Subj : Re: REPOST Post-Quantum Secure Encryption To : warmfuzzy From : warmfuzzy Date : Wed Aug 05 2026 01:06:39 On 03 Aug 2026, warmfuzzy said the following... wa> The algorithms currently recognized as secure against post-quantum wa> decryption are those that rely on mathematical problems which are wa> believed to be hard for both classical and quantum computers to solve. wa> Unlike traditional public-key systems such as RSA and elliptic-curve wa> cryptography, which can be broken efficiently by a large-scale quantum wa> computer using Shor's algorithm, the new post-quantum standards are wa> based on different mathematical foundations. The United States National wa> Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) finalized its first set of wa> post-quantum cryptography standards on August 13, 2024, establishing wa> three primary algorithms for widespread use. wa> wa> The first standard is ML-KEM, formerly known as CRYSTALS-Kyber. This is wa> a module-lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism designed for general wa> encryption and key exchange. It allows two parties to establish a shared wa> secret key over an insecure channel, replacing algorithms like wa> Diffie-Hellman or RSA key transport. ML-KEM is considered secure wa> because it relies on the hardness of solving certain lattice problems, wa> specifically the Module Learning With Errors problem, which has not wa> been shown to be vulnerable to quantum attacks. wa> wa> For digital signatures, NIST standardized two distinct algorithms to wa> provide flexibility for different use cases. The primary signature wa> standard is ML-DSA, formerly known as CRYSTALS-Dilithium. Like ML-KEM, wa> this is a module-lattice-based scheme. It is designed to be efficient wa> and suitable for most general-purpose digital signing needs, such as wa> authenticating software updates or securing TLS connections. Its wa> security is also based on lattice problems that are resistant to wa> quantum computation. wa> wa> The second signature standard is SLH-DSA, formerly known as SPHINCS+. wa> This is a stateless hash-based signature scheme. Unlike the wa> lattice-based options, its security relies entirely on the properties wa> of cryptographic hash functions, which are believed to be much more wa> resilient to quantum attacks than number-theoretic problems. While wa> hash-based signatures generally produce larger signature sizes and can wa> be slower than lattice-based ones, they offer a very conservative wa> security assumption that does not depend on the complex mathematics of wa> lattices. This makes SLH-DSA an important backup option in case wa> weaknesses are discovered in lattice-based cryptography in the future. wa> wa> In addition to these three primary standards, NIST has selected FALCON wa> as an alternative lattice-based signature algorithm for situations wa> where smaller signature sizes are critical, although it is not yet part wa> of the initial mandatory federal standards. It is worth noting that wa> symmetric-key algorithms like AES and hash functions like SHA-2 and wa> SHA-3 are not completely immune to quantum speedups but remain secure wa> if their key lengths or output sizes are doubled to counter Grover's wa> algorithm, a quantum search algorithm. Therefore, while asymmetric wa> encryption and signatures require a complete switch to these new wa> post-quantum algorithms, symmetric cryptography primarily requires wa> adjusting key sizes to maintain security levels against quantum wa> adversaries. Organizations are currently advised to begin migrating wa> their systems to these NIST-standardized algorithms to protect data wa> against future threats posed by quantum computing. wa> wa> Cheers! wa> -warmfuzzy/SilentPartner wa> wa> --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64) wa> * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37) --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64) * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37) .