family almost 00:28:20 yeah, I have a few people like that 00:28:27 and most of us have actually met each other in person 00:28:29 well, I'd be interested in joining 00:28:37 just for technical stuff 00:28:42 well 00:28:43 I want to get into engineering 00:28:48 but if not then fine 00:28:54 there are some, but very few tech people there 00:28:59 god it has been a long time since I've used 4.x 00:29:17 I for example am probabbl the only hardware guru there 00:29:28 there's a few coders 00:29:31 wow, 4.x barfs 00:29:33 on it 00:29:35 a few people do db 00:29:43 one guy works for lycos 00:29:53 etc 00:30:11 we're all pretty close people 00:30:31 if you really want to pick more tech minds, I reccomend linuxnet 00:30:46 hmm 00:30:52 which I frequent and have been a member of since inception 00:30:58 I'd just love to find people with similar interests 00:30:59 and yes, I am an oper there 00:31:05 :-) 00:31:19 I can't find anyone interested in ai, os dev, and organization starting =) 00:31:32 well, scratch that, I know a few cool people here 00:31:33 linuxnet #linux is the place to find minds 00:31:36 i tried to write an os 00:31:49 spent a year and ended up with shit 00:31:50 I don't really use linux 00:31:51 just be aware that alot of them can be quite rough 00:32:07 they're not indifferent to new os's or ideas 00:32:09 hah koft 00:32:13 it's all in the presentation 00:32:19 i did however make good use of my isa trident card 00:32:20 yeah, well 00:32:29 I am indifferent to general purpose systems 00:32:32 and how they are coded today 00:32:36 * ajkroll][ nods 00:32:44 lots of code in linux is utter shit 00:32:45 I don't mix well with other os hobbiest or programmers 00:32:55 the scsi subsystems aren't even maintained 00:33:07 yeah 00:33:10 and that's just one example 00:33:11 scsi is much better on freebsd 00:33:25 and that is why I use IDE, other than the cost 00:37:32 I think that today I'm going to attempt a backup... 00:37:38 it's been a long long time 00:37:57 and these hdd failures are driving me nuts 00:38:23 only big problem is, in doing so, I do lose the old backups 00:38:27 :-/ 00:38:39 * ajkroll][ looks at the spare 60g in the crash box 00:38:51 perhaps I can archive that off first 00:39:34 7.99 gigs used 00:39:57 * ajkroll][ scans arround for a free 10g disk 00:40:12 I should have something available someplace 00:41:52 damn win32 00:42:21 i never have problems with php or apache on bsd 00:42:38 and all my equipment is in ottawa 00:43:57 u ever gone to OLS? 00:44:34 no, whats that 00:44:58 ottowa linux symposium 00:45:40 no i havent, when was the last one? 00:45:54 last spring 00:45:58 i spent 8 months in ottawa working for a security company 00:46:04 guys keep bugging me to go 00:46:16 I just can't justify the expense 00:46:25 how much does it cost? 00:46:39 couplea hun 00:46:47 you wont see me there (: 00:47:14 I would, but... 00:47:15 most likely travel costs 00:47:17 i dont go to thoes things unless my jobbie job pays for the ticket, and they rarely do 00:47:18 not admissions :) 00:47:21 I can't justify it 00:47:52 the only OS meeting I've been to 00:47:57 was OS/2 stuff 00:48:09 never been to any unix conventions 00:48:13 anybody here play around with colorforth? 00:48:30 my friend has 00:48:33 cant seem to back space when i messup a definition 00:48:34 he'll be working on it 00:48:58 i ripped the keys out of an old keyboard to make it easier to use 00:49:03 wierd stuff 00:49:28 maybe try pressing shift+backspace 00:50:02 i dont think he uses the shift keys for anything 00:50:26 just some of the letter keys, and j and z are on a different code page, so to use thoes you have to switch the keymap 00:54:19 it's painfully slow 02:18:31 --- quit: ajkroll][ ("system preps") 02:49:06 --- quit: koft () 06:41:06 --- join: Stepan (~stepan@Charybdis.suse.de) joined #forth 06:41:10 hi... 06:41:12 hey 06:41:45 ree: what exactly belongs into the "dictionary"? 06:42:04 as far as i got this now, it's a linked list in a continuous part of the memory 06:43:31 containing the word name and it's compiled tokens 06:43:49 heh, I know 0 about forth, sorry 06:43:55 but that sounds about right 06:44:01 as well as additional flags for being immediate or being a variable, an function or alike 06:44:46 i want to rebuild feval from openbios, so that it's capable of getting most of the stuff running in forth itself instead of plain c 10:50:21 --- quit: ree (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 11:53:05 --- join: I440r (~mark4@1Cust60.tnt2.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 11:56:25 I440r: is a forth dictionary a contiguous memory region that consists of concatenated entries of the form ( pointer to next entry, word name, immediate?-flag, (word definition, var len)) ? 12:05:09 ok 12:05:26 head space and actual code space CAN be seperate but usually isnt 12:05:48 plus_link dd _pointer to previous word 12:05:58 db length of name field 12:06:06 db 'name field for this word" 12:06:14 db pointer to this words code space 12:06:21 this_words_code_space: 12:06:25 call nest 12:06:29 dd pointer to 12:06:32 dd words that 12:06:34 dd this word 12:06:36 dd execuets 12:06:38 dd unnest 12:07:06 dd pointer to plus link (previous word might have been '+' - this one might be '-' 12:07:11 db lenght byte 12:07:18 db 'name field' 12:07:27 the length byte is also a flags byte 12:07:49 there is usually 5 bits reserved for name field lingth 12:07:56 so 0x1f is a good mask :) 12:08:12 then you have 0x40 as an immediate bit 12:08:20 if that bit is set the word is immediate 12:11:39 ah 12:13:10 there are no other flags like immediate? is immediate different from compile only? 12:13:35 i saw immediate restrict .. what exactly is that? 12:13:35 yes compile only is another flag 12:13:47 it says that you cannot execute a word that is compile only 12:14:00 there is also traditionally a flag to reveal a word 12:14:14 until the word is revealed it is not linked into the dictionary 12:14:29 : foo blah blah (craps out here) 12:14:31 sounds useful 12:14:35 foo wont be in the dictionary 12:14:42 : foo blah blah blah ; 12:14:43 yes, so it keeps the dictionary sane 12:14:51 the ; reveales foo 12:14:58 not only that it allows this 12:15:03 : foo blah blah blah ; 12:15:15 : foo blah foo blah ; 12:15:18 teh second foo calls the first foo 12:15:31 if the second foo was already revealed at that point it would be recursive 12:16:37 aah! this makes sense... 12:17:13 so RECURSIVE would reveal the current word before ; is encountered? 12:18:04 yes 12:18:27 isforth will NOT have "recursive" 12:18:33 unless someone else adds it :P 12:19:39 what makes isforth special? very slim approach? 12:19:53 well 12:20:02 its for linux 12:20:20 its intended to be a complete forth development environment 12:20:26 not a minimal one like eforth 12:20:39 and unlike 99% of all the other forths 12:20:47 isforth isnt trying to be ans compliant 12:20:58 why restrict myself to such a shitty standard ? 12:21:11 and it does NOT use libc ANYWHERE in the kernel 12:21:14 indeed not a bad idea. 12:21:31 it will eventually have teh ability to use libc within application code tho 12:21:37 so the kernel should compile about anywhere.. 12:21:56 the kernel will compile on any linux x86 or fbsd x86 12:22:11 it will be abel to run on either OS 12:22:35 the only difference realy between how isforth runs on linux or fbsd is the way in which syscalls are made 12:22:43 fbsd pushes the parameters onto the stack 12:22:55 linux puts them in registers 12:23:07 so we have a linux-syscall-source-file 12:23:17 and a fbsd-syscall-source-file 12:23:23 u include the one you are going to use 12:23:25 mnake linux 12:23:29 make freebsd 12:23:45 nice! 12:24:45 i'm still thinkin about how to finnish the open firmware evaluator kernel.. but i recognize that it's not too smart writing code when being clueless about forth internals 12:25:19 hehehe 12:27:36 uh.. gotta go home and eat sth... 12:27:41 i hope i will be back later. 12:27:45 :) 12:28:43 --- quit: Stepan ("Do you think it is air you are breathing? Hmm?") 13:12:51 --- quit: I440r (No route to host) 13:24:23 --- join: MrReach (~mrreach@209.181.43.190) joined #forth 14:33:23 --- join: Stepan (~sr@pD9E53EF2.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #forth 14:53:51 --- join: I440r (~mark4@1Cust204.tnt2.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 14:54:13 mrdood! 15:08:15 hihi 15:08:26 just leaving the house (gotta go to library) 15:14:11 k :) 15:42:40 --- join: aum` (~aum@l76-145.world-net.co.nz) joined #forth 15:51:17 hi dood 15:51:25 im debugging isforth with ddd 15:51:26 --- join: ree (user@ip68-3-237-161.ph.ph.cox.net) joined #forth 15:51:26 grrr 15:51:32 its a pile of SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 15:51:34 ddd i mean 15:51:35 heh 16:09:20 yeh - ddd is a bit painful 16:09:32 * aum` confesses to liking the msvc debugger 16:20:33 ugh 16:20:39 i like d386 16:20:48 but its dos :P 16:21:11 tried to get eric isaacson to make a linux version of a86/d86 but he wont :P 16:22:23 looked at nasm? 16:22:36 i prefer that one a lot to the gnu toolchain crap ;) 16:23:25 nasm is what i use for assembling isforth 16:23:34 but nasm is a pile of shit compared to a386 16:23:46 and i have to use an UN-OFFICIAL version of nasm too 16:23:53 and nasm does not come with a debugger 16:24:21 it comes with a REALY shitty disassembler tho 16:24:29 when i last looked at a386 i was used to m68k asm, and then everything using intel assembly looks like like a big pile of shit ;) 16:24:36 about as usefull as tits on a boar hog 16:24:48 heh 16:24:54 i used ndisasm for my bios research 8) 16:25:06 u prolly looked at a86 - a86 = shareware - a386 = registered version 16:25:09 but sync points did not work 16:25:19 sync points ? 16:25:20 ah.. yes. i never bought anything 16:25:27 i did 16:25:31 ndisasm can sync on code points.. 16:25:51 but the versions i tried stopped disassembling at those addresses instead of syncing 16:25:52 its crap - get ida pro :) 16:25:56 i regged THAT too heh 16:26:33 i regged mtv... i wish i didnt 16:26:54 they never answered any of my dozen mails 16:27:52 mtv - the mpeg player ? 16:27:59 i cracked it hehe 16:28:09 but then - i never use it anyay 16:28:12 yepp. i registered it since they had an alpha version 16:28:18 yep.. its crappy.. 16:28:30 xine or alike are much better nowadays anyways.. 16:28:55 i once cracked maplevr3 for linux.. *g* that was a beast - and found regnrs from university 2 weeks later 16:29:08 ? 16:31:16 the math software.. it's pretty nice.. if one happens to need that stuff 16:31:58 ok - i can run.... ./isforth : constant create , does\> @ \; 16:32:05 i have to escape teh > and the ; 16:32:14 i have an array called tail 16:32:15 i say 16:32:19 tail count type 16:32:26 and it shows the complete command tail 16:32:45 restrung together - linux breaks the tail up into individula asciiz strings 16:33:04 if i try INTERPRET that string - in any way - i segfault 16:33:08 cant copy it into tib 16:33:12 cant point tip at it 16:34:24 erm tiB even 16:34:25 grr 16:34:48 heh 16:34:57 I like nasm since it is free + open source 16:35:03 and doesn't do any of the red tape crap 16:35:30 I want just an assembler not a frigging language on top 16:36:14 plus it is pretty up to date for instruction support 16:36:14 --- join: qless (~qless@clgr000977.hs.telusplanet.net) joined #forth 16:36:47 heya mrreach, long time no see 16:36:56 wb qless 16:37:00 hi ree 16:37:01 hi qless :) 16:37:14 i44Or 16:38:51 so who's the geniuses behind isforth? 16:39:05 you just siad it 16:39:11 said 16:39:16 hehe 16:39:19 that would be me :P 16:39:32 cool. got a url for it? 16:39:41 i used to 16:39:53 i removed the sourceforge project 16:40:04 i can send u the lastest code thru dcc tho if u want 16:40:36 sure 16:41:05 ok hang on :) 16:41:58 --- join: I440r_ (mark4@1Cust204.tnt2.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 16:42:12 cant dcc thru ipmasq - will dcc froim here :) 16:42:19 ok 16:42:59 are u in fbsd or linux ? 16:43:13 linux 16:43:25 i know the linux syscall stuff is working properly, need tcn to make sure teh fbsd stuff works rite 16:43:28 when u get it - extact it 16:43:36 ive included nasm in there 16:43:41 the 98e version 16:43:48 you cannot make without that version 16:43:59 ok 16:44:01 put teh bin somewhere in ur path and type 16:44:05 make linux 16:44:15 ull get a ~/isforth/isforth executable then 16:44:27 ./isforth blah blah blah this stuff is ignored right now 16:44:38 tail count type 16:44:38 hehe 16:44:41 : constant create , does> @ ; 16:44:47 that will show does> works 16:45:05 theres still alot of work to be done - we REALY REALY need an assembler 16:45:08 but i HATE 16:45:10 ax # 5 mov 16:45:27 hmmm 16:45:30 i wont have that - isforths assembler will be a SANE assembler 16:45:37 asm == asm - forth == forth 16:46:04 ? 16:46:09 SANE assembler? 16:46:21 yes 16:46:31 using rpn in your assembler just because you are in forth 16:46:35 is a dipshit thing 16:46:40 totally fucked up 16:46:44 assembler is 16:46:47 mov ax, 5 16:46:49 NOT 5 # ax mov 16:47:08 --- quit: I440r_ ("BitchX: its wax ecstatic") 16:47:10 rpn? 16:47:15 pardon me, but sane is: mov $5,%ax 16:47:17 :-) 16:47:24 ugh 16:47:26 u need help 16:47:27 movw $5, %ax 16:47:28 heh 16:47:33 not mov =) 16:47:44 at+t only did that to fuck with peoples heads 16:47:49 no 16:47:54 they did that for fast assembling 16:47:58 and everyone with any intel knows that gcc is a pile of shit :P 16:48:03 so how can gas be any better :P 16:48:05 as is a lot faster than most other assemblers 16:48:11 erm 16:48:18 have you seen how fast a386 assembles ? 16:48:26 because it has to be a backend to gcc 16:48:36 I do not like aXXX 16:48:40 its ugly 16:48:57 a386 is the best damned assembler i have ever used on ANY processor 16:49:06 and you think of some asm - i prolly know it 16:49:06 plus it is commercial 16:49:11 its shareware :) 16:49:13 i regged it 16:49:19 a86 is shareware 16:49:31 it should be open source and free 16:49:34 for me to bother with it 16:49:34 a386 is what you get when you register 16:49:53 does a386 deal ok with 3dnow and mmxext? 16:49:58 neway - check out my scratchings - let me know what u think :) 16:49:59 the worst tool of all to have closed source is an assembler of all things 16:50:08 not sure - he prolly added those extentions 16:50:25 --- join: kholmes (~kholmes@client555.sedona.net) joined #forth 16:50:45 oh - when u check out isforth 16:50:51 do not execute the word "crashme" 16:50:55 ull seg fault :P 16:51:00 heh 16:51:03 you can debug that for me if u want :) 16:51:16 plus nasm will work on several oses 16:51:18 its in isforth.asm i think 16:51:23 aXXX just works on dos 16:51:26 nasm is an "ok" assembler 16:51:29 i have issues with it 16:51:34 for instance 16:51:38 it is standard intel syntax 16:51:41 in the official version 16:51:48 %define x 2 16:51:53 %define y x 16:51:55 yeah I know 16:51:56 %define x 3 16:51:58 the define bug 16:51:59 changes both x and y 16:52:03 heh, every software has bugs 16:52:16 it defines y as a pointer to x 16:52:27 i reported this and they said that was a usefull feature 16:52:33 i replied tahts aa crock of shit 16:52:43 anywhere you would use Y in teh above just use X 16:53:02 y should be defined as a new v%define with the same value as x 16:53:06 changing x shouldnt change y 16:53:12 they refused to fix it 16:53:12 hehe 16:53:23 they now have %xdefine no? 16:53:27 theres absolutely NO application for defining y as a pointer to x 16:53:32 no 16:53:36 98 e does 16:53:38 nasm doesnt 16:53:39 * kholmes hopes for bug-free software. 16:53:49 you are forgetting 16:53:56 the 98.XX versions released 16:54:19 I want to make my own syntax though 16:54:23 condensed syntax 16:54:35 mov ax, 4 lacks a lot of style =) 16:54:40 i do not believe the official versions of nasm have %xdefine 16:54:48 official smicial 16:55:02 netwide project is no more I believe 16:55:03 mov ax,4 ; move value into ax 16:55:09 it has now been taken over by contributors 16:55:12 mov ax, [4] ; move contents of memory into ax 16:55:19 your point? 16:55:23 I am saying the syntax sucks 16:55:30 I want to make something better 16:55:33 how would you improve it 16:55:35 its simple 16:55:36 like brainfuck =) 16:55:39 it gets teh job done 16:55:44 or ook 16:55:48 theres no "flair" to it because it doesnt need it :P 16:55:51 ++++++---* 16:55:55 <<><--++ 16:56:28 arrows? 16:56:31 heh 16:56:33 that is brain fuck 16:56:40 ahh 16:56:40 brainfuck would be easy to do in forth if you put spaces between the operators 16:56:47 grr how do i make my x have xset -s off by default ? 16:56:52 * kholmes understands the name. 16:57:04 ive tried putting that in my .xinitrc and it still fucking blanks!@ 16:57:13 I440r: I put that in my .bashrc 16:57:37 you cant xset in .bashrc unless you use shitty xdm or family 16:57:43 xset has NO application outside x 16:57:51 and i never BOOT to x 16:57:57 i startx when i need it 16:58:13 * kholmes uses xdm because why the fuck not 16:58:20 heh 16:59:23 hopefully...OSes will someday not have a character interface 17:00:12 hee 17:00:16 lamah :P 17:00:27 do you use windomaker ???? :) 17:00:32 nope 17:00:34 want my windowmaker dockable app ? 17:00:37 grrr u are lame! 17:00:40 windowmaker rox!!!! 17:00:46 its okay 17:01:13 time to get some work done... thanks I440r 17:01:16 it would be a bit better if it had a stask bar 17:01:26 --- quit: qless ("changing dimensions") 17:01:36 ? 17:01:43 nah 17:01:46 pwm and ion rock 17:01:51 it does 17:01:56 F12 or something 17:02:04 widnowmaker doesnt have a task bar does it ? 17:02:09 \no 17:02:15 that pops up the menu 17:02:28 heh...even better =) 17:02:52 no i mean a task bar so you can bring windows to the front without having to minimise the ones hiding it :P 17:03:39 F12 doesn't minimize anything 17:04:24 --- quit: aum` () 17:08:27 --- quit: kholmes ("school") 17:12:34 and it doesnt tell me what programs are running 17:12:44 or allow me to bring them to the front of the windows they cover either 18:12:12 --- quit: Stepan ("[x]chat") 18:15:07 --- join: BikoZaar (BounceBack@ip68-11-180-77.br.no.cox.net) joined #forth 18:16:19 hi biko 18:16:22 u code forth ? 18:16:37 Hi.. I used to code forth... 18:16:51 well... get back to it dood :) 18:16:54 Have not had the opportunity in a while 18:17:00 would u class urself as an expert ? 18:17:07 Last I did was f-pc... great development 18:17:08 fairly knowledgabel ? 18:17:13 yes 18:17:18 isforth is loosly based on fpc 18:17:32 my version of fpc is ALOT smaller than tom zimmers 18:17:41 first thing i did was remove the definition for ALIAS!!!! 18:17:43 alias 18:17:46 I'm ok...just looked over some of mty source....hard to decipher 18:17:49 then i removed all aliases heh 18:17:50 words up 18:18:07 anybody using forth for machine control? 18:18:13 i could metacompile and extend on my old dx-266 in 6 seconds with MY version of fpc heh 18:18:30 mrreach does i believe 18:18:37 if u mean "in here" 18:18:43 yeah... 18:19:04 bongo (whe he is here) prlly does too he 18:19:06 heh 18:20:25 Amybody actively developing apps in forth? 18:22:00 few people are 18:22:00 im developing a linux forth 18:22:02 a REAL one 18:22:03 heh 18:22:09 most people develop their own forth 18:22:10 then ill do apps heh 18:22:13 rather than any apps from forth =) 18:22:20 shaddap :P 18:22:34 hehe 18:22:52 Did the "write your own forth like programming language in C++ thing too" 18:23:11 No, seriously....any dev' in forth? 18:26:29 hehe 18:26:33 yeah there is 18:26:36 mostly embedded 18:27:36 embedded as in part of an app...or emmbedded as in part of a hardware product? 18:29:38 embedded is like in microwaves 18:29:40 or your car 18:29:46 etc 18:30:31 microwaves as in o'reilly or as in range? 18:31:07 hehe your microwave and your washing machine and your car are all computer controled these days :P 18:31:10 so is your fridge 18:31:36 yep... 18:31:49 I'd like to get back into embedded products.... 18:32:42 electrical engineering -- to -- controls engineering -- to -- software engineering ..and dealign with end users can suck 18:32:50 im a consultant software engineer 18:32:57 i specialise in embedded control 18:33:06 none of that object obfuscated bs for me :) 18:33:20 --- join: TheBlueWizard (~tbw@ip-216-25-205-192.vienna.va.fcc.net) joined #forth 18:33:20 --- mode: ChanServ set mode: +o TheBlueWizard 18:33:26 hiya all 18:33:27 hehe 18:33:31 Hello 18:33:50 if the engieer has to deal with teh end users then he will be spending ZERO time developing :P 18:33:53 tbw!!!! 18:34:16 hiya I440r :) what's your email addy? the purplecoder.com seems to be dead 18:34:23 Preachign to the choir... 18:34:33 it is dead 18:34:42 hte server is 2 feet to my left using a dial in :P 18:34:50 * TheBlueWizard nods re: engineer and the tech support angle sucking up the oxygen 18:34:51 I440r@mailcity.com 18:35:19 * TheBlueWizard scribbles down the new email addy; he's on Linux machine now 18:36:55 rotating pagers suck too...nature of the biz...write devices that test lines and tanks in gas stations and get phonecalls from people who don't know how to change printer paper rolls 18:37:00 yeah 18:37:06 flashbacks...ahhh 18:37:20 tbw u wanna see isforth ? 18:37:55 or did i send u a copy of the "actually working" version ? heh 18:38:51 you sent me the file last nite; I haven't look at it 18:39:25 will get to look at it sometimes later this week :) 18:39:41 aha ok :) 18:39:50 i cant remember that far back hehe 18:39:53 its old age u know 18:40:31 tcn emailed me back!!!! 18:40:36 1440r what is isforth? 18:40:36 brb :) 18:40:59 isforth is my linux forth compiler (under devel) 18:41:06 does not use libc 18:41:32 own libs? 18:41:52 syscalls 18:42:13 written in assembler 18:42:13 not c 18:42:13 any forth written in c 18:42:16 is NOT (re read that) forth 18:42:33 or isn't optimized forth.... 18:43:02 is it a til? 18:43:04 optimizing ANY code other than by hand is EVIL 18:43:17 isforth wont do any behind your back modification of your code 18:43:42 brb 18:43:42 can't remember that far back?! Gadzooks! BTW I filed a bug report...yaah! 18:43:44 --- quit: I440r () 18:44:03 --- join: I440r (~mark4@1Cust204.tnt2.bloomington.in.da.uu.net) joined #forth 18:44:07 there 18:44:16 ok 18:44:32 isforth does not even use libc library, so you don't have to wait for any stupid upgrades :) 18:44:34 had to switch to bitchx on my laptop :) 18:44:44 theres another thing 18:44:55 when they upgrade libc - isforth WONT BREAK!!!!!!! 18:44:56 heh 18:45:13 yep... 18:47:09 {repeat plus expansion} can't remember that far back?! Gadzooks! BTW I filed a bug report...yaah! It is Bug #131485 :) 18:47:34 my second bug report 18:47:40 hehe 18:47:43 ive filed 3 or 4 18:47:45 * TheBlueWizard loves to report bugs 18:47:49 heh 18:48:01 thinking of reporting a gazillion bugs with gdb and ddd 18:48:10 the biggest bug in both is that they suck 18:48:35 take care 18:48:42 l8er... 18:48:45 --- part: BikoZaar left #forth 18:48:54 nite dood :) 18:50:05 bye I440r 18:50:21 lol re: your idea of bug reporting 18:50:27 im not going anywhere :P 18:50:33 bika left :P 18:50:37 oops 18:50:40 heh 18:50:43 dopy :P 18:50:52 just realized BikoZaar left, not you 18:50:53 u must be blind too :P 18:51:05 I blame it on screen swapping :) 18:51:15 screen swapping ??? :) 18:51:31 yaah! gotta enjoy my new life as a blind guy 18:51:57 oh, the Alt-Fn to switch screens on console based Linux 18:52:32 * TheBlueWizard is websucking teamone ml stuff :) 18:53:57 had to finetune the options hehe 18:54:35 anyway, what's your estimation of completion of isforth at this point? 18:54:53 e.g. 56% finished, whatever 18:55:30 aha heh ya gotta love that bit :) 18:55:41 huh? 18:55:43 i remember my dad used to run doubledos on his pc wayu back 18:55:59 which allowed him to have 2 concurrant dos's running on the same machine 18:56:07 he would run his bbs in the background shell 18:56:24 ah...talking about screen swapping hehe 18:56:35 never heard of doubledos tho 18:56:50 doubledos was neat back in the 80's heh 18:57:00 for a dos yeah 18:57:04 my god that was 20 years ago!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 18:57:09 gawd im gettin OLD!!!!!!!!!!!!1 18:57:10 heh 18:57:17 i even remember the 70's!!!!!!! 18:57:47 um...IIRC 20 years ago there is only one type of DOS...namely PCDOS (MSDOS) 18:57:59 thats right 18:58:07 doubledos ran under one of the above 18:58:10 IBM started selling the original PC in'81 18:58:15 and gave you 2 consoles 18:58:26 hmm... 18:59:47 and I was a high scooler back then...dabbling in 6502 assembly (hex, of corse; I'm cheap) on Apple ][ at school, and on PDP-11 line terminal at school as well 18:59:50 well i guess tcn isnt interested in helping devel isforth atm :( 18:59:56 schooler even 19:00:37 btw I located Jet Thomas' email addy; scoured comp.lang.forth for it :) 19:01:04 cool - find out if he would like to join isforth devel ? 19:02:49 will email to Jet sometimes later this week (from Winblows cuz I have problem w/ email setup on my Linux....fortunately I just acquired a 486 and I plan to put various stuff on 486's Winblows (e.g dsniff, backorifice, whatever) just to figure out what the hell Outlook is sending out so I can imitate it on my Linux :) 19:03:22 * TheBlueWizard likes to be a bit devious with Win stuff 19:03:22 ugh dont use microsoft look out!!! 19:03:39 just configure netscape to use ur pop and smtp servers from ur isp 19:04:10 hey, at this point, it is working...the Linux one (fetchmail) isn't, and I'm trying to find out why 19:05:38 don't wanna d/l Netscape...big...and I heard it sometimes crashes big time 19:05:46 erm i dont use fetchmail - i just configure netscape to use my isp's pop and smtp :) 19:05:53 yea 19:05:55 get mozilla 19:06:01 its big too but doesnt crash as much :) 19:06:07 moz has email? 19:06:08 tho it still has deficiencies 19:06:11 yes 19:06:18 mozilla == netscape 6 19:06:29 cept netscape 6 is about 5 years or so behind in devel 19:06:47 hmm...I don't have X win on my Linux...am waiting for woody to become stable first 19:07:08 hehe re: netscape being late 19:08:47 woody is stable ennuff realy 19:08:51 i use woody everywhere 19:08:57 dont have a single potato machine 19:09:02 even my laptop runs woody 19:09:03 and has x 19:09:06 once the Linux side is working (email) and woody becomes stable, then I can really move over...tho' it is a lot of work 19:09:11 and i have the worlds shitties laptop hehe 19:09:22 installed bare minimum potato (no x etc) 19:09:34 did a dist-upgrade (took 11 hours) 19:09:40 then installed xfree 4.x 19:10:19 world's shittiest laptop? I have seen one such laptop; it looked like it was originally made for us govt (high security) ... boy, no floppy drive! 19:10:40 ouch! 19:11:00 no 19:11:06 worlds shittiest dial in 19:11:09 did i say laptop ? 19:11:10 no 19:11:14 my laptop is realy neat :) 19:11:25 you did say laptop 19:12:08 my mistook :) 19:13:37 hehe...you must be aging at an alarming rate! ;) 19:14:35 heh 19:14:37 i am!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 19:16:37 ha ha....by Friday you'd be dead, and then who'll take care of isforth? :P 19:17:46 * TheBlueWizard discovers that his webget uses a wrong setting...arrrgh! so he killed the webgetting 19:17:57 8-P 19:20:06 * TheBlueWizard is fixing his bash profile to get it right this tine hehe 19:23:10 fixed....notes that it is 10:22 PM here, so gotta go to bed now for a LONG day tomorrow (two major mtgs...whee!) 19:23:42 gotta go...bye! 19:23:50 nite :) 19:23:55 nite :) 19:24:01 --- part: TheBlueWizard left #forth 20:13:41 --- quit: I440r ("Reality Strikes Again!") 21:28:55 --- join: aum` (~aum@l76-145.world-net.co.nz) joined #forth 21:37:21 --- join: kholmes (~kholmes@client1145.sedona.net) joined #forth 22:25:25 --- quit: aum` () 22:31:08 --- quit: ree (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 23:40:06 --- quit: kholmes ("zzzs") 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/02.01.30