Subj : Re: Pascal compiler of ch
To   : Vk3jed
From : Deavmi
Date : Fri Jun 09 2017 21:33:00

On 08/06/2017 01:29, Vk3jed wrote:
> -=> Deavmi wrote to Vk3jed <=-
>   >
>   De> Very fun. I love the syntax. Old languages are fun. I was never around
>   De> in those times (born in 1999) but hell do I love them. My grand mother
>   De> was a systems analyst and did Fortran, COBOL, Pascal and probably more
>   De> back in those days.
> 
> I did BASIC, Pascal and FORTRAN in the 80s-90s.  Never had to deal with COBOL,
> because my studies were in engineering.  I particularly enjoyed Pascal and
> FORTRAN, Pascal, particularly Turbo Pascal, had a lot of great features.
> FORTRAN was awesome for engineering type problems, with built in support for
> complex numbers (used all the time in communication and power systems) - no
> need for my normal complex number types and procedures, which I kept up my
> sleeve for programs.  From memory, the complex type was a record with 2 fields
> of type real - "real" and "imaginary".
> 
> 
> .... 12 Hours Of Work!! What Do You Mean Disk Error??
> --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
>   ¨ Synchronet ¨ Freeway BBS in Bendigo, Australia.
> 
I love how the type is a record. Just makes me feel happy to see data 
structures. Probably just a programmer thing. :) You feel me right XD?
---
 ­ Synchronet ­ KK4QBN + (706)-422-9538 + kk4qbn.synchro.net + 24/7/365

.