X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: f996b,8808011138ca9fd0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: mtornblo@cc.Helsinki.FI (Milco Tornblom)
Subject: Re: ASCII art in signatures
Date: 1996/08/08
Message-ID: <4ud3gs$s1a@oravannahka.Helsinki.FI>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 172979139
references: <4t8ecj$g5c@ccshst05.uoguelph.ca> <4tbcgb$e14@mill.gdls.com>
 <V3GUzDAjf5$xEw1y@chipping.demon.co.uk>
 <slrn4vvg0i.djl.guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de> <4tpns7$knr@milo.vcn.bc.ca>
 <slrn501oag.8ue.guckes@somerville.math.fu-berlin.de>
 <32011176.31A3@atl.hp.com> <slrn503m6n.gij.guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de>
content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
organization: University of Helsinki
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


Sven Guckes <guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
: swm@atl.hp.com (Sandy Morton):
: > Sven Guckes wrote:
: > > Signatures end with the fourth line after the sigdashes.  Period.
: > Aaahh,  but Sven, the length of an allowed signature is a function
: > of the news reader/system/setup/whatever-you-want-to-call-it.
: > Not *everyone* is restricted to four lines.
: 
: And that is what renders signatures useless.  Proper one have four lines.


Really?     :->

-------<>>>>>>>>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
      <>>>>>       \                            ---------------------------
      <====\ __~/\~_                            -    Milco W. Tornblom    -
      (=(�= |_o| \|o|    Eh, who? Me?           - mtornblo@cc.helsinki.fi -
      (=( =     (_)    / Why? Why not?          -    Computing Centre     -
       \   |\______>                            -  University of Helsinki -
        |  \______/                             ---------------------------
    __/   \____-__/ \-  ---------------------------------------------------
              >