X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,d35903f96291cc89 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: "Brock Kevin Nambo" Subject: Re: W3C recommends: Avoid ASCII Art Date: 1998/02/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 324093565 References: <34d905a8.16593650@news.demon.nl> <6bhpv4$2js$1@tron.sci.fi> <6bks76$5bt$1@tron.sci.fi> <34de25d7.33500721@news.demon.nl> <1d454uf.1himu0b1uep83kN@jorn.pr.mcs.net> <34DE709A.31DFF4F5@on.spammer> <34E07036.4ACD@wing.rug.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Shimrod wrote in message <34E07036.4ACD@wing.rug.nl>... >No, IE4 should be avoided like the plague. Unfortunately, as an upgrade to Windows 95, it's very hard to avoid... >Nope, if you consider ascii-art an image format like gif or jpeg, >that should offcourse be: > >my self-portrait > >With selfportrait.asc containing the ascii. It would be ridiculous to >add a new tag for every new image format. This would require browsers to >recognise the .asc extension and display it as preformatted text. This >will offcourse not work with older browsers. how about: > >something Unfortunately, HTML4.0 encourages use of even for images, so it would be something like (but src= may not be the right attri....) For the other example, it would be like, Wow, your browser doesn't do images OR asciiart? yeeeks! Or even: [ insert ascii of image here ] At least, from reading W3C's html spec, that's how it seems to be. I haven't tried any of this yet. >> Here's my example "in action": >> >> http://jota.sm.luth.se:80/~e93-vkn/pics/ascii/asciiarttag.html >> > >Does that work on all browsers? In Veronica Karlsson's dream reality >>BKNambo -- http://come.to/brocks.place