Subj : Re: Testing
To   : Nightfox
From : Vk3jed
Date : Fri Apr 24 2020 11:08:00

-=> On 04-22-20 19:49, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

 Ni> @VIA: DIGDIST
 Ni>   Re: Re: Testing
 Ni>   By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 2020 11:25 am

 Ni>> Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
 Ni>> message is on my BBS..  I did get one reply on my BBS that came up
 Ni>> in DeveloperNet Announcements.  I'm not sure where the mixup might
 Ni>> be.  I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the
 Ni>> internal messagebase codes are different..

 Vk> And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?

 Ni> Yes, as far as I know. I downloaded the latest info pack for StarNet
 Ni> and set up the conference numbers with the hub according to the info
 Ni> pack.  The conference numbers are only applicable on the hub (the
 Ni> conference numbers on my BBS are irrelevant), and StarNet's conference
 Ni> numbers are in the 8000 range.

Yeah it's making sure they match the hub that's critical.  I'm the same with
DOVE-Net.  The conference numbers on VERT (and what I've configured my system
to talk to) are in the 2000s range.  But on my system, they are in the 3000s. 
I've used static numbers that are exactly 1000 higher than on VERT, so I could
feed them on to BRIDGE.  

 Ni> I suppose it may be possible that the hub also carries DeveloperNet and
 Ni> has some duplicate conference numbers, but I have no way to check if
 Ni> that's the case.

Log into the hub using telnet and check what conferences are turned on. :) 

But yeah for some reason, you did end up on DeveloperNet.  I can post a message
in StarNet and see if you get it. :)  I'm on the FTN side there. :)


.... I strive for perfection, what I get is reality.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.51
 þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia.  freeway.apana.org.au

.