X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,38014e8866a27d2d X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: rahvin@nwu.edu (Rahvin) Subject: Re: Is nude-pics ascii????? Date: 1997/03/20 Message-ID: <5gs3ut$7vk_001@cas.nwu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 227079414 References: <332A6379.4C01@geocities.com> <01bc32a6$d5642000$f90862cb@paul-wilkins> Organization: NU nest Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art In article <01bc32a6$d5642000$f90862cb@paul-wilkins>, "Paul Wilkins" wrote: >Wenche Pettersen wrote in article ><332A6379.4C01@geocities.com>... >> >> Why all these nude-pictures in this newsgroup?? >> I didn`t think ascii included nudes "real life" pics, only drawings. >> There are several newsgroups for nude pics, please use them. >> >This newsgroups is for ascii-art. That's ALL ascii art, no matter what it >may be. >Things like ascii nudes are well marked in the subject line, so you don't >have to see them if you don't want to. >I am also sure that the people in alt.binaries.furry.pokwer wouldn't >appreciate ascii pictures appearing when they're looking for realistic-type >looking pictures. >alt.ascii-art is the place for all things ascii, and that even includes >those buts that happen to be R18. > >Anyone have something different to say here? Agreement/argument? > >Paul Wilkins I think what she meant, Paul, is that the "real life" pics happend to be pictures not drawings. You know, things taken with cameras. She was complaining that these pics were not ascii drawn and thus did not belong on alt.ascii-art. -------------------------------------------|Rahvin|-------------------------------------------- rahvin@nwu.edu Northwestern University U2 X-FILES