X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,41e3d564fa129966,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Nana <tssymanc@freenet.calgary.ab.ca>
Subject: Re: Impossible shape.
Date: 1997/06/06
Message-ID: <5nammd$p9g@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 246898669
References: <33945a3b.109064950@news.exit109.com>
 <19970605055900.BAA19573@ladder02.news.aol.com>
Organization: Calgary Free-Net
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


Under normal circumstances I'd agree, but in this case I don't believe the
shape guy was talking about was an original ascii creation, he may have
ascii-fied it, but I'm sure it's an old optical illusion. Maybe in this
case an "Inspired by" might be appropriate if you REALLY feel you need to
give credit?

    -Nana

On 5 Jun 1997, Spunk1111 wrote:
> >I liked this shape so much that I reduced it to use in my sig file.
> >Even though the shading was lost in the reduction, I like it.
> >I'm a newcomer to this forum.  Please tell me, should I put someone's
> >initials on the shape in my sig file or can I just use it as is?
> 
> It depends on whether or not you created it.  If you didn't, you ought to
> give
> credit where credit is due... if you know who did make it.
> That is the polite way to do it.
> -joan