X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,cd1049705f939787
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Paul <ELP96PFA@sheffield.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: "but we don't *do* names..."
Date: 1998/05/11
Message-ID: <3556FAA7.6D24@sheffield.ac.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 352208532
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6idbb1$i49$1@news.ox.ac.uk> <354A3CFA.59E2B600@on.spammer>
 <6ieptf$lqh$1@news.ox.ac.uk> <354DBCD4.596@freent.toronto.on.ca>
 <6ikfs1$704$1@news.ox.ac.uk> <354DEF52.4DCD@gwtc.net>
 <354E2926.595E@sheffield.no-spam.ac.uk> <6imjgt$pae$1@news.ox.ac.uk>
 <6j1jg1$2av$1@news.ox.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Electrical Eng, University of Sheffield, UK
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


Henry Segerman wrote:
> 
> Better? Oh, and what was the agreement about the rotated 'a' or 'A'? Thats
> the only bit thats not working as good as it might...
> 
I've lost the posting so I forgot what it looked like.

Here's a quick three-liner 180' of donovan. Seems to lend itself quite well.


        \  _   _   _       _   _
      |_| \_| | \ |_| \_| |_\ | |
                              \

regards

Paul