X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,193cd6e8aec3f355
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: iltzu@sci.fi (Ilmari Karonen)
Subject: Re: Watsit#3
Date: 1999/03/19
Message-ID: <7cukgm$isn$1@tron.sci.fi>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 456683839
Distribution: world
References: <36E5E883.E18B15BE@gtcom.net>
<19990310030749.25599.00000134@ng51.aol.com>
<36e836dc.7213135@news.vossnet.net>
Organization: (dis)Order of the Holy Spoon (or whatever)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:52:20 GMT, Martin Atkins (zneg.ngxvaf@ovtsbbg.pbz) wrote:
: .----- On 10 Mar 1999 08:07:49 GMT, Lester5374 posted:
: |Okay, "A fucking puppet". hahahahaha
: '---------------------
: fucking is a verb
Bloody English teachers insisting that this bastard descendant of
of French, Old Norse and quite a bunch of other languages has a logical
and consistent grammar, when it should be perfectly obvious that it is
littered with expressions that only make sense in some obscure historical
context. I don't care if it's formally called the present participe or
whatever[1], as far as syntax is concerned it's used like an adjective,
placed like an adjective, and therefore - like the proverbial duck - it is
an adjective.
ObAscii: I did this beer stein for some other thread, but I might as well
post it here:
,-----.
{|[:["[|=-.
`|[.[ [| ))
|[ [ [|//
|[ [ [|'
itz`====='
[1] It might be revealing that here the equivalent form is called the
present participe in Finnish, Swedish, French and German lessons, but "the
-ing form" in English lessons. Apparently it's much easier to teach the
language if one doesn't even try to fit it into a classification that is
more appropriate for, say, Latin.
-- __,,,------._
,-/| `-. Ilmari Karonen (iltzu@sci.fi) ^ All opinions expressed
/, '\, `. ,|"-;;.__ http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/ | in this message are my
/ ' 4(_,-_,-"_,/.' `'--' ,------------------------' own. If you want me to
"`-(_,-"" `-' (,' itz | make some for you too, you should pay for them!