X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,d35903f96291cc89 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: jorn@mcs.com (Jorn Barger) Subject: Re: W3C recommends: Avoid ASCII Art Date: 1998/02/08 Message-ID: <1d454uf.1himu0b1uep83kN@jorn.pr.mcs.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 323246137 References: <34d905a8.16593650@news.demon.nl> <6bhpv4$2js$1@tron.sci.fi> <6bks76$5bt$1@tron.sci.fi> <34de25d7.33500721@news.demon.nl> X-Face: #0%K`N$`(&&tLbyv~^Ip59&CqKAo;?NXix@bv2a,uQX;y*zAek26=&iDOJou, 2\2pLI"TKqjx.[BfZf#2 wrote: > In the long term theoretical kind of way the W3C excels in, what would > perhaps be interesting is the CSS solution. Define a class for visual > clients, e.g. 'asciiartclass', then the ASCII art with it. It should be set up so "ALT" text for images can be an ascii version! I have little respect for W3C-- eg their mistaken preference for "EM" instead of "I"... -- "Tell me, Eutrapelus, which is the weaker person: he that yields to another, or he that is yielded to?" --Erasmus