X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,193cd6e8aec3f355 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: iltzu@sci.fi (Ilmari Karonen) Subject: Re: Watsit#3 Date: 1999/03/19 Message-ID: <7cukgm$isn$1@tron.sci.fi>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 456683839 Distribution: world References: <36E5E883.E18B15BE@gtcom.net> <19990310030749.25599.00000134@ng51.aol.com> <36e836dc.7213135@news.vossnet.net> Organization: (dis)Order of the Holy Spoon (or whatever) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:52:20 GMT, Martin Atkins (zneg.ngxvaf@ovtsbbg.pbz) wrote: : .----- On 10 Mar 1999 08:07:49 GMT, Lester5374 posted: : |Okay, "A fucking puppet". hahahahaha : '--------------------- : fucking is a verb Bloody English teachers insisting that this bastard descendant of of French, Old Norse and quite a bunch of other languages has a logical and consistent grammar, when it should be perfectly obvious that it is littered with expressions that only make sense in some obscure historical context. I don't care if it's formally called the present participe or whatever[1], as far as syntax is concerned it's used like an adjective, placed like an adjective, and therefore - like the proverbial duck - it is an adjective. ObAscii: I did this beer stein for some other thread, but I might as well post it here: ,-----. {|[:["[|=-. `|[.[ [| )) |[ [ [|// |[ [ [|' itz`=====' [1] It might be revealing that here the equivalent form is called the present participe in Finnish, Swedish, French and German lessons, but "the -ing form" in English lessons. Apparently it's much easier to teach the language if one doesn't even try to fit it into a classification that is more appropriate for, say, Latin. -- __,,,------._ ,-/| `-. Ilmari Karonen (iltzu@sci.fi) ^ All opinions expressed /, '\, `. ,|"-;;.__ http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/ | in this message are my / ' 4(_,-_,-"_,/.' `'--' ,------------------------' own. If you want me to "`-(_,-"" `-' (,' itz | make some for you too, you should pay for them!