X-Google-Thread: f996b,a51527f97552397b X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.co.uk!peer.news.zetnet.net!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Aidan Karley Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: porn asciimation Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:00:07 +0100 Organization: Personal Service Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <6U0ve.18210$FP2.6338@lakeread03> Reply-To: doIlookDAFTenoughTOpost@validEMAILaddressTOa.NEWS.group NNTP-Posting-Host: karley.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1119682810 19477 83.104.55.73 (25 Jun 2005 07:00:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:00:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va Xref: g2news1.google.com alt.ascii-art:4205 In article <6U0ve.18210$FP2.6338@lakeread03>, Faux_Pseudo wrote: > But that kind of thing happens when you are using a ascii friendly > browser like elinks. > From the fact that I'm seeing error messages like "illegal URL redirect", I'm guessing that the author made (followed) some assumption about what sort of redirections are considered legal (perhaps he has 2 domains which are aliases for one IP, and he switches between using the domain name and IP in different parts of the code. But the resolution attempts are making part of the code unloadable. Whatever; not my problem.), but is now discovering that different Java engines interpret the security model in different ways. It's been said before - test your website in as many different browsers as you can. I don't think I've even set up particularly strict security rules. -- Aidan Karley, Geologist, "You are in a maze of twisty little presentation styles, all [different | alike]."